Tale Of Two Cities Rhetorical Analysis

579 Words2 Pages

The bloodshed and rallying cries of a revolution transcend beyond all barriers of time, often striking a chord with the most underrepresented and disadvantaged citizens of a nation. With enough backing, fringe ideas wield the ability to force their way into the minds of the populace, providing strength to the once-languished. Using A Tale of Two Cities, influential author of numerous classic works, Charles Dickens, illustrates the gaping holes in rhetoric and action widely disregarded during the French Revolution of the late 1700s as well as criticizing his own country, England, for its administrative flaws. However, his blunt assessment applies to countless eras throughout history, including today’s political environment in the United States. …show more content…

Dickens’ criticism of the revolutionaries in A Tale of Two Cities, relevant to both 18th Century France and modern day America, denounces the misguidedness of the many, the selfishness of the few, and the flawed world their shared movement brings about. While sympathizing with the hunger, poverty, and destitute living conditions experienced by the French working-class, Dickens depicts the needy demographic as willing to shed all previously-held morals in exchange for membership into the mob. His portrayal of the crowd’s transformation from desperate city dwellers into Bastille-storming beasts makes itself apparent in the passage, “For, they are headlong, mad, and dangerous; and in the years so long after the breaking of the cask at Defarge’s wine-shop door, they are not easily purified when once stained red,” (212). This appraisal hints to the forlorn origins of the revolution that act as a driving force in the minds of those revolting. Nonetheless, it also assigns barbaric traits to the rioters, suggesting they sacrificed individuality for a pack-like mental

Open Document