Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast formative and summative assessment
Characteristics Of Formative Assessment
Compare and contrast formative and summative assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In their 1998(a) paper, Black and Wiliam refer to assessment as any activity undertaken by teachers or students to provide evidence of the progress in learning. There are two types of assessment, summative and formative. Summative assessment is a clear method in which to record a pupil’s progress. This form of assessment is usually carried out after a certain period of time, usually in the form of an exam, to determine how well a pupil has understood the required information and they are then assigned a grade. Formative assessment, on the other hand, focuses on assessing pupils throughout the learning process so that teachers can make any possible changes to the teaching methods being used and can provide pupils with the necessary feedback …show more content…
However, Shepard (2007) claimed that the research into formative assessment had lead to a quick increase in the number of products, schemes and classroom methods being developed, but that these were very poorly implemented. This was due to education authorities wanting to ‘tick boxes’, rather than focussing upon the necessary principles underlining formative assessment. A large amount of research was then undertaken to identify the necessary requirements for effective formative assessment. Sadler (1989) identified three concepts as being …show more content…
It was argued that formative assessment helps consolidate learning, increase motivation and helps pupils become more effective learners. The research focuses on the learner rather than focusing on the role of the teacher. Formative assessment encourages the learner to develop his or her own attitudes and skills, promoting learning rather than relying on being ‘fed’ the information. Harlen and James (1996) furthered this idea by suggesting that “pupils need to be active in their own learning”, and unless they are given sufficient and useful feedback, they will not fully understand the strengths and weaknesses in their learning and are therefore unable to make the necessary changes to
Elwood, J. (2006). Formative assessment: possibilities, boundaries and limitations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 215-232, doi:10.1080/09695940600708653
Formative assessment to inform instruction and guide student learning is being underutilized. Many students are not given feedback that is effective in helping them see where they are in regard to reaching the learning goals or that provides plan for moving them forward to achieve that goal. Students are not always given the opportunity to take an active role in the learning process by regularly assessing themselves and their peers as they work to achieve their learning goals. The purpose of this study is to determine how the use of formative assessment with immediate feedback using student response systems will impact student learning. This study will also investigate the effect that student involvement in self-evaluation has on learning.
Formative Assessment- There are a number of formative assessment that are used. The first one is the list created on the first day after reading the passage along with student participation on sharing their findings the following day on day two. Student participation in day six when sharing their papers and the write up of a peer’s paper will be used for a formative assessment. All of these are graded on accuracy and completion and will be worth five points each.
...teacher see what their students know, wonder about and techniques they use to make sense of the world and the classroom. This information can then be used by the teacher to differentiate instruction. The teacher can recover material, present alternative activities that students are more receptive in order to foster student responsiveness and engagement. In Page Keeley’s article An Introduction to Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) she articulates the purpose and power of a classroom that frequently uses formative assessments by saying, “it organizes the entire classroom around learning and informs ways teachers can provide more effective learning experiences based on how their own” (10). Formative assessments foster a supportive classroom community where students and even teacher thoughts are encouraged and in turn shape the future of that classroom.
Summative assessments are used to evaluate students learning at the completion of a specific instructional period, usually at the end of a unit, course, semester, program, or school year. Formative assessment(FA) is generally carried out throughout the learning process. In an educational system, formative assessment might be a teacher (or peer) or the learner, providing feedback on a student's work and would not necessarily be used for grading purposes. Formative assessments can take the form of diagnostic, standardized tests, quizzes, oral question, or draft work. Formative assessments are carried out concurrently with instructions and the result may count. In the learning process formative assessment is exceptional than summative assessment and it helps the students to identify their understanding about the subject and it gives chance to improve. In my view FA is ineluctable in the learning process, that allow the student and educator to form a more detailed understanding of the student’s abilities, which can be used to inform remediation, reteaching and instructional strategy. ( http://www.nctm.org/Research-and-Advocacy/research-brief-and-clips/Benefits-of-Formative-Assessment/
There are actually a two main forms of assessments that Mr. Bossley can chose from. He can choose to use formative assessments, which are assessments designed for learning. Formative assessments check what the student has learned and how to proceed with expanded that student’s knowledge. Also formative assessments help improve a teacher’s ongoing instruction and focuses mainly on improvement. The other type of assessment that Mr. Bossley can use, is summative assessment, which are the assessments of learning. Summative assessments are assessments that usually happen at the end of a unit or lesson. Summative assessments are often reported using grades,
Formative evaluation provides students with feedback, observation, self-assessment, curriculum-based measurement and developing portfolios and required clinical competencies. Formative evaluation may be used by instructors to improve their teaching and students to improve their learning. Billings and Halstead (2012) describes formative evaluation as a toll useful in the process to guide revision and facilitates improvements through the use of discussion, feedback and student participation. Formative evaluation may be used as a diagnostic
For more than 20 years, formative assessment has been highly researched and even accredited as a critical part of a teacher’s pedagogy. In the last decade it (formative assessment has become something of a buzzword and in some cases a mandate in k-12 schools across the country. Formative assessment can be defined as a part of the instructional process intended to gather information and provide feedback for both students and teachers that allow for needed
“Teachers help students use assessment as a window into their own growth and identify as learners so, they develop the power and agency necessary to take charge of their learning (Tomlinson, 2010). Summative assessments are a mirror to student thinking. Summative assessments help teachers and students see a trajectory of their learning. Teachers can use them to identify which students are ready for other tasks; and which students need more time to develop specific concepts. The assessment that we administered asked students to answer a series of questions using information from a graph. It also prompted them to create a graph using the results of survey for our field trip. This assessment combined constructed response questions with a meaningful task. “The paper and pencil multiple choice test is not the only way to assess learning. It is a limited way to gain insight into what some students know and are able to do”(Berliner, 2010, p.113).
Formative assessment. The goal of formative assessment is to monitor student learning to provide ongoing feedback that can be used by instructors to improve their teaching and by students to improve their learning. To be more specifically, formative assessments help learners’ identify their strengths and weaknesses and specific areas that need improvement. Unlike summative assessment, formative assessments assist educators’ to recognize and immediately address student’s challenges. Formative assessments’ are regarded as low stakes, which means that they have little or no value (Frey, N., & Fisher, D. 2011; Yu, H., & Li, H. 2014).
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a
In this assignment, I assessed my students in geometry class at Deer Valley High School on their knowledge of similar triangle standards that my fellow teacher and I focused on in this unit. The formative assessment was a collection of fifteen questions that were broken up evenly to cover the three district and state standards that we wanted our students, mainly sophomores, to have mastered at the completion of this unit. The intent of this assignment was to gauge how my instructional techniques worked on my students and what I could do differently to improve their overall learning experience.
Through my previous teaching experiences, I have displayed successful use of the teaching and learning cycle. I ensure all learning experiences are student-centred and focused on student improvement of syllabus outcomes. In all key learning areas (KLA) I have implemented diagnostic testing to establish a basepoint for my teaching. Then continue to use formative then summative assessment to reflect and revise my teaching pedagogy to create desired improvements. I use this practice to generate high achievement in students’ outcomes and
For my homophones lesson in Mrs. Anderson’s class, I feel that I did a great job teaching the lesson and providing plenty of practice opportunities. I believe that the formative and summative assessments that I used throughout my lesson provided the information Mrs. Anderson and I hoped to get out of this small unit.
Cauley, K.H. & McMillan, J.H. (2009). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. Clearing House, 83(1), 1-6.