Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Joseph stalin influence on russia
Joseph stalin influence on the russian revolution
Joseph stalin influence on russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Joseph stalin influence on russia
During World War I, many countries were under severe stress and turmoil. Many faced extreme debt along with extreme inflation. Movements enlarged while the government's power and control decreased. Many of the movements shared some similar beliefs but for the most part, they were very different. A significant movement around this time period was communism in Russia. Communism is a theory of economics which supports a classless society in which there is no such thing as private property. The extreme losses from wars and revolutions, combined with extreme poverty, isolation from the outside world, and the unpopularity of the czar made the people of Russia drastically dispirited and generated a longing for a change in government. Thus came the …show more content…
Not only to the country but to the support received from the citizens. The Russians had entered a war they could not handle; the economy was unable to support and the czar was not capable of leading an army. At the end of the war more an estimated 2 million soldiers were killed, 2.8 million soldiers were injured and 2.4 million soldiers were taken prisoners. One of the reasons why Russia did not experience success from war is because of their treatment of soldiers. Russia did not view soldiers as significant and felt that soldiers losing their lives was not that important. Thus being said, they did not put much effort into training their soldiers before sending them off to war. With untrained men experiencing failure in the war, the people of Russia’s support in the government was at an all time low and they wanted a change. Also the Russian men had an opportunity to see the outside world for the first time. They saw an equal and fair life for other people and were jealous of that. This put an idea in their head that they could have a change of government. They saw communism as an opportunity and agreed to the change. Communism and the idea of a classless society offered a potential chance to fix the problems in Russia's government and turn the war failures into …show more content…
For centuries, Russia had been separated from the developing and modern outside world. This separation was mainly due to Russia’s geography. Russia’s location, which was east of the main countries in Europe, allowed Russia to take a different approach to things like politics, control, and everyday life activities for the common people. The isolation of Russia geographically also allowed for leaders to create a distorted version of what society should be like. Leaders such as Joseph Stalin took somewhat advantage on the “clueless people of Russia” who had no idea what a normal society should be like because of Russia’s isolation. Stalin not only was a leader to the people of Russia but he also changed Russia significantly “Under Stalin's rule, the Soviet Union was transformed from a nation based on agriculture to a global superpower.” Joseph Stalin is known as one of the most successful leaders of communism because of this. One of the most reasons why he was so successful was because he was able to take over Russia at perfect timing, which was right after Vladimir Lenin, the starter of communism’s death. Even though, Joseph Stalin can be considered a successful leader does not mean he was kind one. The deaths of millions of people of Russia are due to the reign of Joseph Stalin. He was a leader that would do anything possible to gain power and change Russian government. Stalin was also
For centuries, autocratic and repressive tsarist regimes ruled the country and population under sever economic and social conditions; consequently, during the late 19th century and early 20th century, various movements were staging demonstrations to overthrow the oppressive government. Poor involvement in WWI also added to the rising discontent against Nicholas as Russian armies suffered terrible casualties and defeats because of a lack of food and equipment; in addition, the country was industrially backward compared to countries such as Britain, France, Germany, and the USA. It had failed to modernize, this was to do with the tsars lack of effort for reforms. The country was undergoing tremendous hardships as industrial and agricultural output dropped. Famine and poor morale could be found in all aspects of Russian life. Furthermore, the tsar committed a fatal mistake when he appointed himself supreme commander of the armed forces because he was responsible for the armies constant string of defeats.
In this instance Nicholas did not understand the magnitude of his people's, more specifically the soldiers suffering while at war with Austria and Germany. Often times the war minister, Vladimir Sukhomlinov, misinformed Nicholas regarding the conditions of soldiers leaving the Russian army without food, clothing and weapons. Through this miscommunication, it left not merely the soldiers without defense, but the country defenseless along with them. As a result, “By the following spring, the shortage had grown so severe that many soldiers charged into battle without guns. Instead, commanders told them to pick up their weapons from the men killed in front lines. At the same time, soldiers were limited to firing just ten shots a day. Sometimes they were even forbidden to return enemy fire” (134). This was just one piece of the puzzle that led to the crumble of the Russian autocracy. Especially considering the fact that everyone could see their efforts for winning the war were dissipating all except for one, “. . . everyone in the tsar’s government knew it… everyone, that is, except Nicholas himself” (135). As shown in this instance, basic misconceptions can begin a ripple effect that has the power to put a country in
He would always try to stay one step ahead of other countries and try to begin new projects which seemed to fail. Joseph Stalin had many people suffering and killed when he was
Joseph Stalin became leader of the USSR after Lenin’s death in 1924. Lenin had a government of abstemious communist government. When Stalin came into government he moved to a radical communist society. He moved away from the somewhat capitalist/communist economy of Lenin time to “modernize” the USSR. He wanted to industrialize and modernize USSR. He had overworked his workers, his people were dying, and most of them in slave labor camps. In fact by doing this Stalin had hindered the USSR and put them even farther back in time.
The right for an individual to exercise his or her own economic rights was created, allowing anyone to handle their own economic issues. You are allowed to earn as much money as possible from your products. The Bourgeoisie owned the factories and earned all of the money from the products that the workers made. Communism is the study of how everyone is at peace and works together. There is no need for competition or armies because no wars are going on.
Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were similar in what they claimed to be, but in actuality they were very different people. Although Stalin claimed that he followed Leninism, the philosophy that Lenin developed from Marxism, he often distorted it to follow what he wanted to do. While Lenin wanted to make a unified society without classes, with production in the hands of the people, while Stalin wanted to make Russia into a modern industrial powerhouse by using the government to control production. Lenin accomplished his goals through violence, because he thought achieving Communist revolution was worth using violence, with a ‘The ends justify the means’ mentality. Stalin also used violence to accomplish his goals, however Stalin used much more violence than was often necessary to accomplish his goals. Stalin continued even once he was successful in accomplishing those goals, as he did not stop hurting people, but if anything it gave him more power to hurt people even more. But, at the end of the day, although Lenin ruled for only a very short time, he did raise the standard of living, though there maintained a large amount of hardship. Stalin, however, transformed the USSR from a peasantry to an industrialized nation in less than a decade, he did it on the backs of his millions of victims, who died because of his harsh policies and many purges.
The main fact that must not be forgotten when answering this question is that Russia emerged successful from the Second World War, despite its problems. It could not have done this without the achievements and developments of the industrial 1930s. An industrial decade underpinned by the violence of the Great Terror. Without this motivating fear, neither the Five Year Plans nor collectivisation could have succeeded to the extent that they did, and as a consequence the Soviet Union would have been defeated. Politically, dictatorship and the purging of factions created unity and brought tighter control over the party.
Son of a poverty-stricken shoemaker, raised in a backward province, Joseph Stalin had only a minimum of education. However, he had a burning faith in the destiny of social revolution and an iron determination to play a prominent role in it. His rise to power was bloody and bold, yet under his leadership, in an unexplainable twenty-nine years, Russia because a highly industrialized nation. Stalin was a despotic ruler who more than any other individual molded the features that characterized the Soviet regime and shaped the direction of Europe after World War II ended in 1945. From a young revolutionist to an absolute master of Soviet Russia, Joseph Stalin cast his shadow over the entire globe through his provocative affair in Domestic and Foreign policy.
In the beginning Josef Stalin was a worshiper of his beloved Vladimir Lenin. He followed his every move and did as he said to help establish and lead the Bolshevik party. Much of the early part of his political career was lost due to his exile to Siberia for most of World War I. It wasn’t until 1928, when he assumed complete control of the country were he made most of his success. After Lenin’s death in January 1924, Stalin promoted his own cult followings along with the cult followings of the deceased leader. He took over the majority of the Socialists now, and immediately began to change agriculture and industry. He believed that the Soviet Union was one hundred years behind the West and had to catch up as quickly as possible. First though he had to seal up complete alliance to himself and his cause.
Just like the Tsars, Stalin had total control of the Soviet Union from 1936 onwards where the politburo first came into existence; making Stalin the main decision making body in the USSR. For the people of Russia living under a Tsarist regime or the Stalinist regime, it is seen that there was not much difference. Both governments essentially abolished human rights and democracy with the people of Russia suffering politically, economically and socially at their expense. However, to consider Joseph Stalin as being a “Red Tsar” is to extreme. In some aspects Stalin did in fact re-create Russian Tsardom, but he also opposed many of the key features and core principles behind the
This showed the Russian people how badly led and poorly equipped their country was. Russia suffered 2 huge defeats in The Battle of Tannenburg and The Battle of The Masurian Lakes. The threat of invasion loomed large over Russia creating a sense of anxiety and unrest for the Russian people who were concerned over their security. People were also angered at how unsuccessful Russia were in the war The Tsar and Tsarina were both also hugely unpopular amongst the Russian people. They were hated for the events of Bloody Sunday which saw thousands of Russian civilians killed by the Tsar's own armed forces.
Josef Stalin: Josef Stalin was the ruthless totalitarian ruler in Russia after the revolution. He came into power in 1922 and used his absolute power to suppress all opposition. He abandoned Lenin’s policies and began to revive militarism. His policies censored the public, destroyed agriculture, promoted weapon manufacturing, and killed millions ("Joseph Stalin”). 18.
Russia had been defeated in all except the war with Turkey and its government and economy had the scars to prove it. A severe lack of food and poor living conditions amongst the peasant population led firstly to strikes and quickly escalated to violent riots. Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia with an iron hand while much of Europe was moving away from the monarchical system of rule. All lands were owned by the Tsar’s family and Nobel land lords, while the factories and industrial complexes were owned by the capitalists’. There were no unions or labour laws and the justice system had made almost all other laws in favour of the ruling elite.
The cost of World War One had a significant impact on Russian society. During the war Russia suffered great economic and military loses. This was the stepping-stone for revolutions that changed Russia into a Communist society. So it can be scene that World War One and its effects on Russian society helped bring about revolution.
This was made worse by hyper inflation that saw prices increase fourfold during the war. These factors created serious discontent among the working classes in the cities. There were a number of strikes that had to be put down by troops. The Kadets who wanted to give more powers to the Russian parliament or Duma. This party could be compared to the Liberals in Britain.