Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of a Liberal Arts degree
Benefits of a Liberal Arts degree
Benefits of a Liberal Arts degree
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of a Liberal Arts degree
In Fareed Zakaria’s YouTube Video on “American Innovation Beyond STEM”, he states that rarely do Republicans and Democrats agree on anything, however, they are now united in their beliefs that colleges need to move from a liberal arts education into one that embraces STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math). He continues to argue that it is wrong to ignore a liberal arts education as it is what encourages our “creativity” and enriches our “humanity”. By eliminating a liberal arts education, we would be putting America on a vulnerable educational path. To support this claim he quotes “John Cardinal Newman, who in 1854 stated that, ‘a broad exposure to the outline of knowledge for its own sake’ rather than to acquire skills to practice …show more content…
Although both Jobs and Zuckerman had liberal arts degrees, they also understood and excelled in the field of technology, which ultimately was the key to their successful careers. Their liberal arts degrees may have been what gave them the passion to create, but their embracing of technology is what allowed them to be successful. Zakaria emphasis over and over that a liberal arts education is the major contributor behind the success of entrepreneurs. The confidence with which they excelled could only be taught by “the broad general education, which is liberal …show more content…
Merging liberal arts and STEM to forge a new program that embraces both would allow for an increase in the fostering of success, innovation and entrepreneurship. It would encourage individuals to take the first leap into discovering something new while keeping them from repeating the mistakes of the past. If we only had a STEM education, it might stifle the creative thinking that is fostered by a strong general education; however, if we only had a liberal arts education, it might stifle the advance of science, technology, and engineering. We need to find a way to merge these programs to continue to advance research, science, engineering and technology as well as to continue to foster the continued growth of research and
One idea that I disagree with is the idea that colleges themselves have sold their soul. William Deresiewicz tells us that it is neoliberalism and the way it impacted society pressure students to major in fields that typically provide more money. Such as business or STEM fields. In my opinion, the role of a college is to provide a higher education for those who want to pursue a certain career. Just because students prefer STEM and business fields doesn’t mean that colleges have sold their soul to the market. Many students want to major in STEM and business fields so colleges provide more classes to accommodate them. That doesn’t mean colleges have given up on liberal arts. Colleges still provide liberal arts majors and there are
In ancient civilization, a liberal arts education was considered essential for free people to take place in civic life; without them people would not be willing to disregard one's traditional values, and analyze a broad variety of arts, humanities, and sciences to create new opinions and ideas. In the 21st century many Americans are doubtful that liberal arts degrees are actually worth the cost of college. In his essay “The New Liberal Arts”, Sanford J. Ungar discusses seven “misconceptions” of liberal arts degrees in modern-day America.
But the best argument against a liberal education is perhaps the simplest. When students go to any college, they choose a major and take classes that are related to that major. However to get to those classes they have to take courses in , reading, writing, and history. I don’t think that Zakaria realises this. By the time these students graduate, they will be able to understand all of the technical aspects of their field, as well as being able to express their thoughts and ideas clearly. All of this without a traditional Liberal
In the article “The New Liberal Arts,” Sanford J. Ungar presents the argument of why liberal arts schools are still competitive and useful today. The beginning of the article immediately addresses the problem that Ungar is defending, “Hard economic times inevitably bring scrutiny of all accepted ideals and institutions, and this time around liberal-arts education has been especially hit hard.” The author provides credibility through his time of being a liberal arts presidents, applies statistics about the enrollment and job security outside of liberal college, he addresses the cost factor and how a student may find compensation, and that a liberal arts college is not preparing students for success. The article “The New Liberal Arts,” addresses
In his essay, “The New Liberal Arts,” Sanford J. Ungar advocates that the liberal arts should be everybody’s
Now, let us define liberal arts or liberal education. According to Michael Lind, liberal arts should be understood in its original sense as “elite skills” (54). We all know that liberal arts include cour...
STEM is significant to our society, we need jobs not only to compete globally, but to also fix the important problems of the world. Technology is pervasive in almost every aspect of daily life, and as the workplace changes, STEM knowledge and skills grow in importance for a variety of workers (not just for mathematicians and scientists) (Traurig par. 6). If corporations increase female participation in the future, not only will it increase more genders and diversity to work in the corporation, but it will also help solve the important problems of the world because of all the minds that are working together. STEM is the future for this next generation as technology use is on the rise and more problems occur day by day. Remember when turning on the TV to show your daughter the commercials, that one commercial you showed can be the difference between her being interested in STEM or
Now according to John Newman, he states that by having a liberal education system, the percentage of the intellectual community would increase exponentially. By his expectations, Newman hopes that the intellectual community would be able to communicate with one another regarding any subject matter. Newman also states that in “Knowledge Its Own End” that, “All that I have been now saying is summed up in a few characteristic words of the great Philosopher. "Of possessions," he says, "those rather are useful, which bear fruit; those liberal, which tend to enjoyment. By fruitful, I mean, which yield revenue; by enjoyable, where nothing accrues of consequence beyond the using."”. With this example, Newman is quoting Aristotle, and he is trying to say that, liberal education should be enjoyed. What he means is that, the process of learning through his system should be enjoyed. If learning a subject can be enjoyed then, the individuals who learned that subject can see why the subject is easy to learn by simply learning to take enjoyment of that subject, and the people would have a better understanding within unknown subject areas. By understanding the full scope of what Newman expects from his plan, changes would need to be made in our current United States society if this education system were to be
In Charles Murray’s essay entitled “Are Too Many People Going to College?”, he discusses the influx of Americans getting a college education. He addresses the topic of Liberal Arts education, and explains that not many people are ready for the rigorous challenges a liberal-arts degree offers. In addition, Murray explains that instead of a traditional degree more people should apply to technical schools. He believes that college should not be wide spread, and that it is only for those who can handle it. These viewpoints harshly contrast with Sanford J. Ungar’s views. Ungar believes college education should be widespread, because a liberal-arts degree is, in his opinion, a necessity. He argues that a liberal-arts college is the only place that
Centuries ago during the Renaissance especially, learning the liberal arts were extremely important and deeply rooted in the education system. St. Kate’s requires its students to take courses in that are in the “humanities, social sciences, natural sciences, and formal sciences” departments in order to receive a degree. My TRW class allowed me to be given the feel of English, Theology, History, and Theater classes and expand my knowledge of the four. If a college were to only have students take the courses needed for their desired major, they would miss the opportunities to broaden their horizons. This curriculum fueled my brain to think more critically and never settle for less. I became close to those in my small discussion
In this society, the major educational branches that receive the most attention is, the majors that Involve – Math, Science, Technology and engineering, also better recognized as STEM. It is difficult to find a job involving the arts because those jobs are limited and it’s also hard to find an occupation with a good salary. A good handful of college attendees are majoring in either in a science, or in technology. We have transferred into an era where technology has become prime and science has always been important but in this generation, there more discoveries and questions about the world around us, and many people focus on those branches of education because they have a great impact on society going forward.
This is not to say that liberal arts education should be deemed as more superior than STEM and vice versa. In fact, these two should be hands in hands. Perhaps, the new era of technology advancement and science focus seems to somehow drive STEM related subject away from liberal arts subjects. In the article Liberal Arts vs. STEM: The Right Degrees, The Wrong Debate, Alison Byerly, the president of Lafayette College describes this as a “fasle dichotomy” (Klebnikov). Byerly thought that despite the heavy stress on science and engineering, “you still need liberal arts thinkers applied in other fields” (Klebnikov). We should not consider that any of these two would be harmful to the other. In some schools, there have been a merging of the two curriculum as they are “two important forms of education that complement each other” (Klebnikov).
Newman’s “Knowledge Its Own End” explores the notion that education is essential in order to engross the sciences or liberals as he called them. Newman believes that the use of liberal education “has a very tangible, real, and sufficient end, though the end cannot be divided from that knowledge itself. Knowledge is capable of being its own end” (2). With this in mind, Newman confirmed knowledge as undeniably good, “the compensation of a great deal of thought in the compassing, and a great deal of trouble in the attaining” (2).
Rich people assume that College is important, but it is not a one way ticket to success, and happiness. However, Middle class people believe that education is important to be successful in the future. Education for middle class student is an important tool that is applied in the modern world to succeed, as it reduces the challenges, which are faced in life. “With nearly half of the nation 's undergraduates enrolled in community colleges,…….are playing an increasingly important role in higher education.”(David Hosansky). The information gained through education allows individuals’ future life to be optimally utilized due to training of the human mind. This eventually opens doors of opportunities for individual to achieve better chance in career growth. Education has played a major role in the modern industrial world. “This is attributed to the fact prospective employees must be qualified adequately to perform various tasks effectively.”(David Hosansky) Industries entail resources that are sufficiently equipped with the modern technology to suit the needs and wants of the society. This makes education to become a norm for services in all industrial
University education trains students in academic subjects. But non-academic fields can lead us to success as well. There are countless entrepreneurs, actors/actresses, political leaders, authors, directors, critics, designers, and more who prove that success does not merely depend on having complete education. These non-academic fields require people’s enthusiasm, but not academic knowledge. For example, Abraham Lincoln completed only one year of formal education, yet became a world famous lawyer and the U.S. President. These examples shows tertiary education may not be a necessary factor for success. On the other hand, it is generally believed that university education is necessary for successful life. Education is the key to success because it opens doors for people of all backgrounds, and it expands the human mind with knowledge. Roland (1997) claim that the vast amount of knowledge gained through education prepares individuals to solve problems, teach others, function at a higher level and implement transformational ideas. The 21st century is ever changing, new inventions are coming up non-stop and without proper education, it’s