The Conflict Between The Speaker's Words And Her True Feelings

1245 Words3 Pages

This poem dramatizes the conflict between the speaker’s words and his or her true feelings. The poet also dramatizes losing as an “art”, or something that a person could potentially “master”. She presents a speaker with a tone that appears almost desperate. At the end of the poem, it becomes clear that the speaker addresses him or her self, not an audience, when they say, “though it may look like (Write it!) a disaster” (19). The speaker’s words enclosed in parenthesis make an attempt to convince themselves that they believe their own words. The poem does not take place in a definite time or location, rather in the speaker’s memories, wandering through the past, eventually arriving at the present. The speaker’s own false words cannot convince …show more content…

No resolution exists for these losses, because the speaker refuses to acknowledge them as a problem. He or she insists they have already mastered the “art of losing.” Literally, the speaker states that one can overcome loss by simply putting it into perspective, using examples ranging from car keys to continents. Bishop writes, “so many things seem filled with the intent/ to be lost that their loss is no disaster” (2-3). The speaker’s proposes their theory that if a person practices losing enough, they will grow numb to it. Figuratively, the speaker expresses the exact opposite. Her or she feels so destroyed by loss that they need to convince themselves that it does not hurt. His or her tone starts out in a calm manner that seems somewhat forced. By the last paragraph, it shifts to frantic, almost desperate. Bishop’s first stanza establishes the literal subject of the rest of the piece: “loss is not disaster” (3). The first line introduces a phrase that repeats throughout the entire work, “The art of losing isn’t hard to master” (1). Bishop chooses to refer to losing as an
“art”, which posits an odd word choice in regards to loss. An “art” usually refers to …show more content…

The second stanza introduces a shift in subject. The speaker shifts from speaking generally, to directly addressing the audience, instructing readers to “Lose something every day” (4). Bishop chooses to first write about lost keys, something unimportant that almost anyone could relate to. This helps the audience see the speaker’s theory as reasonable. Bishop also repeats the line “The art of losing isn’t hard to master” (6). By repeating the first line from the first stanza Bishop reiterates her point, and establishes her poem as a villanelle. The second stanza also contains random line breaks in the middle of sentences, separating phrases such as, “Accept the fluster/of lost door keys” (4-5). These seemingly random breaks show an underlying franticness in the speaker’s voice, which aligns with Bishop’s figurative meaning: that the speaker feels so torn by loss that this piece represents a last desperate attempt to convince themself otherwise.
The next stanza accelerates the seriousness of the speaker’s loss. The tone of the poem in general grows more serious in accordance with the speaker’s losses. Door

Open Document