Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy over death penalty
Impact of capital punishment
Arguments supporting the Death Penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy over death penalty
I support the death penalty, also known as capital punishment. It is the legal
process where the state sends a death row inmate to execution as a punishment for a
grave crime committed such as murder, rape, or treason. Although not all crimes are
punishable by death, there are strong opinions shared by both pro-death penalty and
anti-death penalty supporters. Many countries still practice the death penalty, but in
the United States, it is decided by each state as to whether they will allow it. Today, 31
of the states do allow the death penalty while 19 states do not, Mississippi being one
of those that do. Whether it should be carried out or not has been argued many years
between those who favor it and those who don’t. My opinion
…show more content…
in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which enforced the death penalty
for 25 different crimes. Since then death sentences have been carried out by such
means as crucifixion, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, hanging, firing
squads, electric chairs, and gas chambers. Today the most common method is lethal
injection.
The death penalty helps cut down on crime. Everyone has the basic instinct to want to
live. If someone realizes he may be put to death for committing a crime, he is less likely
to carry it out. One of many studies that support this is a study done by Naci Mocan, an
economics professor at the University of Colorado in Denver. "The conclusion is there is
a deterrent effect." His 2003 and 2006 studies found that each execution results in five
fewer homicides, and commuting a death sentence means five more homicides. Since
2001, dozens of studies like his support that capital punishment has deterrent effects.
They are all based on the theory that if the cost of something, whether it be the purchase
of an apple or the act of killing someone, becomes too high, people will change their
behavior - forego the apples or shy from murder. Some take it a step further by
…show more content…
Added to those costs is
the cost of the lethal injection itself, which is how most states execute today. All of these costs
added together normally are more than the cost of lifetime confinement. Another argument is
that by executing a murderur, there is no hope for him to eventually feel sorry for the crime and
to be rehabilitated.
For me, there is no question as to whether the death penalty should be used or not. It is
common sense that if a person knows he will be put to death himself should he take someone
else’s life, then he is less likely to commit the murder. Therefore, the death penalty helps prevent
crime as proved by the study done by Naci Mocan. Also, as we say today “what goes around
comes around”. If a person takes the life of another intentionally, then it is only fair and just that
his life be taken from him. That helps to balance right from wrong in society.
I believe in the death penalty, and for anyone who still needs convincing that the death
penalty should be used, I would suggest that they read about the Oklahoma City bombing that
was a terrorist bomb attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown
point are we not going to value the sanctity of life… we would resuscitate him, and then execute
Some crimes cannot be paid for in full. This is true for many acts of murder, rape, and torture for which some are put behind bars. As said in “Death Penalty’s False Promise: An Eye for an Eye” by Anna Quindlen, “There is nothing anyone could do that is bad enough for an adult who took a 6-year-old boy away from his parents, perhaps tortured, then murdered, him and cut off his head. Nothing at all. Lethal injection?
As for the cost of the executions themselves, there are various options that don’t require a lot of funding and although the costs of the lethal injection are quite steep, there are new developments that are more affordable than the previous lethal
throughout the whole world--the last murderer lying in prison ought to be executed before the resolution was carried out. This ought to be done in order that every one may realize the desert of his deeds, and that blood-guiltiness may not remain on the people; for otherwise they will all be regarded as participants in the murder as a public violation of justice.” (Rachels, 2010)
Narration: Opponents of the death penalty believe it is an ineffective way to stop crime and that there are better ways to punish crime and keep society safe.
The death penalty is something that many people do not have a clear decision on. Many people support the death penalty, while others wish for the death penalty to be abolished, and there are some that support the death penalty, but only in certain cases. My personal opinion on the death penalty is it should be administered only in cases of particularly
If an action would run a high risk of getting yourself killed, you might think twice before committing such an act. If taking one guilty life can save even one innocent life, it’s doing its job. In 1973, Isaac Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis that produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, seven lives were spared due to deterrence.3 Deterring a future killer from taking a life does not only save that victim's life, but it might also save the would be killer’s life. They might see how committing this one act would literally end their own life, and because the fear of death looms over everyone, they may refrain from doing
Between 1977 and 2010, an estimated 8,000 people were on Death Row in the US and out of those 8,000, more than 1,200 were actually executed (Siennick, 2012). Policy makers and scholars have been especially interested in whether the death penalty serves a crime-control function by deterring prospective murderers (Siennick, 2012). This debate on whether or not the Death Penalty is an effective deterrent is important to our society because we need to understand the impact of this ultimate and final punishment. Expectations of deterrence follow from the basic idea that potential murderers decide whether to kill after considering the benefits and costs of killing (Siennick, 2012). The Death Penalty as punishment can be a deciding factor to a potential murderer when they make the decision whether to kill someone or not. There is assorted evidence on whether or not this happens and there isn’t a chosen method to gather data that fully supports this idea.
“The death Penalty: Deterrance.” Michigan State University Comm Tech Lab and Death Penalty Information Center. (2001): 1. Web. 8 Apr. 2014. http://deathpenaltycurriculum.org/student/c/about/argument1a.htm.
One of the most repetitive and controversial topics discussed in the criminal justice system, is the death penalty. Capital punishment has been a part of our nation’s history since the creation of our constitution. In fact, as of January 1st, 2016, 2,943 inmates were awaiting their fate on death row (Death Penalty Information Center). Throughout my life, I have always been a strong advocate for the death penalty. During the majority of my undergraduate degree, I was a fierce supporter of capital punishment when discussing the topic in classes. However, throughout many criminal justice courses, I found myself in the minority, regarding the abolishment of the death penalty. While debating this topic, I would always find myself sympathetic to the victims and their families, as one should be, wanting those who were responsible for heinous crimes to
...s of society thus inhibiting us from committing more crimes. John Lamperti said, “If executions protected innocent lives through deterrence, which would weigh in the balance against capital punishment's heavy social costs. But despite years of trying, this benefit has not been shown to exist; the only proven effects of capital punishment are its liabilities.”9
This process includes the criminal trying to get the sentence appealed by having another court look at the trial and decide if a legal mistake was made, and if the sentence should be withheld. This entire process continues for years, while the criminal sits on death row costing taxpayers double the amount it does to house an ordinary inmate (Erb). When the appeals process is over, the criminal is faced with their “last-meal” and is sent to their death-bed to endure the lethal injection of medication designed to stop their heart and lungs, This concoction of medication costs anywhere from $600.00 to $1500.00, plus a couple million on the pre-trial and appeals process costs (Safdar). For terms of total financing: “In Texas, a death penalty case costs taxpayers an average of $2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years” (Dieter). In the state of New York, implementing the death penalty would cost $118 million annually due to the rising costs of the medications, appeals, and the trial and counsel needed. This money could be given to restore roads and public services, or even implement a new public service
Proponents of the death penalty are right to argue that capital punishment does provide a sense of “closure” to those who are faced with the tragedy of losing a loved one due to homicide, but they exaggerate when they claim that this is the only means by which murderers receive just punishment for their crimes. Advocates of the death penalty fail to recognize that there are alternative methods – such as psychotherapy – that are able to replace the barbaric method of the death penalty.
There are many reasons why capital punishment is a good thing, and should be enforced and used more. First off, capital punishment is a good thing because it deters crime. For example, in the 1960s while the number of executions was decreasing, the homicide rate was increasing. As execution started to increase, statistics show that the homicide rate slowly decreased or stayed the same, but it did not increase. Fear of death deters people from committing crime. The...
"Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared. Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death... Therefore, a life sent...