Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the scope of engineering ethics
About engineering ethics
What is the scope of engineering ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the scope of engineering ethics
What does a fulfilling and happy life comprise of and why? There is an ethical approach to answering this question. Being virtuous in the work place and at home for instance can lead to a happy life. Engineers in particular, due to the influential nature of their profession, have a responsibility to uphold certain key virtues. Many virtues are believed to be acquired through habit. I do believe my studies at Texas A&M has developed and honed them. There are also a number of virtuous qualities I still hope to acquire so that I am better prepared for my future career. Some of these virtues include diligence, a willingness to learn and accept mistakes, honesty, and teamwork. Some philosophers believe that happiness is achieved through actualizing …show more content…
To achieve one’s potential, it is important that the individual strives to be virtuous or arête. Greek philosophy insists that arête is knowledge and the key to a fulfilling life. To have virtue is to become an outstanding model for whatever role you take. Through arête one can fulfill their telos or end goal. Bringing these terms together; an individual’s eudemonia is increased through fulfilling their telos which is brought about by being virtuous or arête. Aristotle insisted that we exhibit virtue in line with our reason. To him squandering our talents and casting aside a virtuous lifestyle surely will not lead to a happy life. As humans we were given the gift of reason and one’s wellbeing is the attainment of arête through …show more content…
To be an outstanding example of a computer scientist, one must be diligent and accept mistakes. In some cases, you have to be able to scrap all of what you have and try again with a different approach. When someone has invested so much in a failed approach often times they will try to salvage as much as they can. Sure, adding a complicated and confusing solution to salvage work may produce a finished product, but is that product the best it can be? It would be like fixing a leak with duct tape. This mindset is actually one major problem with cybersecurity today. One form of attack is a buffer overflow attack. This cyber-attack involves corrupting the memory of a system in order to take control of the system. It was discovered that the stack structure of a computer’s memory can be exploited, but instead of implementing a new system, duct tape measures such as stack guards and canary words were added. As one would guess these obstacles make it harder for the attacker to corrupt memory, but there are still ways around them. This approach, counter to the learn from mistakes and start again virtue, has allowed for these vulnerabilities to
This is the real-time application of the age old canard, “There is no problem that we cannot solve together.”, and thus, the heart of this principle. There may be setbacks, but there is absolutely no unfixable problem. Missteps are always learning devices and life-training tools. This attitude is invaluable. This idea is not just important in Creative Followership, but is a theme emphasized in every work ever written by powerful leaders dating back to the writings of the Roman general and emperor Marcus Aurelius.
Aristotle accepts that there is an agreement that this chief good is happiness, but that there is a disagreement with the definition of happiness. Due to this argument, men divide the good into the three prominent types of life: pleasure, political and contemplative. Most men are transfixed by pleasure; a life suitable for “beasts”. The elitist life (politics) distinguishes happiness as honour, yet this is absurd given that honour is awarded from the outside, and one’s happiness comes from one’s self. The attractive life of money-making is quickly ruled out by Aristotle since wealth is not the good man seeks, since it is only useful for the happiness of something else.
At first glance, a world without any mistakes would be a utopia. However, this couldn’t be farther from the truth. Mistakes are essential to learning and deciphering right from wrong. Even some of the most useful inventions today were created by mistake. Mistakes are a crucial part of the learning process and can help build up character or strength over time. Humans frequently make errors, therefore, mistakes shouldn’t be perceived negatively.
...it is necessary to examine human virtue. Something is considered to have reason in two senses: that which has reason in itself and that which listens to reason. These two senses are the origin of the distinction between intellectual and ethical virtues, respectively. The understanding of virtue and happiness is justified in the ideal that happiness is to be found in pleasure, others that it is to be found in honor, and others that it is to be found in contemplation. Happiness is not found in living for pleasure because such a life is slavish. Nor is it found in seeking honor because honor depends not on the person but on what others think of him. In order to be successful in an organization it is key to find a balance between two extremes that is an end within itself, that’s why Aristotle strongly believes that happiness is acquired through political organization.
In conclusion, Aristotle’s elucidation of happiness is based on a ground of ethics because happiness to him is coveted for happiness alone. The life of fame and fortune is not the life for Aristotle. Happiness is synonymous for living well. To live well is to live with virtue. Virtue presents humans with identification for morals, and for Aristotle, we choose to have “right” morals. Aristotle defines humans by nature to be dishonored when making a wrong decision. Thus, if one choses to act upon pleasure, like John Stuart Mill states, for happiness, one may choose the wrong means of doing so. Happiness is a choice made rationally among many pickings to reach this state of mind. Happiness should not be a way to “win” in the end but a way to develop a well-behaved, principled reputation.
Aristotle begins his ethical account by saying that “every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and every choice, is thought to aim for some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim” (line 1094a1). Though some things might produce higher good than others, Aristotle looks for the highest good, which he says we must “desire for its own sake” and our actions are not decided on some other goal beyond this good itself (line 1094a20-25).[1] This highest good is then realized to be happiness (line 1095a16-20).
In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle then describes steps required for humans to obtain the ultimate happiness. He also states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. A virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself. The role of virtue to Aristotle is an important one, with out it, it seems humans cannot obtain happiness. Virtue is the connection one has to happiness and how they should obtain it. My goal in this paper is to connect Aristotle’s book of Nicomachean Ethics to my own reasoning of self-ethics. I strongly agree with Aristotle’s goal of happiness and conclude to his idea of virtues, which are virtuous states of character that affect our decision making in life.
When we consider the questions of how we ought to live our lives, we often seek for some schematic that we can employ to help us categorize actions or qualities as good, bad, or indifferent. Such a means of organization would indeed make it easier to determine what the right thing to do is. Aristotle once attempted to formulate a similar plan. His ethics used a scheme by which characteristics could be measured and the right amount attained. Such an account is known as the doctrine of the mean. Aristotle’s doctrine is meant to illuminate the nature of eudaimonia, which can be briefly defined as succeeding or flourishing, the key to which is arête.
...Aristotle’s conclusion relates human good, activity of soul and excellence. It is this expression of virtue through action that allows happiness to be obtained. Such dependence on virtue sets the scene for Aristotle to examine virtue more closely. He will elaborate on the two parts of reasoning well (virtue). The first part of reasoning well is having the right desires to aim oneself at the right good and not just the apparent good. The second part of reasoning well is knowing how to get to this proper desire. This will be further elaborated in book two where Aristotle will explore what it means to reason well and what is means to be virtuous.
However, this mentality needs to change in order for programmers to be held responsible for finding and resolving these issues before the code is put into production and patient
Virtues help an individual grow and flourish within both society and themselves. They are what drive an individual to create the future they dream of living one day. Every decision in an individual’s life has been made based on a certain virtue they believe is important to themselves. Within the engineering profession, virtues are even more important because the engineer’s profession involves protecting the public’s health, safety, and welfare. To further this claim one must examine Aristotle’s point of view towards virtues and how virtues relate to one’s self within the engineering field.
Interest is sparked in this area that Aristotle writes of because there is a natural need for Ethics in human life. John K. Roth states, “Aristotle assumes that all things, human beings included, have a good, a purpose or end, which it is their nature to fulfill”. This helps one understand Aristotle’s way of thinking, and provides insight to the basis of his theories. A common theory explored by Aristotle is the Ethics of Virtues, and how to practice them. A theory included in Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics is the unity of all the virtues, and in order to be virtuous, one must exhibit all the virtues. One of these virtues being practical wisdom, or Phronesis.
It was Aristotle’s belief that everything, including humans, had a telos or goal in life. The end result or goal was said to be happiness or “eudaimonia”. He explained that eudaimonia was different for each person, and that each had a different idea of what it meant. Further, he said that people must do things in moderation, but at the same time do enough. The theory, of “the golden mean of moderation” was the basis to Aristotle's idea of the human telos and concluded that living a virtuous life must be the same for all people. Aristotle maintained that the natural human goal to be happy could only be achieved once each individual determined his/her goal. A person’s telos is would usually be what that individual alone can do best. Aristotle described the humans as "rational animals" whose telos was to reason. Accordingly, Aristotle thought that in order for humans to be happy, they would have to be able to reason, and to be governed by reason. If a person had difficulty behaving morally or with ethics, he was thought to be “imperfect”. Moral virtue, a principle of happiness, was the ability to evade extremes in behavior and further to find the mean between it and adequacy. Aristotle’s idea of an ideal state was one where the populous was able to practice eth...
Aristotle feels we have a rational capacity and the exercising of this capacity is the perfecting of our natures as human beings. For this reason, pleasure alone cannot establish human happiness, for pleasure is what animals seek and human beings have higher capacities than animals. The goal is to express our desires in ways that are appropriate to our natures as rational animals. Aristotle states that the most important factor in the effort to achieve happiness is to have a good moral character, what he calls complete virtue. In order to achieve the life of complete virtue, we need to make the right choices, and this involves keeping our eye on the future, on the ultimate result we want for our lives as a whole. We will not achieve happiness simply by enjoying the pleasures of the moment. We must live righteous and include behaviors in our life that help us do what is right and avoid what is wrong. It is not enough to think about doing the right thing, or even intend to do the right thing, we have to actually do it. Happiness can occupy the place of the chief good for which humanity should aim. To be an ultimate end, an act must be independent of any outside help in satisfying one’s needs and final, that which is always desirable in itself and never for the sake of something else and it must be
In turn, the framework provided a foundation for the aretê, the virtue or excellence itself, playing an essential part in the quest to achieving Eudaimonia. This doctrine contains precise steps for a precise path towards Eudaimonia and Aristotle demonstrates why such precision is needed, quoted that, “It is the mark of an educated man to look for precision in each class of things just so far that as the nature of the subject