Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The chocolate war comparative essay
Essay conclusion of the chocolate war
Essay conclusion of the chocolate war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The chocolate war comparative essay
The Chocolate War
Many people often meet different characters in literature and in life that they admire or despise. They conclude if those characters are good or evil and at the same time they reflect on the choices and responsibilities that those characters have. From The Chocolate War I admire Roland Goubert or The Goober based on his actions. I despise Archie Costello (The Assigner of The Vigils) because of the choices that he made and also because of his actions.
I admire Roland Goubert (The Goober) the most of all the characters within this book because he is honest, loving, and a loyal friend to Jerry. In the book when Jerry was refusing to sell the chocolates, Goober felt many feelings that Jerry was feeling. For example the guilt, fear, anger, tension, and most of all the horror of living another day just waiting for the coming of the next homeroom period to once again refuse the chocolates from Brother Leon. That was a sure sign of a bond between the two of them. When Goober waited for Jerry one day at the school’s entrance and pulled him aside to ask, “ Jeez, Jerry, what did you do it for? ” after the assignment was over with and Jerry still refused to sell the chocolates. That showed that Goober cared about Jerry and wanted to warn him of Brother Leon and how Brother Leon could control Ferry’s fate. For example when Jerry stated, “ It’s not the end of the world. Four hundred kids in this school are going to sell chocolates. What does it matter ...
Why would a person decide to betray the beliefs they had fought so hard for? In Robert Cormiers novel The Chocolate War, the character of Jerry Renault changes drastically from a rebel to a follower in the end. The school gang known as the vigils and his moral beliefs motivates Jerry’s actions. He feels he must take a stand against evil. Jerry can be considered a hero because of his beliefs. In the end however he gives in to the things he fought against and becomes a follower.
The perspective of evil is also infrared in this play, but it is ignorance of unfolding events that makes potentially good characters loathsome. These characters do not deliberately choose to be on the wrong side of the system, but they are ignorant of events behind the scenes, and this ends up shaping their character. Danforth and...
Evil is a popular theme in many novels and plays, and there are many factors that contribute to characters becoming evil. Factors such as no interaction with people and the way someone is treated can turn a person to become evil and commit bad acts. The person may start out as a selfless person with good morals, but eventually he will turn evil as a result of outside factors. Some factors might be isolation, the way he is treated by others, and motives. A person’s selfish needs often consume him and he wants nothing but to benefit himself. He will do anything to get what he wants and will eventually commit so many bad acts that he will turn purely evil. In the play Macbeth by Shakespeare and the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the characters
Macbeth is the story of a man who is deeply ambitious and greedy, yet loving and moral. Macbeth has strong morals but does not abide by them, but his morals may be the reason many readers feel sympathy for this complex character. Macbeth is a prime example of a character who has great moral boundaries, but does not exercise his own advice. Not utilizing his moral compass causes a lot of problems for his character. Macbeth is a corrupt ruler, but his guilty conscious makes him a tragic hero. Although Macbeth makes hostile choices, the reader feels sympathy for him because he expresses extreme guilt for his malicious actions.
Robert Cormier’s The Chocolate War conveys that change in a community demands nonconformity from individuals, for instance, common events at Trinity High would have stayed the same if Jerry hadn't shown nonconformity then no change would come to the school.
Tom Brennan is the centrepiece for J.C. Burke's characters' transitions. Through Tom, we see the perspective of someone who has gone through a traumatic experience. We experience the struggles firsthand of dealing with a different environment through Tom. Tom in the beginning is depressed and has no will for social interaction because of his past, “In the dark I could see the grime… I could feel it pasted crawling on my skin,” this emphasises Tom's desolation and a sense of apathy. Tom's state of mind is symbolised through Tom being stationary and getting no physical exercise, a motif that is used throughout the novel for Tom's inability to adapt due to a lack of courage and egoistically avoiding the truth "I tried to smile but it didn't come
‘The story of Tom Brennan’ chronicles a young man named Tom as he faces obstacles which arise as a result of a fatal car accident caused by his brother’s drink driving. Burke incorporates flashbacks, juxtaposing the past with the present. The past symbolises happiness and the present depicts misery. She uses evocative imagery throughout her novel to enhance the reader’s experience of Tom’s physical transition and emotional transformation. Toms initial transition is explored through the internal monologue as he says “my father closed the door of our home for the last time.” The closing of the door symbolising the uprooted comfortable communal existence which was once had in
(Cormier 33). I am not a bossy leader like Archie but I am still a leader. I am an
As we begin our journey into “The Chocolate War” our main character Archie is viewed as the powerhouse of Trinity High school. Everyone in attendance of this school knew that when Archie said jump you were to ask how high. Though at first Archie is very confident with his power and position in this school will he always be this comfortable?
There are times in life where we choose between right or wrong. It can come into effect on how other people judge you based on their views of what's right or what's wrong. In the play Macbeth, William Shakespeare displayed a darker and a wrong side of humankind. Three main characters, in particular, showed similar traits of greediness. Banquo, who appears to be noble fails to resist his desires; Lady Macbeth overrules herself with greed to a fate of anguish. And finally, Macbeth becomes engulfed with greed that leads to horrible deeds. Shakespeare emphasizes that desire for power and wealth can overrule morality in human nature.
Along with opposites, Shakespeare portrays human nature’s duality through changes in the character’s personality. In the beginning of the play, Macbeth comes across as a loyal soldier, ...
... the character Iago. Revenge is also a flaw that most people wish to inflict upon others and have to deal with at one time or another in their lives. It is also one that many people are able to connect to, as they have either been seeking payback or have been avenged. Due to these flaws, a strong connection between today’s society and the well-known character of Iago exists. These humanlike qualities in Iago give to him an appeal to modern-day society. The Othello characters Othello and Iago have many flaws that make them seem even more realistic. Shakespeare incorporated flaws into his characters, allowing for more truth to be seen in them and as a result, there is a wider public appeal. The modern world is still able to connect to Shakespearean literature; (omit) it can be deduced that characters with flaws have more of an influence on society than those without.
Commonly, a hero is considered as a representative of morality, justice and power. Also, people have various ways to evaluate their own heroes. Especially children, as they grow up, are more likely to create their heroes who are usually brave, strong, righteous and indestructible. However, villains are the opposite side of heroes, and they are evil, demoniacal and cruel. Some of those heroes would easily turn into villains when they are trying to get revenge because their hearts are filled with hatred. The play Hamlet by Shakespeare tells the tragic story of a prince avenging the death of his father. In the play, the main character Hamlet changes from a hero into a villain through his immoral and repellant actions.
Road rage is a large problem all over the world, especially in the United States. There are two types of road rage. The first one is habitual road rage. It is a learned behavior; drivers have learned to drive in an aggressive manner. The second one is situational road rage. It is based on the situation that surrounds the driver, such as the driver receiving bad news or losing a job. Many people have died on the American highways because of stress or maybe they are in a hurry to get home to watch the football game, to be at work on time, get to a rendezvous doctor. It may be also that they are using their cell phone. Since driving is dangerous things a person can do, losing focus is an evil something. Road rage causes anger, stress,
Following Morell’s definition of an anti-hero, or more precisely, of an unlikeable protagonist, we learn the benefits of using unlikely leads in our stories to make them more interesting, complex, unpredictable, and insightful (32). She explains how there is a ‘fine line’ in balancing traits that must be kept in order to make the reader feel captivated by the characters. Too much likeability, and the antihero becomes a hero. Too many negative traits, and they become too unlikeable to even relate to (43). Despite of this, there is an abundant number of combinations in character creation for unlikeable protagonists, since the traits we give them can be picked from two sets that are normally exclusive to villains and heroes, respectively. One of the most popular combos is of an antihero whose sense of duty guides all his or her actions. However, what is more interesting is seeing them betray (or adopt) this sense of duty. To understand why it works, this paper aims to explain the often misinterpreted definition of ‘a sense of duty’, and uses two ‘unlikeable’ protagonists as examples as they cycle in their use of moral duty throughout their respective stories: Dan Dunne, from the film Half Nelson, and Helen Farraley from Heathcock’s work Volt.