Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The french revolution
French revolution introduction
The french revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The french revolution
“Republic One and Indivisible, Liberty, Fraternity, Equality or Death!” This was the phrase that resounded through the streets of France in the momentous, intense book by Charles Dickens: A Tale of Two Cities. Yet though these Revolutionaries who attempted successfully to over throw the former aristocratic government held this phrase as their catchphrase, the actions they performed ran ironically in contradiction. From their excusable version of a Republic formed by elitism, to their frightful example of liberty in needless dictatorship, Dickens captures the terrible irony of the French Revolution through this classic book.
The first word that the French Revolutionaries used in their campaign motto was the word republic. According to the Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, a republic is “a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitle to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.” An orthodox example of a republic is the United States of America. Citizens in the U.S. are the ones who elect officials into power, and not one is chosen without consent by the citizens. Ironically, the members of the French Revolution in A Tale of Two Cities have no voice at all. Instead, the wine shop owner Defarge and Jacques’ 1-3 simply start leading the Revolution against the aristocratic establishment (pg. 165-166). Then, a few chapters later, when Defarge enters a room that already holds other French citizens, they all stand to their feet, as if in salutation and honor to him, as he gives direct orders to them (pg. 170-171). In addition, throughout the whole book Defarge and his associates named Jacques give orders to the “citizens” absolutely: no one...
... middle of paper ...
...sserted that though the whole Revolution’s phrase was “Republic One and Indivisible, Liberty, Fraternity, Equality or Death,” the results were completely different of this phrase. Firstly, the Revolution did not produce a Republic where citizens elected leaders, but instead wherespecial citizens set themselves up as leaders. It was elitism, not a republic. Secondly, the Patriots did not promote liberty through their actions. Instead of their rebellion ending the tyrannical reign of aristocrats, the Patriots made only greater tyranny through ridiculous laws, and unjust sentences of death and imprisonment. Finally, though the Revolution did indeed result in many men dying, one man, Sydney Carton, ended up escaping death by resting upon Christ’s sacrifice. Through the course of A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens demonstrated the great painful irony of the French Revolution.
Taylor believed that the revolution was more than just gaining independence from Great Britain, and not only did he believe there was other motives that fueled the revolution, he also believed that the solution of the revolution didn’t completely end once the colonies gained their independence, but continued for about 20 years after there was still an internal revolution on home ground being fought between the upper and lower classes throughout the colonies. Taylor does agree that part of the American Revolution was becoming independent and free of the British control, but Taylor disagrees with the fact that that was the only purpose and outcome of the movement. This prize winning author adds that the revolution was more or less two parts, part one was gaining independence and achieving a successful democracy throughout. While part two of the movement, was the internal issue facing the colonies, the differences between the classes and the inequality that influenced the division. Unlike Brown’s article, Taylor didn’t emphasize Great Britain’s role in the revolution, but instead he focused on what he
“If we measure the radicalism of revolutions by the degree of social misery or economic deprivation suffered, or by the number of people killed or manor houses burned, then this conventional emphasis on the conservatism of the American Revolution becomes true enough. B...
When the King of England began to infringe on the colonists’ liberties, leaders inspired by the enlightenment grouped together to defend the rights of the American colonies. As Thomas Jefferson writes in the Declaration of Independence, “History of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these States” (Jefferson 778). The citizens of France, inspired by the enlightenment, desired a government run by the people. Marquis de Lafayette wrote, “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness” (de Lafayette 783).
The American Revolution was sparked by a myriad of causes. These causes in themselves could not have sparked such a massive rebellion in the nation, but as the problems of the colonies cumulated, their collective impact spilt over and the American Revolution ensued. Many say that this war could have been easily avoided and was poorly handled by both sides, British and American; but as one will see, the frame of thought of the colonists was poorly suited to accept British measures which sought to “overstep” it’s power in the Americas. Because of this mindset, colonists developed a deep resentment of British rule and policies; and as events culminated, there was no means to avoid revolution and no way to turn back.
... truly set the political system of America apart from the political system of England. By only looking at the textbook definition of a revolution it can be argued that the revolution truly was not revolutionary, but after the colonists won the war nothing went back to normal. The colonists could not conserve what they had before, but instead had to completely upheave the entire system. Therefore by the definition of what a revolution actually is, allows the American Revolution to be truly revolutionary.
The French Revolution took place at the time when the poor peasants who had been mistreated, revolted against the wealthy and cruel aristocrats. When they did this, it was bloody, chaotic, and no lived were spared in their conquest for revenge. In Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities, the French Revolution is depicted through the lives of both peasants and aristocrats. The Marquis St. Evermonde and the whole Evermonde family treated many of the peasants cruelly and inhumanely. In the book, the poor townspeople from the suburb called Saint Antoine are among the many French peasants to revolt against the Marquis and all the aristocrats, but this is only the beginning of their revenge. Dickens uses the symbols of a whirlpool, a storm, and a sea, to portray the building of anger in the peasants, which drives them to seek revenge.
Nardo, Don. A. The French Revolution. San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1999. Print.
In answer to the changes sought out by the rebelling French communities, Edmund Burke’s release of the “Reflections on the Revolution in France” in 1790 depicted the man’s careful denunciation of the destructive nature of the people. Concurrently, Thomas Paine published a direct response in the form of two volumes dubbed “The Rights of Man” between 1791 and 1792. But apparently, Paine was ready to support that risk. In conclusion, Thomas Paine’s views are more convincing than those of Edmund Burke, just because of their motives behind the same.
Charles Dickens focuses on the revenge that put the bloody French Revolution in motion in his suspenseful story A Tale of Two Cities. The French Revolution was a revolt instigated by the peasants, who attacked the nobles with vengeful hearts starting in the year 1789, and going on until the year 1799. The settings of the book took place in both London and England, two parallels in novel, two cities where the plotting of the Revolution went into affect. Although the reasons behind the different examples of revenge are exposed, the actions taken with revenge in mind are inexcusable and not justifiable. Dickens portrays the theme of revenge successfully through the joker Gaspard, the brave younger brother who sacrificed himself to protect his family and the brilliant antagonist Madame Defarge.
(Q) What age is Dickens talking about? How does he show the dichotomy and unfairness that is happening during this time? (CL) A Tale of Two Cities takes place during revolutionary France. There is also a comparison made with England. This quotes reveals how the rulers of the country are out of touch with common people. (S) When Charles Dickens says “it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair”, his use of metaphor emphasizes to the reader the ongoing conflict people experienced within themselves. This quote also highlights one of the major themes of the book, duality. With his use of words like “light” and “darkness”, Dickens reflects the mirror images of good and evil that will recur in characters and situation throughout the novel. In this quote, duality is presented by England and France. The differences in these countries are many. When the author talks about the concepts of spirituality and justice in each country, the differences are more pronounced. In England, people are enthralled with the idea of spirituality. On the other hand, French follow the church out of fear.
A Tale of Two Cities is set in France during the 1780’s, a very tumultuous time in the history of the French nation, when the lower classes were rebelling against the oppression, and unfair rights and privileges of the upper classes. It was during this time that France was transformed from a divine right monarchy into a republic, following the execution of King Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette. Dickens gives his own impressions of French society at the time through his narration of the story. His distaste for the extravagance and greed of the French upper-class is apparent in his description of the powerful aristocrat entertaining other aristocrats. He depicts the wastefulness of the aristocrats, and their use of servants, while the poor lack even a means of subsistence.
The French Revolution from 1789 to 1799 was a time of uprising in France, followed by the decline of monarchies and the rise of democracy and nationalism. A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens, is set in the cities of Paris and London and flawlessly captures the angst and changing times of these places during this unforgettable period. Dickens extensively researched the events that occurred to set up perfect scenes that stick with the reader even after the novel is finished. Dickens masterfully uses the literary element of imagery throughout the novel to enforce his theme of man’s inhumanity toward his fellow man and to first create a sense of sympathy towards the peasants with an underlining feeling of hatred towards the nobles, then he creates and sustains a deep love and respect for the main characters of Lucie Manette, Charles Darnay, and Sydney Carton, and lastly Dickens sways the reader’s opinions as he creates a fresh sense of hatred for the Revolutionaries and a sympathy towards the nobles at the novel’s closing.
By showing how the revolutionaries use oppression and violence to further their own selfish and bloodthirsty ends, in A Tale of Two Cities Dickens suggests that whoever is in power, nobles or commoners, will fall prey to the temptation to exercise their full control. He is fully aware of the sufferings the French commoners endured and acknowledges that at times force is necessary, but believes the revolutionaries mistook their vengeance as natural passion. In other words, Dickens shows that while tyranny will surely lead to revolution, revolution will lead just as surely to tyranny. The only way to break this cycle is through the application of justice and
The French Revolution was a period of social and political disorder that began on July 14, 1789 when the Revolutionaries attacked the Bastille. The Revolution was caused by the social injustice that the rich aristocrats put against the poor peasants. A Tale of Two Cities, was written by Charles Dickens in 1859 and was mainly based in London and Paris leading up to the French Revolution. In the story Dickens makes many references throughout the book about the struggles of the French Revolution. He uses words with different meanings and symbols to represent the themes and ideas of the Revolution. Throughout A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens uses symbols like the mill, the fountain, and the shadow to represent the theme of inhumanity.
Dickens begins A Tale of Two Cities with this famous sentence. It describes the spirit of the era in which this novel takes place. This era is the latter part of the 1700s - a time when relations between Britain and France were strained, America declared its independence, and the peasants of France began one of the bloodiest revolutions in history. In short, it was a time of liberation and a time of terrible violence. Dickens describes the two cities at the center of the novel: Paris, a city of extravagance, aristocratic abuses, and other evils that lead to revolution and London, a city rife with crime, capital punishment, and disorder. In both cities, the capabilities of an angry mob were a dangerous thing, to be feared by all.