Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A essay about shame
Essay on the impact of shame
A essay about shame
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A essay about shame
In the poem “The White Judges” by Marilyn Dumont, the speaker is aware of how her and her Indigenous family are constantly being judged by white society. The poem juxtaposes the family with the encircling colonialists who wait to demean and assimilate the group. The family internalizes a sense of shame and guilt while being surrounded by the primarily white population. Consequently, the family faces the pressures of being judged for their cultural practices. Dumont’s use of prose and lyrical voice distinctly highlights the theme of being judged by white society. Her integration of figurative language enhances the Indigenous tradition and cultural practices throughout the poem. As well as her use of anaphora and musicality which amplifies the …show more content…
feeling of being watched and judged. Dumont renders the disapproval and oppressiveness the speaker’s family experiences through her use of structure, sound, and figurative language. Dumont writes in two types of structures, prose and lyrical, that contribute to the overall thematic concern of confining to the white culture, which limits the Indigenous household. The poem begins in prose form, which outpours like conversation. As a result, the prose structure creates a very warm, homelike feeling. The prose paragraph describes the speaker’s home life and provides a backstory for the reader. It is evident that there is a sense of family belonging through the speaker’s description of their home: “our walls high and bare except for the / family photos whose frames [are] crowded with siblings” (8). Undoubtedly, the family is large and fellowship with one another is an important aspect of their home life. Next, the poem abruptly switches to a lyrical voice adding a sense of musicality and anaphora. The shift emphasizes the change the speaker and her family feel when they acknowledge they are being judged by the white population. As a result, the poem first appears very uniform, then as “the white judges” (10), watch the poem drastically switches, appearing chaotic and unorderly in lyrical form. The switch occurs quite early in the poem: At supper eleven of us would stare down a pot of moose stew, bannock, and tea, while outside the white judges sat encircling our house. And they waited to judge waited till we ate tripe watched us inhale its wild vapour (9-14). As a result of the strong feeling of judgement, the white judges are elevated to the level of a symbol. For example, the poet figuratively places the judges around the family’s house while they enjoy a meal. Taken together, Dumont’s structure choice helps the reader to identify the period when the family begins to experience shame and guilt as a result of judgement. Dumont incorporates figurative language into the lyrical section of the poem to emphasize her Indigenous culture and tradition.
She elaborates on the traditional act of hunting through a simile: “my mother would lift and lay it in place / like a dead relative” (40-41). The relation to a dead relative shows reverence and respect for the animal. The white judges also observe the practice of “praying, coaxing, and thanking” (42), the dead animal as the speaker describes her mother performing the cultural practice of preparing the meat. Dumont’s use of description adds imagery to the poem as she states, “until we had become it and it had become us” (20), further noting the cultural and spiritual connection with animals. Overall, this incorporation provides the reader with information about the Indigenous culture and …show more content…
tradition. In the same way, Dumont uses figurative language to emphasize the marginalization the Indigenous family experiences. The poem provides a great sense of family bonding and cultural togetherness, as Dumont describes with a simile, “all nine kids and the occasional friend slept upstairs like cadets in rows,” creating an image of closeness within the family (4). Although the family is close, they see the efforts of marginalization when, “the cardboard boxes / [are] anonymously dropped at [their] door, spilling with clothes,” (21-22), suggesting that they should conform to the norms of the predominantly white population. The anonymous donation boxes provide a cold and charitable tone, adding to the idea of adapting to the surrounding norms. In turn, the family’s isolation from society allows them to have a great sense of togetherness and cultural fellowship, resulting in positive effects on the household, even as they experience the uncomfortable judgement. Dumont’s use of sound and musicality in the lyrical portion of the poem strengthens and builds the feeling of being watched and judged.
The repetition of the words “waited” (13), and “watched” (14), throughout the stanzas adds anaphora and mystery to the vivid disapproval surrounding the family. Moreover, the use of repetition deepens the focus on the shame and guilt the young girl and her family are experiencing. The anaphora used throughout the poem intends that there is something being waited for. Therefore, the colonialist settlers are continuously waiting and watching for something to happen. In the last stanza Dumont states, “Or wait until a fight broke out” (55), suggesting that this is the action being waited for. As a result, the negative action causes the family to feel shame and regret. Overall, the use of musicality and anaphora successfully allows the reader to experience the pressure of
judgement. The poet’s use of shifting structure, anaphora, and figurative language proves the oppressed nature and condemnation the speaker and her family experience. Dumont’s use of prose and lyrical form emphasizes the theme of conforming to white society and customs, consequently limiting the Indigenous family. Her incorporation of figurative language accentuates her Indigenous tradition and cultural practices. Throughout the lyrical section of the poem, she uses sound and musicality which adds persistence to the judgement. Dumont leaves the reader with the idea of guilt and shame, which successfully leads into assimilation.
Repetition in poetry is a choice the writer makes when they want an idea to become clearer to a reader. By repeating the same word or phrase, the poet draws attention to it and therefore the reader must pay focus in on it to find a deeper meaning. In “The Supremes” poem, Cornelius Eady uses this particular strategy to draw attention to one specific part of the poem; “a long scream” (lines 5 & 18). As the boys in the poem grow up the one trait that remains is the scream in the back of their minds. The scream means that they don’t like what they are doing and that they don’t want to go along with what everyone else wants them to be. This poem explores what this particular group feels is their set path and they want to rebel and act in their own ways. The message is explored in a variety of ways including color and descriptive objects.
As this poem characterizes the view of a native woman expressing feelings of passion relating to her culture, it also criticizes society, in particular Christianity, as the speaker is experiencing feelings of discontent with the outcome of residential schools. It does not directly criticize the faith, but through the use of a heavy native dialect and implications to the Christian faith it becomes simple to read the speakers emotions.
The timeline carries on chronologically, the intense imagery exaggerated to allow the poem to mimic childlike mannerisms. This, subjectively, lets the reader experience the adventure through the young speaker’s eyes. The personification of “sunset”, (5) “shutters”, (8) “shadows”, (19) and “lamplights” (10) makes the world appear alive and allows nothing to be a passing detail, very akin to a child’s imagination. The sunset, alive as it may seem, ordinarily depicts a euphemism for death, similar to the image of the “shutters closing like the eyelids”
As majority of the narrative in this poem is told through the perspective of a deceased Nishnaabeg native, there is a sense of entitlement to the land present which is evident through the passage: “ breathe we are supposed to be on the lake … we are not supposed to be standing on this desecrated mound looking not looking”. Through this poem, Simpson conveys the point of how natives are the true owners of the land and that colonizers are merely intruders and borrowers of the land. There is an underlying idea that instead of turning a blind eye to the abominations colonizers have created, the natives are supposed to be the ones enjoying and utilising the land. The notion of colonizers simply being visitors is furthered in the conclusion of the poem, in which the colonizers are welcomed to the land but are also told “please don’t stay too long” in the same passage. The conclusion of this poem breaks the colonialistic idea of land belonging to the colonizer once colonized by putting in perspective that colonizers are, in essence, just passerbys on land that is not
The first four stanzas are a conversation between the mother and daughter. The daughter asks for permission to attend a civil rights march. The child is a unique one who believes that sacrificing something like “play[ing]” for a march that can make a difference will be worthwhile (2). However, the mother understands that the march is not a simple march, but a political movement that can turn violent. The mother refuses the child’s request, which categorizes the poem as a tragedy because it places the child in the chur...
The poem is about the early stages in the narrator’s pregnancy. The doctor gives her news that the baby may be unhealthy. In a state of panic, we see the narrator turning to the methods of her homeland and native people to carry her through this tough time, and ensure her child’s safe delivery into the world. Da’ writes, “In the hospital, I ask for books./Posters from old rodeos. /A photo of a Mimbres pot /from southern New Mexico /black and white line figures—/a woman dusting corn pollen over a baby’s head/during a naming ceremony. /Medieval women/ingested apples/with the skins incised with hymns and verses/as a portent against death in childbirth” (Da’). We not only see her turning to these old rituals of her cultural, but wanting the items of her cultural to surround her and protect her. It proves her point of how sacred a land and cultural is, and how even though she has been exiled from it, she will continue to count it as a part of her
Connie Fife is a Saskatchewan, Cree poet who writes using her unique perspective, telling of her personal experiences and upbringing. This perspective is revealed to her audience through the poems “This is not a Metaphor”, “I Have Become so Many Mountains”, and “She Who Remembers” all of which present a direct relationship to her traditional background and culture (Rosen-Garten, Goldrick-Jones 1010). To show the relationship of her experiences through her poetry, Fife uses the form of dramatic monologue, as well as modern language and literal writing to display themes about racism presenting her traditional viewpoint to her audience.
Although the little girl doesn’t listen to the mother the first time she eventually listens in the end. For example, in stanzas 1-4, the little girl asks if she can go to the Freedom March not once, but twice even after her mother had already denied her the first time. These stanzas show how the daughter is a little disobedient at first, but then is able to respect her mother’s wishes. In stanzas 5 and 6, as the little girl is getting ready the mother is happy and smiling because she knows that her little girl is going to be safe, or so she thinks. By these stanzas the reader is able to tell how happy the mother was because she thought her daughter would be safe by listening to her and not going to the March. The last two stanzas, 7 and 8, show that the mother senses something is wrong, she runs to the church to find nothing, but her daughter’s shoe. At this moment she realizes that her baby is gone. These stanzas symbolize that even though her daughter listened to her she still wasn’t safe and is now dead. The Shoe symbolizes the loss the mother is going through and her loss of hope as well. This poem shows how elastic the bond between the daughter and her mother is because the daughter respected her mother’s wish by not going to the March and although the daughter is now dead her mother will always have her in her heart. By her having her
...smile”; however, after listening to the introduction about every pen from the girl, the boy’s voice “filling with fear”. This marked contrast indicates the speaker’s impatience, and the audience can feel the development of the story clearly. If the attitudes of the speaker remained the same throughout the poem, it will create a lack of movement so that the audience cannot relate to the speaker.
The poet in her writing used the language tools of symbolism, images, metaphor and nature to illustrate her poetic ideas. The writer, used the word ‘’Hunters’’ in the first line which indicates an imagery of man in existence, example
Before colonization, the Native Americans used oral traditions to teach, remember, entertain, and pray. Much of this knowledge was lost because of various reasons. After translation became an option some of these were written down. This is the beginning of Native American literature, the becoming of sound into word. A major pattern of distrust for the white man’s words are evident in this beginning of their literature.
For example, in the local school, stereotypes such as the image of the ‘wild man’ are consolidated by claiming that there was cannibalism among the indigenous people of the northwest coast (Soper-Jones 2009, 20; Robinson 2010, 68f.). Moreover, native people are still considered to be second-class citizens, which is pointed out by Lisamarie’s aunt Trudy, when she has been harassed by some white guys in a car: “[Y]ou’re a mouthy Indian, and everyone thinks we’re born sluts. Those guys would have said you were asking for it and got off scot-free”
Throughout House Made of Dawn Momaday forces the reader to see a clear distinction between how white people and Native Americans use language. Momaday calls it the written word, the white people’s word, and the spoken word, the Native American word. The white people’s spoken word is so rigidly focused on the fundamental meaning of each word that is lacks the imagery of the Native American word. It is like listening to a contract being read aloud.
The first line sets the scene with,” Traveling through the Dark I found a deer dead on the edge of the Wilson River Road” presenting the setting as night-time in the woods away from cities. Already the poem has a creepy atmosphere. In line five,” By the glow of the tail-light” tells us the speaker is using light from the back of his car that does not give him the best vision in the night. When he stands near the doe, it is described as a “heap”, what is now a mound of flesh that used to be a living animal. The animal “had stiffened already, almost cold”, gives the reader a sensory detail of what was left and relates to how unforgiving death can be. In the second and third stanzas, it is almost like the gravity of the situation had drowned out all of the sound for the speaker. After the shock of examining the doe and finding out she was pregnant, he first starts to notice the sight of his cars lights. Then, he notices the soft humming of its engine that calls him back to the reality of what he has to do. He could then “hear the wilderness listen” as if it was waiting for an answer to what he was going to do, silently, and
In the third stanza the speaker looks toward the future, “Tomorrow,” when to one will object to his dining with the others. A change comes in the fourth stanza when this hopeful tone switches from hopeful to a near mockery. This shift is characterized by the word “Besides.” This structure creates a chronological state of events. With the poem organized this way the reader can realize that the black...