Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Punishment as a behaviour modification strategy
A essay about shame
Mental health problems in prisons essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Punishment as a behaviour modification strategy
Being the sufferer of a dreaded shame punishment is much like embarking on a long journey. Although painful at the time, one can look back upon the experience and be made a better person in the end. Shame punishments build character and serve as alternatives to those who need a little extra push. Shame punishments can build an immeasurable amount of good character. Typical judicial punishments today involve years jail time, and they simply hinder upon interactions with friends and family. A shame punishment serves as an effective method to build the hard working traits of a model citizen. For example, after enduring the punishment, the person will be reminded of it every time they think about doing something wrong. The painful experience
serves as a wall in the person's mind to bar them from making bad decisions. Knowing shame will follow a bad behavior, one has the opportunity to make the right choice, thus promoting positive and responsible behavior. Shame motivates responsibility, and claiming your actions can lead to a sense of self-forgiveness. Shame can also be used as an alternative method for promoting non criminal actions. Not everyone is greatly affected by jail time or community service. Different people are motivated by different methods, and shame punishments create a memory that can be more harsh than the simplistic jail sentence. Public humiliation works better than traditional methods ever could. Young people are more heavily impacted by what others think of them, and after carrying out the shame punishment, young criminals turn into good citizens in fear of having to suffer the punishment again. Deep slices of shame will heal, and the scar serves as a reminder to never commit those heinous acts of crime ever again. For example, when my friend went against her curfew, her punishment was to bear the eyes of the students as she went to school everyday void of makeup and her stylish clothing for a whole month. She never disobeyed her curfew ever again. This effective method of torture persuaded her to follow the rules, and it serves as a reminder for every time she wants to stay out late. Overall, shame punishments serve as an effective measure to regenerate self awareness for the individual. Attention is drawn to a wrongdoing, and creates opportunities to form a respectful and loving environment for the person. This is an invaluable opportunity for repair, both within the person and their relationships. If you had a chance, would you choose to right your wrongs?
Punishment that makes a person feel guilty normally involves feelings of remorse for the crime committed or regret of making the bad decisions. Tangney (2001) states that “research has shown that this sense of tension and regret typically motivates reparative action…without engendering all the defensive and retaliative responses that are the hallmark of shame” (para. 11). If individuals that have committed a crime are subject to punishments that are less extensive than jail time, for example, then they may actually want to change their behavior and not make the same mistakes in the future. For example, a drunk driver might understand just how devastating accidents can be if they are forced to visit the sites of accidents and pick up the debris from the streets and surrounding area. Visiting these accident sites would open their eyes to the potential they could cause if they were to drive under the influence. Additionally, forcing those who have committed crimes to feel a sense of guilt will help an individual not feel like they are a bad person. Tangney (2001) talked about how allowing for individuals to feel guilty about their actions makes them want to work harder to improve their lifestyles so they do not repeat the crime in the future. If they know that they do not have to work on improving their whole selves, but only a behavior that they exhibit frequently, they will have the motivation to better themselves for not only their own personal growth, but for the growth of the relationships that they have with their families and
Herbert Morris and Jean Hampton both view punishment as important to a healthy society. However, their views on what kind of role does punishment plays in a healthy society are vastly different. Morris believes that when one commits a crime they “owe a debt to the society and the person they wronged” and, therefore the punishment of that person is retributive, and a right for those who committed this wrong (270). Hampton, on the other hand, believes that punishment is a good for those who have strayed in the path of being morally right. Out of the two views presented, I believe that Hampton view is more plausible, and rightly places punishment as a constructive good that is better suited for society than Morris’s view.
Ultimately, there are other punishments besides public shaming to discipline the offender. Public shaming is an ineffective way of punishment of today’s society due to the fact that guilt is more humiliating than shame. The wrongdoer will instinctively feel guilty about what they have done to receive the punishment. Shaming people publicly is also a violation of privacy and in some cases ruin lives. Instead of humiliating the individual and making them feel worthless to society, the culprit should be forced to do something that fits the crime and will make them a better person because of
In conclusion shame may not be a perfect punishment for all minor criminal offenders. But to totally exclude the idea as an effective tool for dealing with many minor crimes is a close minded approach. I believe that shame can be an effective punishment if used properly the benefits of an alternative massively outweighs the small fixable consequences that it may have.
Some crimes do not have to resort to being put in jail. This is where he the alternative come in at . Like for drunk drives, A.A, or if a person has a bad anger problem, have them go to anger management before he harms someone. Some are low enough offences that can be solved without shaming. Tapping into the feelings of individuals to behave in a more responsible manner in the future by fostering constructive behavior. Researchers have stated that “public shaming and humiliation is not the path of choice”. (June Tangney “Condemn the Crime Not the Person,” pg. 578) but it is a more affordable
Many people think that publically humiliating people will reduce the act of crimes. According to Tangney that “shamed individuals are no less likely to repeat their transgression” (Tangney 525). This shows that when a crime happen big or small saying it publically will bring more crimes, because everywhere the person goes people see him as a bad person not as a person who made a mistake. Often, it will lead to the person to actually do a crime worse than the one they have already done because they see themselves as bad people as a result of the societies view on them. Often, they will be unable to accept the fact that they have made a mistake. Because the government usually involve by giving them a punishment that only make them feel worse about themselves. Which will lead them to deny their criminal act. Because the shameful punishment the government give them will make them become “Irrationally angry withers” (Tangney 525). Therefore, is better to give criminals punishments that will make theme behave better than to shame them in front of everyone’s
Shame punishments should be implemented in the Justice system. Because we waste so many tax dollars for locking up small-time offenders, we should use shame to save money and make the system more helpful for those who are in it. Punishing by shame can be effective through many forms, such as, community service or participating in an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting to overcome drinking problems. Shame makes the punishment more personal to the offender and creates a solution that is best for society. If a graffiti painter had to clean up all of the graffiti in the city, he would be sick of it. Shame is a way we could solve the problem in the Justice system.
With incarceration costs becoming high there are new alternatives rising, one of the most popular being public shaming. Public shaming should not be considered appropriate for any offense that can result in a short jail term. Public shaming can do so much emotional damage to someone, and no one should feel such incredible humiliation or self hatred. People who endure public shaming cannot bear to live with themselves sometimes that it could lead them to do something irrational. Public shaming at times is not even a punishment for some, if someone does a crime they should also do the time. Public shaming can comes with serious consequences if given to the wrong person and if given to others it is just a slap on the wrist. Crimes should be taken seriously and so should the punishments. People should go to jail or do community service based on what they have done, they should not be let go so easily.
Punishment has been around for ages. From century to century the thoughts of punishment have changed for good and bad, but the focus of punishment has not changed. With two sides to the story one being to reform or rehabilitate and the other to be punitive and ask for a penalty in return for the wrong doing done. It is hard not to see that there is plenty of controversy revolving around the subject, punishment has with stood the test of time and with good reason. Some would say the need for punishment is obvious, but others believe it has been taken too far. I say, the glue that holds society in order is punishment. Without our government’s systematic penal code to enforce the social norms that are set in place, our neighborhoods might not be as safe. The issue with this type of mentality though, is deciding how far is too far, and how to judge properly.
Shame punishments should be implemented in the Justice system. Because we waste so many tax dollars for incarcerating small-time offenders, we should use shame to save money and make the system more helpful for those who are in it. Punishing by shame can be effective through many forms such as community service or participating in an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting to overcome drinking problems. Shame makes the punishment more personal to the offender and creates a solution that is the greatest for society. If a graffiti painter had to clean up all of the graffiti in the city, he would become sick of graffiti paintings. Shame is a resolution to the current problem in the justice system.
Shame is like a scar, eventually the pain from the initial injury will subside, but once the damage is inflicted it can’t be undone and will remain there for the rest of life for the public to see. While shame is an effective tool used to demonstrate societal values and rules, shame in today’s society is no longer effective because it has a destructive effect on human lives and it targets women.
Antecedent concepts are encounters that one detects before an idea happens (Chinn & Kramer, 2015). Consequences are a direct result or outcome of the concept (Avant & Walker, 2011).
Many people have fallen victim of shame and as our culture advances, shame adapts whether it’s spread through social media or personally. Shame is a feeling of deep humiliation because of a wrongful behavior or the public’s action of condemning an unlawful doing. When these intense emotions are not dealt with appropriately it can be unhealthy for the brains development as well as our mental health. Shame has been a part of our society for generations as a method to deter individuals from committing crimes, creating safer communities; however, the use of shame should be controlled to stop people from using humiliation as a tool to degrade others through modern communication.
The shaming of offenders has been in existence since the late 18th century. It was a form of corrections that was used to serve justice by offenders who had committed criminal acts. Offenders who had committed crimes against person or property were likely to be handed a sentence of shaming. In lieu of serving a sentence in a cell or incapacitated place, an offender could be sentenced to some degree of public punishment that would attempt to reform the offender and help him see the error of his ways. Popular methods of late 18th century shaming included "the whipping post, the pillory, stocks, branding, banishment, the dunking stool, and the use of the brank." All of these devices were used to demonstrate public shaming of the offender. Common reasons that would incorporate the use of shaming would be "blasphemy, adultery, failure to observe the Sabbath, and a general laziness." All of these punishments were used to help re-instill popular religious beliefs and bring back the good of a person into society. Lo and behold, shaming must have some positive attributes to it because it still exists in the present day. Instead of judges issuing jail/prison sentences, many offenders will receive some form of probation. Of course, this all depends on the seriousness of the crime. Judges tend to use probation on offenders in hopes of bringing them full circle from being a criminal to an integral part of society. Plus, a judge has more discretion in the use of probation as a form of corrections than with incarceration. Just as in any form of corrections, there exists four main goals that are to be achieved in some way, shape, or form. In order for the offender to feel the intended outcomes of shaming, he must experi...
On the job punishment as illustrated in this case incident is a bit over the top. However, job punishment is justified in some cases. The use of punishment would be justified in cases of deviant workplace behavior (29) as well as fraud, unethical behavior, drug use, and tardiness or absenteeism.