Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is islamic terrorism fueling islamophobia
Refugee crisis today essays
Refugee Problems Introduction, Body, conclusion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is islamic terrorism fueling islamophobia
The terrorist attacks on Paris furthered the rejection of Syrian refugees by enhancing the Islamophobia against Syrians, feeding to the Anti Syrian Sentiment. The international community used the fear produced from the Paris attacks to develop more restrictive policies such as closing borders, refugee detainment, and Syrian refugees now seek shelter with the negative stigma of being associated to terrorism.
On the night of November 13th, six specific Parisian local hotspots, chosen by ISIS extremists, were bombarded with explosives and gunfire. The main players involved were ISIS extremists against French people. The motive behind this massacre was to attack sites that were against the moral values of ISIS. The Islamic State refers to Paris
…show more content…
as "the capital of abominations and perversions," resulting in terrorist attacks being committed in areas where French residents go to enjoy themselves (International Business Times). Many people were puzzled to discover that the targeted locations were not prestigious landmarks visited by tourists. The sites chosen were locations of pure amusement: a sports stadium, a concert hall, restaurants and bars. Initial attacks occurred simultaneously, with two explosions close to the Stade de France, and eventually moving into Central Paris. In total, 352 people were injured, 99 people were in critical condition and 130 people were pronounced dead (source). This was the deadliest violence strike against France since World War II. The most bloodshed occurred at the concert hall hosting an American rock band. The concert hall had many civilians held hostage, with the attackers later detonating their explosive belts. Once police forces stepped inside, the concert hall was already a horrific blood bath. In addition, dozens of civilians were killed in an attack in a restaurant in the 10th arrondissement and several other crowded establishments on a Friday night. It is quite alarming that terrorists preferred to cause mayhem in the heart of working-class Paris rather than a touristy neighborhood. Paris was a target because of the city’s core values and inclusive way of life. In the third location, authorities said that at least three people died when the bombs went off outside the soccer stadium. Contrary to belief, the Paris massacre did not emerge out of the blue. Prior to the November 13th attack, France launched airstrikes in Syria on Sept. 27, 2015, a move that the governments of other European countries like the United Kingdom and Germany have yet to legally sanction. This airstrike worsened the relations between France and the Middle East, causing further animosity. Moreover, France opposes the idea that Assad should play a role in the Syrian transitional process from a dictatorship to a democratic state. France’s combative attitude toward Assad and the large scale of its intervention in Syria can be clarified by two factors. Firstly, France is using its interventionist foreign policy in Syria and the Middle East more broadly in order to reinforce its self-perception as a great power. Secondly, France regards its steadfast opposition to Assad as an opportunity to enhance security cooperation with anti-Assad Sunni countries in the Middle East that also share France’s deep distrust of Iran. It is unfortunate that ISIS chose the 10th and 11th Districts of Paris; districts opposing France’s foreign policy (New York Times). These districts are neighborhoods with a strong immigrant and working-class influence, and have become increasingly gentrified in recent years. ISIS extremists were attentive with the culture of these French sites rather than the politics surrounding European involvement in the Middle East. These targeted locations are known for alcohol consumption, dining, and musical entertainment. They are locations where cultures and religions intermingle as thousands of people gather for a festive night. Regrettably, all these actions committed by Parisians challenge the foundation of ISIS’s pure principles. As the crime scenes were investigated, it was alarming that there was discovery of a Syrian passport, found near the body of one of the terrorists. This newly found evidence generated maximum security within Europe and among other countries, such as the United States and Poland. It is unsure if the passport discovered was intentionally left behind by ISIS or as a way to frame Syrian refugees. Regardless of the intentions, the passport found at the site left a negative stigma against Syrian refugees. There is concern that ISIS supporters may be traveling alongside the thousands of asylum seekers coming into Europe. The possibility of this occurring has generated a backlash against Muslim refugees in Europe and even in the United States. Immediately following the Paris terrorist attacks, United States President Obama made a statement on national television addressing the massacre by saying the attack is “… on all of humanity and the universal values we share”. As the United States oldest ally, we need to stand in solidarity with France during a period of immense struggle. President Obama furthered his address by saying that "we stand prepared and ready to provide whatever assistance the people of France need to respond." (CNN) Relief for refugees, fueled by the image in September of a drowned Syrian boy on a Turkish beach, has shifted to dire warnings of unacceptable security risks after the revelation that at least one of the terrorists arrived with migrants through Greece. Several governors now stand against refugees not being welcomed in their states. House GOP leaders are drafting legislation to Obama's plan to accept 10,000 refugees in 2016. Texas senator, Ted Cruz, initially expressed acceptance in early 2014 concerning the refugee debacle. Cruz spoke about the dilemma concerning refugees seeking asylum in the United States, and spoke generally about U.S. values. "We have welcomed refugees, the tired huddled masses for centuries," he said. "That’s been the history of the United States. We should continue to do so,". In present day, with Syria's bloody civil war still raging and with fears stoked about ISIL fighters slipping into the U.S., Cruz takes back his acceptance and is pushing legislation that prevents Syrian refugees from entering the country. Cruz challenged Obama’s refugee relief efforts for 2016 "I have to say, particularly in light of what happened in Paris, that's nothing short of lunacy." In present day, the refugee crisis is primarily an emergency of global governance. Effective global governance is “a process of cooperative leadership that brings together national governments, multilateral public agencies, and civil society to achieve commonly accepted goals.”(International Monetary Fund) International countries, specifically the EU, need to be proactive when carefully addressing the problem.
There is a lack of aid for the countries attracting the most refugees as a result of the proximity to conflict zones is not effect governance. There should be strategies to share the burden among countries accepting refugees; and a renewed focus on addressing the underlying issues that motivated refugees to flee their home countries. Refugees face on a societal level is the ability to support themselves.” Davis described the local- and family-level challenges faced by those considering fleeing from conflict. She also brought attention to the disproportionate impact that the refugee crisis has on the already impoverished communities of the host …show more content…
countries. With 6 million, registered plus unregistered, Syrian refugees in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan and the autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government of northern Iraq.
Still inside Syria, there are 7.6 million displaced by the chaos. These last, mainly Sunni Syrians, are especially vulnerable now that Russia, the main ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad after Shia Iran, has stormed into Syria and targeted most of its air strikes on non-Isis rebels caught between the regime and the jihadis’ so-called Islamic State. Walid Jumblatt, Lebanese leader, says most of these internal refugees will be permanently displaced, as the war fractures Syria on ethno-sectarian demographic lines. Jumblatt says, “The 7-8 million displaced will never be able to return to their homes and villages”. “They have been ethnically cleansed.” (CNN) Asylum seekers and refugees are running out of places to flee. Many could swell the Syrian migration just as aid turns against refugees. Still others could be driven to seek refuge with Isis, in its self-declared caliphate. This requires a political solution. Without a resolution, the refugee numbers expand and the duration of exile lengthens. The hope withers and refugees become frantic. At the same time, a gradual disproportionate weight arises to many developing countries that continue to host the majority of the world’s refugees. A solution to alleviate the burden on less developed host countries is for more developed nations to take some of the most vulnerable
refugees for resettlement. Muslim extremist groups have been an issue for several decades now and the current actions of both the United States and France has not been successful. The airstrikes and continuous killings of civilians in the Middle East have generated further support for these Muslim extremist groups. However, ISIS is so extreme that negotiations and peace talks are non-existent. But what I do believe is that the global community should continue to close their borders to preserve their land and citizens. We must think of the greater good of our countries and disregard our inhibitions. If we aimlessly accept more refugees we can end up in Paris’s position of mass mayhem. Our families, friends, community and very existence can be tarnished at the hands of these unpredictable refugees.
According to the 1951 Refugee Convention, refugee is a term applied to anyone who is outside his/her own country and cannot return due to the fear of being persecuted on the basis of race, religion, nationality, membership of a group or political opinion. Many “refugees” that the media and the general public refer to today are known as internally displaced persons, which are people forced to flee their homes to avoid things such as armed conflict, generalized violations of human rights or natural and non-natural disasters. These two groups are distinctly different but fall ...
In fact, as tensions continue to rise in the Middle East, they have been further exacerbated. In just the past few years, France has been struck by numerous radical terrorist attacks from the Charlie Hebdo attack, to the Nice Bastille Day attacks, to the infamous Paris bombings that took place a year ago. While tensions have remained high since the 1970s when immigrants first came under scrutiny by the French upper classes, never before has such global attention been paid to France’s immigration and religious toleration policies. What is even more concerning is that the perpetrators of some of these attacks grew up in the banlieues of Paris. As La Haine predicted, since the institutional problems facing the French government continue to be ignored, the fall will be that much more
On November 13th, 2015 the world was shocked to discover that terrorists had attacked Paris, however in the latest string of terrorist attacks one must pose the question of whom terrorism impacts the most. Traditionally, in terrorism the victim is the group or region in which the attack is target. Recently, we have seen a large shift in the brunt of the backlash being placed toward minority religions that are simply blemished by small groups of extremists, thus painting an unjust image of the religion entirely. In the case of the Paris attacks, the extremist group, ISIS, has showcased views drastically different than a majority of Muslims, yet the media and millions of people globally have created the misconception that such an anomalistic
This, however, pales in comparison to the 65.3 million people forcibly displaced worldwide. (UNCHR) The refugee crisis the United States faces today is extremely controversial. Refugees should not only be allowed, but also be welcomed into the United States. It is actually safe to let them in, but it also makes America more cultured and it brings the refugees to safety.
America needs to accept the Syrian refugees because if they do not, the United States is abandoning its morals and leaving thousands of people stranded in danger. While Syrian refugees are often labeled as terrorists, they are actually the opposite. Through research by Lauren Gambino, Patrick Kingsley, and Alberto Nardelli, three writers from an English Newspaper, “The Guardian”, have found interesting results. They admit, “Syrian refugees are generally afraid of exactly the same thing that Americans are: Islamist terrorism” (Gambino 3).
On November 13, 2015, Paris, France was attacked by a terrorist group. 130 people were killed and many hundreds of people were wounded by explosions and gunshots from the attack. The attack was targeted in 6 locations across paris and ISIS claimed responsibility for all attacks. The were also suicide bombs in cafes and massive explosions by football fields.
A refugee is defined as an individual who has been forced to leave their country due to political or religious reasons, or due to threat of war or violence. There were 19.5 million refugees worldwide at the end of 2014, 14.4 million under the mandate of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), around 2.9 million more than in 2013. The other 5.1 million Palestinian refugees are registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). With the displacement of so many people, it is difficult to find countries willing to accept all the refugees. There are over 125 different countries that currently host refugees, and with this commitment comes the responsibility of ensuring these refugees have access to the basic requirements of life; a place to live, food to eat, and a form of employment or access to education. Currently, the largest cause of refugees is the Syrian civil war, which has displaced over 2.1 million people. As a country of relative wealth, the United States should be able to provide refuge for many refugees, as well as provide monetary support to the refugees that they are not able to receive.
Syrian refugees may face hardships. Refugees are people fleeing from their country and home because it is no longer safe “ due to war, persecution, violence, or natural disasters.” After arriving in a new country, many refugees cannot speak nor understand the native language. Refugees have already been through alot and to add to taht they come to a new country knowing nothing.
The United Nations (UN) has estimated that the two and a half year long Civil War in Syria has lead to more than one hundred thousand deaths in the region. The continued conflict in Syria has caused the UN to stop updating the death toll in Syria because they have found that information from Syria and the surrounding region is no longer verifiable (UNCHR, 2014). The UN’s Refugee Agency (UNCHR) (2014) has noted that 2.4 million Syrians have registered as refugees, but they estimate that there are, in fact many more unregistered Syrian refugees escaping through the Iraq border.
According to Nicole Ostrand in the article “The Syrian Refugee Crisis,” Syrian refugees are in need of shelter in wealthier countries because the countries they are currently placed in are not financially capable of providing them sufficient protection and support. In the article, Ostrand states that Sweden, the United Kingdom, the United State, and Germany have all agreed to host more refugees in 2015 than they have in previous years, yet she argues that their efforts alone are inadequate for improving the conditions of these refugees (Ostrand, 268). Throughout the article, Ostrand argues that more countries need to become involved in these Syrian refugee relocation efforts in order to ensure that the
A week ago, a devastating photo of Aylan Kurdi circulated around the world. It placed a young and innocent face on an issue that is now affecting more than four million people, the displacement of Syrian refugees and the treatment of the situation. Writer for the Washington Post, Ishaan Tharoor, writes in his two articles Slovakia will take in 200 Syrian refugees, but they have to be Christian and Europe’s fear of Muslim refugees echoes rhetoric of 1930s anti-Semitism the surreal treatment of these refugees. Griffe Witte and Karla Adam, fellow Washington Post writers, add supplemental information in Britain takes in so few refugees from Syria they would fit on a subway train, showing even first world countries handling of the issue. Hundred
The civil war in Syria has been going on for nearly six years. The war began in the year 2011. There has been a numerous amount of casualties, adding up to nearly 400,000 deaths. It would take nearly 7.7 billion U.S. dollars to meet the needs of the Syrians. In neighboring countries there are more than 4.5 million Syrian refugees. Most of the Syrian refugees are living in Jordan and Lebanon because that’s where the Mercy Corps has been helping them since 2012. More than half of the Syrian refugees are under the age of 18. In 2012 the first refugee camp was opened in Za’atari, Jordan. Thousands of refugees flee Syria everyday. Unemployment was only at 15% before the uprising in 2011. Now it’s a booming 57.7 percent since the civil war started.
After the civil war broke out in Syria, a lot of Syrian refugees moved to my country, Turkey. Especially after the borders’ opening to refugees, I started to see them everywhere. I did not know how they felt at that time and saw the situation from the media’s perspective. Not surprisingly media outlets were mostly showing the ill sides of the happenings. Even though I was aware of how desperate and distressed they are, the news showing refugees doing robberies, and murders, started to affect my perspective and create prejudices. But when my family needed to flee the dictator regime in Turkey to the U.S., I felt the desperation of those refugees. Next, I saw the refugees in the U.S. news and understood Syrian refugees' feelings in Turkey when
We are facing a refugee crisis of a magnitude that has not been seen since world war two, presenting the world with countless challenges and a dichotomy of decisions. Images of Syrians fleeing their homes and taking treacherous journeys in search of safety in Europe have dominated the news, as levels of global displacement have escalated. The United Nations High Commission for Refugees has estimated that 1 in every 113 people globally are now either, asylum-seekers, internally displaced people or refugees, facing the challenges of starvation, abduction, violence and obtaining admission into a protected country. Coincidentally, these statistics indicate that one person in this room today would fit this situation.
Al-assad has blamed the refugee crisis on Western’s support for terrorists, as people fleeing the countries civil war, travel towards the European Union. Al-assad feels that the core of the whole issue regarding the refugee crisis is the fact the Western Nations are supporting terrotists and terrorism. Al- assad has said that he feels that European Nation should be held accountable for the crisis. "Europe is responsible because it supported terrorism," said Al-assad. "Can you feel sad for a child's death in the sea and not for thousands of children who have been killed by the terrorists in Syria?" al-Assad said, referring to images of a dead Syrian boy that shocked the world. "And also for men, women, and the elderly? These European double standards are no longer acceptable."