Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stalin propaganda
Cold war propaganda essay
Cold War propaganda US
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stalin propaganda
Kant: Wow Darwin you either did not read the book, or you completely missed what was going on. Superman had superpowers that consisted of super hearing, super vision, super strength, and flying.
Darwin: I did read the book Kant I just wanted to make sure that I wasn’t making up the ridiculousness that this book portrayed. No other human has Superman’s powers which makes me question where his alleles came from. In the world that we live on, the traits that Superman had were useless so I wonder if by natural selection Superman’s offspring would have them. I am not even quite sure if a supernatural being like Superman could actually mate with an earthly being to create an offspring.
Mao: I do not understand where you are going with this.
…show more content…
Darwin: Usually when a species has extra traits that are not suitable in the environment that it lives in; that species will either lose its traits or end up harming itself. For example, Superman has super hearing meaning that he will always hear other people’s conversations and people screaming for help that he might not be able to sleep or do simple tasks because he is constantly hearing voices. Maybe in the planet he came from everyone else spoke in a different range of voice that he did not have to hear everyones conversation. Mao: Lets steer away genetics for a quick second and actually speak about the moral conflict between Superman and Lex Luthor.
Personally I think Lex Luthor was the real villain here. I personally agreed with and loved Stalin. I thought he was a brilliant man and I followed most of his ideals.
Kant: Who do you think would’ve been the best person to succeed Stalin: Pyotr or Superman?
Mao: I think Pyotr would’ve been a better candidate for the long run. Superman did not have it in him to turn the whole world into communism. Pyotr would have done anything needed to make that happen. However, I do believe that Superman was more like Stalin and myself.
Darwin: What makes you say that?
Mao: Well first of all Stalin created the cult of personality, everyone loved him and admired him because in all the images he was depicted on he seemed powerful. When Stalin turned Russia into a superpower after winning World War II everyone admired him even more. When the second Sino-Japanese war happened It was me who created a massive guerilla warfare and defeated the Japanese. Because of my formidable and effective fighting force I was the savior of China and everyone loved me. Superman was loved by everyone in the Soviet Union because he kept everyone save while still implemented Communist ideals. We were all saviors and if you did not agree with our ideals we would send you to rectification camps. For example, when superman defeated super villains he put them in a rehabilitation program that
included
Joseph Stalin said, “Ideas are far more powerful than guns. We don 't let our people have guns. Why should we let them have ideas?”. Stalin was a dictator of the USSR from 1929 to 1953. Under his dictatorship, the Soviet Union began to transform from a poor economy to an industrial and military based one. While still a teen, Stalin secretly read Karl Marx 's book the “Communist Manifesto”, and became more interested in his teachings. When Stalin gained power, he ruled his nations using terror and fear, eliminating those who did not comply with his governance.
In the following, I will present the hypothetical case of Superman vs. Lex Luthor; it is wrong for Superman to prevent Lex Luthor from obtaining his goal of world domination. Luthor is a villain, his actions are “evil,” which is the reason Superman and Luther are in conflict; but Luthor believes that “the ends justify the means” meaning although his actions are disagreeable, his end goal is to better humanity as a whole. I will then analyses the case according to three ethical theories, namely Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.
This essay will concentrate on the comparison and analysis of two communist figures: Mao Zedong, leader of the Communist Party in China, and Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union. The main focus of this paper will be to explore each figure’s world view in depth and then compare and contrast by showing their differences and similarities. Joseph Stalin was a realist dictator of the early 20th century in Russia. Before he rose to power and became the leader of the Soviet Union, he joined the Bolsheviks and was part of many illegal activities that got him convicted and he was sent to Siberia (Wood, 5, 10). In the late 1920s, Stalin was determined to take over the Soviet Union (Wiener & Arnold, 1999).
Mao Zedong will forever live on history as a revolutionary, not only in China but across the globe. There are very few communist nations today because of the many difficulties of having a homogenous population, which shares the same ideals. Mao was able to modernize and re-socialize his citizens in a short amount of time. He defined himself as the face of change in China. Mao’s vision of equality for all Chinese citizens has still not been achieved but it is well on its way. The only question lies in, does the end justify the means.
Mohandas Gandhi and Mao Zedong were two great leaders who succeeded in many ways by their actions and decisions. Gandhi was an Indian leader and Mao a Chinese leader. However, their approach to success, peace, and ultimately, a revolution, was very different. Mao favored peace through violence, and Gandhi favored peace through non-cooperation and standing up for what is right. He also believed that these changes will be accomplished by “conscious suffering”, was the way he put it. However, despite their differences, these two leaders were similar too. They were both very charismatic leaders who successfully made it through their revolutions. Mao’s revolution led to change in class structure while Gandhi’s revolution involved India as a country, and he wanted people to realize that working together is a great way to gain independence. While Mao and Gandhi both believed that each of their countries have the need of independence, their views differed when it came to the use of violence, development towards the revolution, and their thoughts on a caste system.
In conclusion, both Lenin and Stalin stood for nearly the same thing, but ended up being quite different in their approaches as to hot to implement the theoretical ideas into the real world. However, while neither man was particularly moral, Stalin especially was evil. But both of them caused famines and wars that caused the deaths of millions of people, not to mention the horrible life of those who survived. I do not believe that Lenin and especially not Stalin realized the goal of the Revolution as they had promised it, and I think that the people of Russia would have been better off if neither Lenin nor Stalin had come to power, and they continued to live under the Tsar.
The pressures of society and many factors against us can at times seem impossible to overcome, however, these limitations are only the ones we place on ourselves. Whether it’s during the adolescent years as Sherman Alexie explained in “The Joy of Reading and Writing: Superman and Me”, about the struggles of overcoming the stigma bound by his culture where “A smart Indian is a dangerous person, widely feared and ridiculed by Indians and non-Indians alike”, as well as having the courage to break free for his own benefit. In addition, this theme was also explored in the later years of adulthood as demonstrated in Malcolm X’s essay, “Learning to Read” where he’d become so frustrated while kept in prison, unable to quite express himself as he did
When most people hear the name Joseph Stalin, they usually associate the name with a man who was part of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. He was willingly to do anything to improve the power of the Soviet Union’s economy and military, even if it meant executing tens of millions of innocent people (Frankforter, A. Daniel., and W. M. Spellman 655). In chapter three of Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book, Everyday Stalinism, she argues that since citizens believed the propaganda of “a radiant future” (67), they were able to be manipulated by the Party in the transformation of the Soviet Union. This allowed the Soviet government to expand its power, which ultimately was very disastrous for the people.
...ense of worth in which they were as they had to change who they were to survive in a troubled time. Stalin in the end was not looking to eradicate or find a neat “final solution” because since his plan did not go as planned, he has to constantly try and adapt and tweak his idea till it became something completely different all together. The Russian people allowed Stalin to rein supreme over them, and if enough people had revolted, there could have been a different outcome. Most people accepted their fate and in the end they died from it.
Trotsky. Instead he was more of a mediocrity, described. as a grey blur which deceived people into trusting him. However, Stalin was a very cunning man. He made up for all of his weaknesses.... ...
More murderous than Hitler, more powerful than Stalin, in the battle of the Communist leaders Mao Zedong trumps all. Born into a comfortable peasant family, Mao would rise up to become China’s great leader. After leading the communists away from Kuomintang rule, he set out to modernize China, but the results of this audacious move were horrific. He rebounded from his failures time and again, and used his influence to eliminate his enemies and to purge China of its old ways. Mao saw a brighter future for China, but it was not within his grasp; his Cultural Revolution was not as successful as he had wanted it to be. Liberator, oppressor, revolutionary, Mao Zedong was the greatest emancipator in China’s history, as his reforms and actions changed the history of China and of the wider world.
Joseph Stalin is a polarizing figure. Decades after his death his legacy still continues to create debate about his tumultuous years as the leader of the Soviet Union. This is evident throughout the four documents while some praise Stalin as impeccable others criticize his policies and lack of political, economic, and social progress during his regime. Even though Stalin was behind various violations of human rights he was able to maintain the Soviet Union during a time of turmoil both domestically and internationally as a result he has earned notoriety as a great leader and advocate for Marxist ideology.
Joseph Stalin, dictator of the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1953, grew up as despicable male. When he was a young man, he was a thief, agitator, and an assassin. If anyone spied on him or voted against Joseph Stalin, they would be doomed to death. He would kill the family members of anyone who loved him.
The Ghost of Superman Kids had stars in their eyes when they talked about their hero Superman. A DC comic superhero who was incredibly strong and to top it all off he was as fast as the wind and he could fly. However this was just what they could get from the pages of a comic book. Then in 1952 came the TV series “The Adventures of Superman” putting their hero on the screen. The actor playing Superman was rightly chosen since he looked strong and muscular and was a handsome figure.
Stalin not only was a leader to the people of Russia but he also changed Russia significantly “Under Stalin's rule, the Soviet Union was transformed from a nation based on agriculture to a global superpower.” Joseph Stalin is known as one of the most successful leaders of communism because of this. One of the most reasons why he was so successful was because he was able to take over Russia at perfect timing, which was right after Vladimir Lenin, the starter of communism’s death. Even though, Joseph Stalin can be considered a successful leader does not mean he was kind one. The deaths of millions of people of Russia are due to the reign of Joseph Stalin.