The Antitrust Laws

1095 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Monopolistic affects on the economy

“The Antitrust Laws” Research Paper

There once was a time where dinosaurs roamed the earth. Some dinosaurs were stronger than others, making them the superior creatures. The Tyrannosaurus Rex is not that different from a corporate empire; both T-Rexes and monopolies ruled the land with little to no competition. They devoured the weak, crushed the opposition, and made sure they were king, but then, all of a sudden, they were extinct. The giants that once were predators became prey, whether it be a natural disaster or the Antitrust laws they no longer had control over the whole. The Antitrust laws have had a positive impact on American society through restricting monopolies; ensuring that no single business can control a market then using that power to exploit customers, protecting the public from price fixing, and producing new higher quality and innovative products through competition.

The “dinosaurs” that ruled the country at the turn of the 20th century were coming to a halt, JPMorgan, Andrew Carnegie, and Rockefeller would no longer have the grasp over the country like they once had. They all had their troubles building their massive empires, JPMorgan, Andrew Carnegie, and Rockefeller all had monopolies over one or more products, JPMorgan was a financial banker who controlled the electric, railroad and steel businesses, he acquired the steel monopoly from Andrew Carnegie, and Rockefeller controlled almost all of the oil business, producing oil products like kerosene and gasoline. The Antitrust laws would no longer allow the big businesses like theirs to grow and conquer like they did before. The lower class of the late 18th and early 19th centuries lived in filth and poverty that the monopolies had created through price fixi...

... middle of paper ...

...loit customers, protecting the public from price fixing, and producing new higher quality and innovative products through competition. Without these acts there would be more poverty than the United States would know what to do with, therefore making the acts, although created 100 years ago, still one of the most important acts of American history.

Work Cited

Letwint, William L. "Congress and the Sherman Antitrust Law: 1887-1890." Jstor: The University of Chicago Law Review. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.

Lowenstein, Roger. “When Titans Tie the Knot.” Wall Street Journal. 14 Feb. 2014: A13. eLibrary. Web. 28 Mar. 2014.

"Monopolies and Combinations in Restraint of Trade." U.S. Code Collection. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Print. 28 Mar. 2014.

"The Antitrust Laws." Protecting Americas Consumers. Federal Trade Commission, n.d. Print. 28 Mar. 2014.

Show More
Related

  • Gilded Age DBQ Essay

    547 Words  | 2 Pages

    During this era, businesses supplied large amounts of employment for citizens which created power for these businesses. They had the power to provide bad working conditions, lower wages, and fire their employees without any justification (Doc 1). George E. McNeill, a labor leader, states how “whim is law” and one can not object to it. The government took a laissez-faire approach and refused to regulate economic factors. This allowed robber barons and business tycoons to gain more authority of each industry through the means of horizontal and vertical integration. It wasn’t until later in the time period that the government passed a few acts to regulate these companies, such as the ICC and the Sherman Antitrust Act. One of the main successful industries was

    Read More

  • Comparing The Robber Barons And The Gilded Age

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan, and Vanderbilt all had something in common, they were all “Robber Barons,” whose actions would eventually lead to the corruption, greed, and economic problems of Corporate America today. During the late 19th century, these men did all they could to monopolize the railroad, petroleum, banking, and steel industries, profiting massively and gaining a lot personally, but not doing a whole lot for the common wealth. Many of the schemes and techniques that are used today to rob people of what is rightfully theirs, such as pensions, stocks, and even their jobs, were invented and used often by these four men.

    Read More

  • Post Civil War Businesses Influenced Politics and the Economy in America

    736 Words  | 2 Pages

    Corporations growing was beneficial to the economy, mainly because of the costs of different things. Indexed prices between 1870-1899 are shown in Document A. The document shows the food prices and fuel and lighting prices declined a lot. It also shows how the cost of living declined only a little not as much as the food, fuel and lighting prices. Different mining and lighting technologies led to fuel and lighting prices being reduced. Mass production in general led to cost of living prices being reduced. There was improved agricultural technology which led to food prices being reduced (as shown in Document A). The prices falling for local agricultural products worried local farmers as there wouldn’t be profit for them while there’s mass production and technology advancements. Post-civil war america was controlled by big corporations of people like Rockefeller and Carnegie. Some of these people, tried to use the changes in america to benefit the poor. Document E talks about how wealthy men should be trustees for the poor (to benefit the economy), how they should make trust funds for the “most beneficial results for the community”. in docum...

    Read More

  • Monopolies In The Gilded Age

    1325 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unfortunately, these monopolies allowed companies to raise prices without consequence, as there was no other source of product for consumers to buy for cheaper. The more competition, the more a company is forced to appeal to the consumer, but monopolies allowed corporations to treat consumers awfully and still receive their business. Trusts were bad for both the consumers and the workers, but without proper representation, they could do nothing. However, with petitions, citizens got the first anti-trust law passed by the not entirely corrupt Congress, called the Sherman Act of 1890. It prevented companies from trade cooperation of any kind, whether good or bad. Most corporate lawyers were able to find loopholes in the law, and it was largely ineffective. Over time, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and the previously passed Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which regulated railroad rates, grew more slightly effective, but it would take more to cripple powerful

    Read More

  • 19th Century's Industrialists: Robber Barons or Industrial Statesmen?

    1060 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...interpretations of their assumption of millions of dollars. Due to their appropriation of godlike fortunes, and numerous contributions to American society, they simultaneously displayed qualities of both aforementioned labels. Therefore, whether it be Vanderbilt’s greed, Rockefeller’s philanthropy, or Carnegie’s social Darwinist world view, such men were, quite unarguably, concurrently forces of immense good and evil: building up the modern American economy, through monopolistic trusts and exploitative measures, all the while developing unprecedented affluence. Simply, the captains of late 19th century industry were neither wholly “robber barons” or “industrial statesmen”, but rather both, as they proved to be indifferent to their “lesser man” in their quests for profit, while also helping to organize industry and ultimately, greatly improve modern American society.

    Read More

  • Laws for Fair, Balanced and Competitive Business Practice

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    United States has several laws that ensure that competition among businesses flow rely and new competitors get free access to the market. These laws intend to ensure fair and balanced competitive business practices. However, there are times when some businesses will do anything to gain competitive edge. USA has strong antitrust laws that prohibit fixing market price, price discrimination, conspiring boycott, monopolizing, and adopting unfair business practices. The history of Antitrust laws goes back to 1890 when Congress passed Sherman Act. In 1914, Congress passed two more acts: Federal Trade Commission Act, and Clayton Act. With some revisions, these three acts are still core antitrust acts.

    Read More

  • Gilded Age Dbq Essay

    1434 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...he government to the ordinary people as explained in July 5, 1892 by the Omaha Morning World –Herald (Doc F). Lastly, the laws for the regulation of businesses was enforces until President Theodore Roosevelt had also contributed by suing companies that violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

    Read More

  • Theodore Roosevelt, A Brief Annotated Bibliography

    544 Words  | 2 Pages

    This is a description of the Sherman Act. It gives a brief history of the Act and explains its function.

    Read More

  • Agrarian Discontent in the Late Nineteenth Century

    1288 Words  | 3 Pages

    Near the end of the nineteenth century, business began to centralize, leading to the rise of monopolies and trusts. Falling prices, along with the need for better efficiency in industry, led to the rise of companies, the Carnegie Steel and Standard Oil company being a significant one. The rise of these monopolies and trusts concerned many farmers, for they felt that the disappearance of competition would lead to abnormaly unreasonable price raises that would hurt consumers and ultimately themselves. James B. Weaver, the Populist party's presidential candidate in the 1892 election, summed up the feelings of the many American Farmers of the period in his work, A Call to Action: An Interpretation of the Great Uprising [Document F]. His interpretations of the feelings of farmers during that time were head on, but the truth is that the facts refute many of Weaver's charges against the monopolies. While it is true that many used questionable methods to achieve their monopoly, there were also other businessmen out there that were not aiming to crush out the competition. In fact, John D. Rockefeller, head of Standard Oil and a very influential and powerful man of that time, competed ardently to not crush out his competitors but to persuade then to join Standard Oil and share the business so all could profit.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Sherman Antitrust Act

    1447 Words  | 3 Pages

    When these large companies have too much power, they are able to completely run the market based on their own agendas. Should smaller companies still exist, the larger firms are able to lower prices and absorb the loss from it, where the other company would inevitably fail to compete with the low prices of the firm. Firms like Carnegie Steel and Standard Oil rightfully took advantage of the US free market at the time, but once word of their predatory practices became publically known, these companies received penalties from the federal government. In 1890, the Sherman Antitrust Act was the first mass legislation passed to address oppressive business practices and monopolies. This act was in response to the aggressive business tactics.

    Read More

  • The Great Depression

    915 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...e excessive speculation in the late 1920's kept the stock market artificially high, but inevitably led to the big crash. Overproduction may have seemed like a good idea but in the long really hurt the U.S. as the farm industry fell, workers fired, and purchasing levels across the country were at all time lows. These speculators combined with the overproduction and the maldistribution of wealth, caused the American economy to crash. Today, our government still argues over who should have the nation’s wealth and even if the wealthier should pay higher taxes then the less wealthy. Some could argue that the government should of utilized laissez faire and kept there hands off of the people’s business and let the people work things out on there own. Either way, the country did a very good job of making changes and not letting anything get as worse as it was in the 1920’s.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of the Populist and Progressive Era

    1671 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the nineteenth and twentieth century monopolizing corporations reigned over territories, natural resources, and material goods. They dominated banks, railroads, factories, mills, steel, and politics. With companies and industrial giants like Andrew Carnegies’ Steel Company, John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company and J.P. Morgan in which he reigned over banks and financing. Carnegie and Rockefeller both used vertical integration meaning they owned everything from the natural resources (mines/oil rigs), transportation of those goods (railroads), making of those goods (factories/mills), and the selling of those goods (stores). This ultimately led to monopolizing of corporations. Although provided vast amount of jobs and goods, also provided ba...

    Read More

  • Google's Antitrust Laws

    70 Words  | 1 Pages

    Not all monopolies have been owned by selfish people trying to get rich. Google was found innocent in the United States of antitrust law violations. Furthermore, Google has continues to develop innovative technologies. Throughout history in the United States people have created businesses that have propelled industry and the way of life toward the future. In the late 1800s it was kerosene and steel, today it is with innovative technologies.

    Read More

  • Antitrust Immunity

    279 Words  | 1 Pages

    I wanted to follow-up on our discussion about union decertification and antitrust suits. Please forgive me if you already are aware of this.

    Read More

  • The Impact Of Monopolies

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    Monopolies have a tendency to be bad for the economy. Granted, there are some that are a necessity of life such as natural and legal monopolies. However, the article I have chosen to review is “America’s Monopolies are Holding Back the Economy (Lynn, 2017)” and the name speaks for itself.

    Read More

More about The Antitrust Laws

Open Document