Suzy Miller Autism Case Study

769 Words2 Pages

Autism refers to a developmental disability, which is a low ability in communicating and interacting with others, it is shown in a verbal and nonverbal ways and also socialization skills.(Block, Block, & Halliday, 2006) Parents are desperate to find a treatment or therapy to cure their child who has suffered from Autism. However, the increasing awareness of Autism rises the supply of variable treatments which including those are not tested as safety or effective. Suzy Miller is one of the ‘therapists’ who claimed her treatment can help children within Autism and increase their ability. In my opinion, I believe the treatment of Suzy is pseudoscience or still has not being proved as scientific. In this essay, the features of her “new science” will be shown and the …show more content…

However, the healing of Autism is nearly impossible, and the ‘remotely’ treatment is absurd either. There is no proof of their treatments are tested and qualified. Most importantly, these sort of treatments are not only provided by Suzy and William. “One site tells parents they can "defeat the autism in your child" by buying a $299 book” (Shute,Nancy, 2010) Stephen points out that the demand of improvement in Autism create the market full of fraud and pseudoscience. (As cited in Shute& Nancy,2010)
Furthermore, non-falsifiability is another feature of this pseudoscience treatment, as i said before, there is no proof of effectiveness, but no one can also prove their broadcast or consultation is not useful. There are several studies have shown that the improvement of Autism is because of the changing in ages, Stephen also backs this point, he said the reason of improvement is not these alternative ‘treatment’, but the growing of children. (As cited in Shute& Nancy,2010) However, parents prefer to believe that Suzy and William’s treatment are helpful and

More about Suzy Miller Autism Case Study

Open Document