Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bottled water vs tap water essay
Effects of bottled water on society, the economy and the environment
Bottled water versus tap water essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bottled water vs tap water essay
The debate on bottled water vs. tap water has been going on for many years now. Over the last thirty years, people have steadily been switching over to bottled water due to fears of their tap water being unsafe, or unhealthy to drink. Some of the major issues with tap water are the chemicals added to water at the plants and the common occurrence of public water supplies becoming contaminated. However, I have noticed over the last ten years people are not happy with the large ecological footprint of the bottled water industry. This is making many of those people want to switch back to tap water. Unfortunately, people do not feel comfortable drinking their tap water so they stick to bottled water for the time being. One of the main reasons …show more content…
Bolted water, which is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has a much safer track record than tap water, which is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). When tested to the FDA and EPA standards, gallon per gallon bottled water is subjected to more coliform testing than tap water. "In 2006, EPA researchers reported an estimated 16.4 million cases of acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI) per year are caused by tap water" (Edberg 7). In contrast, as of 2012 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had only five cases of AGI linked to bottled water for the past ten years. Municipal water supplies are just more susceptible to contaminants. Just a simple crack or leak in a water main can allow microbial and chemical contaminants to enter the drinking water supplied to thousands of people. Until the public water systems can be updated and have fewer incidents, people are going to continue to drink bottled …show more content…
Some of the chemicals, such as chlorine and fluoride are actually added at the water plant. Chlorine is added to kill bacteria, viruses, and other living organisms in the water, but it is also linked to bladder, rectal, and breast cancer (West). Chlorine also produces dangerous by-products during the disinfection process such as, bromate and haloacetic acids, which are both cancer-causing agents according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Alton). The other aforementioned chemical fluoride, is added to municipal water supplies to promote healthy teeth. Fluoride being added to our water has been a controversial subject since it began back in 1945. The results of many scientific studies, show high levels of fluoride to have a neurotoxic effect on brains (Connet). Researchers from Harvard School of Public Health and China Medical University in Shenyang combined 27 studies and found strong indications that fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children
Fluoride is the only substance added to water that doesn’t affect the water itself but the person consuming the water- fluoride is a medical treatment. The same NHS website that boasts the marvellous pros of the UK’s fluoridation scheme also explicitly explains ‘Consent is required from a patient regardless of the intervention – from a physical examination to organ donation’ on a page regarding the legalities of medical consent. It is required by law that all patients must be aware and accepting of the treatment that they receive therefore feeding us a medicine (if it can even be called that) that we as society in many cases, know very little about is highly illegal and dangerous for everyone involved. Today doctors who give patients treatment without their consent face legal procedures and punishments so the fact that this practice goes on everyday under our noses with no repercussion is astonishing and shouldn’t happen just because the perpetrator (the government) is more powerful than a
Credibility Statement: It is fact that we all consume fluoridated water regularly; whether it’s through water directly, food, or other beverages, we could very likely be putting ourselves at risk.
Disinfection is applied in water as well as wastewater treatment as a finishing step so as to destroy pathogens but the cause of concern regarding the disinfection process is the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Natural organic matter (NOM) in water has been considered as the predominant DBP precursors. Disinfectants are powerful oxidants that oxidize the organic matter present in water forming DBPs. Chlorine, ozone, chlorine dioxide, and chloramines are the most common disinfectants used nowadays and each produces its own suite of chemical DBPs in finished drinking water (Richardson, 2003). DBPs so formed pose a threat to human health because of their potential to cause cancer and reproductive/developmental effects. Most developed nations have regulated concentration of DBPs so as to minimize exposure to potentially harmful DBPs while maintaining adequate disinfection and control of targeted
Fluoride is considered a drug by the Food and Drug Administration therefore a type of mediation which is why I made the claim of mass medication, which I believe is unethical to put in a public goods such as water. That is one of the reason other developed nations like Europe decided to stop this practice (FluorideAlert). Fluoride is already found in items such as toothpaste and other like items, putting it in the water just farther leads to over dosing the set limit of fluoride before the FDA declares it unsafe which is 2.4mg per liter of water (FluorideAlert). It can be clearly proven that this limits are surpassed daily for the average person and one sign is that more children are being affected by dental fluorosis, a condition that causes white or brown discoloration or spots on the enamel, or tooth surface that only occurs from to much fluoride and this should not be much of surprise if you include the fact that on top of water having anywhere from 0.7-1.4mg of fluoride, toothpaste is 94% fluoride, processed beverages also contain it, and many other products we would not think of like tea. While its just considered more of a cosmetic issue, it is also an indictor or red flag of over exposure on the rest of the
Not Fluoridating Water People around the world wake up each morning and brush their teeth with toothpaste, not knowing what's in it. Fluoride is being used in things that shouldn’t be, like water. Water is H2O that people around the world drink constantly. Some drink more than others, like athlete’s, manual laborer’s, diabetic’s, and people with kidney disease who are exposed to more fluoride than other’s (12 Reasons). All the other water treatment chemicals are added to improve the water for safe drinking, but fluoride does not.
Zhang, J. (2009, July 13). More Scrutiny Urged for Bottled Water . Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970203577304574276473594279310?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052970203577304574276473594279310.html
People around the world wake up each morning and brush their teeth with toothpaste, not knowing what's in it. Fluoride is being used in thing’s that shouldn't be, like water. Water is H2O that people around the drink constantly. Some drink more than others, like athlete’s, manual laborer’s, diabetic’s, and people with kidney disease which are exposed to more fluoride than other’s (12 Reasons). All the other water treatment chemicals are added to improve the water for safe drinking, but fluoride does not. How are we supposed to control how much fluoride goes into our bodies’? It’s impossible to control the dose each person receives because each person drinks different amounts of water. Portland Oregon made a agreeable decision to reject the plan to fluoridate drinking water supplies because fluoride is a hazardous, cancer-causing chemical that should not be added to water supplies that serve an entire city.
Since the implementation of artificially introducing fluoride into water, a great amount of resistance has taken place. Many people claim that fluoridating community water sources can cause not only dental fluorosis, but a multitude of adverse systemic conditions. This perception has led to many political battles on the subject. The problems associated with fluoride ingestion tend to present when concentrations are higher that generally accepted. In communities with natural high fluoride concentrations, adverse effects have range from dental and skeletal fluorosis to decreased birth rates, increased kidney stones, impaired thyroid function, and lower intelligence (Chen, 2013, p. 1). These tend to be the concerns of the opposition to community fluoridation of water supplies. However, these concerns may not be scientifically sound.
Researchers have stated that plastic bottles containing water can contain many deadly chemicals. After close examination of the plastic, researchers concluded that some plastics contain chemicals, like phthalates, bisphenol A (BPA), endocrine disrupters, and cancer, may percolate into the water, especially after being stagnant for long periods of time. Likewise, bottled water is not exposed to the rigorous testing tap water endures. Thus, bottled water is more inclined to be contaminated or a source of infection. Tap water is subjected to daily safety testing, bottled water, however, is only tested monthly at the source; twenty-two percent of the water tested contained contaminant levels that exceeded strict health limits. Safety of the people could be secured through banning water bottles.
The contamination of water (ground and surface) can result from when chemicals from
At least 25% of bottled is actually tap water that has been bottled near the distribution point. The reality is that tap water is being packaged into water bottles and sold as being “purified” or straight from serene mountains and icecaps. Approximately 2.5 million gallons of municipal tap water each year are bottled and sold throughout the United States (Shapley). Ironically, the most highly monitored supply of water is the municipal tap water system. The reason it’s monitored so closely is because of the threatening effects that untreated bacteria can have on the body. For example, city tap water can’t have any trace amounts of E.Coli or fecal coliform. E. Coli is a dangerous strain of bacteria found in the intestines of humans and animals, that can cause severe food poisoning. Fecal coliform is another bacteria found in the digestive tracks of humans and animals that can cause harmful ear infections and hepatitis, just to name a couple. On the other hand the FDA does not require bottled water companies to adhere to these standards. Bottled water is allowed to have a certain amount of these harmful bacteria present. In addition to that shocking standard, much is not done by water companies to prevent the spread of this harmful bacteria. Water plants must test for coliform just once a week, while big-city tap water must be tested over 100 times a month (Olson, 1999). This ratio is truly outstanding. Bottled water companies are feeding its customers lies that its water is as pure as the “rivers” and “mountains” it comes
Meaning that drinking unsanitized and unfiltered water can expose you to harmful types of microorganisms and other harmful things to take in such as dirt and decomposed plant life, which can lead to illness. The results of our experiments also answered our question, “Does water treatment kill all living things in the water? If the treated water is containing any microorganism then should we drink it?” Well as we studied local treated water in our experiments we did not find bacteria, but in the case of if you did find harmful or non-harmful bacteria in your water. Contact your local authorities so they can take care of the problem, but in the meantime drink bottled
Imagine drinking fresh clean water out of a plastic bottle, the clean taste of water as it refreshes you. Why would you buy water when you already have perfectly clean water coming right out of your faucet? You can save so much more money by drinking tap water. You’ll also be helping the planet decrease the amount of trash there is. It will also be less pollution in the air if you just drink tap water. I agree that the water inside of the plastic bottles are clean and fresh, but when stored in hot temperatures, the water inside of the bottle can be harmful and dangerous to drink. Think before you drink.
Some people may think that bottled water just goes through filters that get rid of the chemicals that are contained within it, and while they are not wrong they are, however, still uniformed. Bottled water is not only taken from streams and filter but “40% of all bottled water is taken from municipal water sources [a.k.a tap water]” (Bottled Water Pros and Cons. 2014. Para. 9). People drink bottled water so that they do not have to drink tap water when in reality they most likely are drinking some tap water that is mixed into their bottled water. On top of that not only has the bottled water been filtered but it has been found that “22% of tested bottled water brands contained chemical contaminants at levels above strict state health” (Bottled Water Pros and Cons. 2014. Para. 9). In other words, though the water may not have the same weird taste as tap water is does have chemicals in it that are at levels that are not safe to be consuming. When it comes to tap water which contains normal amounts of chemicals, bottled water is not safer to be
The commotion revolving around bottled water has existed for some time now. Some people say that bottled water is the best option available, but have they submerged themselves in the facts about the other side? Have they submerged themselves into tap water? When people face the decision of drinking tap water or bottled water, most tend to turn to bottled water due to its convenience and taste, but there are deeper and more appealing motivations to desire tap water instead. Motivations such as a healthier choice, a fit environment, and stronger protection against harmful chemicals.