Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrator's role
Literature according to Vladimir Nabokov
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Narrator's role
Lolita
The book Lolita is a highly controversial novel written by Vladimir Nabokov. Lolita tells the story of a man, Humbert Humbert, and his utter infatuation with a young “nymphet” named Lolita. The book and subsequent film adaptations, specifically Stanley Kubrick’s 1962 adaptation and Adrian Lyne’s 1997 adaptation aim to create a feeling of sympathy for the protagonist, Humbert Humbert. Through the use of first person narration, Humbert Humbert is able to manipulate readers with simple inaccuracies, making him an unreliable narrator.
The term unreliable narrator was famously coined by Wayne Booth in Rhetoric of Fiction. Booth defines the reliable and unreliable narrator in the following way: “I have called a narrator reliable when he speaks for or acts in accordance with the norms of the work (which is to say the implied author’s norms), unreliable when he does not” (158-59). In other words, when a narrator expresses values and perceptions that strikingly diverge from those of the implied author he is deemed unreliable. Moreover, once a narrator is deemed unreliable, then this unreliability will be consistent throughout the work, according to Booth (158).
When a narrator is unreliable, there is a conflict between the narrator’s presentation and the rest of the narrative, which makes readers suspect his sincerity. There are three sources of unreliability; the narrator’s limited knowledge, his personal involvement, and his questionable morals. When narrators display a personal involvement the story, they portray characters or events in a subjective way Lastly, if the implied author does not share the narrator’s moral values then his morals are considered questionable. If they do share moral values then the narrator is un...
... middle of paper ...
...asserting his claims of illness.
The notion of an unreliable narrator can also be seen in Kubrick’s 1962 Lolita. There are ways in which Kubrick plays with the gap between perception and reality. There is a quite masterful moment when Charlotte, Lolita’s mother and recently Humbert’s wife, discovers Humbert’s true desires upon reading his journal. Humbert, believing Charlotte to be upstairs, yells bald-faced lies at the ceiling while he prepares his wife a conciliatory martini. He then receives a phone call telling him that Mrs. Humbert has been struck by a car. The timing is set up so perfectly that it seems ridiculous to us, too, that Charlotte, who was last seen fleeing into her room, could have just been killed, yet she was. However, Kubrick’s film provides an objective view of the events occurring in the novel by refusing to rely heavily upon voiceover.
This source was talking about the unreliability of narrators in the twentieth-centure. I did not find this source overly helpful because it took a long time to get to the point, however, once the writer got to talking about the unreliability it was helpful.
Often, when a story is told, it follows the events of the protagonist. It is told in a way that justifies the reasons and emotions behind the protagonist actions and reactions. While listening to the story being cited, one tends to forget about the other side of the story, about the antagonist motivations, about all the reasons that justify the antagonist actions.
The story was told in a completely believable tone of voice. The narration was not s...
In life, many people strive to find a person that is reliable and to separate the people that are unreliable. Unreliable can be defined as an adjective meaning not dependable. Having read through the short stories “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe, “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, and “Strawberry Spring” by Stephen King, it is reasonable to conclude that each of these stories has its own unreliable narrator. The most unreliable narrator, however, is the narrator/killer Springheel Jack from “Strawberry Spring” by Stephen King due to the narrator’s cognition problems and the violent nature of the murders.
An unreliable narrator is when the character unconsciously doesn’t tell the entire story as we are seeing it from one pair of eyes. Although one could say that it’s an unreliable first person point of view. Yunior does not show any sign of trying to make himself appear better instead he is unreliable in the sense of how he is telling the story. “She has big stupid lips and a sad moon face and the driest skin” (Diaz 145).
Gilman has the narrator start off as very reliable in the beginning and throughout the story slowly transition into an unreliable source. The story begins with the protagonist describing, the house they are staying in for the summer, the depiction she gives seems very clear. For example when Gilman writes, “A colonial mansion, a hereditary estate, I would Say” (302). This description comes off very vivid, leading the reader to believe the narrator as a reliable source, and by using the words “I would say” she shows confidence her in statement. With such opinionated writing the audience trusts the protagonist’s sanity, by clear recalling of events. Next she immediately describes her husband in the very next exert, as a well-edu...
As he begins telling his point of view, he states “It makes me sad to see it, the look of disbelief in each person’s eye. Trudy’s disappearance makes me sad, too… (85)” This shows he is putting a higher value on people’s confidence on his account then his own grief for his vanished wife. This already gives the account a different motive and thus seems like the narrator may be manipulating his audience in order to maintain a notion of honesty.
In Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita, the overruling drive of the narrator, Humbert Humbert, is his want to attest himself master of all, whether man or woman, his prime cravings, all-powerful destiny, or even something as broad as language. Through the novel the reader begins to see Humbert’s most extreme engagements and feelings, from his marriage to his imprisonment, not as a consequence of his sensual, raw desires but rather his mental want to triumph, to own, and to control. To Humbert, human interaction becomes, or is, very unassuming for him: his reality is that females are to be possessed, and men ought to contest for the ownership of them. They, the women, become the very definition of superiority and dominance. But it isn’t so barbaric of Humbert, for he designates his sexuality as of exceptionally polished taste, a penchant loftier than the typical man’s. His relationship with Valerie and Charlotte; his infatuation with Lolita; and his murdering of Quilty are all definite examples of his yearning for power. It is so that throughout the novel, and especially by its conclusion, the reader sees that Humbert’s desire for superiority subjugates the odd particularities of his wants and is the actual reason of his anguish.
... the characters from his point of view. However, is Nick a trustworthy narrator? Some readers may see him as a hypochrite, because of how he describes him self compare to the other characters.
When a child is born, he or she does not see the same things an adult sees. The baby does not understand language and cannot make the distinction between races or gender or good and evil. While it is impossible to go back in time, novels allow readers to take on a new set of eyes for a few hours or days. They give a new perspective to the world, and sometimes provide a filter to the things seen in the world. Unreliable narrators give authors the flexibility to lie to and withhold information from readers, providing new perspectives into the narrator as well as the other characters of the novel. Authors use unreliable narrators not to give more information to the reader, but to withhold information in order to further character development.
Literary critic and the novel’s annotator Alfred Appel Jr. claims “what is extraordinary about Lolita is the way in which Nabokov enlists us, against our will, on Humbert’s side… Humbert has figuratively made the reader his accomplice in both statutory rape and murder” (Durantaye, Style Is Matter: the Moral Art of Vladimir Nabokov 8). Nabokov employs various literary devices such as direct second reader address, metaphor, and allusions through Humbert Humbert as a means to conjure up feelings of empathy. The reader comes to find that . It is clear that Humbert Humbert uses second person address as a way to control how the reader perceives him. Through the use of this narrative mode, he aims to convince the reader that his sexual violence is artistically justifiable and that the art he creates is a remedy for mortality. I will argue is that art is not a remedy for mortality because in Humbert Humbert’s creation of Lolita, t...
In “The Absence of Emily,” by Jack Ritchie, the unreliability of the narrator creates suspense throughout the entire story which then is turned around with an excellent use of dramatic irony. Early on in the story we are introduced to Albert, a married man who has a secretive past. His wife Emily has gone missing and her cousin Millicent suspects that Albert has murdered her due to the fact that his first wife died. When questioned by Millicent about his first wife, Cynthia, he states that “she couldn’t swim a stroke” and that she believed life vests “hindered her movements” (1). Millicent comments that “It appears that you were the only witness to the accident” Albert agrees and also tells the reader he inherited 90,000 dollars of her insurance
For example, a sense of insanity in the narrators had led to the violence. In “The Tell-Tale Heart” the narrator had no objective to kill the man other than his disliking for the eye. His mentally ill state of mind provides an explanation of why he would act in a violent way. He continuously tries to convince the readers that he is sane, which, in turn makes the readers think he is actually insane. In “The Black Cat” the narrators insanity stems from his drunken state. Even the narrator believed “through the fiend Intemperance [I] had… experience a radical alteration for the worse”( ). In addition, the narrators had killed something or someone. In one of the stories, the narrator had meant to kill the cat because it angered him. The wife had tried to stop him from killing the cat resulting in her death, instead of the cats. In the other story, the narrator had intended to kill the man from the beginning. Furthermore, the narrators arrogance had gotten in the way with getting away with murder. In “The Tell-Tale Heart” the violence committed had gone unnoticed at first, which cause him to be arrogant and think he could get away with it. When police officers arrived he was calm and invited them inside the room where he killed the man. He believed they would never know because he had been very careful and cleaned everything up. When guilt took over he shouted “I admit the deed! Tear up the planks!”(
...by the narrator and from his point of view he constantly gives his opinion throughout the story.
it is the protagonist that we are unable to trust. This is due to the