Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Themes of identity in books
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Carver develops the narrator’s tone chronologically from disdainful to cautious to introspective by deepening his relationship with Robert to express the false perception of strangers that assumptions can produce. In the beginning the narrator’s tone is derisive, as though he’s mocking Robert’s being blind. The narrator sees Robert as a nuisance, getting in the way of him and his wife, whose past relationships with Robert and other men seem to irritate the narrator. “Her officer – why should he have a name? he was the childhood sweetheart, and what more does he want? – came home from somewhere, found her, and called the ambulance,” (Carver 2). The narrator won’t give his wife’s ex-husband, which emits an angry or contempt feeling in the text. …show more content…
His anger towards Robert and his wife’s relationship is the same way, the narrator seems to be jealous. The narrator also seems to have a naïve perception of the blind. “My idea of blindness came from the movies. In the movies, the blind moved slowly and never laughed…A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to,” (Carver 1). Carver portrays the narrator as someone who doesn’t have much experience with the blind and who doesn’t feel inclined to have that experience. The wife’s past relationships that irritate the narrator, whether with Robert or her “officer,” and the narrator’s inexperience with the blind both contribute to his expectations of the ensuing events of the story. Robert, the blind man arrives at the narrator’s house and immediately the narrator’s tone shifts from scornful to tentative because the narrator didn’t want to say or do anything that may offend Robert.
“ ‘I feel like we’ve already met,’ he boomed. ‘Likewise,’ I said. I didn’t know what else to say. Then I said, ‘Welcome. I’ve heard a lot about you,’ ” (Carver 4). As soon as Robert walks in the door the narrator is at a loss for words and repeats himself, showing his nervousness around blind people. The narrator assumes the worst for Robert, seeing his wife’s relationship with Robert as creepy and unorthodox, which taints his perception of him before they even meet. The narrator’s tentativeness continues when he changes the television channel to something he thinks Robert might not like. “I wanted to watch something else. I turned to the other channels. But there was nothing on them, either. So I turned back to the first channel and apologized,” (Carver 9). The narrator apologizes for something as small as changing the channel, hoping that it didn’t offend or anger Robert, continuing the anxious ambience of the middle of the story. The narrator doesn’t know how to act around Robert because he’s never been around someone like him and the author of the story uses this event to show that Robert and the narrator are more alike than the narrator believes in the beginning. After this encounter between Robert and the narrator the feeling of the story changes and the narrator’s opinion of Robert begins to develop an experiential meaning, as opposed to his previous knowledge of blind
people. The narrator’s tone changes from cautious to thoughtful as Robert and the narrator spend more time together and connect through the Medieval churches being shown the television. They begin to draw a cathedral, with Robert leading the narrator and eventually aiding him physically and connecting on a deeper level. Since Robert can’t see he tells the narrator to close his eyes, bringing them closer by using images only from within and not the outside world. “My eyes were still closed. I was in my house. I knew that. But I didn’t feel like I was inside anything. ‘It’s really something,’ I said,” (Carver 13). The narrator begins to think like Robert and through this simple task they truly connect. The drawing of the cathedral drew Robert and the narrator closer and it made the narrator think about Robert and how being blind doesn’t mean he can’t really see. This deep connection that Carver develops between Robert and the narrator makes it seem as though the narrator begins to appreciate him instead of being hesitant or contemptuous. The author draws the connection between Robert and the narrator to prove that strangers are more than they seem and that judging someone based on previous knowledge or what others say can be very different from a personal experience. The narrator’s experience with blind people is almost nonexistent and many of his assumptions come from glorified and dramatized movies that misrepresent the blind and lead to the awkward encounter of Robert and the narrator. As the narrator and Robert spent more time together the narrator realizes that his presumptions about the blind are wrong and they’re the same as normal people except that they see things differently. The author connects the narrator and Robert by using the cathedral drawing, Robert’s vision of the cathedral is the same as the narrator and they connect deeply and realize they’re more similar than the narrator thought. The narrator of the story makes an assumption about Robert but as Carver transforms the narrator’s tone from condescending to wary to considerate that previous perception proves to be wrong. The narrator’s expression of anger about his wife’s past relationships with an ex-husband and then with Robert gave him a negative opinion about Robert, but as the story progressed his view changed. Carver expresses how a perception about a stranger, someone has in his or her mind, can be misleading as to what the stranger is truly like through the shift in the narrator’s tone throughout the story.
First is the way Carver uses imagery in order to give the reader a cynical impression
Beard’s tone throughout the essay is reflective and detached. Even at the moments of immediacy--during the shooting, when Beard is talking to her friends and coworkers--Beard’s tone makes it apparent that the events she relates are
Knowing her personally is more of reality, and the husband is blind to reality. Carver analyzes the protagonist’s emotions through diction and visual aid throughout the story, providing a great understanding of the meaning as a whole.
Weele, Michael Vander. "Raymond Carver and the language of Desire." Short Story Criticism. Ed. Thomas Volteler. Detroit: Gale Publishing Inc., 1989. 36-41.
Her tone is so happy through out the whole story because she is so happy to go to China to meet her new family members and also rekindle with old family members. “And I can’t help myself. I also have misty eyes, as if I had seen this a long, long time ago, and had almost forgotten.” (264) She said that as she was arriving to China, showing how happy she was. On the other hand, the main character who is nameless in Cathedral is so bitter through out the whole story. His wife even mentions that he doesn’t have any friends. The only time he didn’t seem like he was in a bad mood was at the end of the story, when drew a cathedral with the blind man, so that the blind man could “see” what a cathedral looked like. Robert tells the man to draw with his eyes closed, then when he was done, he told him to open his eyes and tell him out the picture looked, but he didn’t. “My eyes were still closed. I was in my house. I knew that. But I didn’t feel like I was inside anything” (42) He was different now and had a better attitude towards blind
She was unhappy with her life and tried to commit suicide by swallowing pills. She would keep in touch with the blind man by sending him tapes and the suicide attempt was one of them. He has a jealous tone towards this, he says, “She told him everything, or so it seemed to me” (201). He recalls the time his wife asked him to listen to the latest tape a year ago before this time. He didn’t seem happy to hear his name from the blind man as he said “I heard my own name in the mouth of this stranger” (201). A knock on the door interrupts the couple from the tape, he suggests taking the narrator bowling. She reminds him that his wife, Beulah had just died, he replies by saying “Was his wife Negro?”(202). The narrator’s wife tells him about the blind man’s wife how she was the blind man’s reader after the narrator’s wife stopped working for him, and they eventually got married. After eight years, however, Beulah died from cancer. He felt sorry for Robert for a bit, but then thought about how awful it must have been for Beulah to know that her husband could never even know what she looked like. After staring at Robert’s face analyzing what he
The narrator's insensitivity reveals itself early in the story when his wife's blind friend, Robert, comes for a visit after the death of his wife. Almost immediately in the beginning of the story the narrator admits "A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to." [Carver 2368] He even goes so far as to suggest to his wife that he take the man bowling. He hears the story of Robert's dead wife and can not even imagine " what a pitiful life this woman must have led." [Carver 2370] The narrator is superficial, only recognizing the external part of people and not recognizing the value of a person on the inside.
Carver tells the story in first person of a narrator married to his wife. Problems occur when she wants a friend of hers, an old blind man, to visit for a while because his wife has died. The narrator's wife used to work for the blind man in Seattle when the couple was financial insecure and needed extra money. The setting here is important, because Seattle is associated with rain, and rain symbolically represents a cleansing or change. This alludes to the drastic change in the narrator in the end of the story. The wife and blind man kept in touch over the years by sending each other tape recordings of their voices which the narrator refers it to being his wife's "chief means or recreation" (pg 581).
The narrator in Raymond Carver’s "Cathedral" is not a particularly sensitive man. I might describe him as self-centered, superficial, and egotistical. And while his actions certainly speak to these points, it is his misunderstanding of the people and the relationships presented to him in this story which show most clearly his tragic flaw: while Robert is physically blind, it is the narrator who cannot clearly see the world around him.
He constantly complains that “a blind man in my house was not something [he looked] forward to” (362). The close friendship between the narrator’s wife and Robert provokes his insecurities. This friendship has lasted for ten years and during those years, they have exchanged countless tapes regarding experiences they have gone through. Because of this, her husband feels “she [has] told him everything or it seems” (363) about their relationship. Upon the arrival of his wife’s friend, the husband is ultimately uncomfortable around Robert because he does not know how to communicate with or act around him.
A transformation took place during the story and it is evident through the narrator?s character. In the beginning he was lacking in compassion, he was narrow minded, he was detached, he was jealous, and he was bitter. Carver used carefully chosen words to illustrate the narrator?s character and the change. Throughout the story his character undergoes a transformation into a more emotionally aware human being.
...ry there are many instances in which the narrator seems to dislike Robert, in which case it is because he is “blind”. Not only is he blinded in the way that he cannot understand Robert, but it leads him to believe that Robert is not human at all because of his disability that he possess. The narrator develops with the aid of Robert, to see Robert as an actual human being. Raymond Carver gives the narrator a transformation through characterization as well as the aid of Robert to show his development and progression throughout the story.
The story begins with the narrator feeling apprehensive and suspicious of his wife’s blind friend visiting their home. He specifically takes issue with the man’s disability. He notes to his wife: "I don't have any blind friends” (Carver 64). His wife, criticizing his lack of experience with other people as a whole, says: "You don't have any friends… Period" (Carver 64). Throughout the story, the author hints that the narrator’s distaste for the disabled comes less from experience and more from ignorance. He explains: “My idea of blindness came from the movies” (Carver 61). The narrator clearly has had little to no interaction with the disabled and thus has had his views on them shaped through the culture surrounding him. He looks at the blind not as human beings who happen to have lost their sight, but rather as vulnerable dependents who are overly reliant on society. As the narrator has intimate conversation with Robert, however, he begins to be more open in his interaction with the blind man. Citing the late time, the narrator offers to make up a bed for Robert. Robert turns down the offer in favor of spending more with the narrator. Instead of becoming irritated as one may expect, the narrator looks forward to their future conversations. He mentions to Robert that he is “… glad for the company" (Carver
Ironically, however Robert is physically blind, it is the narrator who is the one who is bling to the world. The narrator is a troubled individual; from the discussion with his wife, it is uncovered that he doesn't have companions. Like Carver's life, the storyteller's utilization of alcohol is destroying his marriage with his wife; she rather discuses personal problems and converse with Robert and not her husband. The strong friendship between the narrator's wife and Robert aroused his insecurities and bias opinion. He is envious of the relationship between Robert and his wife; he feels like "she has told him everything or it so it seemed" about their marriage. The narrator tries to hide behind his hopeless life by drinking; almost identical to Carver addiction to alcohol when he was bankrupt and could not support his family with his minimum wage job.
This story, written as the thoughts of the narrator, is about an old blind friend of his wife’s coming to visit for the first time. The story focuses on the narrator’s cynicism toward the blind man and the way his wife seems to look up to him. Through out the visit there is halting interaction between the blind man and the narrator, however in the end the narrator experiences something he never could have imagined. Through the eyes of a blind man, he gains a better understanding of who he could be.