Teachers Salaries Should Not Be Based On Student Test Scores

1697 Words4 Pages

Every classroom should have a teacher who is well-experienced in the course that they teach. Salaries of teachers should be based on their ability to educate students the best they can so when standardized tests arrive they’ll be able to perform well. Workers who show up to their job and fail to educate their students correctly should receive a deduction from their paycheck. Although it is the teacher’s responsibility to educate his or her students, the students should also put effort in wanting to learn. Some may argue that teacher’s salaries should not be based on students test scores,I think otherwise.
Once again, others may think that teacher’s salaries should not be based on test scores but I believe that should be the case. Some teachers …show more content…

Although, people may think teacher’s salaries shouldn’t be based on test scores there are pros and cons to this. The pro of teacher’s salaries being based on student test scores is that it allows bad teachers to be removed easier. According to, Thoughtco.com, standard teacher contracts make it difficult to terminate employment, but a performance based pay contract makes it easier to remove a bad teacher (Meador). The con of this is that teachers pay being based on students test scores is that it can potentially be costly to the district. School districts across the United States are already cashed strapped. Teachers on a performance based contract do receive a base salary. They receive a “bonus” for meeting specific objectives and goals. As a result, this “bonus” money can add up quickly (Meador). In this case it’s not only about the teachers and what they do. If a student is constantly sick and they have missed most of the school year the teacher shouldn’t be responsible for still educating the student. People might say the student still needs to make up the work, but it’s hard to make up work when you feel sick all the time. According to Parentsacrossamerica.org, Research shows that the carrot of higher pay does not lead to better results. Also, in an authoritative study conducted at Vanderbilt University, for example, teachers who were offered bonuses for improving student test results produced no more improvement than the control group (Tying Teacher Salaries). This shows that it’s not always the teachers fault. Also, how can teachers control what the students do? Just because a student was either sick or had a bad day and performed awfully on a test doesn’t mean it’s the teachers fault. It’s understandable that merit pay encourages teachers to teach better, but they should be able to do that without encouragement. There are plenty reasons on why teachers who

Open Document