The Cask Of Amontillado Essay

2193 Words5 Pages

Society turns around those who remain lodged in the past with no desire to progress alongside the rest of humanity. Within “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe, the narrator, Montresor, clings to his tradition and his family’s past. Ensnared by the pride of his family’s prestigious station in society, Montresor enacts revenge against Fortunato, who had gravely insulted him. He lures Fortunato deep into the catacombs, taking advantage of his arrogance before trapping him down there, burying him alive. Additionally, William Faulkner projects a similar ideal within his work, “A Rose for Emily,” as the reader witnesses the decline of the noble Grierson name. Emily, the last living Grierson in Jefferson, adheres to her traditional views …show more content…

However, in regard to the present South, Miss Emily is a fallen monument, the last of the Griersons. Aware of her family’s previous prestige, Miss Emily boastfully continues her life, seemingly oblivious to her loss of relevance. Furthermore, the concept that she is averse to releasing her family’s ways is shown through Emily’s “long strand[s] of iron-gray hair” (Faulkner par 63). Holding something in an iron grasp is a way of saying that a person’s hold on an object or ideal is unrelenting. As shown throughout the narrative, Miss Emily is unable to relinquish her tenacious grip on the traditional values the Grierson family is accustomed to. Meanwhile, kinetic Jefferson spins around static Miss Emily, abandoning her past. Montresor, within “The Cask of Amontillado,” demonstrates an obsession with his family’s arms, which to the rest of society had become an irrelevant aphorism. As Montresor compels Fortunato to join him in the catacombs, the reader can deduce how Montresor’s pride in his family name influences his every action. Inside the catacombs, Fortunato and Montresor speak of the Montresor …show more content…

He is determined to protect and earn back his family’s honor, and once his pride is wounded by Fortunato, Montresor resolutely vows revenge. Montresor acrimoniously vowing revenge against Fortunato for his insult informs the reader outright that Fortunato will suffer; the question is how. Though unrecognized by Montresor, he and Fortunato share a similar pride in their social status and a similar arrogance regarding their intellect. The difference between them is that Montresor’s pride drove him to revenge, while Fortunato’s led him to his death. While Montresor and Fortunato are deep inside of the catacombs, the two have a conversation about masons; while Fortunato speaks in the context of the prestigious, secret society, Montresor pronounces that he is a mason and presents “from beneath the folds of [his] roquelaire a trowel” (Poe par 66). From this interaction, the reader can undoubtedly assess Fortunato’s pride regarding his social standing. The reader can also deduce that the trowel Montresor produces is a piece of his plan for revenge. Through the conversation on the topic of masons, the reader is able to observe how Montresor taunts

Open Document