Imagine being in a hall filled with empty bottles scrattered along the floor. Kids shuffle past them with out picking any up. Bottles at strewn about the community, and people are constantly dropping more. I believe bottled water should be banned in schools. Here are my reasons to explain. My first reason bottled water should be banned from schools is because of litter and trash. When I am at school I notice that there are empty and half full bottles in the hall. People drop them or just leave then in the halls. In the article, “Bottled versus tap: Which is safer?” Elena Conis wrote, “ Just 15% of the tens of billions of bottles consumed each year are recycled.” This shows me that people who are finished with bottles just throw them away to sit in a dump. Also, in the article, “Goodbye, Bottled Water?” Gail Hennessey wrote, “More than 1 billion plastic water bottles end up in California’s landfills each year taking 1000 years to biodegrade.” This is important to notice because kids bring their plastic bottles to school and most of …show more content…
In, “Statement form International Bottled Water Association Regarding Concord, MA ban of bottled Water”, the author wrote, “People choose bottled water for several reason, including its refreshing taste, reliable quality, zero calories and additives, and convenience.” This shows me that bottled water has a great taste and very convenient. In, “Bottled versus tap: Which is safer?”, Elena Conis wrote, “State rules don't solve the problem of aging pipes that can carry water from public lines into peoples homes, which can leach copper and lead.” This is important to notice because the water from tap can have minerals that are unhealthy, especially lead. Kids can enjoy a convenient and safe way of drinking water. All of this is very important to note, but the environment and correct uses of petroleum matter
Johnson tries to convince that although bottled water is convenient to use and sometimes even becomes a life savior, it should be avoided at any cost and tap water should only be preferred. This claim allows The Shorthorn readers to be sure that the author is taking account of both positives as well as negatives of bottled water but includes comparatively lots of negative factors to persuade readers that bottled water should be avoided. She supports this claim by reasons such as bottled water has a negative impact on human health, plastic has a negative impact on the environment, and the plastic bottle is just a waste of money and energy. She also supports her claim of convenience of bottled water by talking about reusable water bottles ' convenience. These reasons are important to those readers who prefer bottled water and are not aware of its negative
Zhang, J. (2009, July 13). More Scrutiny Urged for Bottled Water . Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970203577304574276473594279310?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052970203577304574276473594279310.html
Both Barnett’s claim that bottled water is not better than tap water (139-141) and Gleick’s claim that specialized water is not better than tap water (118-120) demonstrate that companies’ claims are unreasonable. Furthermore, consumers assume bottled water is better than tap water because they have the impression that tap water is dangerous because of the tap water incident in “2003 [where] 400,000 people [got] sick” from drinking tap water. One may wonder whether companies use this incident to remind consumers how dangerous tap water is with the way Gleick presents bottled water companies even after the tap water is taken care of. Because Gleick portrays the deception of advertisement from bottled water businesses, he makes it clear that Barnett hints that they are taking advantage of the case by informing consumers that their water is safer than tap water in an indirect, subtle way. However, Barnett ensures readers that tap water are safe to drink again after the incident by proving that both bottled water and tap water are equally safe to drink with a study she provides: The testing from Florida Trend (magazine brand) concludes that Publix brand bottled water and tap water both contains “0.020milligrams per liter [of] THMs (trihalomethanes)”, a “common byproduct…linked to increased risk of cancer” (139-140). Although other bottled water brands may not have
Thesis Statement: The purchase of bottled water may be completely unnecessary as tap water in most municipalities of the United States is safe to drink. The limit of purchase of bottled water, would not only save consumers money but limit the amount of non-renewable resources spent in making and transporting the bottles, and therefore limit their negative impact on our environment. When reading through the list of options for our essay topic, I was interested by the impact of bottled water as I am a regular consumer of the product and rarely ever think of it's environmental impact. Therefore, I was intrigued to see what statistic showed, and what the different points of view were in regards to the product.
rid of bottled water would be unfair to manufactures when other bottled drinks aren't banned. In
My research question: Is the convenience of bottled water worth all the sacrifices in terms of money, resources, health and damage to the ecosystem?
Some people may think that bottled water just goes through filters that get rid of the chemicals that are contained within it, and while they are not wrong they are, however, still uniformed. Bottled water is not only taken from streams and filter but “40% of all bottled water is taken from municipal water sources [a.k.a tap water]” (Bottled Water Pros and Cons. 2014. Para. 9). People drink bottled water so that they do not have to drink tap water when in reality they most likely are drinking some tap water that is mixed into their bottled water. On top of that not only has the bottled water been filtered but it has been found that “22% of tested bottled water brands contained chemical contaminants at levels above strict state health” (Bottled Water Pros and Cons. 2014. Para. 9). In other words, though the water may not have the same weird taste as tap water is does have chemicals in it that are at levels that are not safe to be consuming. When it comes to tap water which contains normal amounts of chemicals, bottled water is not safer to be
Moreover, the energy used in bottle production can supply energy to over 190,000 homes. The resources that can be conserved by ceasing the production of water bottles can solve many global problems faced by a growing population. The cost involved in water bottles is inconceivable to many. Bottled water costs 240 to 100,000 times more than tap water, which can be brought to your house for just pennies per day.
According to the “Competition in the Bottled Water Industry in 2006 Case,” bottled water industry became the one of the world’s most attractive beverage categories, as more and more people began to focus on health and fitness. Consumers start realizing the need of proper hydration, and they began purchasing bottled water instead of drinking tap water, because they were worried about safety of tap water, which tasted like chemicals. Actually, tap water contained chemicals, such as chlorine and fluoride, which are harmful for human body; however, this problem was solved when the bottled water was brought to the market. Due to bottled water’s convenience, purity, and portability, and safety, bottled water industry began to rise rapidly. During
Imagine this: Your mouth is dry. You are completely parched, and yet it is still almost impossible to access a decent drinking fountain in order to fill up your water bottle. The awful drinking fountains in our school are slow, dirty and are not good for students to use. Students are becoming unhealthy, wasting their money and not learning as much as they should be. The fountains are causing problems within the school system and need to be replaced.
Bottled water is a healthy alternative to other beverages. It's easy and convenient to grab a bottle and go, and more people than ever are taking advantage of its benefits. However, the cost of the bottled-water trend to both our environment and our wallets is just too high to ignore. The best—and most responsible—choice is tap water.
While watching “The Story of Bottled Water,” I thought to myself, “Is this all true, or is this really being blown out of proportion?” I simply couldn’t grasp the idea that we as consumers are that wasteful. So, I decided to watch the film again to really grasp the narrator’s message. Then it hit me: in high school AP History, we discussed how bottled water started and how it has become a multi billion-dollar company. From a business point of view, it seems so ignorantly deceptive, yet it was absolutely genius. With a little marketing, bottled water became a huge success. However, it is killing the environment and the water is usually comparable to tap water regardless. The “The Story of Bottled Water” is a very well-made short
Given all the negative effects that come from plastic, why are people still participating in this poisonous cycle? Some claim that bottled water simply tastes better than water from the tap whether they prefer spring, purified, distilled, or mineral water. Most people just appreciate the convenience bottled water offers; it’s easier to carry little bottles that one can throw away instead of larger reusable bottles that need to be brought home at the end of the day. Also, bottled water comes in big “value packs” in most stores, which is beneficial for large group events and big families.
Today, many schools have banned water bottles in classrooms due to the bottle flipping craze. I think bottle flipping should be banned in all schools. The noise drives everyone crazy, and creates a very large mess. It is completely unnecessary as well. Bottle flipping should be kept outside of classrooms.
Indeed, walking to the kitchen and turning on the tap is much easier than driving to a store and carrying a case of bottled water home. Government should publicize that the quality of tap water is ensured to be as healthy as bottled water. In addition, the advertisement from bottled water companies should be strictly regulated to prevent them from misleading the customers. If the situation is not ameliorated, government can tax bottled water company heavily to decrease both the quantity demand from customer and the quantity supply from the bottled water company. As a matter of fact, the heavy tax for bottled water is justified because the negative externalities that the plastic bottle creates are harmful to the Earth.