Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis Camus's The Stranger
Critical analysis of the stranger by albert camus
Stranger by camus essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis Camus's The Stranger
In the novel The Stranger by Albert Camus, the narrator’s monotonous tone makes the reader experience a lack of emotion and feeling. The novel starts off describing Mersault’s current job and how he must go on leave in order to attend his mother’s funeral. He and his mother have been disconnected for some time as they had come to a mutual agreement with her staying in an elderly home. Mersault, the main protagonist, did not have the money or time to tend to his mother. The elderly home was the best option for the both of them. When he returns home from the funeral, Mersault gets caught up in external affairs he should not be in. He ends up writing a break up letter to Raymond’s girlfriend, which drives the rest of the story. Raymond beats his …show more content…
girlfriend for cheating on him, leaving him in the hands of the law. His ex-girlfriend’s brother follows Raymond around and they end up in an altercation.
Mersault ends up shooting the Arabian brother and is tried in court. Mersault’s insensitivity and ignorance regarding his mother’s death, Raymond’s abuse, and the murder leaves the reader in a bleak mood after experiencing such a dry, emotionless tone. Mersault’s attitude towards his mother’s death exemplifies and introduces the reader to his lack of remorse. The opening sentence of the novel shows how indifferent he is as he has no guilt for not being there for his mother nor grief for her passing when receiving the telegram notifying him of her sudden death, “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know” (Camus 3). He is very direct and his diction offers short, little details, evoking the attitude of disregard in Mersault. When approaching his boss for two days off, he does not show any sign of emotion, but tries to justify the reason for his leaving as his mother’s fault. The funeral director takes him to his mother’s coffin, to find that it has already been sealed. To the caretaker’s and director’s surprise, Mersault does not want it to be opened. He does not mind that they have skipped past formalities of allowing close family members to view their deceased relatives by sealing …show more content…
the coffin. Instead, Mersault falls asleep and wakes up later in the afternoon to drink coffee and smoke, showing how indifferent he is towards his mother’s death, “I felt like having a smoke. But I hesitated, because I didn't know if I could do it with Maman right there. I thought about it; it didn't matter” (Camus 8). He remains in this current attitude as the story progresses. The days after the funeral, Mersault exhibits no sign of grief nor sadness. Instead, he pursues a former female co-worker, Marie. As if he completely forgot about his mother’s passing or ignores the significance of her death, he returns to his daily life with no change in his attitude. The emotionless tone stays constant as Mersault does not find any traumatic consequence to his mother passing when he attempts to explain his situation to Marie, “I felt like telling her it wasn’t my fault, but I stopped myself because I remembered that I’d said that to my boss. It didn’t mean anything” (Camus 20). As Mersault gets back into his daily living, he writes a break up letter to Raymond’s mistress. Raymond explains how he beats her and has cheated on her before. Surprisingly, Mersault exhibits no astonishment or remorse as a normal person would when being told of this. Raymond asks him to write the letter and Mersault complies only to please him even though he knows they are not friends. His tone throughout this encounter in Raymond’s apartment does not change; he remains monotonous and displays no positive nor negative attitude towards this situation by the fact that he just listens to Raymond speak without forming an opinion.
By writing this letter, Mersault gets himself into an ironic situation where he ends up killing the man that Raymond was supposed to kill. Moreover, Mersault does not feel guilty for his actions dating back to his mother’s funeral to now as he is put on trial for the murder he should not have been involved in. At the point in the novel, all the events that have happened are being brought up against Mersault in his murder trial. Attendees of his mother’s funeral are present as witnesses to describe Mersault’s actions at her funeral. Mersault was in total acceptance of the situation and did not think much of it as the witnesses on the stand describe him to be careless and unloving. One begins to feel sympathetic and understanding of Mersault’s situation after all this evidence is being wrongly used against him. The tone of the novel shifts to a more serious and concerning mood. By contrast, Mersault’s emotionless tone stays constant as he is being falsely accused, without bursting into an outrage. Marie is brought to the stand and the prosecutor begins to explain uncorrelated events based on fallacious beliefs in an order that makes it seem as though Mersault murdered his own mother and the
Arabian brother on purpose. Mersault accepts the accusations as he cannot formulate the correct words to describe the motives for his act and is sentenced to death by guillotine, “The utter pointlessness of whatever I was doing there seized me by the throat, and all I wanted was to get it over with and get to my cell and sleep” (Camus 105). The novel ends with Mersault wishing for a large crowd of spectators crying with hate as they watch him die. Mersault’s tone starts with little regard and barely any emotion but ends with happiness as he has come to terms with his last days of living. Soon after Mersault is put on the death sentence, he seems to not care for anything since everyone dies at one point. As his date of predetermined death comes closer, Mersault begins to hope that guillotine malfunctions, giving him the opportunity to live. With this, Albert Camus wrote this novel to emphasis how humans should be the ultimate decision maker and to have control over their life. People should not live life with predetermined ideals like that of the guillotine. Like Mersault, Camus advises the reader to live life as it goes by and be the sole reason for why one acts.
Monsieur Morrel was having money problems. He had lost hope in recovering financially and wanted to preserve his family name, so he attempted to take his life as well. Fortunately, after his daughter concluded that “although he was outwardly calm, she had noticed that his heart was pounding violently” she found a treasure which saved her dad and family. Morrel’s son, Maximilien, also lost hope in life. After he lost his lover, he fell into a deep despair and said “All my hopes are ruined my heart is broken, my life is ended and there’s nothing around me but mourning and dismay.”
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
...r has not done makes no essential difference at the end. The nurse at the funeral tells him, "if you walk too slowly, you'll get heat exhaustion, but if you walk too fast, then the cool air in church will give you a chill.” As he kills the Arab, he thinks, "Whether I fire or don't fire is irrelevant; the ending will be the same.” And at the trial, Meursault tells the prosecutor, "I have lived my life thus and did x, but if I had done y or z instead, it wouldn't have mattered.” And, ultimately, Meursault turns out to be correct; he discovers that when death approaches, all men are equal, no matter what their ages or previous lives. Meursault views death as an escape: you can't escape from it, but you can escape into it, and he prepares himself to do so, bit by bit. Each parellel incident is just one more winding round of the rope that will bind him completely.
As part of his revenge Raymond beats up his girlfriend, only to be followed by her Arab brother. At this time Raymond thinks Meursault to be his good friend and takes him to his friend Masson's beach house, where the two major violent acts that lead to Meursault's ultimate metamorphosis takes place.
In the novel, we are given a more complete view of Meursault. The story is told from his point-of-view, which allows us to understand the situation as Meursault perceives it. Looking at the situation in this light, we can see Meursault as not evil, but simply indifferent and detached from life. He doesn’t attempt to get wrapped up in emotion or relationships, he just takes things as they come, doing whatever is easiest for him. He becomes friends with Raymond and agrees to marry Marie simply because he doesn’t have a very good reason not to. Seeing the story from Meursault’s viewpoint, we understand that even killing the Arab wasn’t an act of malice or evil intent. As Meursault puts it, “My nature is such that my physical needs often get in the way of my feelings.” With this in context, things begin to make more sense. Meursault’s seemingly cryptic statement that he murdered the Arab “because of the sun” can be taken as truth. Meursault does things that society judges as wrong not because he is evil or wants to appear immoral, but because the sun and heat, symbols for Meursault’s emotional state, cause him to become uncomfortable and act “inappropriately.
Chapter 6 of part I of The Stranger concluded with Meursault’s conscious decision to shoot an Arab because of the physical discomfort the Arab’s knife caused him. The significance of the ending of part I is that it was the first demonstration of Meursault’s awareness of the possible consequences of the act that he committed. This awareness continues into the second part of the novel as he is arrested and trialed. The reason for Meursault’s trial is the murder of the Arab. His insensitivity towards Maman’s death and lack of a social conscientious are factors that contributed to support further investigations, but are not reasons to trial him because they have not ‘harmed’ society on a way that he could be arrested for. For example, if Meursault
Though both Alan and Meursault are deemed as “appalling” members of society, their stories become lost and unimportant when Dysart and the members of the law seek representation of their lives. Both characters arrive in the story at the convenience of Dysart and the members of the law, and because of this convenience, Shaffer and Camus glorify Dysart and the members of the law, rather than solve the problems in Alan or Meursault’s lives. What one finds truthful in the world or their lives becomes unreliable in its presentation to the reader, as displayed in both Equus and The Stranger.
In Camus’ The Stranger, the use of the minor character Raymond helps illustrate the absurd nature of Meursault. Through imagery, dialogue, and irony, the novel investigates the moral decisions Meursault makes under Raymond’s influence. The constant tactical bribery and other forms of manipulation steer Meursault’s writing of the letter that leads to him killing the Arab and ultimately receiving the death penalty. Camus uses Raymond to highlight the cultural and societal values. In addition, through Raymond’s help, Meursault ends up in jail where he finally realizes the theme that life is
First, Raymond influences Meursault negatively as seen when he convinces Meursault to testify against a woman who was supposedly cheating on Raymond which eventually leads to him downfall, his death sentence. Without any evidence or proper reasoning, Raymond falls into a craze where a simple lottery ticket and bracelet deemed his mistress as a cheater. With thorough conviction and compliments, Raymond manipulates Meursault into agreeing with everything he has to say. He blames everything that happens between him and the Arab on the Arab, and presents himself as the victim. He says “I was about to help him up but he started kicking me” (29), but refrains from mentioning that the Arab was actually the beaten mistress’ brother until later. Raymond consistently tells Meursault “I knew about things, I could help h...
The trial portrays the absurdist ideal that absolute truth does not exist. This ideal destroys the very purpose of the trial, which seeks to place a rational explanation on Meursault’s senseless killing of the Arab. However, because there is no rational explanation for Meursault’s murder, the defense and prosecution merely end up constructing their own explanations. They each declare their statements to be the truth, but are all based on false assumptions. The prosecution itself is viewed as absurd. The prosecutor tries to persuade the jury that Meursault has no feelings or morals by asking Perez if “he had at least seen [Meursault] cry” (91). The prosecutor then continues to turn the crowd against Meursault when he asks him about his “liaison” with Marie right after his mother’s death. Though Meursault’s relationship with Marie and his lack of emotions at his mother’s funeral may seem unrelated to his murder, the prosecutor still manages to convince the crowd that they are connected to one another. The jury ends up convicting Meursault not because he killed a man, but because he didn't show the proper emotions after his mother ...
Mersault is characterized by an indifference to change. At one time, Mersault gets an invitation to move to Paris by his boss, but he declines. Mersault says that "people never change their lives, that in any case one life was as good as another and that I wasn't dissatisfied with mine at all." (Camus, p. 41) Mersault is content with what he got. He has his work, his home and his girl: it's all he needs. He lives, like Roquentin, in solitude, reflecting upon the actions of others. But he never gets involved since it doesn't matter to him. He neither feels happy nor sad. It is as if all emotions were drained from his body.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
The death of Maman in The Stranger conveys an example of existentialism. The phlegmatic and unattached response to the death of his mother shows an excellent example of Mersault’s existentialism; he accepts life or death without looking for a deeper significance. Mersault receives a telegram from the home notifying him of his mother’s death, “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don't know. I got a telegram from the home: ‘Mother Deceased. Funeral Tomorrow. Faithfully yours.’”(Camus 3). When he gets to the home he does not even want to see the body, instead of mourning he sits back and relaxes drinking coffee and smoking. Mersault seems more concerned about taking time off of work to go to his mother’s funeral that he has nothing to do with, than the actual death of his mother. The first thought of his day is about work, “As I was waking up, it came to me why my boss had seemed annoyed when I asked him for two days off…”(Camus 19). Mersault does not show any emotion at all while at the nursing home that Maman lived. He is just there because he feels as if he has to be. Everything about the weekend seems to annoy him events like the vigil, the funeral, and some Maman’s friends, in particular to the sobbing woman at the vigil.
Mrs.Mallard for the first time experiences freedom and see the world in a new perspective that she did not see before her husband 's supposed death. Mrs.Mallard see the world with more life and takes in the atmosphere of life around her and as the narrator describes Mrs