Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact Of Media
The role of the media in influencing
The role of the media in influencing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On the night of December 26, 1996, six year old Jonbenet Ramsey was murdered in her home. To this day, her murderer remains unknown. Over the past twenty years, there have been many theories and speculations on what happened that winter night. Soon after the story made its way into headlines everywhere, the public was outraged. People believed that Jonbenet’s parents were to blame for her death. Many people still believe that to this day. Regardless of who the killer was, this case showed how wealth, beauty, and massive amounts of media attention can affect the way a crime is handled. The story started early Christmas morning. Jonbenet and her brother, Burke, ran downstairs to open presents. The whole family then went to a friend’s Christmas …show more content…
party. On the way home from the party, Jonbenet fell asleep in the car, so her father, John, carried her to bed. That was supposedly the last time anyone saw the little girl alive. The next morning, as Jonbenet's mother, Patsy, woke up and walked down the stairs, she found a ransom note from her daughter’s killers. The note demanded that the Ramseys leave $118,000 for the safe return of Jonbenet. After Patsy read the note, she ran to Jonbenet's room. Realizing that her daughter was not in her bed, Patsey made a frantic phone call to 911. The police arrived soon after. As the cops started their investigation, some of Patsy’s friends arrived at the house. She had invited them over to comfort her in her time of grief. With so many people coming and going, any evidence in the house became unreliable. The police then told John that they were going to search the house from top to bottom to see if they could find any clues to who could have done this to his daughter. John immediately rushed downstairs. Without turning any of the lights on, he found his daughter lying on the floor of their wine cellar, wrapped in a white blanket. He carried Jonbenet upstairs, laid her on the floor, and then an investigator moved her from the floor to the couch. After searching the house, the police found the rope that was used to strangle Jonbenet, but the autopsy concluded that Jonbenet had been struck in the head with an unknown object. This was the object that killed her. A year after the crime, John and Patsy appeared on television and said that they were afraid for their lives because there is still a killer on the loose. In 1999, a grand jury was assembled to hear the forensic evidence, but it was dismissed without any indictment. The case remained silent until 2008, when new DNA technology announced that the Ramseys could not have been responsible for the death of Jonbenet. Nonetheless, some still had suspicions about the Ramseys. Fast forward to today and the culprit is still unknown. Anyone who knew, or worked for the Ramseys knew that they were a very wealthy family.
They had a large, elegant house, took many vacations, and bought their children many luxuries. Many people believe that their abundance of money had an influence on the case. Things happened during the investigation that were not supposed to happen. For example, John and Patsy were never questioned about the crime. Questioning the family is a common procedure, so why was it simply overlooked in this instance? Had the police officers been persuaded by someone? There is also a theory that the grand jury that was assembled in 1999 was “warped by the influence of money” (Prendergast). One of Jonbenet's favorite hobbies was to compete in beauty pageants. Her mother had participated in them as well. While this a common activity for little girls to partake in, it made Jonbenet look like someone she wasn’t. All of the magazine and tabloid covers that discussed the case plastered pictures of the young girl glammed up at beauty pageants, not pictures of a six year old girl. This made it hard for people to understand the reality of the case. All they were presented with was a beautiful little pageant girl, and not a victim of a brutal crime
(Enochs). From the very beginning the public could not get enough of the Jonbenet case. People were desperate to know who was responsible for this tragic murder, and what the killer’s motive was. Less than a month after the crime was committed, tabloids were covered with stolen crime scene photos (Ramsey). Another question with an unknown answer is why. Why would anyone want to kill Jonbenet? If John and/or Patsy committed the crime, possible motives could have been jealousy, an outburst of wrath, or to cover up an accident. If the killer was someone outside of the house, it could have been a disgruntled worker trying to get back at John, or possibly someone who knew the Ramseys were wealthy and desired their money. The hardest thing for people to accept is that there could have been no motive at all, and that it could have been done out of pure hate. The lack of answers was difficult for everyone to accept. The question still remains; who killed Jonbenet Ramsey? Nobody knows if there will ever be justice for her. Many people still believe that her family was in involved in her death, and that some sort of influence on officials covered up the clues that pointed to them. Others are simply shocked that the case was dismissed in such a nonchalant manner. However, this case did bring public attention to an important topic. Aspects of people’s lives that should be irrelevant in criminal trials still sometimes find way to unroot the integrity of our judicial system. The JonBenet Ramsey case is a prime example of possible corruption that remains in our country today.
Then the devil inside comes into play, the Ramseys decided it would be better to cover up Burke’s crime, than have him punished. They slap together a typical, kidnap/murder that often happens to wealthy
Scott Peterson was an educated man from California Polytechnic State University where he graduated with a B.A. in Agricultural Business. He was married to his wife Laci Peterson who was also pregnant with their unborn son. In December of 2002 Laci Peterson went missing in the Modesto, California area where she shared a home with Scott. Once the investigation of Scott’s missing wife started authorities began to suspect Scott as a suspect in her disappearance. In April of 2003 a fetus and a female torso that was missing hands, feet, and a head were found on the shoreline of San Francisco Bay. The San Francisco Bay area was where Scott was boating the day of Laci’s disappearance. The body was later identified as Laci Peterson and the fetus as Laci and Scott’s unborn son. Scott was also arrested in the month of April shortly after the discovery of Laci and their son’s body and was later sentenced to the death penalty. Over the course of this paper I will cover the whole event of the disappearance of Laci Peterson, relating it to a sociological theory, the impact the event had on our society and how the media had influence over this national event.
On June 20, 2001, a terrible tragedy occurred, as Andrea Yates drowned all five of her children in the bath. After drowning each child child, she picked them up, tucked them in her bed and called in her next victim until all 5 children were deceased. After she had successfully drowned each child, she calmly called her husband and notified local police that she was in need of an officer. As this case reached international news, many pondered what would make the mother of five do such an abysmal thing. Once the investigation began, it became acknowledged that Andrea Yates was influenced by several psychological perspectives and was not in her right mind when she committed the heinous crime.
Sue Grafton once stated: “Except for cases that clearly involve a homicidal maniac, the police like to believe murders are committed by those we know and love, and most of the time they're right.” This is clearly the thought the Boulder Colorado police conceived in the case of little beauty queen JonBenet Ramsey. As many have observed from the onslaught of media coverage, the day after Christmas 1996, six year old Jon Benet Ramsey was found buried under a white blanket, bound, beaten, and strangled to death in the wine cellar of their Boulder home. With such a strikingly rare and glamorous story of a six year old beauty queen dead, who was a part of a “perfect American upper-middle class family”, combined with a lack of a lead and ever mounting suspicion piling up against the parents it was no surprise to find that it was fuel to the media and soon stories sold and became a matter of competition between the press. So, like wildfire, this heart-breaking story spread, stretching across the nation, shattering the souls of the world. News broadcasts, magazine and newspaper articles, and television specials all shaped and molded peoples perceptions of this beautiful child’s murder, especially her parents, John and Pasty Ramsey’s involvement or lack there of. The police and FBI’s merciless quest to connect Jon Benet’s murder to her parents, seemed to cause the them to overlook important evidence, or at the very least dismiss suspicious findings that would otherwise send red flags to investigators. There are many contributors as to why this case remains unsolved including lack of investigative expertise, failure to protect valuable evidence, and focusing too much on the parents as suspects but, ultimately, the over involvement of...
There is no doubt in my mind that Casey Anthony fascinated people much more than she would have if she had not been an attractive, young woman. While everyone had an opinion on the case, that they felt obliged to talk about, and give the same recycled, regurgitated opinions on, at the end of the day you can't really blame them. The media is really just an extension of the masses. What gets reported is based upon what interests people, and this case sure did interest people. I think this level of exposure oftentimes benefits the defendants because evidence becomes over saturated to a point where it blinds the jury from seeing the basic points of the case, and the foundation for a guilty verdict. Casey Anthony's trial is often compare to the O.J. Simpson trial for reasons similar to this. The trials are among the most high profile cases to take place during the new media era, and the not guilty verdict created public outrage and calls for Anthony to be punished. Media figures discussed why prosecutors failed to convict in what seemed to be a can't-miss trial. One reason the guilty verdict fell through could be the lack of Casey Anthony's DNA or fingerprint evidence at the scene of where the body was recovered. This is known as the CSI effect, and involves a jury's desire for forensic evidence, even when a clear picture of the crime is created, and a logical motive is present (English). Many criticized
In his article, “The Nightmare of the West Memphis Three”, Rich explores how the people of Memphis drew horrific conclusions about people based on the lifestyle they chose to practice. The article highlights the trials and tribulations faced by the accused three young teenagers. Rich does this by citing the popular documentary series “Paradise Lost” which is an in depth analysis into the lives of the accused, the victims’ families and members of the community. This paper outlines how the belief system of that time superseded the inconclusive evidence, which ultimately led to an unfair trial. By “othering” and “marginalizing” those three teens, the society and police created a scenario that aligned with their belief system at the time. Lastly, this paper highlights the influence of the media and celebrity in changing the course for these boys.
The ransom note was photographed in the wrong place, the police did not immediately search the house, and friends and family were allowed to enter the home. Due to the holidays, the coroner arrived more than six hours from when he was called. It was not until 1:20 p.m., a thorough search was proposed and ordered to do by John Ramsey (Ramsland). Since the police allowed family and friends to enter the Ramsey’s home, it enabled various people to touch vital evidence and compromise the crime scene. If the police would have properly secured the crime scene and took affirmative action sooner clear evidence could have been obtained, directing them to the killer. Jonbenet was found in her own home by her father after several hours of “searching” which immediately led people to become suspicious. Most compelling evidence suggests that JonBenet was murdered several hours before she was found. The time frame of death indicates that JonBenet was “abducted” right after her parents put her to bed. Evidence suggests no sign of forced entry, as well as a lack of footprints in the snow surrounding the house. Whoever committed this crime must have been familiar with the layout of the house since the body was hidden in the wine cellar in the basement (Bardsley and Bellamy). With this information, clearly someone inside the house was in some way involved in the murder of JonBenet. To be more specific, all signs point to John
All these things contributed to the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. The events leading up to her murder were typical events for a family on Christmas Eve. On Christmas Eve night, the whole family attended a Christmas party at a friend’s house. They came home at about 9:30 PM and JonBenet was carried upstairs to her bedroom at 10:00 PM. This was the last time she was seen alive.
The tragedy that happened in Newton, Connecticut swept the world with a variety of emotions. Many individuals became angry or saddened by the tragedy. I think more of the individuals were angry of what happened to those 20 innocent children. Parents send their children to school thinking that they are safe but in this case ended in tragedy. I am going to discuss similarities and differences between two articles. I am also going to discuss how this shooting is a symbolic crime, how likely policy changes will be enacted and how unlikely they are to be enacted.
When horrific crimes occur in large cities, many of them can be chalked up to gang violence or to the larger population of that specific city. But when horrific crimes happen in small cities like Lincoln, Nebraska, people begin to ask questions like who did this and why. In 1958, a nineteen year old man named Charles Starkweather put the entire state of Nebraska and possibly the entire nation in a state of terror. With his murder spree taking only three days, Starkweather had collected a body count of ten bodies, including two teenagers and a young child. Understanding Starkweather’s past and state of mind begins to answer the second question of why.
In reference to the media’s role, they have been highlighted for playing a part in maintaining these views by portraying victims in a certain way according to the newsworthiness of each story and their selectiveness (Greer, 2007). Furthermore, there has been an increase in both fictional crime programmes and crime documentaries, with Crimewatch particularly becoming a regular part of British viewing. In the modern context, crime has continued to represent a large proportion of news reporting and with the aid of social networking sites and self-publicity via the internet, journalists are now more able to dig even deeper into the lives of people on whom they wish to report. Newspapers continue to keep the public informed with the latest headlines and the internet has also provided opportunities for members of the public to have their input in blogs.
The evidence discovered during the investigation suggested to the police that OJ Simpson may have had something to do with this murder and they obtained an arrest warrant. The investigators believed that they “knew” OJ Simpson committed the murders. His lawyers and him were informed of the arrest warrant and agreed to a specified time when OJ would turn himself into authorities. Investigators are later admonished, by the defense, on how they handled the crime scene.
On the morning of July 4, 1954, Marilyn Sheppard was violently beaten in her home in Bay Village, Ohio, on the shore of Lake Erie. She was four months pregnant and had been felled by 35 vicious blows (Quade). Right away Sam Sheppard was accused of being the victim to do this. Sheppard had told investigators that he had been asleep downstairs and was awakened by his wife’s screams. Sheppard said when he went upstairs and entered the room he was knocked unconscious by the intruder. He denied any involvement and described his battle with the killer he described as “bushy-haired” (Linder). After a police investigation, Dr. Sam Sheppard was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. With the hectic media covering it, they were quick in decision that it was him that committed the murder. This was an unfair trial, ruined a man’s life, and gave him no time for a career.
These murder cases stayed unsolved for decades, and their resolution may give some sense of closure to the long-suffering families of the victims. But these triumphs are largely symbolic. By congratulating ourselves too much for them, we risk neglecting the challenges of the present.
In 1993, Jon Venables and Robert Thompson, aged ten at the time, abused and murdered a two-year-old boy, James Bulger. There was media uproar about the case with the two boys being described as ‘evil’, ‘monsters’ and ‘freaks’ in the media (Franklin & Horwath 1998). There were many references to evil in the newspapers; with the telegraph stating that Thompson’s nickname was ‘Damien’ (from The Omen) and declaring that Venables birth date was Friday the 13th. The majority of society was united in the belief that these two boys were the epitome of evil and it was the media that nurtured this belief. ‘Newspaper reports were unequivocal in their denunciations of Thompson and Venables as inherently evil, prompted perhaps initially by Justice Morland’s description of the murder as an act of unparalleled ev...