Eleonore Stump, Petitionary Prayer

1014 Words3 Pages

Eleonore Stump writes an article concerning her standing on petitionary prayer. Stump starts her argument by defining petitionary prayer as simply asking God for something through the act of prayer. Stump points out since this is the definition of petitionary prayer, prayers of praise and worship cannot be considered petitionary since they are not making requests but instead displaying a sense of loyalty. Stump responds to an argument by Kant stating petitionary prayer was pointless on the account of God will do what is right regardless of you asking. Kant also states petitionary prayer is, at its worse, an insult to God because it implies the human knows better than God what is right or because the human is asking God to perform an act other than what is considered justice. Stump intends to defend petitionary prayer against the accusations of pointless or insulting. Throughout her article, Stump argues against previous problems associated with petitionary prayer. The problem of petitionary prayer is,
1. If God is all-good, he would this world to be the best of any possible world.
2. If God is omniscient, he would know how to make this world the best possible world.
3. If God is omnipotent, he can make it the best of any possible world.
4. Therefore, it is [assumedly] already the best of any possible world.
5. Petitionary prayer asks for the world to be in another form than it is.
6. But that would make the world less than perfect, which God would never do.
7. Therefore, either petitionary prayer is pointless since it asks for what God is going to carry out anyway, or it is pointless because it asks for God to carry out something he would never do.
8. Therefore, petitionary prayer is rendered pointless.
While Stump d...

... middle of paper ...

.... Stump states that we should always ask for good things by way of petitionary prayer so that good things will occur in our world. If Stump’s claim is correct, then two scenarios could come into play. If God has the power to put the world in a better state than it already is, but we, humans, aren’t sending him requests by way of petitionary prayer, God can either choose to put the world in a better state than it already is or he can choose to not change the state of the world at all. The consequence of God making the world better is the infringement of the human free will. On the other hand, if God chooses not to make the world better because of the lack of petitionary prayer, human free will is left intact but the world is not made better.

Works Cited

Stump, Eleonore. "Petitionary Prayer." American Philosophical Quarterly. 16.2 (1979): 81-91. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.

Open Document