More handpicked essays just for you.
Strength and weakness of social capital
Strength and weakness of social capital
Strength and weakness of social capital
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strength and weakness of social capital
The ambiguities of "social capital" can be elucidated by reformulating it as a gathering-based asset got from social relations, the viability of which is dependent upon the extensity and force of social ties and the gathering's assets, and the making of which may include a potential cost to a person. This paper audits the writing on an absence of diversity in the workforce which has caused more millennials to leave corporate American and progress toward becoming business people/entrepreneurs and ethnic minorities to perceive how ethnic connection as a type of social capital has influenced the financial prosperity of settlers and minorities and refines the idea of social capital. Investigations of "ethnic connection" and of the "ethnic versatility
trap" have focused on the "punishment" of ethnic ties and fondness. In any case, considers on the ethnic enclave economy and transnational groups have credited the flourishing of the enclave economy and the financial achievement of some ethnic diasporas to ethnic systems. The paper presumes that social capital and a lack of diversity can be empowering for people and gatherings, subject to the level of diverse types of capital present. Yet, social capital can't supplant several types of cash-flow to deliver implausible results past the material furthest reaches of its logical limits. In this way, social capital is a helpful idea, not as an all-inclusive ideal, but rather as a circumstance-based limit social and class settings.
In a society whose dominant narrative revolves around meritocracy, values such as a strong work ethic often take a higher precedence over other factors in describing social mobility. The “American Dream” serves as this narrative, reinforcing the belief that anyone has the capacity to succeed if they work hard enough. Yet disparities regarding social mobility are present between ethnic groups in America, which begs the question— why? Thomas Sowell’s Ethic America and Stephen Steinberg’s The Ethnic Myth attempt to make sense of these ethnic variations of social mobility, but both come to drastically different conclusions. Through comparing the theoretical frameworks, arguments, and conclusions of both Sowell and Steinberg, it becomes clear which
The fancy American Dream has drawn people from all over the world to the United States to push for their upward social mobility. They have a dream and they want to make it come true. At this time Immigrants, into the major cities of the U.S, making them a melting pot. That melting pot has a different ethnic, social and cultural background, some of which contradict each other, while others are very harmonious. Race is often an obstacle to cultural communication and understanding. For this problem, Sherman Alexie his short story “Gentrification”, and Alex Tizon, with his story “Land of the Giants”, have a lot to say about how race is Obstacle to intercultural communication and understanding and that affect people misunderstand.
The ability for people to look at a situation from a different perspective is vital in today’s globalized society. Diversity is the most important core attribute we share that gives us a new perspective to assess situations differently through our diverse backgrounds and upbringings. Unlike Patrick J. Buchanan’s argument in his essay titled “Deconstructing America,” diversity is not a burden, but rather a necessity in America’s culture. Conversely, Fredrickson 's essay titled, “Models of American Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective,” illustrated a more precise version of American history that disproves Buchanan’s ethnocentric ideologies. Buchanan speaks of diversity as a narrow, one-way street. The imprecise interpretations of history
The issue of black success in a corporate world such as America is best understood as one of culture and ethnicity. Generally, success in business demands a certain personality and level of ability, just as does success in politics. A quick look at the current status quo of power and authority in the business world will prove that. But existing societal conditions remnant of the evil specter of slavery have created a persona within the common black identity that is fundamentally opposed to business success. Nagel writes: “Culture is constructed … by the actions of individuals and groups and their interactions within the larger societ...
...Y-W. (1985). Ethnic Resources and Business Enterprise: A Study of Chinese Business in Toronto. Human Organization, 44(2), 142-154.
This essay will discuss the intrinsic relationship between diversity conceptualization and social integration presenting a response against David Brooks’ essay entitled “People Like Us.” In order to do this I will discuss four crucial elements: the influences of different definitions of diversity in cultural unification, Brook’s ideas about social groups working together and social groups coexisting together, the importance of diversity, and the influence of diversity in social changes. I will examine why some people have the perception that our American society ignore or see as unworthy diversity. Thus, I will dispute Brook’s view stating that our society disregards diversity, and Americans just pretend that it is important to them.
In America, there are many considerable companies created by immigrants during the height of immigration. During the early 1900s, the American Dream was in full swing and patriotism was found amongst most Americans. During this time, Americans had a sense of vivaciousness when talking about America and the economy. With the roaring 20s and significant economic growth in the 1910s, many non-natives flocked to America in search of a better life. However, as time went on and America’s economy started to adjust, the American Dream and patriotism of indigenous Americans also evolved. Bogged down with the aftermath of the Great Depression in the 1930s, second and third generation Americans fell out of love with America. Immigrants kept hope though,
Following the 1890’s, the world began to undergo the first stages of globalization. Countries and peoples, who, until now, were barely connected, now found themselves neighbors in a planet vastly resembling a global village. Despite the idealized image of camaraderie and brotherhood this may seem to suggest, the reality was only discrimination and distrust. Immigration to new lands became a far more difficult affair, as emigrants from different nations came to be viewed as increasingly foreign. In the white-dominated society of the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the only way to truly count oneself as American was to become “white”. For this reason, the idea of race, a socially constructed issue with no real physical basis, has become one of the most defining factors which shape immigration and assimilation in the United States.
To fully understand why social, economic, and cultural capital could lead to success or failure, it is essential to know the difference between the three. Social capital is defined by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development as “the links, shared values, and understandings in society that enable individuals and groups to trust each other and to work together” (OECD, 2015). Social capital can be multiple things including family members, colleagues, and strangers who have the
A social structure can be defined as stable patterns of human interactions and behaviours (Innocente 2015). Canadian tire possesses these characteristics because their employees go to work and commit to hands on labour for the common goal of earning income. I asked my brother for a job in order to have a source of income, which illustrates the manifest function or the intended effect from a social structure (Brym and Lie 2012). The reason why I and countless others are in the workforce, is for the clear and intended purpose of earning money. In addition to earning money, other unintended benefits, such as skills and knowledge are attained by simply being in the workforce. This is known as the latent function, which is the unintended effect from a social structure (Brym and Lie 2012). Although I go to work to earn money, I unconsciously increase my cultural capital, which is the set of social skills that individuals possess (Brym and Lie 2012). This makes me an efficient worker through interactions with coworkers and customers, consequently widening my social network, which is a set of individuals who are linked together by the trade of information and material (Brym and Lie 2012). A widened social network has made it possible to attain new and higher positions in
This new generation is also very entrepreneurial and positive about the future. Most Hispanic Millennials in the US acknowledge that they are better off than their parents, in both terms of financial and social standing. Many see turmoil within the economic and social systems within their countries of heritage and are aware of their parent’s struggles, which make them more appreciative of the opportunities provided within the US. This positivity is conveyed in their entrepreneurial spirit, with 52% of Hispanic Millennials expressing a desire to start their own business in the
...ely and directly convertible into money and may be institutionalized in the form of property rights. When I stated I went to high school the students and I also had a similarity which was being “well endowed” as cultural capital, Cultural Capital is fluid and can be supported by economic capital to expand one cultural community for example the more money I have the more likely my community that I involve myself with will be just as financially endowed and may be institutionalized in the form of educational qualifications; and as social capital going into a company or organization I stated that I got in contact with one of the alumni at my local high school who so happens to working for the company or as an executive officer in that organization I get hired and the cycle starts again making me the central figure for economic capital, given me a title and prestige.
In spite of mis-representation, certain culture is prone to be seen in corporation. Managing any variety of cultures will require some form of flexibility an understanding of personality that may not their personal environment. In the next few paragraphs, diversity will be dissected how some minority thrive and struggle in some areas. Mr. Taylor and Kachanoff worked on a theory that emphasizes, there is a psychological aspect of diversity which may influence the horizontal and vertical aspect of multiculturalism (2015,
It is proven when an individual experiences financial security - as well as reduced social tensions - they will invest more. When Americans invest their earnings in a business and entrepreneurship, America as a whole becomes a more prosperous country because new jobs would be created to benefit every ethnicity. Also, with an exceptionally diverse society, business owners need employees with different backgrounds to ensure every type of customer feel welcomed and encouraged to return. Dr. Thomas Sowell, author of “Cultural Diversity: A World View,” concludes that the “great thinkers of the past – whether in medicine, philosophy, science, or economics – labored not simply to advance whatever particular group they happened to have come from but to advance the human race” (44-55). America’s accomplishments have derived from all ethnic groups, but Americans do not highlight the nation of origin. Instead “we” as Americans have succeed together sociologically and
For the purpose of this paper, I will define what the term Diversity means, and then I will concentrate on the diversity as a result of geographic origin or ethnic diversity. I will look at how ethnic diversity is managed generally and then how my employer, deals with the diverse ethnic groups in its organization and what it needs to improve on.