Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How birth order affects a child's personality
How birth order affects a child's personality
How birth order affects a child's personality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How birth order affects a child's personality
How Birth Order Influences Personality The influence of birth order plays a large significant role in determining the personality of children. In “Birth Order”, by Kelly Gfroerer and Kelli B. Ritter, Alfred Adler, the founder of the theory known as Individual Psychology, first introduced the concept of birth order. Alfred Adler developed theories of personality to understand an individual within the conditions of social environment. While “Birth Order and Personality”, by author Russell Eisenman consider the differences between firstborns and later-borns in regards to creative differences, achievement and risk taking. The importance of psychological birth order emphasizes how it can influence personality. Author Kelly Gfroerer and Kelli B. …show more content…
With regard to their first child, the birth of their firstborn is a major event in the parents’ lives and will cause the tendency to be overly anxious. In turn, many parents are inclined to be restrictive with their first-born and this anxiety may influence the personality of the child. When parents have their later-born, they are more comfortable and are more informed with caring for their children to protect their child from any imaginable harm. However, firstborns will often grow up to be anxious than later-born children. As aforementioned, first time parents aren’t well-informed with the care and need for their firstborn. Although, parents are eventually more comfortable and are more informed with their later-born. Based on this, Emily from “I Stand Here Ironing” displays an anxious behavior growing up. Since her mother was single and nineteen with minimum support and help from anyone, Emily was left in the care of her father’s family. It took a long amount of time for her mother to get her back and by that time, her mother hardly knew her: “walking quick and nervous like her father” (Olsen …show more content…
However, this appears to be untrue for Emily’s case since her sister Susan is “telling jokes and riddles to company for applause while Emily sat silent” (Olsen 227). Whereas Emily later tells her mother that it was her riddle and she had told it to Susan. Eisenman found that creative differences between firstborns and later-borns should also consider gender differences, however, “this finding could be explained by the ways in which parents treat their firstborn child as well as how parents treat their female children” (Eisenman n.
...ck of cards that prevented her from becoming her full potential. When the mother speaks of Emily this way she is simply saying that Emily will find her way through life somehow, someway. She might not become anyone important, she might not do incredible things, and she might not even live the life she wanted. In the end, Emily will still live a life that is worth living with all the mistakes, regrets, and decisions that will all be her own.
The concept of infant-mother attachment is as important to the child as the birth itself. The effect this relationship has on a child shall affect that child for its entire life. A secure attachment to the mother or a primary caregiver is imperative for a child’s development. Ainsworth’s study shows that a mother is responsive to her infant’s behavioral cues which will develop into a strong infant-mother attachment. This will result in a child who can easily, without stress, be separated from his mother and without any anxiety. Of course the study shows a child with a weak infant-mother relationship will lead to mistrust, anxiety, and will never really be that close with the mother. Without the right help, this child may harbor these ill feelings for life.
As she entered college, she found her anxiety more manageable, but it has returned full force with this second pregnancy. She is currently employed as a contract manager at the company, which is partially owned by her husband. She notes that her work is the one place where she feels completely confident and does not experience anxiety. In her description of her family of origin, Emily noted several elements that may have contributed to her anxiety. She noted that her father, while revered in his profession, has a difficult relationship with his family members.
From the beginning of Emily's life she is separated from those she needed most, and the mother's guilt tears at the seams of a dress barely wrinkled. Emily was only eight months old when her father left her and her mother. He found it easier to leave than to face the responsibilities of his family's needs. Their meager lifestyle and "wants" (Olsen 601) were more than he was ready to face. The mother regrettably left the child with the woman downstairs fro her so she could work to support them both. As her mother said, "She was eight months old I had to leave her daytimes" (601). Eventually it came to a point where Emily had to go to her father's family to live a couple times so her mother could try to stabilize her life. When the child returned home the mother had to place her in nursery school while she worked. The mother didn't want to put her in that school; she hated that nursery school. "It was the only place there was. It was the only way we could be toge...
‘Birth order theory can help explain why children raised in the same family environment with a strong genetic relationship can have such different personalities’ (Drysdale, 2011). The birth order theory says that ‘first-borns are leaders, the drivers and the responsible type. They love to feel in control and feel uncomfortable with surprises or feeling out of their depth. They are conservative in their outlook’ (Grose, 2013). The personality theory says that last-borns are majorly different to first-borns in their characteristics and traits. It states that last-borns are ‘the
Social pressure to raise pleasant, good mannered children who become grounded and productive adults has been a driving influence for many generations. If our children do not fit into this mold then we’re considered failures are parents. Emily’s mother is tormented by the phone call which sets off a wave of maternal guilt. Emily’s mother was young and abandoned by her husband while Emily was still an infant so she had to rely on only herself and the advice of others while she raised her daughter. After Emily was born her mother, “with all the fierce rigidity of first motherhood, (I) did like the books said. Though her cries battered me to trembling and my breasts ached with swollenness, I waited till the clock decreed.” (Olsen 174). Then when Emily was two she went against her own instincts about sending Emily to a nursery school while she worked which she considered merely “parking places for children.” (Olsen 174). Emily’s mother was also persuaded against her motherly instincts to send her off to a hospital when she did not get well from the measles and her mother had a new baby to tend to. Her mother even felt guilt for her second child, Susan, being everything society deemed worthy of attention. Emily was “thin and dark and foreign-looking at a time when every little girl was supposed to look or thought she should look a chubby blond replica of Shirley Temple.” (Olsen, 177) she was also neither “glib or quick in a world where glibness and quickness were easily confused with ability to learn.” (Olsen 177), which her sister Susan had in
As time goes on Emily grows up, her mother criticizes and blames herself for the distance between the relationships. It is causing tension in their already rocky relationship. The mother is obviously suffering from guilt on how Emily was raised and the unpleasant memories of the past. Emily was also suffering. We see her shyness towards those who care for her. She was a very depressed teen. She had quietness in her daily duties, and her feelings of not being good enough towards herself. She always felt that she was extremely ugly and not smart compared to her younger sister, Susan. She thought she was perfect. She was the typical “Shirley Temple” image.
A layman would define personality as an individual’s characteristics in terms of how they think and behave. Many theorists, however, interprets personality differently resulting in various personality theories. Personality is determined by traits which are behaviours displayed by a person in most given situations. How a person reacts to common circumstances may also be used to foresee future behaviours. Traits are then categorized into types that allow easier comparisons to be made between each individual’s attributes. The focus of this paper would be on the biological aspects of personality whereby traits are thought to be inheritable through genetics and associated with the central nervous system. Behavioural genetics are research that makes use of results from studies done on family, twins and adoptions. The findings of how both genes and environment influences personality from the studies will be discussed. Some researchers found possible issues with the representativeness of such studies. The outline of Eysenck’s biological model of personality and arousal, Gray’s BAS/BIS theory and Cloninger’s biological model of personality will further explain the biological effect on personality.
Although a pregnant adolescent faces many stressors, which can translate into sundry psychological quandaries such as melancholy, the most consequential effects may pertain to the child. According to Steinberg (2011) children of adolescent mothers “are at a more preponderant risk of developing a variety of psychological and gregarious problems”; largely, due to being raised in a poor environment and/or a single parent household (p. 363). Psychological issues can additionally arise due to puerile parents interacting with their infant less often, which have a consequential effect on the child’s development (Steinberg, 2011).
The foundations for a child’s development begins not only in the child’s first year, but also while they are in utero. A child’s development can also be influenced by how much the parents are contributing to the development of the child. A couple that interacts well with one another as well as with the child can have “positive impacts on a child’s cognitive, language and motor development, this can also positively benefit the couple relationship, and the parent-infant relationship,” (Parfitt, Pike, & Ayers, 2013). A parent’s especially a mother’s mental health can greatly impact a child’s development if a mother is less stressed the will be more comfortable around the child creating a better mother-child attachment which also promotes language development. (Parfitt, Pike, & Ayers, 2013). If a father’s is positively involved in a child’s life early on that the child will have a greater reduction in cognitive delays, this is especially true in boys (Parfitt, Pike, & Ayers, 2013). Another positive key in a child’s development comes from the sibling relationships. Siblings help a child learn social, emotional, cognitive and behavioral
The first two years of a humans life are bursting with biosocial, cognitive, and psychosocial development. In the first few weeks after conception to two years after birth a child’s brain experiences more growth than any other organ in the body. During the first two years of a child’s life the brain is very plastic and malleable. In order for children to continue down a path of success and learning there are certain experiences a child must have in order to develop normally. The First Two years of a child life is responsible for the foundation that is layed.
If an infant observes their parents avoiding social situation and getting anxious when interacting with others they are more likely to pick up these same
Though Emily hadn’t seem to let it affect her, instead she accepted that factor and continued writing. As we age, we become more aware of the characteristics we possess. Sometimes these qualities are not loved by others or even ourselves. Though that is what keeps us in the dark about our strengths and weaknesses. Due to the non acceptance of ourselves we are never able to enter the light of what we are truly capable of.
According to Erikson’s psychosocial theory, there are two psychological conflicts that affect infant and toddler personality. The first psychological conflict within the first year is basic trust versus mistrust. A trusting infant is able to see and explore the world with open arms. On the other hand, the mistrustful infant can’t count on the kindness of others and ultimately withdrawals herself from other people. The second psychological conflict which affects toddlers is autonomy versus shame and doubt.
Parents and their parenting style play an important role in the development of their child. In fact, many child experts suggest that parenting style can affect a child’s social, cognitive, and psychological development which influence not just their childhood years, but it will also extend throughout their adult life. This is because a child’s development takes place through a number of stimuli, interaction, and exchanges that surround him or her. And since parents are generally a fixed presence in a child’s life, they will likely have a significant part on the child’s positive or negative development (Gur 25).