Margaret Atwood's Surfacing

1297 Words3 Pages

Margaret Atwood's 'Surfacing'

Throughout the book the narrator constantly intertwines the past and

present as though it is side by side. Atwood shows this in the

opening sentence ‘’I can’t believe I’m on this road again’’. The use

of the adjective ‘again’ reveals the narrator has been in this place

in an earlier life. The narrator seems to repress a lot of her past

and continuously contradicts herself, which at times confuses the

reader as we can not tell whether she is talking about her past or her

present and whether she regards it as home as she says ‘’Now were on

home ground foreign territory’’.

This links in with one of the key divisions in the story between the

Americans and the Canadians that is portrayed throughout the book.

This paradoxical declarative reveals that the protagonist feels she

should belong there but feels detached from this childhood place,

suggesting she may feel alienated from this place revealing something

oppressive about this home ground. Also David is the key person who

emphasizes this division between the Americans and Canadians. On page

three David stresses ‘’Bloody fascist pig Yanks’’, reiterating the

stereotypical Canadian disliking of the Americans, using his usual

hostile, aggressive language. Ironically David seems to be the

fascist pig being the unpleasant chauvinistic pig. The use of the

adjective ‘foreign’ links in with the division of language between

French and English that we see later in the book.

In chapter 2 we see that there is a clear division between the

narrator and any emotions. We see that the narrator is emotionally

detached from her husband and her child as she “left him in the city,

that would be perfectly true, only it was different city; he...

... middle of paper ...

...ust them, I can’t think

of anyone else I like better, but right now I wish they weren’t

here”. This shows that the narrator is showing her regrets for

bringing them with her reiterating her distrust in them.

We also begin to see the narrators distrust in those who are closest

to her, her family. When she begins to reminisce on the past she

refers to her family with the third person pronoun “they” for example

when she says “they used to go over it as fast a possible” then later

realizes this mistake she is making and states “that won’t work, I

can’t call them ‘they’ as if they were somebody else’s family”.

However the tables are turned as we the readers begin to realize that

it is the protagonist that we are unable to trust. This is due to the

protagonist’s constant self contradictions and self corrections as she

says “my husband, my former husband”.

Open Document