Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the influence of money
The effect of money essay
The effect of money essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the influence of money
Poem Explication: In the poem, “Ballade of Worldly Wealth”, the author, Andrew Lang uses repetition within lines that contain parallel constructions. I think that the author chose to use repetition for the rhetorical pattern as a way to explain his ideas, feelings and tone about the poem’s main concept; money. After reading this ballade, one can easily deduct that the author believes that money can corrupt/destroy an individual’s life or enhance it, depending on how the individual uses said money. Despite the fact that the author mentions/implies that money can either make life better or worse, it is obvious that he feels negatively towards money overall. This poem is comprised of three stanzas, with each stanza containing eight rhyming lines. These rhyming lines make up the parallel construction, which was the authors way of elaborating on the importance of his repetition and the true meaning of his words. Parallel construction can be found even within the first …show more content…
stanza when he wrote; “Money taketh town and wall, Fort and ramp without a blow, Money moves the merchants all, While the tides shall ebb and flow, Money maketh Evil show Like the Good, and Truth like lies, These alone can ne’er bestow Youth, and health, and paradise.” In the first stanza the author mainly focuses on and expresses the fact that he believes money has negative effects on the individual and society itself overall due to greed and corruption.
In addition to the focus on the negative impact, the author also points out that money (and the things it can buy/attain) cannot buy/guarantee a person youth, health and “paradise” meaning internal happiness with themselves and life itself. In the second stanza the author, Andrew Lang, this time focuses more so on the possibility of positive impacts from money in the following lines; “Money maketh festival, Wine she buys, and beds can strow, Round the necks of captains tall, Money wins them chains to throw, Marches solciers to and fro, Gaineth ladies with sweet
eyes: These alone can ne’er bestow Youth, and health, and paradise.” In this second stanza, the author points out the different good things money can buy, however the author also uses repetition at the end of this second stanza from the last two lines of the previous stanza to support the author’s belief that even though money can do good, it causes more negative impact than positive. In the third and last stanza, Andrew Lang elaborates on the concept that money can have either positive or negative effects and/or impact, completely depending on how the individual perceives, values and uses that money in the following; “Money wins the priest his stall, Money mitres buys, I trow, Red hats for the Cardinal, Abbeys for the novice low, Money maketh sin as snow, Place of penitence supplies: These alone can ne’er bestow Youth, and health, and Paradise.” Even though the author makes the point to mention and imply the potential for both the good and/or bad effects from the use and desire for money, it is obvious from the tone and word usage that he mostly feels negatively about money because he feels that it does more harm than help. One main reason why I can deduct from the poem that he overall feels negative towards money is because of the last two lines to each stanza, “These alone can ne’er bestow Youth, and health, and Paradise” This repetition evidently shows that the author thinks despite the potential good effect of money, he thinks that it cannot provide true happiness, nor real fulfillment because according to his poem and repeated lines, money cannot buy youth, health, or “paradise”. All things considered, after reading and analyzing each line of this poem, I can conclude that even though the author addresses both the positive and negative effects of money by mentioning what you can and cannot buy (meaning both the harmful and helpful things you can buy), the author obviously leans towards the belief that overall, money is bad and harmful because it is the source of greed and corruption due to money-lust.
This essay is anchored on the goal of looking closer and scrutinizing the said poem. It is divided into subheadings for the discussion of the analysis of each of the poem’s stanzas.
The informal language and intimacy of the poem are two techniques the poet uses to convey his message to his audience. He speaks openly and simply, as if he is talking to a close friend. The language is full of slang, two-word sentences, and rambling thoughts; all of which are aspects of conversations between two people who know each other well. The fact that none of the lines ryhme adds to the idea of an ordinary conversation, because most people do not speak in verse. The tone of the poem is rambling and gives the impression that the speaker is thinking and jumping from one thought to the next very quickly.
A penny saved may be a penny earned, just as a penny spent may begin to better the world. Andrew Carnegie, a man known for his wealth, certainly knew the value of a dollar. His successful business ventures in the railroad industry, steel business, and in communications earned him his multimillion-dollar fortune. Much the opposite of greedy, Carnegie made sure he had what he needed to live a comfortable life, and put what remained of his fortune toward assistance for the general public and the betterment of their communities. He stressed the idea that generosity is superior to arrogance. Carnegie believes that for the wealthy to be generous to their community, rather than live an ostentatious lifestyle proves that they are truly rich in wealth and in heart. He also emphasized that money is most powerful in the hands of the earner, and not anyone else. In his retirement, Carnegie not only spent a great deal of time enriching his life by giving back; but also often wrote about business, money, and his stance on the importance of world peace. His essay “Wealth” presents what he believes are three common ways in which the wealthy typically distribute their money throughout their life and after death. Throughout his essay “Wealth”, Andrew Carnegie appeals to logos as he defines “rich” as having a great deal of wealth not only in materialistic terms, but also in leading an active philanthropic lifestyle. He solidifies this definition in his appeals to ethos and pathos with an emphasis on the rewards of philanthropy to the mind and body.
Everyone grows up with a dream, but everyone will not get the opportunity to do so, being born in the financial situation of their family. In third world countries people struggle to make money on a daily basis. These people want more than what they have, but to attain those extra luxuries, they have to sacrifice their current possessions.This is not possible in as sacrificing what they have can lead to starvation. They want a better future but they need to be able to live on a daily basis. It is called investment in the future vs temporary happiness. Attaining security requires risking one’s belongings to earn liberty and equality in the future. Although temporary contentment must be sacrificed to attain security in life, it must be one’s
In the poem “Ballade of Wordly Wealth,” the author, Andrew Lang designates the reality about money and peoples outlook on money in the 1800s and 1900s. Repetition is used throughout the poem to clearly explain that money can either be good or evil. The setting of this poem seems to be in the author’s own town. The people mentioned in the poem are merchants, soldiers, and priests. The audience of this poem could be anyone from any period of time because money has always existed. It is obvious that the tone/mood towards money is negative. In short, this poem describes that money is both a requirement and the impelling cause of exploitation and power in the society.
Each stanza is composed of words that present a logical flow of growth through the entire poem. The words in the poem do not rhyme and the lines are different lengths.
I believe that the structure of this poem allows for the speaker to tell a narrative which further allows him to convey his point. The use of enjambment emphasizes this idea as well as provides a sense of flow throughout the entirety of a poem, giving it the look and feel of reading a story. Overall, I believe this piece is very simplistic when it comes to poetic devices, due to the fact that it is written as a prose poem, this piece lacks many of the common poetic devices such as rhyme, repetition, alliteration, and metaphors. However, the tone, symbolism, allusion and imagery presented in the poem, give way to an extremely deep and complicated
In relation to structure and style, the poem contains six stanzas of varying lengths. The first, second, and fourth stanzas
. . is written in rhymed quatrains, rhymed so insistently, in fact, that it is possible to read the poem as having only two rhyming sounds for its eight lines. It is also rendered in complete, conventional sentences, and it has a fairly consistent iambic rhythm. . . . The rhythmic repetitions of the form stand for the repetitive nature of the work, which appears most obviously in the nearly perfect iambic line that represents the resumed swinging of the scythes” (“On
The center of many stories is the inspiration that money can’t buy happiness and that people can live healthy and happy lives without money. In the passage; “On the Want of Money” by William Hazlitt, the author completely disagrees with this, money may not buy happiness, however, without money agony is sure to follow. Money is such an important aspect in or lives, that if we have none it is just like taking away your ability to breath, tormenting and distressing. According to Hazlitt, the idea of being without money is pure craziness; your life will become full of anguish and sorrow. Hazlitt makes the argument that money the key to a prosperous life, and by using despondent word choices and engrossing syntactical strategies, Hazlitt successfully reveals that, if money cannot buy happiness, a lack thereof can certainly led to misery.
Parallel structure is a prominent rhetorical device used throughout the poem. The use of parallel structure in a passage symbolizes the two separate phrases are of equal importance. For example, when Taylor says, “Make me O lord thy spinning wheele … Make mine affections as thy swift flyer … Make my soule thy holy spoole”. In this quote, parallel structure is used to represent that each part of his body and mind is equally gods. Without parallel structure, it would seem as if each part is represented disproportionally. It would also seem as if they aren’t connected at all making it harder to comprehend the point of writing that section.
The construction of the poem is in regular four-line stanzas, of which the first two stanzas provide the exposition, setting the scene; the next three stanzas encompass the major action; and the final two stanzas present the poet's reflection on the meaning of her experience.
According from the film, lesson Number four “Many people think that happiness comes from having more power or more money.” For example, Edward is a businessman in China who always felt happier by having a lot of money. He always uses his money on any situations he wants, and people treat him like a boss. That’s why when Hector asks Edward, “What is your happiness?” Edward said, “Money is my happiness.” It shows money is a part of life and a part of the happiness. It can buy anything you want, and it also can help you easily becomes VIP in restaurants or clubs. That’s why people want to work hard become rich. Although they are getting old, they don’t want to retire and fear any loss of money. That makes Hector writes down, “A lot of people think happiness means being richer or more important.” This statement points out what happens to the society right now. And Hector also feels it. It reflects the overuse of people with money. Further, everyone thinks money can make us feel happy and we can buy the happiness. However, does money really true to buy the happiness? That’s why the movie shows us money is important, but it is not everything. The movie tries to explain it, but it also said that without money you couldn’t be
Instead they rely completely on money to be happy. People often do not appreciate what they have, and they feel like they deserve better, and they complain instead of making the best of what they have. It is not necessary to be rich to enjoy life. Often those who have everything tend to live miserably. People can become too attached to money to the point that they forget about enjoying life and caring for their family. The theme of materialism is shown throughout the story of “The Rocking Horse Winner” to explain how being too attached to money can ruin people’s lives.
We often hear about people’s desire to solve the world hunger and poverty problem. According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, there are nearly 870 million people of the 7.1 billion people in the world were undernourished. People in developing countries are suffering from different diseases and hunger while people who live in developed countries can enjoy a cup of coffee in every single morning or even consume different luxury goods. Therefore, in the article “The Life You Can Save” philosopher Peter Singer argues that not donating the extraneous income that we receive to people who are in need is an immoral action; people should endeavor to give their hands to the poor. In this paper, I will argue against Singer’s solution to world poverty as sometimes we are not living up to moral obligation and it may change due to experiences.