Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cognitive function affected by Frontal Lobe damage
Damage to frontal lobe essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cognitive function affected by Frontal Lobe damage
The question of what causes the déjà vu experience has been wondered for many years. A vast variety of theories have been researched, but still no one knows the definite reason of why it transpires. A hypothesis to consider, and what the rest of the report will be focused on, is that déjà vu results from a form of recognition memory known as familiarity-based recognition (Cleary, 2008). To expand on this, the article Recognition Memory, Familiarity, and Déjà vu Experiences will be referenced. In the text, we learned about memory, which is the ability to store and retrieve information. Looking further into memory, more specifically the seven “sins” of memory, it included memory misattribution. This is defined as the assigning a recollection or an idea to the wrong source. A part of memory is recalling when, where, and how information was acquired, commonly known as source memory. A type of memory misattribution is false recognition, a feeling of familiarity about something that hasn’t been encountered before. Although this is more common in people with damage to their frontal lobes, there is a subjective experience of this that occurs in everyday déjà vu experiences. Individuals with neurological damage …show more content…
This is the type of memory that allows people to realize that what they are currently experiencing was experienced before (Cleary, 2008) and false recognition in this is what leads us to experience déjà vu. Recognition memory has been experimented using dual process theory, with recollection and familiarity as the processes. Recollection refers to bringing to mind a prior instance in which the current situation previously occurred and familiarity refers to experiencing inly a feeling if familiarity with the current situation. So, the key difference is that with recollection you know where the instance previously occurred, and with familiarity you cannot identify why it feels
Human memory is flexible and prone to suggestion. “Human memory, while remarkable in many ways, does not operate like a video camera” (Walker, 2013). In fact, human memory is quite the opposite of a video camera; it can be greatly influenced and even often distorted by interactions with its surroundings (Walker, 2013). Memory is separated into three different phases. The first phase is acquisition, which is when information is first entered into memory or the perception of an event (Samaha, 2011). The next phase is retention. Retention is the process of storing information during the period of time between the event and the recollection of a piece of information from that event (Samaha, 2011). The last stage is retrieval. Retrieval is recalling stored information about an event with the purpose of making an identification of a person in that event (Samaha, 2011).
Steffens, M., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (2007). False memories: Phenomena, theories, and implications. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal Of Psychology, 215(1), 12-24. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.215.1.12
Many of the memories that were remembered are usually previous childhood experiences. Dewhurst and Robinson (2004) conducted a study where 5, 8 and 11 year old children were tested on memory illusion. One of the procedures used to test false memories is the DRM paradigm. The DRM paradigm presents a list of words that include a critical word that is typically remembered although it was never presented. During the DRM procedure the children were given five lists that contained eight words. Each list consisted of at least one rhyme and a semantic theme. Each child was tested on their own by the classroom
People of all varieties in all parts of the world have reported experiencing déjà vu. According to Art Funkhouser, creator of the Déjà Experience Research website, a variety of people, young and old, both within and outside the U.S.A. have sent him unsolicited accounts of their déjà experiences (Funkhouser, 2014). On his website, he posts these firsthand narratives as a resource for other researchers and so that visitors who have experienced the phenomena may parallel their own accounts with those reported to him. He provides a page where visitors can submit their encounter with déjà vu to augment the rapidly expanding database. The following accounts are extracted from his website and have been condensed for brevity. The first account is from M. of the U.S.A. M. relates that he vividly remembers how he feels when déjà vu starts and that it always combines the place and the actions he takes and that everything and everyone around him is involved. M. says, “All of a sudden I freeze ¬ and the feeling comes over me and I realize I¹ve done and seen and heard ...
...pporting details. At the conclusion of the article, the authors share their thoughts on how it might be virtually impossible to determine when a memory is true or false. I also like their willingness to continue the investigations despite how difficult it might be to obtain concrete answers.
Bryan Willey Alzheimer’s disease Alzheimer’s is a progressive, degenerative disease of the brain and individuals with the disease suffer from many symptoms such as memory loss, agitation, impaired judgment, and difficulty communicating with others. The different lobes affected include the parietal lobe which deals with language, temporal lobe which deals with memory and frontal lobe which deals with behavior and judgment. The specific type of memory loss that an Alzheimer’s patient deals with is declarative memory. Declarative memory is remembrance of facts such as people’s names, what their faces look like and important dates from our past (Marieb and Hoehn 2013). The formation of these memories can only happen when the temporal lobe or more specifically the hippocampus are able to receive acetylcholine inputs.
...e to them. No matter how much evidence science provides, there will never be enough to answer one simple question: Why? So it is now left up to each individual to discover and form their own theory for themselves, making precognition and déjà vu a mysterious and complex, yet quite an intriguing and eccentric idea for the world to ponder.
Because these worlds are parallel, the worlds themselves mirror each other, but just as a mirror reverses the reflection, so do the universes, meaning they differ in many areas. Large scale events, both global and personal, tend to take the same route, but as the importance of the event decreases, so do the chances of an identical outcome. In those unimportant events that occur at the same time by chance lies the secret of déjà vu. This, exactly this, has happened before-it’s happening now, just like in a mirror. Just like that, déjà vu traps one and all in endless Groundhog Day-esque moments, in which the victim cannot shake the feeling this has happened before, just as it has occurred today. Wait a
False Memories are essentially, unintentional human errors, or a state of none-factual creativeness; which results in persons having declared memories of events and situations that did not occur in the actuality of their own lifespan reality history. If they were not unintentional errors they would be deception, which has the nature of a different purpose, morality and legality. False memories have no authenticity, realness or legitimacy, in the subject’s actual life. However they may not be complete false memories: more likely to be a combination of subjugation of previous memory cue’s; or imaginative inventive production, activated and initiated by an origination of external scenario additive as a prompt, indicator or sign, which fuses into memory recall. Therefore ‘False Memories’ are a genuine but inaccurate remembering of experimental data or recall of an genuine occurrences; both of which have rudiments of accuracy and inaccuracy in their transitive attention, giving most ‘False Memories’ partiality.
The experience of déjà vécu incorporates an abundance of detail and people may feel like they are reliving a familiar experience or past memory (Funkhouser, 1996). For example, this might be a time where you sense everything around you is identical to something you have experienced before. Every object and circumstance seems the exact same. An entire sequence of specific events might seem like it has been lived through before. Researchers hypothesized that episodic memories contain the information and the experience of recollection (Ratliff, 2006). The slight amount of consciousness attached to a memory informs us that we that we are recalling a past experience. When you constantly have the feeling of recalling something from your past, but don’t have the feeling of memory information, you experience déjà vécu. It can be serious and some people never clear out the feeling of something already occurring. For instance, a woman who frequently experienced déjà vécu, returned her library card because, to her, it seemed that every book in the library she had already read. Although déjà vécu is the most common and complex type of déjà vu, there are two other ways to classify the familiar
Memory is the tool we use to learn and think. We all use memory in our everyday lives. Memory is the mental faculty of retaining and recalling past experiences. We all reassure ourselves that our memories are accurate and precise. Many people believe that they would be able to remember anything from the event and the different features of the situation. Yet, people don’t realize the fact that the more you think about a situation the more likely the story will change. Our memories are not a camcorder or a camera. Our memory tends to be very selective and reconstructive.
The findings of this research would reinforce findings of previous research specifically in relation to the robustness of false memories. The experiment undertaken by students will also be helpful to the study of false memories specifically to test the reproducibility of this type of experiment.
Titchener would say that when you identified the object, you put together memories of sensations from your past
The recognition accuracy for old events was calculated as the proportion of performed and imagined events that were correctly recognized as old, regardless of whether they were correctly attributed to having been performed or imagined. (Kelley, 2009). Even with a 1-week delay, the percentage of performed actions or imagined performing in phase 1 that were correctly remembered as old was relatively high 91.1%, and overall false alarm rates were relatively low at 4.7%. (Kelley, 2009). However people remembered that an event happened does not mean they correctly remembered how it happened. (Kelley, 2009). Source accuracy was somewhat impaired, though well above chance with the average performance of 88.8% and did not differ significantly between performed actions (M=88.7%) and imagined actions (M=89.0%). (Kelley, 2009).
According to Sternberg (1999), memory is the extraction of past experiences for information to be used in the present. The retrieval of memory is essential in every aspect of daily life, whether it is for academics, work or social purposes. However, many often take memory for granted and assume that it can be relied on because of how realistic it appears in the mind. This form of memory is also known as flashbulb memory. (Brown and Kulik, 1977). The question of whether our memory is reliably accurate has been shown to have implications in providing precise details of past events. (The British Psychological Association, 2011). In this essay, I would put forth arguments that human memory, in fact, is not completely reliable in providing accurate depictions of our past experiences. Evidence can be seen in the following two studies that support these arguments by examining episodic memory in humans. The first study is by Loftus and Pickrell (1995) who found that memory can be modified by suggestions. The second study is by Naveh-Benjamin and Craik (1995) who found that there is a predisposition for memory to decline with increasing age.