Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
4 different aspects of diversity
Four aspects of diversity
Explain the possible impact of diversity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With an increasement of students attending public schools, there tends to be a shortage of space and resources. Schools begin to limit open seats for new comers. They also increase the difficulty on academic standards. The Consent Decree was created in order for equality between different ethnicities in public schools. Some administers created control target race numbers for their faculties. The article Desegregation in a Diverse and competitive Environment: Admissions at Lowell High School by Racy Ming describes how Lowell high school changed its admissions policy to have an equal number of each ethnicity in the school and the result of that change. Lowell high school was known as the best public high school in Mississippi. Lowell prepared its students for college level work. It was known as a very academic competitive school that is hard to get into. For admission the school asked to see students’ standardized test scores as well as their middle school GPA. They took both the standardized test scores and middle school GPA and they made a point system which created a student average. If the students received 69 points, then the school would accept that student right away if the student received anything lower than 69 points, then that student would have to wait until all students with 69 points were …show more content…
accepted. In 1990’s the admissions office began to evaluate applicants’ ethnicity part of the admissions process. This new regulation was created because of the Consent Decree, “the Consent Decree specified that no one ethnicity could exceed 40% of the student population within an alternative school such as Lowell” (Ming, 178). The Consent Decree is a desegregation plan which was created in order to help all races and ethnicities have an equal opportunity in receiving public education.
To follow the guidelines contained in the Consent Decree, Lowell changed its admission applications to cutoff applicants based on their race. This caused many issues for instance; many Chinese Americans felt that they were being targeted because there was such a high percentage of Chinese Americans in Lowell high school. This caused the case Ho v. SFUSD to be created. The Ho v. SFUSD case was created by Chinese American parents who felt that that the Consent Decree was harming Chinese American
students. The outcome of the case Ho v. SFUSD was to end race based assignments within the school district. There was a new enrollment plan was proposed which would have looked at race, family income, reading and math scores and language proficiency the information was going to be used to create a diversity index. The court rejected the new proposal due to race not being used as constitutionally. The board decided to give “preference to students who live near the school, have siblings attending the school, those who need special programs, who live in certain zip codes in the city or who live in public housing” (Ming, 189). Lowell changed its admissions for the class of 2000, they kept that 80% of student applicants would be based of the cutoffs and 20 % would be from the “value added” group. Value added group was constructed based on the following requirements socioeconomic, public benefits status, residence in public housing, homeliness and living below national and state poverty levels. The value added applicants also had to meet certain criteria in the middle school course work and extra-curricular activities and residence zip code. Applicants that were admitted with lower scores had to attend a summer session and had to take a class during the year known as “Strategies for Success” which helps the student prepare and adjust to the academic environment. In conclusion, when schools start to limit the amount of ethnicities in their population, many times parents’ will fight for their children’s right to attend to a great school. This kind action was shown in the case of Ho v. SFUSD, parents’ of Chinese American students were fighting with the school district about the Consent Decree with created a limit on number of ethnicities attending each school. The result of Ho v. SFUSD is that schools will not base race for the student’s admission to the school.
The school appealed this decision and brought it to the Supreme Court to argue their case on October 12th 1977. The Supreme Court upheld the California Supreme Court's decision with a 5-4 vote. The Court also ruled that the special-admissions program constituted reverse discrimination and was therefore illegal. The Court also said that schools could continue to look at race as a factor when accepting applicants, but they could not set up a quota system or look at race as the only deciding factor.
In the late 1940’s and early 1950’s there were many issues that involved racial segregation with many different communities. A lot of people did not took a stand for these issues until they were addressed by other racial groups. Mendez vs Westminster and Brown vs The Board of Education, were related cases that had to take a stand to make a change. These two cases helped many people with different races to come together and be able to go to school even if a person was different than the rest.
The name of this case and the specific facts, however, were unavailable at this time.9 Obviously affirmative action and reverse discrimination are still heavily debated issues. This is because they affect all people of all races and ethnicities. Conclusion Allan Bakke was denied his fourteenth amendment right to equal protection of the laws. In addition the University of California at Davis violated Title IV of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. By order of the Supreme Court Bakke was admitted and th e numerical quotas of the special admissions program were deemed unconstitutional. Justice was served to Bakke, but future generations who are not minorities may be plagued by the other half of the decision: That race may still be used as a "plus" on an application.
The decision to integrate Boston schools in the 1970’s created negative race relations and later fueled a political debate that would change schools across the country. Most desegregation efforts in the United States began with the case of Oliver Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka in 1954. The case ruled that segregation on the basis of race was prohibited because it violated citizen’s rights under the Constitution. On June 21, 1974 in the case of Morgan vs. Hennigan, Judge Garret made a ruling that accused the Boston School Committee of engaging in racial segregation. “This ruling later would serve to fuel one of the prominent controversies embedded in our nation’s ongoing struggle for racial desegregation.” The busing policy created extreme acts of violence, invaded personal freedoms, hindered students’ education and
The issue of desegregation has been a very controversial issue since it was first legally introduced by the Supreme Court in 1954 with Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS. Favoring or not favoring desegregation has not been the issue; almost everyone says they are for it on the surface. The controversy arises when it comes to how to implement desegregation. Immediately following the Brown decision, which advocated school assignment regardless of race, many school districts adopted a geographic school assignment policy. This plan, especially in the 1950's, did very little to do away with segregated schools even though it was a race-neutral policy for integration. From that rocky beginning to desegregation, to the current battles over how best to implement desegregation through mandatory (or voluntary) busing of minorities and whites, this issue has been in the forefront of discussions about race and education. This paper will attempt to give a brief history of desegregation in the United States, followed by a discussion of the current events which surround this issue (with balance given to the viewpoints of both sides), and then offer advice on solutions which most benefit everyone involved.
Affirmative action has been a controversial topic ever since it was established in the 1960s to right past wrongs against minority groups, such as African Americans, Hispanics, and women. The goal of affirmative action is to integrate minorities into public institutions, like universities, who have historically been discriminated against in such environments. Proponents claim that it is necessary in order to give minorities representation in these institutions, while opponents say that it is reverse discrimination. Newsweek has a story on this same debate which has hit the nation spotlight once more with a case being brought against the University of Michigan by some white students who claimed that the University’s admissions policies accepted minority students over them, even though they had better grades than the minority students. William Symonds of Business Week, however, thinks that it does not really matter. He claims that minority status is more or less irrelevant in college admissions and that class is the determining factor.
“There is exactly one sentence about why schools should want to discriminate… It reads, ‘When the state’s most elite universities are less diverse, [a school official] said, it doesn’t provide our students with a level of diversity they need in order to learn about other cultures and other communities’…And that’s supposed to outweigh all these costs of discrimination; It is personally unfair, passes over better qualified students, and sets a disturbing legal, political, and moral precedent in allowing racial discrimination.”
In 1954 through Brown V. Board of Education, the Supreme Court decided that forced segregation denied African Americans equal protection under the law as stated in the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown mandated equal access and opportunity. This decision created a wave of effects throughout the African American community. Unequal outcomes were fueled by low expectation and cultural incompatibilities along with the drainage of resources such as the removal of the best teachers through reassignment to desegregated schools or through firing (Green et al., 2005). Black students were also bused to predominately White schools disproportionately, causing many African American schools to close (Morris, 1999). Morris further state...
Affirmative action has improved the overall life of numerous people. Many minorities, specifically African-Americans, have improved due to educational opportunities acquired via affirmative action. Enrollment of black students skyrocketed because of affirmative action. Blacks had accounted for less than one percent of students entering into universities in 1951. Affirmative action, starting in the 1960’s allowed for blacks to make up 6.3% of Ivy Leagues by 1978, and approximately eight percent of law and medical schools by 1995. The same schools that were less than one percent black in 1951 now had a population consisting of 7.1% black students in 1989. A study d...
The Florida Consent Decree outlines how a student’s English proficiency is identified and assessed. When a student enters a Florida school district, he or she is given a Home Language Survey which asks the following questions:
Topics of race and inequality are critical topics we continue to debate everyday in America. My research synthesis paper is about school segregation, and I wanted to identify how and why schools continue to be racially and socioeconomically segregated today. I will use these questions, as well as knowledge gained from scholarly articles, as a platform for my analysis of school segregation and its implications for students and communities. So I wanted to discover if integration still matters, do our schools need to be desegregated, and if not, then how can our schools become diverse and effective. Racial segregation, segregation and systemic oppression doesn’t just start in one place. There is a structure in place that makes all of the discrimination
United States school systems have has a history of segregation. This segregation began with the passing of Jim Crow laws in the south in the late 1800’s. The influence of this practice was at first the slave culture of the southern states, and later was manifest as residential segregation and school choice programs. There were also many Supreme Court rulings which failed to overturn implement segregation which allowed for the practice to continue to flourish. Although we have seen social improvements in our society in the past 50 years we can still see that many citizens of the United States are still placed at a disadvantage due to their class and race. In this paper we will examine the history of segregation practices and
Family Law (Law Express) 2th edition, by Jonathon Herring, published by Pearson Education Limited 2009
The public high schools began a grading system as a way of telling an individual how they were performing. There was no interest by the public in reporting the school’s progress at teaching. Teachers, in an effort to recognize outstanding performers, looked for a way of rewarding hard-working students for their efforts The grading structure changed from superior and excellent to A’s and B’s. This placed much of the burden of recognizing academic talent on the high schools.
Divorce is a growing epidemic in Canada and the United States. It affects both parties involved, being the spouses, and also has a profound affect on children of the marriage. Recently our government has been revising the old divorce act. It was apparent that it was time to revise the act because it did not properly protect the children from being caught in the middle of things.