Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Significance of formal education
Significance of formal education
Benefits and Challenges of an Effective Teacher
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Significance of formal education
Formal education is of utmost importance in the modern world. Education shapes the way individuals think reason and make important decisions in their daily lives. The quality of education that learners get, right from kindergarten to the time they start their careers, is of high significance. Quality tools for teaching and learning, quality environment for teaching and learning and quality teaching are the major determinants of quality education (Lowman, 1984). Governments, learners and other stakeholders in the education sector are regularly facing various issues in the quest for quality education. One such issue is the teaching style that teachers decide to use in their classes. Dictator/authority figure (where the teacher is the center of attention and all learners must focus on him), authority model (here the teacher demonstrates some behaviors that are beneficial to the learners), student oriented (here the learners are involved in activities that enable them to develop relationships while learning the needed course material), hands off (here the students are left to study the course material on their own), and self-learning (where the teacher develops detailed lesson plans that the students read through) are some of the commonly used teaching styles in most learning institutions (Gomberg, 2000).
In the dictator teaching style, the teacher is portrayed as an authority figure. The teacher acts as a dictator and the students as his/her subordinates. On most occasions, the teacher maintains very distant and stringent relations with the students in order not to lose control. This often results in authoritarian and businesslike relations between the teacher and the students. He/she dictates what is to be done in a step by step ...
... middle of paper ...
...t between the students and the teachers, and student-student relationships. From the discussions above, it is true that dictator teaching style has both positive and negative impacts on learners and other stake-holders in the education sector. On the one hand, it improves personal discipline in the students and creates a social order in learning institutions. It also leads to efficient and straightforward decision making and, therefore, improves the performance of learners. On the other hand it is dictatorial, denies the student’s freedom of expression, discourages thinking and creates poor relationships between learners and teachers and among the learners. These result in poor performance. I believe teachers should be encouraged to adopt student-friendly teaching styles in order to improve education standards and make the learning process enjoyable.
References
A dictator is a ruler with total power over a country, typically one who has obtained power by force, and generally not liked by the community. The major dictators of the 20th century left an infamous legacy behind them, all using similar tactics during their reign. Mussolini, dictator of Italy from 1922 to 1942, used his power to abolish all other political parties in Italy, thus making him superior. Hitler gained dictatorship in the 1930’s. In that time, he purged opposition and used his newly confiscated power to create his definition of superior humans, annihilating entire groups due to them not meeting his criteria for appropriate human value.
Apaydin and Seckin (2013) investigated the following research questions:"1. What are the civilized behaviors in the classroom according to the teachers and students? 2.What are the emotions of the teachers and students towards these behaviors? 3.What are the uncivilized behaviors in the classroom according to the teachers and students? 4. What are the emotions of the teachers and students towards these behaviors"(p. 2394)? In their finding they concluded, Civilized behaviors of the teachers in the classroom according to the student's view closely correlated with "educational themes" and "personal." Students responded to civilized actions by teachers with positive emotions, positive emotions towards teacher, and positive emotion towards the curriculum presented. Civilized beha...
The authoritarian style of leadership for many may seem harsh and extremely cut and dry. However that is not the case. For some people the best way to function is to create a system that works best for their planning ideas and methods. The Authoritarian style of leadership is the best method in this scenario. It allows one to plan in great detail how a scenario should play out and what each person involved should to do to meet the end goal. Perhaps because of the word authoritarian it seems
Dictator folks take into account minimal open dialog in the middle of guardian and tyke and anticipate that kids will take after a strict arrangement of tenets and desires. On the off chance that kids challenge the principles or inquire as to why, they are typically told, "On the grounds that I said as much." Children are not normally given the explanations behind the standards and there is no place for any arrangement. Tyrant folks may utilize disciplines rather than results. In spite of the fact that youngsters who grow up with dictator folks have a tendency to take after standards a great part of the time, they may create respect toward oneself issues. At times youngsters get to be antagonistic or forceful as they may concentrate all the more on being furious at their guardians for the discipline instead of figuring out how to settle on choices and understand issues. They as a rule depend on discipline to request dutifulness or show a lesson. While the structure and standards of a tyrant guardian are vital for solid tyke improvement, all great things can be overcompensated. It is vital to offset the gave structure open correspondence so the youngster knows precisely why it is essential for them to take after the principles set before them. Offspring of dictator folks are inclined to having low respect toward oneself, being dreadful or timid, partner
Students should see the human behind the scary instructor exterior. Being a dictator can lead to students fearing and resenting you. When this happens the students are unwillingly to stretch their minds and see how far their abilities can take them. They gain no sense of responsibility. They are just afraid of failing and suffering the wrath of the hard teacher. Only doing as much as they need to do satisfy the anger of the teacher. In Teach Like Your Hair’s on Fire, Rafe explains 6 levels of moral development. The most basic level of a student’s character development and reasoning is “Level 1: I don’t want to get in trouble” (Esquith, 2007, p.14). A teacher risks having their students stuck in this level and unable to grow to the ultimate “Level 6: I have a personal code of behavior and I follow it (the Atticus Finch level)” (Esquith, 2007, p. 22). Being genuine and yourself opens you up to the students and allows for them to reach you. This aspect contributes to the aspect of trust. Students will be more willing to open up and respond to you and your teaching techniques if they are facing a real, genuine and authentic teacher with feelings, passion for teaching, and sympathy (and to a certain point empathy) for the students themselves. As Rafe explains in his prologue “there are no shortcuts.” (Esquith, 2007, p. xii.). There is no easy way to get a classroom to obey your every direction, learn
...cilitator’ or ‘leader’ is not to eliminate authority but rather to, for want of a better word, authorise it. Authoritarian approaches in the end are not ‘authorities’ as such at all. Rather they are better associated with raw irrational power and dictatorships. Alternatively, an authority is authorised for the freedom of the subjects under the authority of the teacher. (What precisely shapes this freedom is another question.) A teacher who rigidly and harmfully oppresses students may be powerful, but not an authority. This means that as a teacher, I remain inevitably an authority, yet I exist as an authority for the freedom or ‘humanising’ (Freire, 1996) or ‘growth’ (Dewey) of my students.
When we think of zoos many people think of a fun place where you go to look at exotic animals with friends or family. Although, this is true, there is much more to zoos then the average person might believe. If one explores further and thinks harder about what a zoo really is, one might come to conclusion that it is in fact an informal learning space. Informal learning spaces are places where people gather other than the regular classroom setting to learn.(Siebert-Evenstone,2016) One of the main focuses of informal learning spaces is that they encourage learning by doings, which is unlike the formal way of learning. Informal learning further differs from formal learning because it is often unstructured and unintentional. (Siebert-Evenstone,2016)
Kazu, Ibrahim Yasar. “The Effect of learning styles on education and the teaching process.” Journal of Social Sciences (Apr. 2009): 85. Academic OneFile. Web. 20 July 2011.
Meanwhile, teachers need to be aware of the learning styles,but more so to be wise about each lesson individually and deciding the best way to reach students. “While there might not be a
The job of a teacher is never easy but we have seen how cooperative discipline and enabling students to feel capable, connected and contributing can improve classroom management and maybe even our own moods. If we create an environment of mutual respect and give our students legitimate power of voice and choice in the classroom we will see positive results in improved student behavior and student achievement. Because when our students believe that they can succeed, they will.
In this course I experienced an important change in my beliefs about teaching; I came to understand that there are many different theories and methods that can be tailored to suit the teacher and the needs of the student. The readings, especially those from Lyons, G., Ford, M., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2011), Groundwater-Smith, S., Ewing, R., & Le Cornu, R. (2007), and Whitton, D., Barker, K., Nosworthy, M., Sinclair, C., Nanlohy, P. (2010), have helped me to understand this in particular. In composing my essay about teaching methods and other themes, my learning was solidified, my knowledge deepened by my research and my writing skills honed.
Thought out our lives, we are faced with many different learning experiences. Some of these experiences have made a better impact than others. This can be attributed to everyone’s different multiple intelligences or learning styles. A persons learning style is the method though which they gain information about their environment. As a teacher, it is our responsibility to know these styles, so we can reach each of our students and use all of the necessary methods.
Teaching styles tend to conform to the grade level that is being taught. I prefer being the only one in charge, but I do want my students to be actively involved.
Many schools have different frameworks which outline what makes for effective teaching and learning in a classroom, these follow quite closely with the teacher’s standards.
My personal classroom management style revolves around student rapport and relationship. I went into my classroom the first day with a clear vision of my rules and management, but quickly adjusted to the needs and wants of the students. I allowed them to help formulate rules and consequences for actions. By allowing them input, there was more buy-in and respect build. I had a very strict format for rules and turning in of coursework, but I realized quickly that I needed to be flexible in a high school setting versus