Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of community service as punishment
Community service as a punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Shame punishments should be implemented in the Justice system. Because we waste so many tax dollars for locking up small-time offenders, we should use shame to save money and make the system more helpful for those who are in it. Punishing by shame can be effective through many forms, such as, community service or participating in an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting to overcome drinking problems. Shame makes the punishment more personal to the offender and creates a solution that is best for society. If a graffiti painter had to clean up all of the graffiti in the city, he would be sick of it. Shame is a way we could solve the problem in the Justice system.
Jail Time vs. Shame In her essay, June Tangney explains her position on shame
…show more content…
Community service is an excellent way to teach an offender a lesson without them feeling as if they are worthless to society. Criminals do not realize how bad the crime really is until they see the consequences in their face. Drug dealers do not genuinely know how their drugs destroy multiple lives by encouraging their bad actions for their personal gain. Servicing a drug rehab center could let them know the stories of the people that he would have encouraged to get back on drugs. They would think about their past actions and regret …show more content…
People, who are humiliated through shame punishment, will act out because they do not want to be made out as a bad person. Humiliation should not be the goal of shame punishments. Guilt should be the goal to work towards. If a person is humiliated amongst their peers, they will act out by attacking people that make fun of them. What happens with humiliation is people use it to punish the person, not the action. Guilt punishes the actions and causes the individual realize that they are not bad people they did a bad action. Once the person realizes the consequences of their bad actions, they will grow as individuals and repair their
Punishment that makes a person feel guilty normally involves feelings of remorse for the crime committed or regret of making the bad decisions. Tangney (2001) states that “research has shown that this sense of tension and regret typically motivates reparative action…without engendering all the defensive and retaliative responses that are the hallmark of shame” (para. 11). If individuals that have committed a crime are subject to punishments that are less extensive than jail time, for example, then they may actually want to change their behavior and not make the same mistakes in the future. For example, a drunk driver might understand just how devastating accidents can be if they are forced to visit the sites of accidents and pick up the debris from the streets and surrounding area. Visiting these accident sites would open their eyes to the potential they could cause if they were to drive under the influence. Additionally, forcing those who have committed crimes to feel a sense of guilt will help an individual not feel like they are a bad person. Tangney (2001) talked about how allowing for individuals to feel guilty about their actions makes them want to work harder to improve their lifestyles so they do not repeat the crime in the future. If they know that they do not have to work on improving their whole selves, but only a behavior that they exhibit frequently, they will have the motivation to better themselves for not only their own personal growth, but for the growth of the relationships that they have with their families and
Law enforcement must turn their attention to the people buying the drugs. To stop drug users from using drugs is for them to seek help through rehab or other social agencies. Most drug users turn to drugs due to personal problems they are afraid to face which has negatively affected their financial means and relationship. Therefore, by sending drug users to rehab centers and not jail would encourage them deal with their underlying problems, get clean and be productive in life to overall improve their well-being. The fourth goal is to restore the quality of life in urban communities by ending street level drug dealing. To disrupt the sale of drugs being pumped into the community, law enforcement must patrol the streets of high drug-dealings to discourage the sale of drugs and target dealers in those areas. This would deter the selling of drugs in these areas, decrease drug consumption and reduce drug-related crimes. The fifth goal is to help prevent children from experimenting with drugs. Most adult drug users started exterminating with drugs in their preteen or teenager years. Teens are more prone to using drugs because they are impressionable. They want to fit into a popular group or to deal with problems at home. Children must be taught the dangers of drug use and its consequences as preventing early use of drugs may go a long way in reducing the potential of drug use and can
We need to lower the causes for crime and prevent it in the first place. We also need to decrease the punishment.
The correctional system’s two main goals in penalizing offenders are to rehabilitate and to maintain behavior (Orth 2003). Our justice system is in charge finding the offender guilty and handing down
Also placing them on probation is dangerous to others, and they can continue committing their crimes against society(Marshman,2008). In placing them back into the community, they will go back and surrender themselves with the same criminal friends they were hanging out with,doing the same things, this gives them a much higher chance of
The proliferation of harsh mandatory sentencing policies has inhibited the ability of courts to sentence offenders in a way that permits a more "problem solving" approach to crime, as we can see in the most recent community policing and drug court movements today. By eliminating any consideration of the factors contributing to crime and a range of responses, such sentencing policies fail to provide justice for all. Given the cutbacks in prison programming and rates of recidivism, in some cases over 60% or more, the increased use of incarceration in many respects represents a commitment to policies that are both ineffective and unfair. I believe in equal, fair and measured punishment for all. I don't advocate a soft, or a hard approach to punishment. But we must take a more pragmatic look at what the consequences of our actions are when we close our e...
Many people think that publically humiliating people will reduce the act of crimes. According to Tangney that “shamed individuals are no less likely to repeat their transgression” (Tangney 525). This shows that when a crime happen big or small saying it publically will bring more crimes, because everywhere the person goes people see him as a bad person not as a person who made a mistake. Often, it will lead to the person to actually do a crime worse than the one they have already done because they see themselves as bad people as a result of the societies view on them. Often, they will be unable to accept the fact that they have made a mistake. Because the government usually involve by giving them a punishment that only make them feel worse about themselves. Which will lead them to deny their criminal act. Because the shameful punishment the government give them will make them become “Irrationally angry withers” (Tangney 525). Therefore, is better to give criminals punishments that will make theme behave better than to shame them in front of everyone’s
Public humiliation supposedly enforces people’s behaviors to change but does shame really influence people to change? Most people have their different opinions on public humiliation but either way Hester is a victim of this cruel well-known Puritan punishment. On the other hand, as a result of Reverend Dimmesdale withholding his sin, a hard-hitting sickness secretly hits the reverend. The scarlet letter located on Hester’s chest is a constant reminder of her wrong decision. In the novel The Scarlet Letter, author Nathaniel Hawthorne expresses the effects of sin in many ways, including public humiliation, Hester and the scarlet letter and Dimmesdale’s sickness. Maria Stromberg, who wrote the article “Hawthorne’s Black Man: Image of Social Evil” expresses the danger of breaking laws through her writings about The Scarlet Letter. Olivia Taylor’s article “Cultural Confessions: Penance and Penitence in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter and The Marble Faun” indicates that with every sin one commits there are consequences.
Take a moment to envision all of the people with an eating disorder across the world. Additionally, consider how much shame these individuals place on themselves. According to the National Eating Disorder Association, approximately ten million women American women suffer from eating disorders (Mirasol). The majority of these individuals with an eating disorder look in the mirror every day and do not like what they see. “Patients with eating disorders determine their self-worth largely, or even solely, based on their body, and judge themselves according to their ability to control their eating, weight and shape, intensively fearing losing control over these aspects” (Matos, Marcela, et al. 39) Placing additional shame on these individuals should
Punishment has been around for ages. From century to century the thoughts of punishment have changed for good and bad, but the focus of punishment has not changed. With two sides to the story one being to reform or rehabilitate and the other to be punitive and ask for a penalty in return for the wrong doing done. It is hard not to see that there is plenty of controversy revolving around the subject, punishment has with stood the test of time and with good reason. Some would say the need for punishment is obvious, but others believe it has been taken too far. I say, the glue that holds society in order is punishment. Without our government’s systematic penal code to enforce the social norms that are set in place, our neighborhoods might not be as safe. The issue with this type of mentality though, is deciding how far is too far, and how to judge properly.
Emotional intelligence in restorative justice not only falls into a method for helping mend wounds and resolve anger and fear issues after a crime has taken place, but also to prevent it. By holding emotional power over potential offenders, the community can use these emotions to seek to restore and prevent reoffending individuals. Besides positively engaging offenders, communities that practice restorative justice can also seek to shame offenders for their acts, without blaming the offender directly for their actions. One such method of restorative justice that communities utilize is the reintegrative shaming theory. Developed by Braithwaite in 1989, the theory states that societies that aim to create shame on the act of crime will reduce crime rates (Braithwaite, 2001). The theory
This research seeks to establish whether making the penalty stiff will work in repeating repeat and future offenders. This research is tied to a larger theory that harsh punishments act as a deterrent to crime. They work by making people not commit a crime for fear of the punishment that is going to follow. This research is applicable across many facets of crimes that are rampant. It is going to help identify whether enacting stricter laws and enforcing them helps in reducing the relate...
There are many explanations for what punishment characterises. For Emile Durkheim, punishment was mainly an expression of social solidarity and not a form of crime control. Here, the offender attacks the social moral order by committing a crime and therefore, has to be punished, to show that this moral order still "works". Durkheim's theory suggests that punishment must be visible to everyone, and so expresses the outrage of all members of society against the challenge to their collective values. The form of punishment changes between mechanic (torture, execution) and organic (prison) solidarity because the values of society change but the idea behind punishing, the essence, stays the same - keeping the moral order intact not decreasing crime. Foucault has a different view of the role or function of punishment. For Foucault, punishment signifies political control. His theory compares the age of torture with the age of prison, concluding that the shift from the former to the latter is done due to changes in society and new strategies needed for the dominance of it by the rulers. Punishment for Foucault is a show of power first brutal and direct (torture), then organised and rational (prison). Punishment does not get more lenient because of humanitarian reasons but because the power relations in society change.
Sounds like a very easy and simple solution, however there is a caveat, this requires more money. In the article Making Rehabilitation Work the author tells us “Most efforts at reducing crime have therefore been directed towards incarceration, relying on its deterrent and incapacitate effects. The number of Americans in local jail or state or federal prison grew from just over 500,000 in 1980 to slightly under 2,000,000 in 2001. As a result, The Economist was able to sum up the general situation in the USA in 2002 as follows: “Rehabilitation has become something of a dirty word in American debates about crime. ... To begin with, some rehabilitation projects – particularly drug treatment – seem to work (Murray, n.d., p.6).
Punishment has been in existence since the early colonial period and has continued throughout history as a method used to deter criminals from committing criminal acts. Philosophers believe that punishment is a necessity in today’s modern society as it is a worldwide response to crime and violence. Friedrich Nietzche’s book “Punishment and Rehabilitation” reiterates that “punishment makes us into who we are; it creates in us a sense of responsibility and the ability to take and release our social obligations” (Blue, Naden, 2001). Immanuel Kant believes that if an individual commits a crime then punishment should be inflicted upon that individual for the crime committed. Cesare Beccaria, also believes that if there is a breach of the law by individuals then that individual should be punished accordingly.