Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Malcolm X's views on white people
Summary on malcolm x thoughts on race
Summary on malcolm x thoughts on race
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Malcolm X's views on white people
Malcolm X, an African American Muslim minster and human rights activist, once said “We declare our right on this earth to be a human being, to be respected as a human being, to be given the rights of a human being in this society, on this earth, in this day, which we intend to bring into existence by any means necessary.” According to Malcolm X, everyone on the earth has a right to be called a human being and fit into the category of a human being; no matter if they are young, old, disabled or incompetent. Yet if we were to look back on our past and cannot seem to count how many times these so called human beings have treated others who share the same characteristics of human beings as lesser creatures. It becomes as if in order to have some form of equality, there must always be one group of people that is treated as inferior. According to Francis Fukuyama, author of “Human Dignity”, if we were to live by his idea of Factor X, the world would be a more equal place. “What the demand for equality of recognition implies is that when we strip all of a person’s contingent and accidental characteristic away, there remains some essential human quality underneath that is worthy of a certain minimal level of respect (Fukuyama 186).” In all true fairness this does seem like a good idea in the beginning, however people will always find another reason or characteristic to say that one group of people is better than another. How does Factor X put boundaries and restriction on those that do of fall into the category of Factor X? How can Factor X be improved or change to include them? Do we then create another type of Factor X to create equality again or are we as humans going to accept the fact that there can never really be truly fair, b... ... middle of paper ... ...ts taken away before they even have the chance to used them. They no longer have the choice in how they want to live their lives, political feelings or social interactions because they are either different or do not possess Factor X. These people posses what are as Fukuyama calls them accidental characteristics, that make them unable to be categorize under Factor X. Leaving the idea if these people should still be considered a human being and the idea that if Factor X was amended to fit these people, who will be the new group of people that do not fit into the Category of Factor X ? As we look back into the past there have always been one group of people who do not fit into the general population and are seen as inferior. Even in the present they are these types of people, so if it has been done in both the past and the present, what does it leave for the future.
Temporary inequality exists as a means of “improving” a subordinate to the level of a dominant. After the period of inequality is over, the two view each other as equals. The other form of inequality, permanent inequality, exists solely because of an ascription of inferiority to a subordinate that is inherent and unchangeable. Unlike temporary inequality, there is no possibility of improvement for the subordinate; they are, in the eyes of the dominant, inferior and impossible to “fix.” The dominants, who view themselves naturally superior to the subordinates, begin to take advantage of the subordinates. “Out of the total range of human possibilities, the activities most highly valued in any particular culture will tend to be enclosed within the domain of the dominant group; less valued functions are relegated to the subordinates” (Rothenberg, 112). Moreover, the subordinates, who by this point are under the total control of the dominant group, may begin to internalize the value of the dominants. “[Subordinates’] incapacities are ascribed to innate defects or deficiencies of mind or body…More importantly, subordinates themselves can come to find it difficult to believe in their own ability” (112). This theory of domination and subordination are clearly mirrored in race relations in the United States. Whites, who are the dominant group, make all of the fallacious errors involved in race-based thinking; they are prone to, like Miller describes, hoarding superior roles in society and practicing systematic cruelty towards the subordinates due to their sincere belief that the subordinates are inherently incapable of rising to the level of the dominant. This internalized belief on the part of the dominants, that the subordinates
The only exception Locke provides to the desired goal of equality among all humans is if “God·, the lord and master of them all, were to declare clearly and explicitly his wish that some one person be raised above the others and given an undoubted right to dominion and sovereignty” (Locke 77). However, God certainly never said people who has ancestry from Africa were inferior to those in Europe, so all that remains is one of the view “rights” Locke says is both inarguable and easy to articulate: “the right that an injured party has to get reparation” (79). Black Americans undoubtedly qualify as an “injured party”, and as a result Locke and Malcolm X once more share reasoning for taking action. Even though Malcolm X was a devout Muslim, he did not see Islam as a necessary part of being a black nationalist. He implores listeners to keep their own religion “between you and your God. Because if it hasn’t done anything more for you than it has, you need to forget it anyway”, and instead to derive the need to resist from whatever theological source one ascribes to (X 75). By viewing existence as an implicit contract with a higher power to prosper whenever possible, Malcolm X forms an argument for rising up against oppression that structurally could
Equality appears to be the ideal factor that can perfect a society. It eliminates the need to feel envious of any human or their qualities. Nevertheless, with impartiality comes lack of diversity and ambition. Inequality is the entity that provides individuals with the passion to strive for a better life. If everyone has already reached their full potential there is no purpose for living.
Francis Fukuyama describes Factor X as, “the one essential human quality underneath that is worthy of a certain minimal level of respect”(Fukuyama 186). Factor X is the center-point of what is known as human dignity. In today's society, there is a regression in the amount of Factor X and a decline in the amount of human dignity shown. In the past, it was common for people to show each other respect as well as respect themselves as it was just common place in society at that time. The treatment of women by both men and other women best shows the drastic f...
Malcolm X is an important figure in human history because he was a human rights activist and fought for equality among people. He was a proficient public speaker who spoke for minorities, mostly African Americans. By reading Malcolm X’s story, I visualize on how a man suffered from the effects of prejudice and his whole disposition was formed from it. I see how a very angry man stayed angry at the "white devils" f...
The autobiography of Malcolm X captures the personal growth and the journey of Malcolm Little, also known as Malcolm X. Throughout his life, Malcolm’s experiences shaped him into the human rights activist that we are all familiar with today. In his early age Malcolm believed every white person was malicious, he was a criminal, and he believed that Christianity prevented the progression of African Americans- later on in life, Malcolm became a controversial human rights activist, believed that white people were “well-meaning” people, and was a devout Muslim (pg. 383).
Ensuring equality among the people promotes fairness and reduces conflict and jealousy. By treating everyone equally we maintain our respect and are able to work together better. The rule we create treats everyone the same and does not provide any special treatment to any specific person. As long as everyone does what is required of them they will obtain what is rightfully due to them.
On February 11th 1965 Malcolm X gave a speech at the London school of economics. In Malcolm’s speech Malcolm discussed the racism that plagued the United States during the 1960s. During this speech Malcolm brought up police brutality and the riots that it caused, saying that the riots were nothing more than a reaction by the African community because of police brutality. Since Malcolm x’s time many things have been accomplished for the equality of Africans in America; however In today’s society America still feels the anguish of riots based on police brutality. Malcom X’s view on racism was a “whatever it takes” type of theology, justifying violence to end racism. During Malcolm X’s speech on February 11th 1965 Malcolm sheds light on many of
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are known figures who paved the way towards fighting racial discrimination and demanding equality for black people. Despite being freed from slavery 100s of years ago, African-Americans are still considered inferior to white people. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X point this out in their speeches as the United States of America’s failure to achieve racial equality.
Malcolm’s life may have ended more than 50 years ago, but his struggle lives today. Regardless of his imperfections, his example of courage and desire for truth should be an example for all. Trying to live a life true to your beliefs of right and wrong can be the most intimidating task a human ever faces. Malcolm X took on that challenge with courage and did the best he could, with the means provided to him. As with Malcolm’s example, keep an open mind, be willing to change your beliefs and misconceptions, and this book can provide insight into his life and possibly your
...o their efforts. Black Americans who are audiences of the speech of Malcolm X will relate what he said to their own life. His point is change the view of Black Americans that they should be treated equally to White Americans. We are born in the same way and we can’t choose our identities so why we are treated differently just because our identities?
Malcolm X, man of determination, loyalty, courage and most of all man of integrity. To be a man with integrity means to "be honest and to have strong moral principles; moral uprightness" ("Integrity"). By this definition of the word Malcolm X was one of the most incorruptible civil rights activist in history, never once did he do anything to compromise his principles when it came to racism and equality for minorities, namely African Americans. Though he has been called a hate monger for his belief of using any means to achieve equality, he never shook from his burning desire for equality and peace from the oppressive racism of his time. Malcolm X believed in the civil rights movement to such an extreme that during one of his speeches he stated "If you're not ready to die for it, put the word 'freedom' out of your vocabulary"("Malcolm-X.org" 2). He was so infatuated with freedom that he would even accept death if it means that he achieved his goal for freedom.
Basic rights such as free speech, privacy, fair trial, freedom of religion, the right to ones own body, and life should be present universally. But beyond these, what else is necessary? At the very least, equality for all in education, work, voting, rights, pay, and marriage. Depriving one of rights due to their race, age, socioeconomic class, sex, gender, disability, and sexual orientation is morally unethical. The Dalai Lama says it best, “Whether one is rich or poor, educated or illiterate, religious or nonbelieving, man or woman, black, white, or brown, we are all the same. Physically, emotionally, and mentally, we are all equal. We all share basic needs for food, shelter, safety and love.” It is vital for one to look beyond these differences and treat their fellow human equally. Political rights such as voluntary voting and the ability to check and balance the government are also imperative. The ability to vote voluntarily gives p...
THESIS: Scientists and other intellectuals recognize the modern concept of "race" as an artificial category that developed over the past five centuries due to encounters with non-European people. Even though people still attempt to organize humans into categories according to their race, these categories have been shown to have no scientific basis.
First, laws and restrictions are an issue. The government and other agencies can prevent equality by creating rules. “Everyone gets a lifetime maximum of one hundred points… according to the FSEB.” (95). These laws can lead to difficult situations. “You’ve done nothing wrong, what we’ve one is illegal.” (122). In the book The Adoration of Jenna Fox, Jenna is illegal. She is able to break the law and use more than one-hundred points. She isn’t equal, because Jenna was able to take advantage of having unlimited points. Equality is not always about treating everyone the same, it is about treating people in such a way that the outcome for each person can be the same. For a person who is blind it may involve having screen readers on people’s computer and removing obstacles in buildings. This means creating laws