Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the contributions of Aristotle to education
In defense of a liberal education analysis
The effects of social economic status on education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the contributions of Aristotle to education
Liberal Education: A Proposal on Education Ever since humans have created stratified societies, they always felt the need to educate themselves at a higher level. To make things clearer, these individuals always needed a higher education system because, it creates a higher need to be more of an intellectual, and also creates the desire to have a higher socioeconomic status. However, throughout history there has been many different higher education systems in order for people to achieve that higher socioeconomic status. Some of these higher education system contains different requirements in order to achieve so, that individuals can graduate. According to John Henry Newman’s “Knowledge Its Own End”, Newman proposes his theory of the perfect …show more content…
To further elaborate, the ideology behind a liberal education system is basically a system that has broad education requirements. According to Newman’s “Knowledge Its Own End” he states that, “I am but saying what whole volumes have been written to illustrate, viz., by a "selection from the records of Philosophy, Literature, and Art, in all ages and countries, of a body of examples, to show how the most unpropitious circumstances have been unable to conquer an ardent {104} desire for the acquisition of knowledge." (33). With Newman’s idea, he would want an individual to take an extensive amount classes. Whether it is from chemistry, or classes from the social science field. Newman has great expectations on the effects on his proposed system if they were to be …show more content…
Now according to John Newman, he states that by having a liberal education system, the percentage of the intellectual community would increase exponentially. By his expectations, Newman hopes that the intellectual community would be able to communicate with one another regarding any subject matter. Newman also states that in “Knowledge Its Own End” that, “All that I have been now saying is summed up in a few characteristic words of the great Philosopher. "Of possessions," he says, "those rather are useful, which bear fruit; those liberal, which tend to enjoyment. By fruitful, I mean, which yield revenue; by enjoyable, where nothing accrues of consequence beyond the using."”. With this example, Newman is quoting Aristotle, and he is trying to say that, liberal education should be enjoyed. What he means is that, the process of learning through his system should be enjoyed. If learning a subject can be enjoyed then, the individuals who learned that subject can see why the subject is easy to learn by simply learning to take enjoyment of that subject, and the people would have a better understanding within unknown subject areas. By understanding the full scope of what Newman expects from his plan, changes would need to be made in our current United States society if this education system were to be
The Student Guide to Liberal Learning encourages apprentices to consider the significance of what is truth? James Schall, explains the nature of the universe as an open door to seek guidance through the knowledge of the great thinkers as an attempt to better comprehend the ultimate truth of our reality as a whole, to understand how things perfectly align with each other and how to find the ultimate truth that humanity continuously seeks. Furthermore, Schall states that: “…the truth comes from reality itself, from what is. Truth is our judgment about reality.” Schall lays out the initial quest as form of “clear knowledge of truth” while he persuades to stimulate and spark the curiosity of students to seek his or her own truth of reality through a two-step process:
In Chapter 2 of In Defense of a Liberal Education by Fareed Zakaria titled “A Brief History of Liberal Education” Zakaria does just that he begins chapter 2 giving a history lesson on the history of liberal education. From its beginning in Ancient Greece, where lessons consisted of the studying of Homeric poetry to codes, values, and physical training. In the start, the people of Greece did not like the need for this liberal education. Zakaria talks about how Plato and Isocrates both had different outlooks on what should be taught. Plato “considered education a search for truth.” (Pg42) Where Isocrates believed that studying rhetoric, language, and morality (Pg43). Zakaria also talks about the liberal education in the Roman empire along with
Liberal educations benefit students in the long run, long after students have paid their loans. People are able to be informed on national topic, while also being able to be self dependent. Two qualities that are essential in the modern society. I believe it is important to have such a basic understanding of education and knowledge, just like what Nussbaum agreed too in her essay. However, I also believe the curriculum should be centered around making students a better person. Institutions should try to produce good people with the right intentions instead of just focusing on testing intelligence, similar to what Cronon focused on in his essay. If we can incorporate both of these important features into our liberal education system, then and only then, will we be thriving as a society. Graduates will have a good understanding of knowledge from an array of different fields, as well as having important traits that will carry on for the rest of their
In the 1997 article, “On The Uses of a Liberal Education: As a Weapon In the Hands of the Restless Poor,” published by Harper’s Magazine, the social critic Earl Shorris described how political power could be achieved by a rather non-vocational educational discipline, the humanities. He emphasizes on how the knowledge of a liberal Education can be used as a form of weapon within the lives for the poor.
But the best argument against a liberal education is perhaps the simplest. When students go to any college, they choose a major and take classes that are related to that major. However to get to those classes they have to take courses in , reading, writing, and history. I don’t think that Zakaria realises this. By the time these students graduate, they will be able to understand all of the technical aspects of their field, as well as being able to express their thoughts and ideas clearly. All of this without a traditional Liberal
“A high school graduate who has acquired Hirsch’s core knowledge will know, for example, that John Stuart Mill was an important 19th-century English Philosopher who was associated with something called Utilitarianism and wrote a famous book called On Liberty. But learning philosophy in college, which is and essential component of a liberal education, means that the student has to be able to read and understand the actual text of On Liberty”. (Murray
Murray believes that students should receive a liberal education, yet they should not have to wait until college to do so (Murray 225). Murray states that a person should not be forced to obtain a college-level liberal education, simply because they are capable of doing so (Murray 228). On higher education, Murray says, “A large proportion of people who are theoretically able to absorb a liberal education have no interest in doing so.” (Murray 228). Regardless of the fact that a person fits the criteria enabling them to pursue a college degree, does not necessarily mean that they should, if they are not interested. It is more logical to teach students extensively before the time of college, instead of leaving out information and forcing them to attend a school (Murray 225). However, Addison disagrees with this ideology, and believes that a college education is essential to growing up.
“Hence you see why “liberal studies” are so called; it is because they are studies worthy of a free- born gentlemen. But there is only one really liberal study – that which gives a man his liberty. It is the study of wisdom”, said Lucius Annaeus Seneca, the Roman Stoic philosopher who lived during the time of Jesus Christ. Historically speaking, learning liberal arts we learn ourselves to be passionate, loyal, brave and what is more important, generous. The word “freedom” has been the fundamental component of any American Dream. Today we celebrate our nation’s independence and allowance to govern ourselves.
James V. Schall’s, “A Student’s Guide to Liberal Learning” wants us to understand that the nature of the universe gives us opportunities for different things. He addresses that the universe allows us to gain new knowledge in any place that we might be. In Schall’s “A Student’s Guide to Liberal Learning,” he mentions “one that is capable of altering us to intellectual riches that are almost never found in universities or in the popular culture.” From this I understood that the universe always gives opportunities to acquire and learn new knowledge. The universe allows us to learn different things. For example, things that might be facts or simply random things that are interesting.
Throughout time education has been highly valued role in society in theory to keep everything running. The world would not be able to run without educated people discovering new ideas and solutions to large problems. In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics he describes how important it is to obtain the morality of education. A person who gains intellical knowledge has a greater view on life rather than a person who does not get an education. Striving for the ultimate best helps each society run comfortably by not only the faculty contributing to their students, but the students inputting feedback which creates a healthy learning environment. While getting a degree from a specific university, many different things factor into achieving the
These professors are often researchers but not inventors. They build on the findings of others, fail to think critically, and never think to ask their own questions.4 The main problem that Bloom has with what liberal education has evolved into is that the many classes students are required to take are not beneficial to them at all. Students are forced to take classes that they may gain knowledge from, or they may not. Even if they do gain the knowledge, it may not be retained, or it may be a dormant skill that the student rarely uses. When students are forced to take so many classes and retain so much information that does not play into or is not related to in any way to each other, how are they to be expected to remember it all? I would take a miracle, especially over the course of four years. “We are faced with the choice between a careful knowledge of one [field] or a superficial acquaintance with many.”5 As previously stated, knowledge is taught to students, but if they are not taught how to use it, it is useless to
There is too much “necessary” information in today’s world. That’s exactly why we need to alter what necessary means. We can’t mope about not learning things about our history because there is too much to learn. If you narrowly define what “necessary” means, people will focus on these subjective necessities and forget the depth of literature that speaks volumes in different, but just as important, ways. Books like The Feminine Mystique are essential to highlighting very relevant and timely social issues but would rarely be considered “necessary” by people who only value specific books considered “classics” for providing “a background in history, philosophy, sociology, politics, and economics.” But that view
Study/education improves the development of a society hence the need for educated individuals to occupy significant position in order to improve such society.
Modern day society is engrossed in a battle for protection of individual rights and freedoms from infringement by any person, be it the government or fellow citizens. Liberalism offers a solution to this by advocating for the protection of personal freedom. As a concept and ideology in political science, liberalism is a doctrine that defines the motivation and efforts made towards the protection of the aforementioned individual freedom. In the current society, the greatest feature of liberalism is the protection of individual liberty from intrusion or violation by a government. The activities of the government have, therefore, become the core point of focus. In liberalism, advocacy for personal freedom may translate to three ideal situations, based on the role that a government plays in a person’s life. These are no role, a limited role or a relatively large role. The three make up liberalism’s rule of thumb. (Van de Haar 1). Political theorists have
Furthermore, some beliefs that Kant possessed are still found in school systems today. Kant had an extremely strict view on what education should entail, and many of his ideas have been adapted to a modern society. In relation, the ultimate goal of education today is still to develop morally sound individuals. With a liberal arts education, we strive to create well-rounded, sympathetic persons who benefit the world in some way and make informed, respectable