Synoptic Gospel And Jesus Comparison

657 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Comparison of the gospel of John and the other gospels

The most significant difference between the portrayal of Jesus in the synoptic gospels and John’s gospel is the exclusion of important events that occurred during Jesus’ life. John’s gospel fails to mention, what some say are the most critical events of Jesus’ life (For example: The Lord’s Supper). In John’s gospel, he also excludes any mentioning of Jesus casting out demons. Whereas, in the first three books there were several scenario’s in which Jesus cast out demons. I account for John’s exclusion because there was a large chunk of time (about a twenty-year difference) between the first three books and John being written. Therefore, in this amount of time what the authors found to be important content could’ve changed.

When I compare John’s …show more content…

They are similar as they are all written in third person perspectives. However, some of these excerpts differentiate in their tone. In John’s story of Nicodemus is seems that Jesus is speaking to Nicodemus in a more questioning and assertive tone. Whereas, in the story of the woman with the flow of blood and the raising of the girl, Jesus seems to use a very calm and peaceful tone. The different tones in these excerpts give the reader a different perspective into the story, and I believe the author (John) did this on purpose. “ 42 Immediately the girl stood up and began to walk around (she was twelve years old). At this they were completely astonished. 43 He gave strict orders not to let …show more content…

Since John knew what was already included in the Synoptic gospels, he didn’t have to add the exact same content in the exact same format as the synoptic gospels. Rather, he was able to focus on a different audience, and use different context to do this. What I found to be the most surprising different between John and the synoptic gospels would be the differences in tone. I wonder if the authors used certain tones because that’s how they themselves perceived Jesus to be. For example, if one of the authors told a story with Jesus having a more accusatory tone, then did he perceive Jesus to be an accusatory person? Or if Jesus had a humble tone in their book, then did they perceive Jesus to be a humble person? These are things we can only question, as we will never know for certain. In doing this discussion I discovered that Mathew, Mark, and Luke had very similar (the same) format in terms of their layout. I think that it’s interesting that they used the same format even though they were attempting to reach different

Show More
Related

  • Christian Scriptures Essay

    492 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are the origin of nearly everything the Christian Church teaches about Jesus. The Gospels, in turn, serve as the scale or test of truth and authenticity of everything the church teaches about Jesus. It is said that the Gospels are the link between Jesus of Nazareth and the people of every age throughout history who have claimed to be his followers. Although the Gospels teach us about Jesus’ life they may not provide concrete evidence that what they speak of is true there are several other sources.

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Gospel of John

    868 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Gospel of John, the last of the four gospels in the Bible, is a radical departure from the simple style of the synoptic gospels. It is the only one that does not use parables as a way of showing how Jesus taught, and is the only account of several events, including the raising of Lazarus and Jesus turning water into wine. While essentially the gospel is written anonymously, many scholars believe that it was written by the apostle John sometime between the years 85 and 95 CE in Ephesus. The basic story is that of a testimonial of one of the Apostles and his version of Jesus' ministry. It begins by telling of the divine origins of the birth of Jesus, then goes on to prove that He is the Son of God because of the miracles he performs and finally describes Jesus' death and resurrection.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Luke Timothy Johnson's Prophetic Jesus

    1114 Words  | 3 Pages

    Luke Timothy Johnson uses Prophetic Jesus, Prophetic Church in order to make a strong point that when studying both Luke and Acts as a unit, rather than reading the canonical order in the Bible, gives us one of our best prophetic looks at the Church for all ages. By presenting this point Johnson hopes to light a fire in our churches of today by using the prophetic works of Luke, so that we as Christians will attend to the ways that Christ intended the church to be. In Johnson’s introduction he states that it is not wrong to study Luke and Acts separately as there are many ways to study the scripture, nevertheless it is wrong to look at Luke and see the prophetic ways of Jesus, and then looking at Acts as non-prophetic. Through seeing Luke’s

    Read More

  • Disparity Between The Passion Of The Christ by Mel Gibson and The Bible

    1468 Words  | 3 Pages

    The slight differences in The Passion of the Christ and the gospels' accounts are made to create a more dramatic feeling for the viewer. The addition of devils and Satan to the story adds more emotion, and stresses the dedication Jesus had to his people. Overall, the differences between the stories are to show a more creative depiction of the sacrifice and determination that Jesus gave for his people.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Gospel Of John And The Gospel Of Matthew And John

    1853 Words  | 4 Pages

    While both the Gospel of Matthew and John tell of the global reordering plan for the world, each does so in a unique way. The Gospel of Matthew is able to show the reordering of the world by focusing on the aspect of Jesus as a teacher and the results of this; while the Gospel of John shows the reordering occurring as God works through Jesus showing signs to the people of who he is, focusing on the belief this brings to people. “But all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God” (John 1:12). Through this verse, we see the reordering in effect, as all who receive him and believe in him have the power to become children of God.

    Read More

  • Mark In The Gospel Of Mark

    793 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the main characteristics of the gospel of Mark is it’s length. Mark is much shorter than Matthew and Luke, but what it lacks in quantity, it makes up for in quality. The author of Mark does not slow down the gospel story and makes sure that only important and relevant details are included. When Mark is compared to Matthew and Luke, it becomes obvious to see what Mark has eliminated. The author’s omission of Jesus’ birth, lineage, resurrection, and ascension denotes careful planning and purpose in the gospel of Mark.

    Read More

  • The Portrayal of Jesus in the Gospels of Mark and John

    1057 Words  | 3 Pages

    At the very beginning of the gospels the authors make their representation of Jesus known to the reader, but they rely upon different methods. Mark focuses on Jesus’ role as a servant is apparent as he quotes the prophet Isaiah: “Here is my messenger, whom I send on ahead of you!” (Mark 1:2) This is a rather simple statement, and the use of the word “messenger” connotes a sense of being under another’s command; Jesus is seen as an intermediary between God and man. John’s introduction to Jesus is much more majestic and poetic, devoting many verses to explaining his divine relationship with God: “In the beginning there was the divine word and wisdom. The divine word and wisdom was there with God, and it was what God was. It was there with God from the beginning. Everything came to be by means of it” (John 1:1-3).

    Read More

  • Compare the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke

    570 Words  | 2 Pages

    Compare and contrast the birth narratives in the Gospel of Matthew and that of the Gospel of Luke.

    Read More

  • Matthew And Luke Essay

    742 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since Matthew and Luke are not modern day biographies, they do not follow the standard that we imagine. I think the explanation for the combination of similarities and differences comes from the fact that the Matthew and Luke are styled differently and also have different audiences. Since Matthew and Luke are interpreting history for a specific audience, this would explain why Matthew and Luke contains differing details. For example, Matthew tells of the Wise Men that came to visit Jesus in Matt.2:1-12 while Luke tells of shepherds that came to visit Jesus in Luke 2:8-20. Since Matthew is styled for a Jewish audience, perhaps it is considered more impactful and stunning that wise philosophers came to worship a child. On the other hand,

    Read More

  • Gospel of John and Mission

    2757 Words  | 6 Pages

    Before making some discussions on the gospel we believed to be written by the disciple who loved by Jesus (John 13:23, 19:26, 20:2, 21:7) it is good to see the purpose of this gospel. The purpose of the gospel of John seems summarized in two verses “Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, who are not recorded in this book. But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.” (John 20:30-31, NIV).

    Read More

  • Three Synoptic Gospels

    1681 Words  | 4 Pages

    This work is also said to be anonymous, and believed to have been produced in Syria within a large Jewish and Jewish-Christian community. It is apparent from a number of shared accounts, and overlapping stories of Jesus that the author of Matthew’s Gospel used Mark as a source. Although many of the stories are expanded upon, and carry different connotations, the same basic stories are found in all of the synoptic gospels, and because Mark was the first written, scholars assume it was a source used by both Matthew and Luke. It should also be noted that many of Jesus’ teachings in Matthew were not found in Mark. This led scholars to search for a second source, which resulted in the Q document. Although not available as a feasible document, Q designates a compilation of Jesus’ parables and sayings from about 50 to 70 CE, which are present in Matthew (Harris p.156). Throughout the gospel, Matthew uses formula quotations, meaning he quotes from the Old Testament. This strong relationship with the Hebrew Bible helps scholars determine that Matthew wanted to emphasize his Jewish position. This is important because his interpretations of Jesus throughout the gospel are not agreed upon by all Jews, in fact only a small fraction. Although it is obvious to the readers than John and Matthew carry very different stories of Jesus’ life, it is interesting to

    Read More

  • The Differences In The Gospel Of Mark

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    God’s written law is something that is and should be continuously turned, to not only when Christians find themselves in need, but also throughout in one’s daily life. The four gospels tell to story of Jesus’ life and his teachings he gave while on the earth making it possible for there to be a true example of Christ-like faith. The proposition that there are differences in the story of Jesus and in his teachings seems to question the basis upon which the Christian faith is found upon. Rather than proclaiming the gospels as falsehoods because on the differences they possess, by analyzing the differences in the context of the particular gospel it can be understood that the differences are not made by mistake, rather as a literary device. While the four gospels have differences and similarities, they cannot be regarded as an argument against the faith because their differences are what point to the many aspects of Christ.

    Read More

  • The Four Gospels

    1960 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first three gospels are sometimes called the 'synoptic' (same view) gospels. This is because they each cover teaching and miracles by Jesus that are also covered in another account. John, writing later, recounts Jesus' other words and miracles that have a particular spiritual meaning.

    Read More

  • Four Gospels Research Paper

    654 Words  | 2 Pages

    The four gospels are detailed accounts of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. Each portrays a unique story and angle of Jesus, who is the savior of the Jews and the world. Apostle Matthew’s writings are to prove to the Jews that Jesus is their Messiah. Mark stressed the humanity of Jesus and also his deity. Luke wanted to show that the gentile Christian in God’s kingdom is based on the teachings of Jesus. John speaks of Jesus as one sent from God to reveal His love and grace to man. The four gospels work together to elaborate on the several key themes; salvation, spreading His word, and the fulfillment of Jesus’ promise.

    Read More

  • Gospel Of John Research Paper

    1017 Words  | 3 Pages

    The New Testament teaches about who Jesus is and what he did on the earth. John wrote the last of the four gospels which recount Jesus’ life and what is to come. The gospel of John is somewhat different from the other three gospels, in that it is more symbolic and less concrete. For example, John expresses Jesus as the Passover Lamb when Matthew, Mark, and Luke do not. This gospel is showing that Christianity is moving away from the long-practiced Jewish traditions. John’s gospel can be laid out into four parts: the prologue or the incarnate word, signs of the Messiah with teachings about life in him, the farewell teaching and the passion narrative, and the epilogue or the roles of Peter and of the disciple whom Jesus loved. The Gospel of John is arguably the most

    Read More

More about Synoptic Gospel And Jesus Comparison

Open Document