Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Censorships in school libraries
Censorship in high schools
Outline unrealistic media image of sexuality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Censorships in school libraries
Administrators, librarians, teachers and parents all want the best for children. That is why the topic of intellectual freedom in school libraries is often emotional and heated. While the Library Bill of Rights clearly states that information access should not be denied because of age, when it comes to children the discussion gets complicated. Parents have the right to decide what materials are appropriate for their children, but the librarian has to be able to safeguard the collection for the rest of the school. During the career of a school librarian, the topic of censorship will undoubtedly arise. School librarians need to be prepared to support intellectual freedom rights when it comes to the issues of filtering, relocating, and removing information from a library collection.
Censors assert that materials that contain inappropriate information are harmful to children. Common reasons for censorship challenges include violent and sexually explicit material. It is feared that adolescents with higher exposure to sexually explicit material will be more permissive. Censors also have concern that overexposure to violent behavior will make children and young adults more aggressive. However, it is impossible to determine what other outside influences contributes to these behaviors. Bowie Kotrla (2007, p. 51) emphasizes that more damage is inflicted upon adolescents when they are restricted from obtaining information. She states that students find the limitations “frustrating and demoralizing, as well as a serious impediment to learning.”
Students are entitled to uncensored access to information. Many schools are adopting the use of internet filters in order to protect students from unsuitable websites. However, the us...
... middle of paper ...
...ibrary Bill of Rights. School Library Monthly , 26 (6), 48-49.
Bringelson, C. (2004). On intellectual freedom. School Libraries in Canada , 24 (4), 57-59.
Cornette, L. (1999). Taking a stand pays off. Ohio Medium Spectrum , 51 (2-3), 12-13.
Curry, A. (2001). Where is Judy Blume? Controversial fiction for older children and young adults. Journal of Youth Services in Libraries , 14 (3), 28-37.
Johnson, D. (1998). Internet filters: Censorship by any other name?. Emergency Librarian , 25 (5), 11-13.
Kotrla, B. (2007). Sex and violence: Is exposure to media content harmful to chlidren?. Children & Libraries , 5 (2), 50-52.
Saltman, J. (1998). Censoring the imagination: Challenges to children's books. Emergency Librarian , 25, 8-12.
Schrader, A. (1996). Censorproofing school library collections: The fallacy and futility. School Libraries Worldwide , 2 (1), 71-94.
Objectionable content found in challenged books across the country can range from some vulgar language, to rape and incest, and even to explicit sex scenes. However objectionable these topics may be, high schoolers are already exposed to them in some way, whether it be through listening to popular music on the radio, watching television, or browsing the internet. Many parents, and even board members of some schools, object certain books for a variety of reasons. What they have failed to realize is this: if they are so concerned about what their children read in school, are they as concerned about monitoring what they hear on the radio, see on television, and search online? Many schools across the country are now taking the technological route when it comes to teaching. This often means students can have access to the internet while in their classroom. This point goes back to the prior statement of ...
Simmons, John S., and Eliza T. Dresang. School Censorship in the 21st Century: a Guide for Teachers and School Library Media Specialists. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 2001. Print.
Issues of censorship in public schools are contests between the exercise of discretion and the exercise of a Constitutional right. The law must reconcile conflicting claims of liberty and authority, as expressed by Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter in Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 1940 in “Banned in the U.S.A.: A Reference Guide to Book Censorship in Schools and Public Libraries” by Herbert N. Foerstel (23).
Many say that censorship limits what people can do, but others think differently. Censorship in the United States limits the freedom of what some can do and does not allow teens to read about important situations that could happen in life, listen to positive or negative music, and watch certain shows for them to experience. Many people think that censorship is not necessary and that what is produced to the public, the parents should be alright with it.
In his essay “What Johnny Can’t Read, and the Censorship in American Libraries,” Suzanne Fisher Staples argues books being banned in libraries and schools all over the world. The reason most of these books are being taken off the shelves is because of what they say in them, mostly swear words, sex, gender change and more. It can be good to read what you want because if can teach you what type of person you are, and what you like and don’t like.
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
When you bring your child to the public library to checkout a book, or to let them use the computers for a school project you do not want to have to worry about them accidentally seeing another person there looking at pornography or even worse, them accidentally pulling it up on their computer. Many libraries do not filter their internet and therefore leave children at risk of seeing these disturbing images. Those that oppose filtering the internet feel as if it imposes on their first amendment right and that these filters either filter too much or do not filter enough. Although it is important to protect people’s first amendment right, it is our moral obligation to protect our children from pornography and other disturbing images while they are in a public place, especially a library since it is used mostly for educational purposes. But, with filters comes controversy: whether it imposes on one’s first
Gottschalk, Lana. “Internet filters in public libraries: do they belong?” Library Student Journal 2006: vol. 1. Accessed 31 March 2008. http://www.librarystudentjournal.org/index.php/lsj/article/view/25/18
This article emphasizes the point that censors go too far when they attempt to not only ban a book for their own children but want to remove it altogether from a school library, so that other students cannot read it.
Judy Blume’s essay entitled “Censorship: A Personal View,” attempts to explain her rationale for creating literary works for children and young adults that have been banned or restricted due to inappropriate content. Blume’s clever use of anecdotes, diction, and ethos theorizes her opinion that children are never too young to experience post adolescent concepts.
It seems unlikely that there is a school librarian out there who has not encountered a problem with--or railed against--the presence of CIPA-mandated filters on school computers. My own career so far has allowed me to experience a full range of experiences with school computers, from a filterless library to an overfiltering situation so egregious that my journey to have it resolved culminated in suing the school district that employs me—Knox County, Tennessee. I just discovered, in fact, that a Google search for “internet filtering in schools” lists the ACLU litigation for which I was a plaintiff, Franks v. Metropolitan Board of Public Education, as its second hit.
“Children start using the internet at the average age of three and most to spend twice as much time online as their parents” (Ward, 2013). Through the information age, the internet has become an invaluable tool. We have information at our fingertips in record time, but not everything on the internet is appropriate for everyone to see. Pornography, hate speech, and writings meant to incite violence are making their way to children’s computer screens every day. Scary, but we can change this. Internet filters can change this. Personal computer filters exist today and will help prevent children from accessing inappropriate material, but children also use the internet away from home. Libraries, schools, and community centers all offer internet services to children, but are they safe using these resources? The federal government should require by law that all public or government-funded computers have filters to block the access to material deemed inappropriate or objectionable for children. This would help protect children from exposure to inappropriate materials outside of their home.
McCarthy, M. (2005). THE CONTINUING SAGA OF INTERNET CENSORSHIP: THE CHILD ONLINE PROTECTION ACT. Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, (2), 83-101.
There are many legal and ethical issues surrounding the use of web-filtering software. Globally, different countries use web-filtering software to solve different issues but each has its own controversies. In the first section of my paper I start out with a FAQ about web filtering, followed by the current use of web-filtering in the Untied States and China. Each country has its own controversial and ethical issues regarding this issue. I will then conclude with a comparison between the use of web-filtering software between the United States and China.
Today the ALA takes the stand of anti-censorship, but as illustrated, that was not always the case in the United States. In the 19th and much of the 20th centuries, librarians felt it their duty to restrict access to library materials to children and adults. Librarians were admonished "to ob...