Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexual awakenings in literature
Sexuality and literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexual awakenings in literature
Tom Stoppard, in his hit play, Arcadia, utilizes many different themes to show how time affects the understanding of history; none of these themes have a greater impact than that of sex, or “carnal embrace”(1). Arcadia is built on a foundation of love and lust; characters from two different eras, the Regency era and the modern age, show parallels in their desires. “Carnal embrace” is inherent to Arcadia and this is shown when looking at sex’s effect through the lense of determinism. This theory of inevitability states that all things in life can be reduced into a formula that would be able to predict the future. Determinism is incessantly discussed in Arcadia and is even invented by Thomasina, a young girl from the Regency era who shows flashes …show more content…
of brilliance, when she says, If you could stop every atom in its position and direction, and if your mind could comprehend all the actions thus suspended, then if you were really, really good at algebra you could write the formula for all the future; and although nobody can be so clever as to do it, the formula must exist just as if one could (1).
Thomasina’s discovery lives the test of time and is scrutinized by a modern character, Chloe, “[The formula] doesn’t work...because of sex. The only thing going wrong is people fancying people who aren’t supposed to be in that part of the plan” (73). Sex stifles the formula which consequently ruins the inevitability of the future and makes the past nearly impossible to decode. Chloe’s theory of love and lust being being the reason life has no calculated formula is spot on and it is shown throughout Arcadia.
The constant infatuation with sex is not confined to the modern era; in fact, the regent characters of Arcadia are much more liberal with their desires than the modern characters. These characters of the past, although way more eloquent in their confessions of lust, all have the same animalistic intentions at heart. These impulses of desire caused major rifts and plot points in the lives of these characters. One character that proved Chloe’s theory was Thomasina, the inventor of the theory of determinism. This thirteen year-old student showed the progression of how love takes a hold of a person and throws their life in an unpredictable direction. Thomasina began ignorant to the effect of love and even scrutinized humans for being too wrapped up in love; when talking about Cleopatra, she
says, Everything is turned to love with her. New love, absent love, lost love – I never knew a heroine that makes such noodles of our sex. It only needs a Roman general to drop anchor outside the window and away goes the empire like a christening mug into a pawn shop. If Queen Elizabeth had been a Ptolemy history would have been quite different – we would be admiring the pyramids of Rome and the great Sphinx of Verona (38). Thomasina conveys her misgivings about love and lust by calling out a historical figure on such unnecessary emotions. Thomasina even shows through this quote the issue of how history could have been changed with the influence of sex; with the wind pushing ships to and from different nations, the entire course of history could have been changed by randomness through the vehicle of sex and love. Thomasina is aware of the effect sex has on society and history yet she does not translate it to her own life. Soon though, sex would leak into her brain and her curiosity towards love would show itself. Thomasina speaks the very first line in the play with curiosity towards sex; “Septimus, what is carnal embrace” (1). Thomasina is curious about the frequently talked about subject and seeks an answer from her tutor Septimus. Septimus, although prolonging the answer with manipulative banter, tells her what it is and she responds that the act is “disgusting and incomprehensible” (3). This is very contrary to her beliefs three years later where she is seeking a different type of perspective on sex from Septimus. Thomasina becomes obsessed with her education in romantic things like being able to waltz and to kiss and Septimus, being her tutor, is the primary source of all education. In the final moments of Arcadia, Thomasina convinces Septimus to waltz with her and they share kisses; then she invites him up to her room but he refuses. Septimus: Be careful with your flame. Thomasina: I will wait for you to come. S: I cannot. T: You must. S: I will not. Thomasina would die that night, hindering any love from coming to fruition, but this shows the effect love has on humans, whether they want it or not. Thomasina began ignorant to the influence love would have on her life but it was inevitable. She encounters first-hand how determinism is flawed due to the innate desires of adults. Thomasina’s progression towards loving shows why Hannah, Valentine, and Bernard struggle so greatly to decode the past. Without the influence of sex, life would be so easy to predict because humans would act in robotic ways that could be calculated, but since love is an emotion that can not be turned off or on, some actions are out of the hands of the characters. Bernard tries to understand the past through assumptions that have no root in reality and makes a theory that involves characters who actually have very minor roles in the real history; Bernard’s theory did not feature Thomasina and barely acknowledged Septimus yet they seem to play the most pivotal role in the real history of Sidley Park. Determinism for the future and the hindsight into the distant past go hand-in-hand in that their shortcomings are rooted in the neglect of human emotion. Another character that had his entire life affected by his desires was Septimus, the tutor to Thomasina. Septimus was romantically involved with several women over the course of the play and his infatuations got him into squabbles. The greatest of all the squabbles was when he briefly fell in love with another man’s wife, Mrs. Chater. Septimus’ intentions came to fruition in a gazebo in Sidley Park and he was soon caught and challenged by Mr. Chater: Chater: You insulted my wife in the gazebo yesterday evening! Septimus: You are mistaken. I made love to your wife in the gazebo. This duel never truly happened but caused characters to leave the estate, changing any predictable outcome. This duel from Mr. Chater was inevitable because of his undeterred love towards his wife. He is not the only man that has found love in his wife though; Captain Brice also has fallen deeply in love with Mrs. Chater. An owner of the estate, Lady Croom, also gained the affection of Septimus during the play and she speaks on Captain Brice’s obsession with Mrs. Chater when she says, “It is a defect of God's humour that he directs our hearts everywhere but to those who have a right to them” (71). Lady Croom sees the randomness of love and knows that although some variables undoubtedly are suited towards the equation of life, human emotions trump reason. She goes further when she says that although Captain Brice is aware of Mrs. Chater’s fluidity in changing her partner, he can not be deterred; “Captain Brice is not deceived but cannot help himself. He would die for her” (72). Lady Croom shows Septimus the extent that love will drive someone from reasonable thought through Captain Brice’s predicament. Septimus does not enjoy love at all but rather enjoys sex but this is simply because he had not experienced love until it was too late. At the beginning of the play, when Thomasina asks Septimus if sex is love, he states, “Oh no, it is much nicer than that” (4). This mindset changes though as he becomes very affectionate towards his pupil, Thomasina. Thomasina and Septimus share their waltzing moment at the end of the play but much more is revealed to the viewer through Hannah’s pursuit in finding out who the hermit of Sidley Park is. Septimus, following the death of his pupil and source of his affection, had no reason to go anywhere without Thomasina so he stayed in Sidley Park. Hannah discovers this mutual attraction of Septimus and Thomasina through evidence, such as Thomasina’s drawing of her tutor with Plautus, the turtle. Septimus had great plans to leave Sidley Park and these were discussed at great lengths but when his love fell upon Thomasina, he became rooted in Sidley Park when she died.
There is a destructive nature of man is shown in Daniel Keyes’ Flowers for Algernon through the absence of family. Sci...
Paula Vogel’s play, How I Learned to Drive, artistically tackles the disturbing issue of incestual pedophilia. The play’s protagonist Li’l Bit narrates the action as she goes through her memory of specific events. Much like stream of consciousness, her narration does not lead chronologically to scenes in her past. Rather it jumps back and forth between the present and different points in her life. She tells of her memories of youth and her sexual and emotional relationship with her Uncle Peck. Rather than simply telling about her experiences, though, Li’l Bit shares her memories through vignettes which show the audience her role in the affair within the context of learning to drive (Greene 425).
The time is the sixth century, the place is Rome and the person is Lucretia, a woman who contributed to one of the biggest parts of Roman history: the creation of the Roman republic. The rape of the virtuous Lucretia by Sextus Tarquinius, the son of Tarquinius Superbus' (an Etruscan king) was the final straw for the Roman people and pushed them to want to change from a monarchy to a republic. From the accounts of the rape of Lucretia from ancient historians like Livy, Cicero and Dionysius, it is clear that Lucretias rape not only spurred the roman people to want to get rid of the Etruscan King and his family, but also revealed the important role of virtue in women in roman society.
In “‘A Language Which Nobody Understood’: Emancipatory Strategies in The Awakening,” Patricia Yaeger questions the feminist assumption that Edna Pontellier’s adulterous behavior represent a radical challenge to patriarchal values. Using a deconstructionist method, Yaeger argues that in the novel adultery functions not as a disrupting agent of, but, rather, as a counterweight to the institution of marriage, reinforcing the very idea it purports to subvert by framing female desire within “an elaborate code [of moral conduct] that has already been negotiated by her society.” A reading of The Awakening that can envision only two possible outcomes for its heroine – acquiescence to her role as good wife/mother or “liberation” from the marriage sphere through extramarital passion – suffers from the same suffocating lack of imagination that characterizes the most conventional romance tale. Thus, Yaeger contends, Edna Pontellier’s extramarital dalliances with Alcée Alobin and Robert Lebrun are hardly “emancipatory” or “subversive” as critics such as Tony Tanner would see them.
Beatrice's refusal to be controlled by men and Hero's subservience carries echoes of modern-day feminism. Comparing this novel to a contemporary society, women have made a substantial amount of progress in terms of gender roles. It is women like Beatrice, and the many others that choose to defy the expectations that are placed upon us by society, that help us progress to a more utopian civilization. This novel can be read by future generations to reflect back on how much we have changed and how much we have progressed, not only as women, but as humans in general. Additionally, this play also serves as one of the world's greatest odes to the single life known to man.
The title page offers an immediate insight into the patriarchal constraints placed on women in early modern England. Although The Tragedy of Mariam is the first known English play to be authored by a woman, the fact that Cary is unable to give her full name is indicative of the limitations on women writers of the period. This semi-anonymous authorship...
Love that is filled with hatred and other powerful mixed emotion coincides in the theme of both Sylvia Plath’s, “Mad Girl’s Love Song”, and, “Hate Poem” by Julie Sheehan. Plath’s title a “Mad Girl’s Love Song” hints that the work is about an angry adolescent girl who is heartbroken. The title’s message entails feelings enraged with vengeance, remorse, and, hatred after a heart retching break up. As the poem story unfolds, a woman’s immense pain surfaces. The subject of the poem expresses a specific event, “I shut my eyes and all the world drops dead. / I dreamed that you bewitched me into bed/ And sung me moon-struck, kissed me quite insane” (Plath). The first line of the quote builds towards the impending outcome that would forever change her personal outlook of life, “I dreamed that you bewitched me into bed”; the loss of virginity. Regardless woman or man, an individual’s virginity is a precious and valuable aspect of human life. From this passage, the reader can assume that Plath was tricked, as clued by the word “bewitched”, in giving her innocence to an undeserving man. Feeling broken and unfaithful she wishes, “I should have loved a thunderbird instead; / At least when the
Romeo and Juliet is probably one of the most famous plays in history. It has been translated in almost every of the common languages in the world. Many people have analyzed this piece of art and concluded that one of the main themes is love. This story of forbidden love has been an example and a great influence for future literary works. There has been cases where people’s relationships connect to the lover’s tale. Huxley understands the influence created by these plays, and has reflected his feelings about Shakespearean love in his book Brave New World. He demonstrates in his book that no connection between individuals changes the way you think, yet when there is a feeling of passion your personality can also change.
The idea of sexuality as constructed by Ancient Romans is wholly complex as was most of Roman society. An interesting way to look at Roman sexuality is through the lens of Roman society. Ancient Roman sexuality was not uniform throughout society and different societal classes created different types of sexualities. Three authors examine sexuality from three different social realms, the realm of the prostitute, the realm of Roman patricians in terms of contraception, and the realm of Vestal Virgins. Prostitutes in Rebecca Flemming's article, "Quae Corpore Quaestum Facit: The Sexual Economy of Female Prostitution in the Roman Empire" are a representation of lower class sexuality. Mary Beard's article, "The Sexual Status of Vestal Virgins" examines a form of deviant sexuality based around religious values. Lastly, Keith Hopkins' article," Contraception in the Roman Empire" examines the sexual practices of upper class Romans using contraception and abortifacents, vital conclusions about Ancient Roman society and sexuality can be determined.
In 1979, Caryl Churchill wrote a feminist play entitled Cloud Nine. It was the result of a workshop for the Joint Stock Theatre Group and was intended to be about sexual politics. Within the writing she included a myriad of different themes ranging from homosexuality and homophobia to female objectification and oppression. “Churchill clearly intended to raise questions of gender, sexual orientation, and race as ideological issues; she accomplished this largely by cross-dressing and role-doubling the actors, thereby alienating them from the characters they play.” (Worthen, 807) The play takes part in two acts; in the first we see Clive, his family, friends, and servants in a Victorian British Colony in Africa; the second act takes place in 1979 London, but only twenty-five years have passed for the family. The choice to contrast the Victorian and Modern era becomes vitally important when analyzing this text from a materialist feminist view; materialist feminism relies heavily on history. Cloud Nine is a materialist feminist play; within it one can find examples that support all the tenets of materialist feminism as outlined in the Feminism handout (Bryant-Bertail, 1).
In the plays female sexuality is not expressed variously through courtship, pregnancy, childbearing, and remarriage, as it is in the period. Instead it is narrowly defined and contained by the conventions of Petrarchan love and cuckoldry. The first idealizes women as a catalyst to male virtue, insisting on their absolute purity. The second fears and mistrusts them for their (usually fantasized) infidelity, an infidelity that requires their actual or temporary elimination from the world of men, which then re-forms [sic] itself around the certainty of men’s shared victimization (Neely 127).
In literature, both new and old, one of the most popular themes is love. Many novels, poems, and short stories explore this theme in every imaginable way. Henry James’s Washington Square and Steve Martin’s Shopgirl are worthy additions to this timeless tradition. The twist for these two novels is that both heroine’s, Catherine in Washington Square and Mirabelle in Shopgirl, fall for men that do not love them in return. At least the ladies’ love is not returned in the manner they expect. The novels were written more than a century apart. Thus the dialogue, settings, and characters are different, but the central theme of unrequited love is present in both novels.
Given the tragic outcomes of certain female characters (i.e., Desdemona and Juliet), sexuality must be promptly considered. Desdemona’s “jeopardized” fidelity ignites Othello’s murdering hands. Her sexuality controls him. In the same way, it might be argued that severe sexuality is the compulsion of Romeo and Juliet. Considering the brevity of their relationship, which implies the absence of shared memories and the absence of mutual and intimate knowledge, one may deduce that all they really can share is bodies. And it may be precisely their bodies that drive the entire relationship and tragedy. In Woman’s Part, Paula S. Berggren r...
Works of Literature that I have studied in depth and others that I am acquainted with have challenged me significantly, for they have made me question that which I already seem to know. Often, society bears witness to a few significant individuals who are able to impact it to the extent that they are able to reconstruct and divert the course of history. Such individuals are who we call ‘genius’.
Amidst war, censorship, and persecution, D.H. Lawrence channeled his resulting emotions into his writing and emerged a visionary author. Wholly misplaced with regards to the century in which it was constructed and gifted to the populace, Lawrence’s Women in Love was met with criticism for its sexual implications. However, with proper deconstruction of the novel and psychoanalysis of the principal characters, it is apparent that Lawrence’s genuine intention in his creation of Women in Love was to set concepts of new complex philosophies concerning the rituals of marriage, definitions of love, rapidly increasing modernization, and the negative effects of excessive industrialization within the minds of his audiences.