Summary: Why Did George Counts Criticize Progressivism

955 Words2 Pages

1. Why did George Counts criticize progressivism? Critique Counts' views by identifying and analyzing a major strength and a major weakness of the reconstructionist point of view.
Counts criticized progressive education arguing out that it had identified itself with the liberal-minded upper middle class. According to him if education is to be considered as indisputably progressive it has to stand above the influence of this class, face squarely and courageously every social issue, come to terms with life in its entire stark reality, come up with an organic relationship with the community, develop a realistic and comprehensive theory of welfare, fashion a compelling and challenging vision of human destiny, and become less frightened than it is currently at bogies of imposition and indoctrination (Howard 2012). He criticized the fact that progressivism had taken in its life- adjustment phase and its failure to act on critical issues of the day. Counts …show more content…

It however has some similarities to classical realism. Aristotle was of the opinion that human reached form or essence through the study of particulars while on the other hand behaviorists are of the opinion that people can understand the behavior of humans by a meticulous study of human behavior (Baird 2010). The approach is expanded to the effect that the nature of humans can be explained by what is traditionally considered as a particular component of human nature which is behavior (Howard 2012). One realist element of behaviorism includes going from particular, observable facts to forms are the laws of behavior. Behaviorists assert that human traits of personality, integrity, character among others result from behaving in particular way. Such traits are developed from environmental conditioning which indicates a realist leaning towards the importance of the discernible, factual, observable aspects of the

Show More
Related

  • Roosevelt's Stances On Progressivism Dbq

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    The election of 1912 signified a turning point in American history. Friends, Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft, competed against each other for the presidency. Though both progressive, they disagreed on how the country needed to run. Roosevelts ever increasing progressivism caused their stances on many important issues to be much different. Although, they did have some points on which they agreed. In what ways were Roosevelt 's and Taft 's stances on progressivism similar, and different?

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Square Deal

    1211 Words  | 3 Pages

    Beginning with the birth of the twentieth century, the United States was in a dilemma. America needed amelioration; the country had a tremendous amount of potential but was unable to put forth the necessary actions without the correct guidance. It was vital that the United States was pointed in the right direction or more problems would occur. America required political reform and the elimination of corruption caused by the government, thus, the time prevailed for the Progressive Presidents.

    Read More

  • Global Competition And Manifest Destiny On The Cusp Of The 20th Century

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    Answer: He doesn’t believe that it is dishonest to allow politicians to have “insider” information to be able profit from such information. He thinks that by allowing “honest” grafting one can gain favorable votes, which are necessary for politicians. A distinctive American progressive: women, immigrants, and education 1. What is progressivism according to historians?

    Read More

  • An Obituary For The Progressive Movement Analysis

    2307 Words  | 5 Pages

    Richard Hofstadter, the leftward leaning author of Age of Reform, in his appraisal of the progressive movement makes the central argument that the progressive movement was not catalyzed by economics or moral principal but instead by psychology. Hofstadter describes the progressives as primarily “urban, middle class, and nation wide.” He makes the case that t...

    Read More

  • The Age Of Reform Summary

    2100 Words  | 5 Pages

    In 1955, Richard Hofstadter wrote his Pulitzer Prize winning book The Age of Reform, about the Gilded Age. Hofstadter’s arguments about the Populist and Progressive movements and their origins started debate and renewed scholarship on the Populist and Progressive movements. Many historians did not agree with Hofstadter’s arguments and published their own papers stating their conclusions based on their own research. This scenario occurs all the time in the history field. One historian writes a book or paper and other historians accept or reject his arguments by doing their own research and making their own conclusions. Many historians wrote about the Progressive era after Hofstadter did. Many historians did not accept his argument of a class revolution as the driving force behind the Populist and Progressive movements. Peter Filene in 1970, Richard L. McCormick in 1981, and Paula Baker in 1984 all wrote papers about the Progressive Movement. To understand the how each author has shaped the historical view of Progressivism, one must analyze the main points of each author, scrutinize their use of evidence and then decide if their argument is persuasive.

    Read More

  • Progressivism In The Progressive Movement

    1423 Words  | 3 Pages

    Theodore Roosevelt, the founder of the Progressive party, once stated, “A great democracy has got to be progressive or it will soon cease to be great or a democracy”

    Read More

  • Interpreting American Progressivism

    2968 Words  | 6 Pages

    Filene Peter G. “An Obituary for the Progressive Movement.” American Quarterly 22, no. 1 (1970): 20-34.

    Read More

  • The Successes of Progressive Era Reformers

    821 Words  | 2 Pages

    West, Thomas G. "The Progressive Movement and the Transformation of American Politics." The Heritage Foundation. N.p., 18 July 2007. Web. 11 Mar. 2014

    Read More

  • John Watson's Theory: The Stages Of Behaviorism

    1276 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1913 a new movement in psychology appeared, Behaviorism. “Introduced by John Broadus Watson when he published the classic article Psychology as the behaviorist views it.” Consequently, Behaviorism (also called the behaviorist approach) was the primary paradigm in psychology between 1920 to 1950 and is based on a number of underlying ‘rules’: Psychology should be seen as a science; Behaviorism is primarily concerned with observable behavior, as opposed to internal events, like thinking and emotion; People have no free will – a person’s environment determines their behavior; Behavior is the result of stimulus resulting in a response; and All behavior is learned from the environment. How we process these stimuli and learn from our surrounds

    Read More

  • Behaviorism Essay

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    Behaviorism is a foundational theory in the world of psychology. However, behaviorism though it was a flourishing influential idea during the beginnings of psychology, it suffered a decline when other aspects of scientific research entered the psychology practice. Behaviorism was the scientific study of behavior. A plethora of great thinkers have made their marks with discoveries in behaviorism but B.F. Skinner was one of the most influential thinkers during the decline of behaviorism and the rise of experimental psychology.

    Read More

  • Discussion Board #2: Behaviorism and Tantrums

    622 Words  | 2 Pages

    Behaviorism, or learning theory is one of three “grand theories” of human development. The focus of behaviorism is observable behavior, with no reference to mental processes. As a learning theory behaviorism, assumes that learning occurs via interactions with the environment, through the process of conditioning.

    Read More

  • Nature and Nurture

    585 Words  | 2 Pages

    The quote from the famous psychologist John B. Watson essentially sums up behaviourism. Behaviourism refers to the school of psychology founded by Watson, established on the fact that behaviours can be measured and observed (Watson, 1993). In behaviourism, there is a strong emphasis that the acquisition of learning, or permanent change in behaviour, is by external manifestation. Thus, any individual differences in behaviours observed was more likely due to experiences, and not by the working of genes. As the quote suggest, any individuals can be potentially trained to perform any tasks through the right conditioning. There are two major types of conditioning, classical and operant conditioning (Cacioppo & Freberg, 2012).

    Read More

  • Comparing the Behavioral Perspective and the Cognitive Perspective

    302 Words  | 1 Pages

    Behavioral perspective is the theory that the majority of all behavior is learned from the environment after birth. Freewill is considered to be an illusion, because our environment determines behavior. Behaviorists believe that only behavior should be observed, not our minds, since we cannot see into other people’s minds. There is no way to know if a person is honestly answering a question so it is irrelevant. Behaviorists use strict laboratory experiments, usually on animals, such as rats or pigeons. They test animals because the laws of learning are universal, there are only a quantitative difference between animals and humans, and animals are practically and ethically more convenient to test.

    Read More

  • My Philosophy of Education: Combining Progressivism, Essentialism and Behaviorism

    828 Words  | 2 Pages

    The use of progressivism in the classroom broadens students? points of views and expands their abilities to understand differences in opinions. Furthermore, it inculcates students with a vast array of knowledge about their surrounding environment and everyone in it. Without the use of the progressive method, it is almost impossible to thoroughly educate children on complex topics such as racism, religion, and people that come from different societies, nationalities, or ethnic groups. A lack of knowledge of this sort le...

    Read More

  • Main contributors to behaviorism

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are three types of behaviorism. The first, methodological is a normative theory about the scientific conduct of psychology. It claims that psychology should concern itself with the behavior of organisms and not with mental states or events or with constructing internal information processing accounts of behavior. ("Behaviorism," 2000) The second is psychological behaviorism. It explains human and animal behavior in terms of external physical stimuli, responses, learning histories and reinforcements. The last type is analytical or logical behaviorism. This theory has a philosophy about the meaning of mental terms and concepts. The idea of the mental state is the idea of behavioral tendencies that shows how a person behaves in one situation compared to another.

    Read More

More about Summary: Why Did George Counts Criticize Progressivism

Open Document