The Conjoined Twins Jodie and Mary
The moral and legal case of the conjoined twins Mary and Jodie has set
the nation off in a frenzy of debating on whether or not the twins
should be separated. In doing so, it has been revealed that only Jodie
has a chance of surviving the operation, meaning the operation is
virtually an act of murder in order to save Jodie's life. It has also
been made known that if both twins are left to let fate take its
course, they will be dead within six months. The almost impossible
moral decision of whether or not Mary's life should be sacrificed in
order to save Jodie's lies in the hands of the three Lords Justices of
Appeal. The question remains; should judges be given the permission to
'act God' as some people call it, and take away one life in order to
save another? Or should the twins be left to die which as some argue,
is what fate or indeed God has already decided should happen?
To take away one life in order to save another does hypothetically
make sense, but in reality can it ever be right for a doctor to
intentionally kill someone, even if it is to benefit another? Others
would argue that Mary would die anyway, so why not shorten her life by
six months if it saves another. Euthanasia in this country is illegal,
so should it be appropriate or (more importantly) legal for judges to
practically order the death of an innocent human being, even if
keeping the twins alive will result in the certain death of both
twins. This case is strikingly similar to one of someone wishing to
perform voluntary euthanasia, so why should this operation of
practical murder be allowed to take place? The only difference be...
... middle of paper ...
...does mean ending Mary's life six moths early. But
more important than my view is the parents view, and I find it
ridiculous that they are unable to decide what happens to their
children, and that these court officials somehow feel like they have
the right to determine the fate of someone else's children. Well I and
many others rightfully disagree. Surely it should be the parents that
are responsible for their own children, not irrelevant court judges
who don't have to deal with the consequences of their decision. Even
if the parents are apparently 'too overwhelmed' to decide what is
right for their children it is still their responsibility.
What ever decision is made regarding the twins there will inevitably
be ongoing arguments against what ever happens, and this is
unavoidable as I'm sure the judges very well know.
During the blackest days of the Great Depression there wasn't much hope for anyone, but the Dionne quintuplets helped to lighten the Great Depression somewhat. Who were the Dionne quintuplets and did the Ontario government exploit them? These five sisters had a difficult life; they were displayed to the public for nine years, taken away from their family and put under the guardianship of the doctor who had delivered them. They were used as commercial products, and were robed of the money that they had earned during their early lives.
Mary Musgrove was a very influential woman of her time. Her heritage of both Native American and English blood gave her the perfect advantage for prosperity in the time period in which she lived. She had a great impact on the state of Georgia as an interpreter, a trading post owner, and a tribe member.
Also frustrated with her suggested place in American society, Georgia Douglass Johnson, over-shadowed by her male counterparts, published several poems during the Harlem renaissance, which exposed the struggles faced by women of color, in what is often categorized as aa golden age for African Americans. Her works are a testament to her own struggle, as a female African American writer in the first half of the century. Although Johnson graduated in 1896, from Atlanta University, she did not publish her first poem until 1916, at the age of 36. This is partially due the gender expectations, that kept her geographically removed from the major literary circles of her day, which were in Harlem. Due to her marriage to Washington lawyer Henry
Up until and during the mid -1800’s, women were stereotyped and not given the same rights that men had. Women were not allowed to vote, speak publically, stand for office and had no influence in public affairs. They received poorer education than men did and there was not one church, except for the Quakers, that allowed women to have a say in church affairs. Women also did not have any legal rights and were not permitted to own property. Overall, people believed that a woman only belonged in the home and that the only rule she may ever obtain was over her children. However, during the pre- Civil war era, woman began to stand up for what they believed in and to change the way that people viewed society (Lerner, 1971). Two of the most famous pioneers in the women’s rights movement, as well as abolition, were two sisters from South Carolina: Sarah and Angelina Grimké.
Mystery is a literary genre that hooks the reader in with thrill and suspense. Mary Reilly is a 1990 parallel novel by American writer Valerie Martin inspired by Robert Louis Stevenson 's classic novel The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Faithfully weaving in details from Robert Louis Stevenson 's classic, Martin introduces an original and captivating character: Mary Reilly, a survivor who is scarred but still strong, familiar with evil but brimming with devotion and love. The novel Mary Reilly both compliments and complements Stevenson’s novel.
to kill another human being who breaks the law? Why don't we just use life
Thursday, February 10, 1675/76 -- A state of alertness prevailed in the town of Lancaster, Massachusetts. Its 50 families were always ready to crowd into the 5 or 6 garrison houses in case of an Amerindian attack. The continual war between King Philip's forces and colonial troops made everyone aware of imminent danger. Joseph Rowlandson, minister to the small frontier town, was in Boston appealing, once again, to the colonial government for protection. His appeal fell on deaf ears; the danger from attack was rated as minor.
Mary Rowlandson wrote a narrative about hardships she faced during her captivity, in a journal. Despite her suffering she thanked God for her life and his mercy. Rowlandson wrote during the colonial period and is an example of a puritan writer for many reasons.
There are many alternatives to this act of murder. It is not man's decision to
knows better than God what is right or because the human is asking God to perform an act other
or suicide. One of the ten commandments (Exodus 20) is thou shall not kill, but does this include
...ven a choice few have: to save himself from certain death or to continue on to gain immortal glory.
...just not meant to play as God, for it is too much of a responsibility. We are sinful people, and the ability of cloning places too much power in our sinful hands, so therefore it is not meant to be for us; Only for God.
...he same time, it is ending the person's life that is the most valuable thing a person may ever hope to own. The decision to end one's life at the time of suffering should then be let laid into the hands of the sufferer and let it be upon his/her own conscience to decide whether he/she wants to end their lives. And yet it is a life that they are ending, life that is only given once and can never be replaced by anything else.
common sense that if a person knows he will be put to death himself should he take someone