Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of smartphones
Negative effects of cell phone use
Negative effects of smartphones
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of smartphones
This article discusses the distractions and effects of mutli-tasking and using our electronic devices constantly. "Multitasking is never a good idea if you really need to get something done" (p. 26). When we get a text message or look at our phones an addictive chemical called dopamine is released into our brains. Laptops, mobile devices, and interruptions hinder our learning and focus. Although technology can be very helpful, it has caused many negative situations such as car accidents, poor grades, and bullying. Technology plays a distracting and important role in today’s society. We can’t live with it and we can’t live without it. While using electronics our focus is completely on the device. As humans, we do not multi task, we switch back
and forth. Switching back and forth causes us to perform insufficiently on both tasks. "Selecting one sharp focus requires inhibiting a multitude of others. The mind has to fight off the pull of everything else, sorting out what's important from what's irrelevant. That takes cognitive effort" (p. 56). I find it easier to work on one subject of homework and hopping to the next rather than trying to do both at the same time. "Multitasking is never a good idea if you really need to get something done" (p. 26). There was a study where college students who didn’t have laptops in class did better than those who had them with them in class (Fried, 2008). Our devices are considered addicting because of the dopamine released to our brain while we use them. In conclusion, using our phones and devices can turn into a habit/addiction. In some places it is such a problem that they have created counseling agencies and rehab clinics for the addicted technology users. Accepting that electronics will always be around and improving, can help create solutions to monitoring the use of technology that in time can help the distracted population. For example, writing notes versus using a laptop to type your notes is a better way to retain the information. Mueller & Oppenheimer, concluded that taking pencil-and-paper notes supports better learning and comprehension than typing notes into a laptop. Writing by hand requires more summarizing and engaging with what is being presented. When taking notes on a laptop we fall into a pattern of recording what we're hearing verbatim versus understanding it. Researchers did an experiment to see the time it took after an interruption to return to, and complete the task at hand. They did this by asking college students to use a computer game. The average interval between players' actions in the game was about two seconds. After returning to the task after a brief interruption, the gap doubled to four seconds. Limitations of this study might be the cause of distraction, was it the same for every person? Do different distractions cause longer gaps? Science and technology have helped humans achieve a lot of progress. Science interacts with technology because most scientists use some form of technology and some scientists study the effects of technology. Science and technology work together to us devices and machines to make our life comfortable and make our work easier. In spite of so much progress in science and technology people do not have time for the real world. We are still focused on our small devices in our hands and not the world around us.
As human beings, it is becoming more of a second nature to us to multi-task. As the world is technologically advancing more and more every day, there are becoming more distractions. Social-media is flourishing, reality TV show ratings are going up, and humans even unintentionally check their phones every two minutes. In this day of age, multi-tasking is proving to promote inefficiency rather than productivity.
In the article, “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus,” Alina Tugend centralizes around the negative effects of multitasking. She shows that often with multitasking, people tend to lose focus, lack work quality, have an increase in stress, and in the end she gives a solution to all these problems. Tugend conveys her points by using understandable language, a clear division of subjects, and many reliable sources, making her article cogent.
Students may easily lose their attention and concentration with easy access to such incredibly rich store of information. With such new technologies as television, internet and social networks, people nowadays tend to multitask more often as they have easy access to a large amount of information. However, such easy access may sometimes be a distraction. Study “Your Brain on Computers” reports that heavy multitaskers perform up to 20% worse on most tests compared to performance of light multitaskers. Working efficiency of people, who multitask, is claimed to be significantly lower. The same is with concentration. (Crovitz 353) As a result, they are not engaged in working process. Students tend to be easily distr...
In the article,“Multitasking is actually kind of a problem for kids and adults” by Hayley Tsukayama the author went into detail about how parents and their children view their personal media habits. One of the ways that the parents and children viewed their media habits as was feeling the need to respond to texts and notifications immediately. “More than 1,200 parents and teens surveyed, 48 percent of parents and 72 percent of teens said they felt the need to respond to texts and notifications immediately, almost guaranteeing distractions throughout the day” (Tsukayama). This article can be connected to “The Epidemic of Media Multitasking While Learning” both of the articles discussed the different factors of media multitasking among individuals. The article from The Washington Post website gave great insight on multitasking and rather it is bad for students when it comes to learning. I believe that the issue being discussed is very relevant because if students are easily distracted by technology while in their learning environment it results in them not learning
Today we live in a society where everything is seconds away from us. With the advances and affordability of quality technology, you would be hard pressed to find someone without a smartphone, laptop, or tablet, possibly all at the same time. Because of the accessibility we find that, in our tech-savvy culture, multitasking has not just become an art form of sorts, but rather an expectation. In the article “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus,” Alina Tugend sets out to explore the idea that although multitasking appears to show productivity, it could be doing the opposite. Throughout her article, Tugend uses studies done by neurologists and psychologists to show how in a world that sees multitasking as an expectation it has actually made us less efficient. She proposes, through studies, that although you might be working on multiple tasks it is as if you’re playing tennis with multiple balls (Tugend, 725).
Technology can disrupt people’s train of thought. To begin with, many people around the world use technology. Electronics can help students and also affect them in many ways, but whether or not shutting down all electronics can help. Schools should participate in “Shut Down Your Screen Week” because of many reasons. First of all, using electronics causes people to get distracted.
As a college student, using the internet and technology is a daily task. Everything you need for your classes: schedules, homework, quizzes, even tests are all online. The debate on technology and the brain suggests that technology may have an effect on brain, effect multi-tasking, and cause addiction.
Multitasking, a practice used by many people to complete multiple tasks at once, seems beneficial to the user, but recent research shows that this practice causes more distractions. Alexandra Samuel argues in her essay, “‘Plug in Better’: A Manifesto”, that by getting rid of all of the distractions caused by multitasking, the time spent on the computer can be used more efficiently. As businesses in today’s world are using computers to help employees be more efficient in the workplace, each worker should only have to handle one task at a time to maximize their efficiency. Richard Restak argues in his essay, “Attetion Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of Our Era,” that by not diverting a person’s attention to multiple activities at once, such person
Multitasking with non-course material results in a student’s attention being diverted from the course material that is being taught. This can result in errors in memory for the student and also a more difficult time learning the information outside of the classroom (Kraushaar & Novak, 2010, p.1). The University of Vermont completed a study in order to determine the impacts of multitasking with a laptop during a university lecture. Through the experiment they were able to determine that “students with a high [and long] frequency of software multitasking during lectures will exhibit lower academic performance than students with a low [and short] frequency of software multitasking” (Kraushaar & Novak, 2010, p.6). This shows that repeated and lengthy multitasking with technology in particular laptops during lecture times can cause extremely negative results in a students academic performances and
It is common to notice that the internet has rewired our brain into multitasking much more than before. However, it was concluded after numerous studies that this kind of digital multitasking does not make us smarter or more swift in our activities, but quite on the contrary negatively impacts our academic performance. A more scientific aspect of why our brain is affected by the large sea of information that is available to us is touched upon by Eric Jaffe. The writer explains that “the barrage of new media distractions is placing new demands on cognitive processing, and especially on attention allocation […] While cause-and-effect is difficult to parse here, in some sense it doesn’t matter. If all this digital media is causing people to multi-task
The students who participated in the study varied in terms of their media multitasking usage levels. It is evident that when we multitask, we become less efficient at our cognitive process. We strain our attention limits by trying to do more than one thing at a time. Not only are we susceptible to becoming distracted whilst dividing our attention, but our performance on given tasks is also impaired. It is believed that we multitask to receive some sort of adrenaline rush or to please our senses by continually giving them new experiences (Foehr, 2006).
A quote by Broadbent, an experimental psychologist, says, “Children have lost the ability to self-entertain or control their behaviors without an electronic device in their hands” (The effect). One of the main things that children, or teens, do on a daily basis is attend school. Evidence is shown of this by observing students at school. At schools, teachers are constantly stressing the “no cell phones” rule. “...Several studies have shown that information learned [in school] while partially distracted is often quickly forgotten, so the learning is tragically shallow” (Sullivan). Students are constantly being distracted by electronics and social media. Not only is it harder to learn and remember things when being distracted by electronics, it is also harder to focus on one thing when the phone is constantly beeping or buzzing. Larry Rosen, who is a professor at California State University, did a study of how often students get distracted by electronics while they are studying. NBC News explains the situation: “Rosen’s observers followed 263 students in their normal study environments...and told them to work on an important school assignment for 15 minutes.” It later goes on to say, “The students couldn’t resist texting or using social media. So-called ‘on-task’ behavior started declining at about the two minute mark…” (Sullivan). Not only can electronics distract students from their studies and school work, it can also distract
Nearly everyone believes that electronics has made life easier and more comfortable and that it has enabled us to do tasks that we could not do. Electronics are very advanced technology in the world, while these advancements have brought new aspects of health, freedom and gratification. However, as with almost everything we human beings have created, it has also become a serious problem when concerning eyesight, health, stress, and causes children to become recluse and violent. The overuse of technology may interfere with a students’ ability to learn and attend lessons. Electronic devices are designed to save time and help people to be more efficient. However, it causes addiction, health, and behavior problems.
People may think they are getting things done when they are “multitaskers” , little do people know that when multitasking, it is simply jumping from task to task, and an overload of the brain. “Their brains are rewarded not for staying on task but for jumping to the next thing,” said Michael Rich, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School (Ritchell). A study was done on students and how multitasking with social media worsened them as students. It proved that students who “multitask” are constantly distracted, due to checking their social media about every fifteen minutes (Soltan).
Technology has grown drastically in the education sector over the last several years. Many college students use technology to further their learning process. Although technology presents many educational opportunities, it also interferes with students’ academic outcome. Several things are believed to be linked with the learning behaviours and technology. Some examples include, lack of attention, unable to multitask and consistent distraction. (Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. 2011; Junco R., 2012; Lepp,, Barkley & Karpinski, 2014; Rosen, Mark & Cheever,2013; Weston & Cepeda, 2013). The aim of this paper is to discuss, do such technological distractions impact academic learning and outcome negatively? It is hypothesized that technology use in