Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The airline industry overview
Us airline industry case study
Disadvantages of monopolies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The airline industry overview
For my research paper, I want to find out more about the history of monopolies, why they were created and what effects they have had on consumers. A monopoly is defined as “an absence of competition, which often results in high prices and inferior products.” How monopolies affect the market will be essential in my research paper. I want to focus on the monopolies in airlines, how larger companies such as US Airways, Delta, and United Airlines buy up smaller companies and raise the prices to benefit themselves which result in their controlling and hurting large portions of the market. I also want to research the power of monopolies and the pros and cons of having them. The reason I want to research this topic is because I want to have a better understanding of monopolies, especially in airlines. I have a limited understanding of monopolies and researching these companies should give me more insight and may take away some of my preconceived notions that monopolies have only substantial negative effects. The paper addresses the issues of hub location problems using the industrial organization framework method. A hub is an airport or city where a carrier has their major facilities and operations are being housed. A study by Akio Kawasaki, a student at M.I.T, shows that if the number of rim passengers increases the monopoly airlines will …show more content…
The book advocates that monopolies do not threaten other businesses. Instead, it forces them to be more creative and come up with new and better solutions which improves the product and marketing techniques. It creates more jobs and contributes to maximizing the human welfare over time. The book also shows that this is most effective over a long time and creates better business, we can see it in the car market, they all strive to become better and have the best solutions, the same with technology, for example, Windows versus
Unfortunately, these monopolies allowed companies to raise prices without consequence, as there was no other source of product for consumers to buy for cheaper. The more competition, the more a company is forced to appeal to the consumer, but monopolies allowed corporations to treat consumers awfully and still receive their business. Trusts were bad for both the consumers and the workers, but without proper representation, they could do nothing. However, with petitions, citizens got the first anti-trust law passed by the not entirely corrupt Congress, called the Sherman Act of 1890. It prevented companies from trade cooperation of any kind, whether good or bad. Most corporate lawyers were able to find loopholes in the law, and it was largely ineffective. Over time, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and the previously passed Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which regulated railroad rates, grew more slightly effective, but it would take more to cripple powerful
Since this debate still rages on, many people argue both sides of the story of the pros and cons. Many would argue that not breaking up monopolies actually increase the competition of companies that are attempting to break into some of the market share that the monopoly already has, more so than the free market that exists now. Proponents of the Sherman Anti-Trust act argue that “absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Martin, 1996) as originally quoted by Baron Acton. The idea that no competition within the business world establishes no risk and reward that is all part of the entrepreneur spirit of the U.S. spirit.
In the Travel Pulse article "Airlines Leaving Us Little Choice – Like A Monopoly," posted by Rich Thomaselli, the practice of monopolization is observed in the airline industry. The author criticizes large airlines on their growth that has led to at “93 of the top 100 [airports], one or two airlines controlling a majority of the seats” (Thomaselli). The scornful article was written after recent events that have caused the Department of Justice and five States to sue two of the biggest U.S.
When I researched which sectors of the economy are monopolized, I had a lot of mixed feeling about each industry. For example, I like that our health care industry is monopolized by the government because ordinary Canadians pay less for health care and prescription drugs. However, I dislike the monopoly in the telecommunications sector because of the poor customer 's service and quality of the product i.e. network throttling. Although, I believe this type of monopoly is necessar·y to more our network infrastructure forward.
Although firms in oligopolies have competitors, they do not face so much competition that they are price takers (as in perfect competition). Hence, they retain substantial control over the price they charge for their goods (characteristic of monopolies). In my discussion I will use the Australian airline industry to present how oligopolies operate, and to show the different behaviours and strategies that arise from the interdependence of firms. I will mainly concentrate on the domestic airline market in Australia. The domestic airline market consists of a duopoly of two firms, Qantas and Virgin Blue.
Many companies and individuals have committed monopolies before they were considered illegal and afterwards. A monopoly is when one person has complete control over a company and makes close to 100% of the profits. Since The Sherman Antitrust Act passed on April 8, 1890, “combination in the form of trust and otherwise, conspiracy in restraint of trade;” monopolizing an industry became outlawed. In simple terms the act prohibited any forms of monopoly in business and marketing fields. Monopolies committed before the Act, at the time, legal, but unethical, some famously known marketers like John D. Rockefeller became extremely wealthy. While others took full control of corporations after The Sherman Antitrust Act caused a firm like Microsoft
Governments regulate businesses when market failure seems to arise and occur and to control natural monopolies, control negative externalities, and to achieve social goals among other reasons. Setting government regulations on natural monopolies is important because if not regulated, then these natural monopolies could restrict output and raise prices for consumers. It is important to regulate natural monopolies because they don’t have any competition to drive down the price of the product they are selling. Therefore, with no competition, they can control the output and the price of the product at whatever they deem necessary. With regulations the government keeps it fair both for the consumer and producer. It’s also important for government
Compare to the pure competitor, the monopolist has a longer lifetime and therefore it allows the firm to have more opportunities for research and development from which the firm will reap the benefits. This might bring production cost down, lowering prices, increase production rates and raise the quality of goods (Ulbrich, 1990). The development of technological innovation will overcome technology barriers and allowing the growth of a new era of prosperity, hence fortifying why economy would benefit from monopolies that conducting research and
The oligopoly market is a few relatively large firms that have adequate to significant market power and that they recognize their interdependence. Each firm know that their choice of actions or changes in their outputs will have an effect on other firms and in response to the change, other firms will take actions accordingly to adjust therefore will affect its sales and revenue. (Thomas 428) To closely define, the oligopoly characteristics consist of (a) a few large dominant firms; (b) a product or services either standardized or differentiated; (c) firm’s decision on price and output affect the demand and marginal revenue of other firms in the market and vice versa; and (d) the entry barriers to become a dominant firm consist of substantial involvement of technology and economical terms. With these characteristics, there are usually as few as two and as many as ten firms that make up large market shares in any one particular industry.
Before we discuss government intervention and its affect on an industry’s competition we must first seek to understand the five forces framework. The theory, discussed in 1979 by Micheal Porter seeks to evaluate the attractiveness of an industry. Throughout this essay I will explore the theory and then relate government action and its well-documented affects on the airline industry.
With only a few large companies across the globe (Boeing, MD, and Airbus), the commercial aircraft industry essentially exhibits the qualities of an oligopolistic competition with intense rivalry. Here is an analysis of competition in the commercial aircraft business using Porter’s Five Forces.
Monopolies are when there is only one provider of a specific good, which has no alternatives. Monopolies can be either natural or artificial. Some of the natural monopolies a town will see are business such as utilities or for cities like Clarksville with only one, hospitals. With only one hospital and there not being another one for a two hour drive, Clarksville’s hospital has a monopoly on emergency care, because there is not another option for this type of service in the area. Artificial monopolies are created using a variety of means from allowing others to enter the market. Artificial monopolies are generally rare or absent because of anti-trust laws that were designed to prevent this in legitimate businesses. However, while these two are the ends of the spectrum, the majority of businesses wil...
Firms with market power or monopolies are often seen as detrimental for customers and economic welfare. According to the neoclassical theory, the market power of monopolies and oligopolies is potentially higher than that of firms in monopolistic or perfect competition since they have to face very limited competition, if any (Ferguson and Ferguson 1994). In monopolistic or perfect competition can make supernormal profits in the short term but eventually other firms will enter the market and offer alternative products that reduce the demand for the established firm’s products (Sloman et al., 2013 p. 177). Dissimilarly, this is not the case for dominant firms or monopolies; the lack of competition allows them to set prices and make supernormal profits increasing the perception that big companies are “bad” for consumers. As shown by the graphs in Figure 1 and 2, there are substantial differences in the competitive and monopoly markets. In a competitive environment, the equilibrium is reached where demand meets supply. In a monopolistic market, thanks to the establishment of higher prices and the production of lower quantities, monopolies or dominant firms make supernormal profits; additionally, there is a deadweight loss and some consumers who were willing to pay lower prices wil...
There are three main features that distinguish between a perfect competition and monopoly market structure: the type of firm, the freedom of entry and the nature of the product (Sloman and Norris 1999, pg, 161). A table of these features is contained in Appendix A. These two market structures are on opposite ends of the scale and consequently, the features and benefits of each structure vary quite dramatically.
A monopoly is “a single firm in control of both industry output and price” (Review of Market Structure, n.d.). It has a high entry and exit barrier and a perceived heterogeneous product. The firm is the sole provider of the product, substitutes for the product are limited, and high barriers are used to dissuade competitors and leads to a single firm being able to ...