Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of media on teens
Effects of media on teens
Effects of media on teens
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of media on teens
Arifah Syuhada Ahamad Razman
Professor David Marroquin
English 101A
7 February 2015
Mark Edmundson : On the Uses of a Liberal Education
Mark Edmundson is an English professor at University of Virginia and has published many articles focusing on literary and cultural criticism. In one of his articles, “On the Uses of a Liberal Education”, Mark Edmundson claims his feeling of disappointment and distressed on evaluation day which required his students to rate him on scale of one to five. Even though he gets a lot of positive feedback from his students addressing him as interesting and fun, he feels uneasy in a way that education has changed into consumer-driven society. Despite of interesting and fun, he expects to hear about changes
…show more content…
from his students that he has made through the course and he wants his students to measure themselves to what they have learned. The devotion into consumerism of education that he claims can be seen from where the university’s funds go to. The upgraded gymnasium with branded machines, building new dorms and constructing an aquatics center has relation with what he labels consumerism. Colleges and universities are no longer aiming for the quality of education through what the students have learned and the implication they will made to the outside world, but the coziness and comfortableness they will experienced. What make it worst is when most of the instructors and teachers shift their focus of the classrooms and softening the grades in order for them to be successful. Thus, this makes Mark Edmundson thinks that students nowadays have the power over their own teachers. In this article, Mark Edmundson also provides an example of his student, Joon Lee, who he finds admiring and different from his other students.
Joon Lee’s curiosity and enthusiasm have made him charmingly peculiar with other people. Joon Lee doesn’t mind if he doesn’t fit in with the rest and extremely stood out of the crowd. Rather than making efforts on how they will shape themselves through what they have learned, most of his other students are only interested in mixing and blending with the society. Another reason why most of his students do not have the passion Joon Lee has is that they are worried if working too much on their education will affect their future financially. Mark Edmundson points out that these students’ attitude is taken from consumer-culture serves by the “tube” which runs flawlessly on the screen. With this kind of attitude, he says that they will be no new genius born in the future because they never try to strive for improvement even if they are intelligent. In the end of his article, he concludes that universities and colleges need to change their focuses toward education and put what actual learning means back to priority. He also determined to serve the correct way of teaching even it means to challenge his students’ thoughts and mind
critically.
Edmundson was considered one of the “interesting” teachers because of the fact he would tell jokes in order to keep the students interested, since it was the one way he figured worked; however, he did not “teach to amuse…or for that matter, to be merely interesting” (Edmundson, Greene-Lidinsky 390). College students get to pick their professors and they have to ability to find out if the professor is to their liking, or else they can just drop the class and/or find a better-suited professor. Edmundson felt as though the student’s “passion seems to be spent,” and that “university culture” is becoming more and more “devoted to consumption and entertainment” (Edmundson, Greene-Lidinsky 391). Furthermore, colleges make it even worse due to the fact that they make the campuses beautiful in order to attract students to apply, so students attend those campuses imagining that the classes will be just as
The Student Guide to Liberal Learning encourages apprentices to consider the significance of what is truth? James Schall, explains the nature of the universe as an open door to seek guidance through the knowledge of the great thinkers as an attempt to better comprehend the ultimate truth of our reality as a whole, to understand how things perfectly align with each other and how to find the ultimate truth that humanity continuously seeks. Furthermore, Schall states that: “…the truth comes from reality itself, from what is. Truth is our judgment about reality.” Schall lays out the initial quest as form of “clear knowledge of truth” while he persuades to stimulate and spark the curiosity of students to seek his or her own truth of reality through a two-step process:
Education is one of the most widely debated issues of our country in this current day and age. Many people feel as though schooling is biased and unfair to certain students; meanwhile, others feel as though the schooling systems are not serious enough in order to properly educate students to prepare them for their futures. The three texts that will be discussed, are all well written controversial essays that use a great deal of rhetorical appeals which help readers relate to the topics being discussed. In the essay “School,” Mori manages to specify her views on how different modern education is in America as to Japan; meanwhile, in “A Talk to Teachers,” Baldwin presents his argument as to how all children, no matter
...fessors do not see Pop Culture readings as a form of intellectualism, or what is considered suitable reading for academics. Even though Graff is a professor, he can identify with students and how they feel about bow they can not relate to readings that are see as intellectual in an academic setting. If students are to never catch on to read the different reading that teachers think are suitable, will students give up or will they eventually stop caring.In an academic setting, will Pop Culture readings ever become considered as intellectual and will teachers ever allow students to pick out their own readings. If they don’t will the teachers ever see an interest in the students and their work.
He explains his fear of his students’ opinions of his teaching and then finds himself trying to win over popularity from his students. On the course evaluations, Edmundson observes the “enjoyable” rating, which he then states that he would rather his students be challenged and changed by his teachings than to be having fun without truly learning the curriculum. This is due to the fact that liberal education and general society has completely taken a turn for the worst, which then dives into the discussion on how American culture is today - devoted to consumption and
The journey begins at the heart of the matter, with a street smart kid failing in school. This is done to establish some common ground with his intended audience, educators. Since Graff is an educator himself, an English professor at the University of Illinois in Chicago, he understands the frustrations of having a student “who is so intelligent about so many things in life [and yet] seems unable to apply that intelligence to academic work” (380). Furthermore, Graff blames schools for not utilizing street smarts as a tool to help improve academics; mainly due to an assumption that some subjects are more inherently intellectual than others. Graff then logically points out a lack of connection “between any text or subject and the educational depth and weight of the discussion it can generate” (381). He exemplifies this point by suggesting that any real intellectual could provoke thoughtful questions from any subject, while a buffoon can render the most robust subjects bland. Thus, he is effectively using logic and emotion to imply that educators should be able to approach any subject critically, even non-traditional subjects, lest they risk being labeled a buffoon.
The average human would think that going to school and getting an education are the two key items needed to make it in life. Another common belief is, the higher someone goes with their education, the more successful they ought to be. Some may even question if school really makes anyone smarter or not. In order to analyze it, there needs to be recognition of ethos, which is the writer 's appeal to their own credibility, followed by pathos that appeals to the writer’s mind and emotions, and lastly, logos that is a writer’s appeal to logical reasoning. While using the three appeals, I will be analyzing “Against School” an essay written by John Taylor Gatto that gives a glimpse of what modern day schooling is like, and if it actually help kids
Since high school and now through my second year of college I have had one goal for my future, that goal was to graduate college with a degree in criminal justice. Not being interested in math or science, I was discouraged by the fact of taking classes that had nothing to do with my career choice. Thus being said, many people that I talked too felt the same way as I did. Which constantly led me to question what the importance of a liberal education was. After reading an essay called The Liberal Arts Are Not Elitist by Martha Nussbaum and relating it to an essay by William Cronon called The Goals of a Liberal Education, my perspective changed. An education is more than just a degree in your field of study, but an overall basic knowledge in which will inspire people to be the absolute best they can be.
To put it in another way, schools need to take their students’ passions seriously and put them into a solid matter that grab student attention to conquer their lassitude over tiresome works. According to Graff, “Students need to see their interests “through academic eyes” is to say that street smarts are not enough”(269). The essence of Graff’s argument is that, students now need to put their interests into academic work, and in order for students to accomplish that, it is school duty to provide areas of study that match their interests. Still, this idea will not entirely get the student exactly where they want to be. Nevertheless, students don’t have to be completely pedagogical when they study the areas such as fashion, cars, animals or beauty whereas the mandatory is to think and understand them purposefully and critically, in a way that Graff proposes is to “see them as microcosms of what is going on in the wider culture”(270). Basically, he is saying that students should analyze their interests, observes and consider them as a small piece simultaneously with the extensive world. The world is too big, though, we are still asked to target details, and student are individuals who is need to be understood. Eventually, noticing students’ passion and backing them up will be supportive to lead their path on the
In the 1997 article, “On The Uses of a Liberal Education: As a Weapon In the Hands of the Restless Poor,” published by Harper’s Magazine, the social critic Earl Shorris described how political power could be achieved by a rather non-vocational educational discipline, the humanities. He emphasizes on how the knowledge of a liberal Education can be used as a form of weapon within the lives for the poor.
Have you ever read something and thought “What a bunch of crap”? Well that’s the reaction I had to reading Fareed Zakaria’s book, In Defense Of a Liberal Education. Over the course of the book, Zakaria makes the argument that attending college with the specific intention to get trained for a job is “Short sighted and needlessly limiting”. Zakaria also breaks down the differences between the United State’s education system with other countries across the globe. By attending college with the intention of receiving critical thinking skills and being able to express our ideas, rather than just going to train for a job, Zakaria believes that the average student would be much better off in the world after they graduate.
Graff begins by talking about the educational system, and why it flawed in many ways, but in particular, one: Todays schools overlook the intellectual potential of street smart students, and how shaping lessons to work more readily with how people actually learn, we could develop into something capable of competing with the world. In schools, students are forced to recite and remember dull and subject heavy works in order to prepare them for the future, and for higher education. “We associate the educated life, the life of the mind, too narrowly and exclusively with subjects and texts that we consider inherently weighty and academic. We assume that it’s possible to wax intellectual about Plato, Shakespeare, the French Revolution, and nuclear fission, but not about cars, dating, fashion, sports, TV, or video games.” (Graff, 198-199) In everyday life, students are able to learn and teach themselves something new everyday. It is those students, the “young person who is impressively “street smart” but does poorly in school” (Graff, 198), that we are sweeping away from education and forcing to seek life in places that are generally less successful than those who attend a college or university.
Co-author of “They Say/I Say” handbook, Gerald Graff, analyzes in his essay “Hidden Intellectualism” that “street smarts” can be used for more efficient learning and can be a valuable tool to train students to “get hooked on reading and writing” (Graff 204). Graff’s purpose is to portray to his audience that knowing more about cars, TV, fashion, and etc. than “academic work” is not the detriment to the learning process that colleges and schools can see it to be (198). This knowledge can be an important teaching assistant and can facilitate the grasping of new concepts and help to prepare students to expand their interests and write with better quality in the future. Graff clarifies his reasoning by indicating, “Give me the student anytime who writes a sharply argued, sociologically acute analysis of an issue in Source over the student who writes a life-less explication of Hamlet or Socrates’ Apology” (205). Graff adopts a jovial tone to lure in his readers and describe how this overlooked intelligence can spark a passion in students to become interested in formal and academic topics. He uses ethos, pathos, and logos to establish his credibility, appeal emotionally to his readers, and appeal to logic by makes claims, providing evidence, and backing his statements up with reasoning.
James V. Schall’s, “A Student’s Guide to Liberal Learning” wants us to understand that the nature of the universe gives us opportunities for different things. He addresses that the universe allows us to gain new knowledge in any place that we might be. In Schall’s “A Student’s Guide to Liberal Learning,” he mentions “one that is capable of altering us to intellectual riches that are almost never found in universities or in the popular culture.” From this I understood that the universe always gives opportunities to acquire and learn new knowledge. The universe allows us to learn different things. For example, things that might be facts or simply random things that are interesting.
Modern day society is engrossed in a battle for protection of individual rights and freedoms from infringement by any person, be it the government or fellow citizens. Liberalism offers a solution to this by advocating for the protection of personal freedom. As a concept and ideology in political science, liberalism is a doctrine that defines the motivation and efforts made towards the protection of the aforementioned individual freedom. In the current society, the greatest feature of liberalism is the protection of individual liberty from intrusion or violation by a government. The activities of the government have, therefore, become the core point of focus. In liberalism, advocacy for personal freedom may translate to three ideal situations, based on the role that a government plays in a person’s life. These are no role, a limited role or a relatively large role. The three make up liberalism’s rule of thumb. (Van de Haar 1). Political theorists have