Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frederick douglass slaveholders
Abolitionism essay
Frederick douglass + slaveholder
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The mid-19th century was a turbulent time in American history. The United States dealt with an issue that’s wake is still noticeable today. The issue of slavery was so controversial at the time that it made people question the documents that defined our country. On one side, the South believed that slavery was a necessary institution, and the North opposed this, believing the institution of slavery was inhumane and pushed for abolishment. Abraham Lincoln, William Lloyd Garrison, and Fredrick Douglas offered three distinct views on the side of ending slavery. While all three were in opposition of slavery, each held different motives and reasoning behind their view.
Of the three views, Garrison held the most radical stance on the issue of slavery.
…show more content…
Douglass, who was born a slave, became a well-known figure in America during the abolitionist movement. After escaping from slavery in 1838, Douglass was one of the most famous orators and black men in America just a decade later. In the early stages of the abolitionist movement, Douglass identified closely with fellow abolitionist William Lloyd-Garrison. Both held that the Constitution was a pro-slavery document due to the compromises that allowed for the continuation of slavery and not blocking its spread. Douglass and Garrison produced around 40 anti-Union speeches in 1847. In 1853, in honor of the Fourth of July, a group, consisting of mostly white members, chose Douglass to present a speech. Douglass seized the opportunity to project his stance on the issue of slavery. In his speech, Douglass uses powerful rhetoric to describe injustices a black man or slave endures. He expounds upon how American ideals such as freedom and liberty are an offense to African Americans due to their lack of freedom and liberty. Douglass essentially exposed the hypocritical celebration of these freedoms by Americans, considering a large portion of the population were in bondage. This type of bitterness toward slavery is something both Douglass and Garrison possessed. However, Douglass eventually swayed his view from Garrison regarding the Constitution. With …show more content…
Unfortunately, the conflict resulted in the bloodiest war in American history. It is difficult to know for certain if another approach could have generated the same result without violence. For example, if emancipation of slaves somehow occurred before the South’s succession, the South would have revolted in some way. However, one could speculate on alternative philosophies. The main separation between Lincoln and abolitionists like Douglass and Garrison, is that abolitionists knew they wanted slaves emancipated and instituted as equal citizens right away, while Lincoln was not positive that was the direction he wanted to go. There was still immense friction between African-Americans and whites who opposed slavery. It is unclear whether the same support would have accumulated if a more radical view of abolition took lead. One could offer that the North should have followed an idea like Garrison by allowing the South to succeed, expecting them to become vulnerable due to dependency on one major source of economic income, and then taking over the weakened Confederacy ultimately freeing the enslaved. The issues with this view are the time and social repercussions. It could have taken years for this to take place, and in essentially strangling the South’s economy, the quality of life for the slaves and southerners would have decreased mightily.
In Ira Berlin's, ““I will be heard!”: William Loyd Garrison and the Struggle Against Slavery,” we learn of the inspiration and backlash generated from the publication of Garrison's, The Liberator. Although Garrison's homeland, New England, was already familiar with anti-slavery sentiment, Garrison's publication ignited much anger amongst his supposedly progressive neighbors. In large part, the negative reaction of the north, was due to the humanity in which Garrison asked America to show the black population. Not only did he call for the immediate emancipation of slaves, he denounced the cultural atmosphere of the entire nation in regards to blacks. Berlin states, “Whatever white Americans thought of slavery in principle, they had no desire
After suffering the overwhelming ferociousness and inhumanity of being a slave for over two decades , a black man by the name of Fredrick Douglass fled from enslavement and began to make a concerted effort to advance himself as a human being. Combating many obstacles and resisting numerous temptations, Douglass worked assiduously to develop into a knowledgeable gentleman rather than the involuntary alternative of being an unenlightened slave. In doing so, Douglass successfully immerged as one of the Civil War era’s most prominent antislavery orators. From his first major public speech at the age of 23, Douglass became widely renowned as a premier spokesperson for Black slaves and the movement for the abolition of slavery. In one of Douglass’ most distinguished speeches, “The Meaning of July 4th for the Negro,” he uses the intermittent occasion of speaking on behalf of African Americans to a multitude of White Americans to outline arguments against slavery. In that very speech, Douglass made it clear that, like countless African Americans during this time period,
Frederick Douglass made the most of his years after escaping from slavery in 1852. Douglass spread his words against slavery through being a well-known writer. Douglass was one of the most prominent reform leaders of his era (Foner, 481). A popular document written by Frederick Douglass on July 5th, 1852, spread some powerful words among the nation. Douglass’s speech was titled “What to the slave is the Fourth of July”. When his speech was published, his intended audience was his “fellow citizens” and those unaware that the Fourth of July was a day of mourning for slaves; unlike white Americans celebrating the day of freedom. The reason Douglass’s speech was published was to bring attention to the separation on the Fourth of July between white and black Americans. Even though Frederick Douglass was free he could not celebrate but mourn the day for horror of the past and presence of slave cruelty.
Abraham Lincoln’s original views on slavery were formed through the way he was raised and the American customs of the period. Throughout Lincoln’s influential years, slavery was a recognized and a legal institution in the United States of America. Even though Lincoln began his career by declaring that he was “anti-slavery,” he was not likely to agree to instant emancipation. However, although Lincoln did not begin as a radical anti-slavery Republican, he eventually issued his Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves and in his last speech, even recommended extending voting to blacks. Although Lincoln’s feeling about blacks and slavery was quite constant over time, the evidence found between his debate with Stephen A. Douglas and his Gettysburg Address, proves that his political position and actions towards slavery have changed profoundly.
Born into slavery and fathered by an unknown white man, “Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey” was born in Maryland around 1818. He was raised by his grandparents and with an Aunt, having seen his mother only a handful of times before she died. It was during this time that he witnessed firsthand the cruelty of the institution of slavery: lashings, exposure to the elements and hunger. When he was eight years old he left for Baltimore, and it was there that his master’s sympathetic wife taught him to read and write. When he recounted the move later in his life he said, “Going to live at Baltimore, laid the foundation, and opened the gateway, to all my subsequent prosperity.” Typically slaveholders would prevent slaves from becoming literate. And Douglass’ master would often punish his wife for teaching the slaves the alphabet because he would make them disobedient. Slavery means you are to remain ignorant but freedom means that you were enlightened. He would struggle, but he knew that knowledge was more than power, it was freedom. After he escaped slavery September 3, 1838 and fled to New York, he joined various abolitionist groups and in 1841 he met the white abolitionist leader William Lloyd Garrison, who went on to become his mentor. Despite many apprehensions that releasing his story would endanger his life as a free man, Douglass published his autobiography, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written By Himself in 1845. After becoming more independent from Garrison, he spoke against his belief that the Constitution was pro-slavery, and argued that it may “be wielded in behalf of emancipation,” where the federal government had exclusive jurisdiction. Douglass d...
After the American Revolution, slavery began to decrease in the North, just as it was becoming more popular in the South. By the turn of the century, seven of the most Northern states had abolished slavery. During this time, a surge of democratic reform swept the North to the West, and there were demands for political equality, economic and social advances for all Americans. Northerners said that slavery revoked the human right of being a free person and when new territories became available i...
James Oakes’ The Radical and the Republican narrated the relationship between two of America’s greatest leaders: Frederick Douglass, the “radical” abolitionist, and Abraham Lincoln, the “Republican” politician. He did an astonishing job of demonstrating the commonalities between the views of Douglass and Lincoln, but also their differences on their stance of anti-slavery politics and abolitionism. Despite being on the same side of the argument of slavery, Douglass and Lincoln went about their opinions separately. Lincoln held a more patient and orthodox stance on anti-slavery, while Douglass was proven to be obstinate and direct with
The movement against slavery had begun before the mid-nineteenth century; it was not new to anyone. However during the mid-nineteenth century the movements against slavery increased and gained more force. These movements were centered specifically towards the slavery system in the South. Before the 1830’s there were antislavery movements; after the 1830’s, abolitionist movements began. Despite the fact that both were against the same issue, both had different impacts on the nation. One was more peaceful, the other was considered fanatical and dangerous because of those who supported it.
His main argument in the speech is that it 's unjust and hypocritical for a country to celebrate its freedom while it still has slaves. Now that in itself is a morally viable argument, and it has never been more relevant than today in our racially hate fueled world where every situation is turned into a hate crime. However, back in those days majority of slaves were sold into slavery by their own people. Most slaves were sold by rival tribes as prisoners of war, or trouble makers of the tribe, thus giving us the “bottom of the barrel” of the groups. Another counter to Douglass was that even though slaves were people, they were still considered property. A hard working farmer could have used his last penny in order to purchase that slave because he was unable to tend his farm and provide for his family. One common misconception was that all slaves were beaten and treated lower than swine, while to the contrary some were treated well being given a bed and meals every day in exchange for their hard work. While Douglass may have had a bad time under the ownership of Auld, most northern states did not treat their slaves in this manner. This is one of the main reasons Douglass learned how to read, yet no credit is given to his former owner. Most slaves developed a relationship with their owners, in which their owners taught them useful skills such as reading, writing, simple math and farming skills. Another argument brought into Douglass’ speech was that most churches were segregated, and in turn perpetuated the racism that helped keep slavery alive in well. He proposed that a God that wouldn’t allow such evil and disservice in this world would contradict everything the bible proposes and teaches. He praises the writers of the constitution, considering them his equal and thanking the signers of the Declaration of Independence, calling
Frederick Douglass's Narrative, first published in 1845, is an enlightening and incendiary text. Born into slavery, Douglass became the preeminent spokesman for his people during his life; his narrative is an unparalleled account of the inhumane effects of slavery and Douglass's own triumph over it. His use of vivid language depicts violence against slaves, his personal insights into the dynamics between slaves and slaveholders, and his naming of specific persons and places made his book an indictment against a society that continued to accept slavery as a social and economic institution. Like Douglass, Harriet Jacobs was born into slavery, and in 1853 she published Letter from a Fugitive Slave, now recognized as one of the most comprehensive antebellum slave narratives written by an African-American woman. Jacobs's account broke the silence on the exploitation of African American female slaves.
Frederick Douglass's "Fourth of July" Speech is the most famous speech delivered by the abolitionist and civil rights advocate Frederick Douglass. It attracted a crowd of between five hundred and six hundred. Douglass’s speech to the slaves on the Fourth of July served to show the slaves that there is nothing for them to celebrate. They were not free and the independence that the rest of the country celebrated did not apply to them.
In his speech, Frederick Douglass made it clear that he believed that the continued toleration and support of slavery from both a religious and legal standpoint was utterly absurd when considering the ideals and principles advocated by America’s forefathers. He began by praising the American framers of the Constitution, an...
Slavery was the core of the North and South’s conflict. Slavery has existed in the New World since the seventeenth century prior to it being exclusive to race. During those times there were few social and political concerns about slavery. Initially, slaves were considered indentured servants who will eventually be set free after paying their debt(s) to the owner. In some cases, the owners were African with white servants. However, over time the slavery became exclusive to Africans and was no limited to a specific timeframe, but life. In addition, the treatment of slaves worsens from the Atlantic Slave trade to th...
Also known as the Second Great Awakening, the Abolitionist Movement swept through the colonies in the early 1830’s. This was a movement to abolish slavery and to give blacks their freedom as citizens. Many men and women, free and enslaved, fought for this cause and many were imprisoned or even killed for speaking out. If it were not for these brave people, slavery would still exist today. The Abolitionist Movement paved the way in eradicating slavery by pursuing moral and political avenues, providing the foundation for the Underground Railroad, and creating a voice for African Americans.
Frederick Douglas speech, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July,” was one of the most memorable and moving speeches of the Douglass’s career. On July 5, 1852, Douglass was invited to Rochester, New York to speak on behalf of the African American community on their thoughts of the fourth of July. Independence Day was supposed to be a celebration of freedom for the United States but, as the speech detailed, this day was and still is a mockery to the slave or African American citizen. When Frederick Douglas spoke on behalf of the slave on that memorable day, he really explained the condition on the African Americans during those times, which still holds true throughout society today.