Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assignment on organizational development
The field of organizational development
16 personality test
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Assignment on organizational development
1. INTRODUCTION More and more organisations are using competencies and competency structures to identify, develop and reinforce certain types of behaviour that are prerequisites in achieving organisational success. Selection is a critical human resource management practice in organisations in order to have the right fit. (Moyo & Theron, 2011). According to Cattell (1946), the Fifteen Factor Questionnaire Plus (15FQ+) was developed as an alternative to the 16 Personality Factor series of test, measuring personality and individual differences. Psytech (1992) first published the 15FQ of which the FQ15+ represents an update and revision. The 15FQ+ has kept the authenticity of the FQ15, measuring fifteen of the fundamental personality factors …show more content…
Items have been written in simple, clear and concise business English (European). The questionnaire have been designed to be brief – comprising of items per scale. Items have been selected to maximise reliability, while maintaining the breadth of the original personality factors. The questionnaire is available for both pencil and paper and computer (including online) administration. Moreover, for the pencil and paper version of the questionnaire, self-scoring answer sheets and computer readable answer sheets are available. A short form of the test, comprising just six items per scale, is also available. The short form of the 15FQ+ has been developed for those situations where rapid test administration is more important that high reliability and validity.” …show more content…
Reliability of a test measure the stability of the test’s scores over a period of time or internal consistency of the test’s items. (Psychtech International). According to Tyler (2003), the Fifteen Questionnaire Plus have been used on various samples and it has confirmed good levels of internal consistency when the length of the scales are taken into account. Tyler (2003) further states that Psytech South Africa made evidence available on their website of internal consistency reliability. It is assumed that the 15FQ+ is a reliable measure of personality in South Africa, even though the alpha levels are usually lower than in UK samples, however, in comparison to those obtained in South Africa it is favourable from other measures of personality. Psytech South Africa is conscious that literacy and education levels is a challenge and does put constraints on the test’s use and interpretation, therefore, it does not endorse using the 15FQ+ for broad entry level screening outside the United Kingdom. (Tyler
With the exception of the MF scale that is part of the four factor model, the remaining three which are General Maladjustment, Social Introversion and Over-Control, relevantly address the behavioral problems exhibited by Jane. Hence, it is imperative that the racial disparity of the MF scale be considered from a cultural perspective because studies have shown that there is a tendency of non-Whites scoring higher than other races (Gass & Odland, 2014). Ideally, the variations in cultural values must be considered when applying the test on Whites and non-Whites since the differences reflect socio-economic factors rather than racial differences. The use of personality tests helps both teachers and parents in creating stronger and richer relationships with students more quickly by providing more insight into who they are and what their interests are (Pittenger, 2005). Head-to-head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions.
Understanding why people do what they do has baffled people for centuries. The Myers-Briggs Personality test has answer a few of these questions. Are you an Extrovert or an Introvert, Sensor or iNtuitive, a Thinker or a Feeler, a Judger or Perceiver? Once you have the tools to understand yourself, you are capable of understanding others. How does your personality complement a coworker, a family member? How can I be more understanding based on my knowledge of how a coworker comes to conclusions about life and their surroundings? Needs work
D.P. (1992). The Five Factor Model in Personality: a Critical Appraisal: Journal of personality. USA: Duke University P. PERVIN. A.L. & CERVONE. D. & OLIVER.
The bases of this paper will be based on the results that I had obtained when I took the Myers-Briggs personality test. The results that I had obtained was that I was determined to be an ENFJ. I will go into depth about letter and how each represents that a specific aspect of my personality. The results that I had received were not what I had expected, but the more I read about the trait the more I realized how it suited me. I will also talk about the information that I had found useful from the book, Type Talk at Work: How the 16 Personalities Types Determine Your Success on the Job by Otto Kroeger, which gave me insight on how to interact with other personality types especially in the work environment. The information that I absorbed from the personality test and from the book will go into use in my personal and work life so that both environments will be cohesive and peaceful.
These scales are commonly alternatively represented by the OCEAN acronym Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion/Introversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism. The Big Five structure captures, at a broad level of abstraction, commonalities among most of the existing systems of personality description, and provides an integrative descriptive model for personality research. (Oliver& Sanjay 1999)
Utility of assessment. Why are these types of personality assessments useful? Did you find the results useful? Why or why not?
five factor theory is a fairly recent proposal and has its basis in earlier work,
In the field of psychology, personality refers to the unique characteristics and behavior patterns that distinguish one individual from another. Personality can be a complex spectrum to evaluate. Personality of is not always stable and may change over time for different reasons such as shocking events, education, and environment to name a few. The study and assessment of personality has been used to describe and discover from severe mental disorders to assist self-awareness. Personality inventories are a method to assess personality traits. These evaluation methods arose from the need to understand and treat the effects of war on soldiers’ personality. Personality inventories have evolved over time and today are used in several fields: education, research, clinical, counseling, and industrial / organizational. This paper aims to explore and offer details of one of these personality inventories: The Sixteen Personality Factors Questionnaire (16PF).
Later research attempted to reduce Cattell’s sixteen “source traits” to five universal personality dimensions resulting in what is now known as “The Big Five Personality Factors.” (Costa & McCrae, 2006; Noftle & Fleeson, 2010)
The first criticism is that it views personality as a universal biological construct existing throughout the ages, as something that is unaffected by culture. “In five factor-theory, the biological and psychological measures associated with the trait structures are unspecified” (Cervone & Pervin, 2013, p. 277). Personality could be a function of biology, culture or epigenetics (the ways in which genes are influenced by the environment). This means there is an open question of how much personality can change or how much it is affected by the environment based upon the way that personality is presented in the Five Factor test. For example, I might seem very introverted if I am in a social situation where I am not comfortable with the majority of the people around me while if I am in a scenario talking
Personality is massive part of an individual’s identity. Our personalities dictate our patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting. An individual’s personality exposes them to predispositions and habits that influence their actions and lives. Early on, personality assessments consisted of physical features ranging from head shape and facial characteristics to body type. In today’s world, personality assessments are mainly based around traits. Traits are simply descriptions of one’s habitual patterns of behavior, thought and emotion. The most popular personality assessment is the Five-Factor Model, also known as The Big Five. This model allows us to describe people based on the five main traits/dimensions. These traits are extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. Each of these five traits measures a different aspect of one’s personality. Extraversion is based on one’s level of engagement with the world,
Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Directions: Regardless of whether you complete a “live” study, or participate in online research, after completing each study, you are required to complete the brief questionnaire below. Answers to these questions MUST be typed and submitted by the date indicated by your instructor. If you do not answer the questions sufficiently, you will NOT be given credit.
Morasco, B. J., Gfeller, J. D., & Elder, K. A. (2007). The Utility of the NEO–PI–R Validity Scales to Detect Response Distortion: A Comparison With the MMPI–2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(3), 227-281. doi:10.1080/00223890701293924
The Five-Factor Model of Personality gives an insight to psychologists when dealing with patients and test subjects. Due to this theory, research psychologist are able to research personality more accurately and uphold a better understanding when discussing the reasoning behind certain pre-disposed tendencies. Also, counselors which practice different types of therapy are enabled to learn details concerning their patient that can assist in the treatment of that specific patient. There have been multiple disputes in regards to the validity of the Five-Factor Model of Personality theory. Many skeptics believe that there are too many variations that come into play when dealing with personality in order to accurately depict and diagnose a 100% accurate declaration of ones’ characteristics (McCrae, 1991). The issue with relying on the model in order to declare one’s characteristics is that there is often overlap between the degrees of high and low (Popkins, 1998). Although this is a valid statement, the model is a significant role in sorting through the variations to achieve a probable consensus. Therefore, the model cannot achieve a result without any probable cause for doubt but generally will provide a clear depiction of ones’ traits and