Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Blue velvet scene analysis
Blue velvet scene analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Blue velvet scene analysis
Absurdist media is characterized by its intentional incoherency, and David Lynch's Blue Velvet is a prime example of such. It is sometimes difficult to differentiate between what is symbolic, and what is weird for the sake of weird. Are continuity errors, such as a dress changing between frames, intentional or just sheer mistake or coincidence? Throughout absurdist media these questions types of questions are frequently asked, but not always answered. Despite its somewhat bizarre structure, Blue Velvet, the story of a small town mystery is carried through its setting, major and minor characters, and symbols. If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? Lumberton, USA, a fictional town that could be anywhere within the United States, is the stage for this film. It seems like the ideal suburban lifestyle, with green grass, picket fences, and the booming lumber industry. While Jeffrey is spying on Frank in his car, the radio says that Lumbertion is the only town where they truly know how much wood a woodchuck chucks. It is evident that there is not much else going on …show more content…
The ear was the initiator of curiosity; it was very thing that got Jeffrey into this position. The ear of Donald being cut off refers to Van Gogh, explicitly stated by Frank himself. This could refer to the mental health state of Frank. The insects could symbolize the scumminess or ill intent of people like Frank, which Jeffrey has to exterminate. The robins, although said to be a symbol of light and love by Sandy, commonly represent birth. In the final scene, the robin is shown eating the bug, showing that love has conquered and the evil has been slain. Light and dark are also symbols in this film, as almost everything Frank does is in the dark. When he rapes Dorothy, he blows out the candles and says, "Now it's dark," as if the light prohibits him from behaving in such a
The only real way to truly understand a story is to understand all aspects of a story and their meanings. The same goes for movies, as they are all just stories being acted out. In Thomas Foster's book, “How to Read Literature Like a Professor”, Foster explains in detail the numerous ingredients of a story. He discusses almost everything that can be found in any given piece of literature. The devices discussed in Foster's book can be found in most movies as well, including in Quentin Tarantino’s cult classic, “Pulp Fiction”. This movie is a complicated tale that follows numerous characters involved in intertwining stories. Tarantino utilizes many devices to make “Pulp Fiction” into an excellent film. In this essay, I will demonstrate how several literary devices described in Foster's book are put to use in Tarantino’s film, “Pulp Fiction”, including quests, archetypes, food, and violence.
The examples of light through the book like the fire, Ralph’s fair hair, and the pale skin of the boys, are symbols of the good and safety. The examples of darkness such as the face paint, the night and the density of the forest’s foliage symbolize shady dealings and frightful encounters. Jack, one of the more savage boys, truly descends into a hateful madness when he smears on mud as face paint. This not only makes him look more gruesome, but it hides his pale skin away from the world. Also, it should be noted that throughout the book there is a common theme of hair color being an example of foreshadowing towards the mindset of each boy. For instance, one of the notoriously good characters, Ralph, has very fair hair whereas Robert, a sadistic and violent boy, has dark hair. Jack is one of the few characters to break this mold because his red hair shows his progression into madness as well as the fire’s steady decline from light imagery into something darker. In the beginning of the book, Jack is tasked with keeping the fire lit. However when the fire goes out around the same time Jack catches his first pig and paints his face, Jack descends into depravity and the fire becomes an ominous symbol. This, along with the hunters want to live deeper in the woods where the sun does not reach shows the darkness as a symbol of malicious intent. However, it is here in the forest where one of the characters discovers the Lord of the Flies and becomes enlightened. It is this sort of contrasting imagery that shows the books love of blurring the lines of the good and the
Everything was great, every day was the same except that particular day when your life
In conclusion, by using the production elements of both allusion and symbolism; director Tim Burton has created the film in such a manner by making deliberate choices in order to invite a certain response. The film is constructed and given greater depth through the allusion to elements from other genres and ridicules the suburbia’s materialism and lack of imagination, which in turn enhances the invited response.
Candyman (1992) directed by Bernard Rose tells the story of a graduate student whose research on urban legends becomes reality and consumes and threatens her life. The viewer of this film is not able to reconcile whether Helen Lyle, the graduate student, or Candyman is the perpetrator of the kidnapping of baby Anthony McCoy, the murder of Helen’s friend and fellow graduate student Bernadette Walsh, or the brutal gutting of Helen’s psychiatrist. Is Candyman real or a figment of Helen’s obsessive research and interest in the legend? This uncertainty roots this film in “the fantastic,” a phenomenon discussed by French theorist, Tzvetan Todorov. Todorov declares “the fantastic” to hinge on “the reader’s hesitation.” In other words, when the viewer has “nearly reached the point of believing” but hesitates, that is when a story becomes fantastic (Todorov 31). This paper will discuss hesitation within the film Candyman. The film’s greatest linchpin to “the fantastic” is the indefinability of Candyman’s monstrosity. Rose’s “monster”
As with much of the psychological thriller genre, Blue Velvet owes a large debt to 1940s and '50s film noir, filtered through a uniquely individualistic vision, containing and exploring such conventions as the femme fatale, a seemingly unstoppable villain, and the questionable moral outlook of the Hero ? extended here to include even the humanity of the hero, as well as the usual shadowy, beautiful and sometimes dark cinematography and important and frequent symbolism. The film also pays tribute to many 1950s and 1960s soap operas and B-films, showcasing nostalgic visuals, the setting is also very indistinguishable, as there are references to the both the 1950s and 1960s, and the 1980s (Dorothy Vallens TV looks as if it was from the 60s, not 1986 era).
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” Visual and Other Pleasures. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1989. 14 - 26.
The significance of the question “Does a tree falling in the forest make a sound if no one is there to hear it?” is that if our senses are not there to take it in, it raises the question of it being real. We don’t see the tree fall, hear it, or even feel the impact. So we are only left to image the tree falling. George Berkeley would have said the tree made no sound.
My work proposes a broader view of the theatre-film interface, one that relies on intertextuality as its interpretive method. I believe it is valuable-both pedagogically and theoretically-to ask broad questions about the aesthetic, narrative, and ideological exchanges between the history of theatre and contemporary film and television. For example, this paper will study how the "Chinese Restaurant" episode of the sitcom, Seinfeld, intertextually reworks Samuel Beckett's modernist play, Waiting for Godot. In each text, characters encounter an existential plight as they are forced to wait interminably, and thus confront their powerlessness at the hands of larger social forces. As a pedagogical matter, this connection encourages the students to see academic culture in the guise of having to read Beckett's play for my course, not as foreign and alienating, but instead as continuous with their understanding of leisure activities like watching sitcoms. As a theoretical matter, this intertextual connection allows important ideological matters to come into bold relie...
Since its inception in 2005, YouTube has grown into the most popular video sharing platform in the world. With its easy to use platform and a massive perspective audience, YouTube connects many content creators with the audience they’re seeking, and introduces many individuals to content and creators they otherwise might have passed over. The sheer amount of content and variety on YouTube has created microcosms of fans, creators, and genres of content, all with their own specific conventions and popular YouTube Stars. One particularly interesting genre that had become popular is the abstract film. In this rhetorical analysis, the conventions of abstract film and storytelling will be reviewed, how one popular abstract artist, Poppy, fits into the genre, and how my own creation, “I’m Poopy” fits into the conventions of Abstract storytelling as well.
His Girl Friday, Citizen Kane and Rashomon are all very well recognized films in the cinema & media world as well as from avid movie viewers worldwide. Although all three are iconic films, they vary greatly in the film form in which they’re presented. His Girl Friday is a prime example of a classical form, whereas Rashomon can be classified as an example of art cinema. The third film, Citizen Kane cannot be grouped into either one of these distinct categories because it shares similarities that both classical and art cinema film involve. Citizen Kane belongs in a category of its own and can be seen as a “hybrid” combination of both classical and art cinema.
A strange, a wonderfully twisted film, the 1986 feature Blue Velvet, can be seen as one of David Lynch’s more grounded film’s in regards to it’s narrative focus and general veering away from his usual surrealist style features; such as his previous efforts given his breakout film Eraser Head (1977), and his many experimental short’s that laid way to that.
Objects represent the physical form of intangible memories and feelings in a person’s mind. An object can have a different meaning depending on the person being asked. In Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children an adolescent boy begins as an ordinary kid living in the suburbs. Jacob is petrified after his own grandfather dies in his arms after being attacked by a creature that Jacob does not know if he imagined. He finds the peculiar kids of his grandfather’s childhood and finds out how he is a part of these children. This journal explains the meaning of the cairn, the house, and the statue of Adam from Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children.
“Entertainment has to come hand in hand with a little bit of medicine, some people go to the movies to be reminded that everything’s okay. I don’t make those kinds of movies. That, to me, is a lie. Everything’s not okay.” - David Fincher. David Fincher is the director that I am choosing to homage for a number of reasons. I personally find his movies to be some of the deepest, most well made, and beautiful films in recent memory. However it is Fincher’s take on story telling and filmmaking in general that causes me to admire his films so much. This quote exemplifies that, and is something that I whole-heartedly agree with. I am and have always been extremely opinionated and open about my views on the world and I believe that artists have a responsibility to do what they can with their art to help improve the culture that they are helping to create. In this paper I will try to outline exactly how Fincher creates the masterpieces that he does and what I can take from that and apply to my films.
Alfred Hitchcock is one of the most recognized directors of the Golden Age of Hollywood for his suspenseful and meticulously designed films. Although Hitchcock experimented with a few bold camera movements, the majority of his films followed the Hollywood style known for its seamless camera techniques aiming to depict reality. The reality shown on screen is limited to the perspective of a single protagonist, since the narrative is “psychologically and, therefore, individually motivated” (Hayward, 64). Analyzing the ways in which cinema recreates an illusion of reality through plot devises and character arcs exposes how “contrived and limited [on screen reality] is and yet