Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Writing process reflection essay
Process of a reflective essay
Writing a reflective analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Brent Staples, who was a journalist of the New York Times, and studied mental philosophy from the University of the Chicago, shows the different subject positions in his published version of the “Just Walk on By: A Black Man Ponders His Power to Alter Public Space”, and his draft version of the “Just Walk on By”. Brent Staples wrote two different versions of the essay, but the each essay’s subject position is pretty different to the reader. Also, each subject position describes the same situation quite differently by illustrating each way of looking based on dissimilar perspectives. In his Published version, he describes himself “I was twenty-two years old, a graduate student newly arrived at the University of Chicago”(Staples 240). Also, the published version says, “To her, the youngish black man—a broad six feet two inches with a beard and billowing hair, both hands shoved into the pockets of a bulky military jacket—seemed menacingly close”(Staples 240). However, in another version, which is the draft version of the essay before publication, he draws himself “I was wearing my navy pea jacket, the collar turned up, my hands snug in the pockets”(Staples “Another Version”). In another version of his essay, there is no describes the woman’s position who ran away after saw the writer of this personal essay. Without the title, and the author of the writer, those two personal essays seems entirely different to the reader, and each subject positions of these essays makes same situation diversely, which means each perspective and ways of looking make two different essays The draft version of the essay is quite offensive, but published version of the essay is entirely defensive. As the reader’s view, these differences are quite clear to
As society continues to change, it is important for Christians to realize that they must respond in new and different ways. The original publisher, Tindale House, published this essay as an informative measure while Baker Academic uses this essay as a way to teach how to evaluate a specific style of writing. This essay's purpose is to not only be a source of information, but also an essay that can be evaluated in order to learn about a specific style of writing.
The tone of this essay is largely persuasive but turns sarcastic as it progresses towards the end. His unique use of diction clearly supports the persuasive tone to his readers. The author's use of the word "tongue-lashing", to describe the way a soccer player "may find himself writhing under a coach's tongue- lashing", gives a harsh impression that the players are forced to cheat like slaves were forced to work. Secondly, the use of over exaggerated adjectives such as "astronomical salaries" is overblown to a point where the reader starts to agree with his arguments. The use of his harsh words and exaggerated adjectives gives insightful depth to his arguments, and in return consistently supports his persuasive tone. His syntax supports his tone as well, since he gives out his own biased opinion to prove h...
basic charge of this criticism can be stated in the words of a recent critic,
Jill Klein knowing this about memory, she interviewed her family, and whenever something was not so clear for anyone, she looked over maps and photographs to help her family to remember exactly about details. One example of this is in chapter 3 where she talks about “The Walk.” She used a map, like a sketch, of the concentration camp in Auschwitz to help Gabi to remember whether Herman turned to the left or to the right when they arrived. This map also started to help her to see where the Crematoria where, so she could analyze the information given to see if Herman went to Crematoria I, II, III, or IV.
While the author actually did a great job in conveying her message by providing many statements from different people to prove their disappointment and drawing their emotional appeals in the article when the building has been whitewashed, the author did not emphasize her credibility in writing an article and thus making her argument become less convincing.
The “writer is attacking someone on a personal level instead of addressing his or her opinions and argument”. (Prinsen, 4) The author bluntly critiques the report, but not for it’s content. Mallick makes weak statements such as “The report is badly written, by the way” and describes those who wrote it as “an amorphous group with an unrivalled talent for educational jargon”. By attacking the report not based on it’s content, but it’s writing style Mallick isolates many readers. She claims that she stands up for those students, but she chooses not to use facts to support her claims. Additionally, by berating the people who wrote the report Mallick further degrades her readers’ trust. Ultimately the reader is left questioning the author’s validity because of her slanderous attacks in place of legitimate
The essay, “Walk to Morning”, by Joseph Boyden details the failed suicide of the author. If one was to describe said story with a single word, no word would do better than the word decision. What is evident to the reader in the beginning of the story is how the author was mistreated the night of his attempted suicide, claiming she “was, saying nonsensical things and being mean to me”. At any time during this sudden change of attitude, the author could of made a decision to inquire about the cause of this sudden hostility. If this action was taken, perhaps his girlfriend would of at least explained the causes of why she wanted to break up with him or at least give him some meager sort of comfort following the break up.
The author uses special writing strategy that he puts his strong emotion in sceneries and recalls the old times. For instance, the author describes, “as I gazed at the shore, I noticed that the trees had stopped moving against the graying sky. Looking out the other window, I was surprised to see barges overtaking us. Just then the radio crackled to life” (Johnson). The author uses the dialogue to present his perspectives, he puts deep emotion in this essay and uses exquisite writing style. However, although the article successfully sparks people’s emotions, it fails to analyze the historical reasons and decreases its credibility and its argument
In this narrative essay, Brent Staples provides a personal account of his experiences as a black man in modern society. “Black Men and Public Space” acts as a journey for the readers to follow as Staples discovers the many societal biases against him, simply because of his skin color. The essay begins when Staples was twenty-two years old, walking the streets of Chicago late in the evening, and a woman responds to his presence with fear. Being a larger black man, he learned that he would be stereotyped by others around him as a “mugger, rapist, or worse” (135).
In a dystopian city, it is normal that “an entire street be startled by the passing of a lone figure, [Leonard Mead], in the early November evening” (1). This entire street, along with the rest of the city, would be stuck in their houses, eyes glued to ‘viewing screens’ or televisions. As the one person varying from these actions, Mead walks around outside and takes in the lifeless city at night. While most people are caught up in some show on their viewing screen, Mead recognizes how the huge city suddenly dies in the evening. The abruptly quiet city seems like it should be strange, but for this society, Mead’s actions are what is truly odd. This society would rather Mead simply do what everyone else is doing without question. A prevalent
This version focused more on the speaker and his internal struggles. This developed the speaker more in depth than the first version, which in turn created a connection between the audience and the speaker. Part of this connection is developed through the use of the introduction. In the first version, the introduction is long and somewhat misleading. In the second, the work starts with a sense of tranquility, which is consistent with the impact the past has on the speaker. This encompasses the entirety of the message and therefore begins the description of the past in the light that it is meant to be explained in. Whereas in the first version, the past is described initially as hidden, torn, faded, and hollow. This completely contrasts the soft, tingling, smiling, coziness, and sense of belonging that the second version ensues. The second also provides more of an analysis of the pain that the present forces on the speaker. For example, in the second the speaker is described as betrayed back to the present. This clarified his true desire to lie in the past, where he could find the comfort of
The second textual criticism is found on pages six and seven. Here the author speaks about the ...
The next step in applying New Criticism is to examine some of the outlining themes to deter...
The writer had evidence from the book where Nick’s father told Nick not to judge anyone because not all of them had the same privileges as him (Nick). “Whenever you feel like criticizing someone just remember that all the people in the world haven’t had all the advantages you’ve had”. The writer needs to avoid the use of a fallacy known as hasty generalization in which he/she automatically assume that Nick actually followed the instructions giving to him. The writer himself/herself had absolutely no idea who Nick was and if he actually criticized someone but failed to admit that in his writing. Although he/she used a fallacy known as hasty generalization his/her arguments were more convincing. Overall, writer had good evidence form the book that supported his/her claims. The writer had a professional voice and thoroughly expressed his/her arguments. The writer made great use of cohesive words in his writing. “Next, in an honest and reliable manner, Nick Carraway presents original plots or conversations between characters”, this example is to show the great use of cohesive words and how the writer’s opinions and arguments were connecting together. Overall the ideas were properly structured meaning his/her arguments were not all over the
Living in a world where the smallest misuse of words can lead to someone feeling offended; the use of certain words should be kept to a simple meaning. In the pieces the biggest arguments that were used was the fact that people disliked the use of certain words leading few of the writers to feel offended. By simplifying the meanings or limiting words to have a specific meaning, the English language would be more easily accepted by people from different aspects of the language.