Does root beer and other sodas need sugar warning labels? Does Root Beer need sugar warning labels? What about other sodas? There is currently a debate on whether there should be warning labels on soda. One side is the opinion that there is too much sugar in soda that is contributing to obesity and other health problems. These people say that some people don't know how much sugar is in a can of soda, so they think that there should be warning labels warning people of the high sugar content. The other opinion is that warning labels will not help people be healthier. I think that there should not be warning labels because soda already has nutritional information, and if we put warning labels on soda, then we will need to put warning labels on other unhealthy food. …show more content…
One of the required nutrition facts is the sugar content. If someone wants to know how much sugar there is in a soda, all they have to do is look at the nutrition facts. If a law requires a warning label because soda has high sugar content, it would make sense for all items with high sugar content to have warning labels. One 12oz can of Cherry 7-Up has 38 grams of sugar. 12 ounces of VH Splash juice has 27 grams of sugar, then we would need warning labels on juice. What about candy? A snickers bar has 27 grams of sugar, more than two thirds the amount of sugar as a can of soda. This sounds like a lot of sugar to me. What about breakfast cereal? 2 cups of fruit loops has 20 grams of sugar, requiring a warning label. Why stop with processed sugar? A pineapple has 89 grams of sugar, more than 2.3 times the amount of sugar than a can of soda. If we need warning labels on soda, then we definitely need a warning label on pineapples. Fat, chemicals, preservatives are all just as unhealthy as sugar. Should we put warning labels on these things too? The sugar content of soda is on the
The article,“ Battle lines drawn over soda tax,” by Associated Press , the Press explains how there is an ongoing “national fight about taxing sugary drinks.” According to Associated Press, “ Health experts say the beverages contribute to health issues such as diabetes, obesity, and tooth decay.” This quote demonstrates that sugary drinks can lead to health issues. Since sugary drinks leads to health issues, people are considering soda tax. This is because thirteen percent of adult minorities are diagnosed with diseases such as diabetes.
Just like the kid that buys a sugary cereal just because it has Spongebob Squarepants on it, or like the person that goes to Disneyland to have fun but at end of that day, they can buy a churro. Parents also need to take a action in this too, just because you kid gives you a temper tantrum doesn’t mean that you need to buy them the candy they want in order for them to stop crying, and parents should also be informed of the things that their kids are consuming at their schools. Food companies should market or promote the TINY WORDS on the back of their product that informs all of the substances they used to make the product, to the consumer. Just like they would promote their food products to get consumers. Think about these following questions: What will you do to be informed of the chemicals used on the products you and your family consumes? Is it worth buying just because it has your favorite characters, movie, or games on
After reading "The Toxic Truth About Sugar" and "Banning the Big Gulp", I am not entirely convinced that government intervention is necessary. Lustig, Schmidt and Brindis' article practically clarifies the the dangers of sugar itself, while Bittman's article passionately discusses the temporary cessation of the decision to ban/restrict the sale of over-proportioned drinks. Although, as Lustig and his colleagues pointed out, sugar has potential for addiction and other long term detriment to health and economy, the authors failed to acknowledge the fact that people can still watch what they eat. For example, a 1.9lb (862g) bag of Sour Patch Kids contains approximately 550 grams of sugar; 26g per single serving of 16 pieces (40g). Lustig and his
since sugar affects the mind of an individual the same as some drugs that it should be regulated like one? Do individuals want to treat sugar as if it's alcohol and not make it illegal but put a age limit? People know that if they make regulated sugar people will still get it easily because it is everywhere. If sugar was regulated or was needed to be reduced in foods many companies would be mad. Many food companies rely on sugar in there foods for better sells and money. Sugar in foods is what makes their products addictive and liked to consumers. Researchers believe that sugar can be more addictive than hardcore drugs.
Since nearly the invention of commercially sweetened foods and advertising that celebrates their goodness, sugary foods and drinks have been identified as the cause of several chronic diseases, contributing to poor health. When a person’s diet contains a lot of sugar, especially when it begins early in life, it is likely to cause health problems and possibly death at a young age. For these and many other reasons, it is essential to carry out research in order to establish the extent to which these foods affect people’s health. In gaining more information on this issue, the argument can be made that the government should ban sugary foods and drinks should be sold in elementary and middle schools.
Should sugar be regulated by the government in the same way that tobacco and alcohol The consumption of sugar in food has become more efforts to burn it have become less. Use of sugars in daily routine cannot be vomited, but people argue that it should be regulated. Excess use of sugar leads to diabetes which is a serious, chronic disease. “In 2017, an estimated 8.8 percent of the adult population worldwide had diabetes. This figure is projected to rise to 9.9 percent by the year 2045”
I have talked about some of the harmful ingredients in Diet soda, some of the side effects in diet soda, and some major diseases and complication that are in Aspartame and Saccharin. Although many people think diet soda is better for you than regular soda, it actually has harmful ingredients in it that can lead to serious health problems and death. You also might think that Diet soda is going to make you lose weight, but trust me, it wont. The information I presented today shows you why you need to stop drinking diet soda forever, and just drink water.
This new awareness is something I believe has accounted for these statistical drops in soda consumption amongst the American population as a whole. The more awareness we have, the better the decisions we can make as an educated society. The first three questions I asked my peers at school are advertantly interlinked to the health risks that pertain to them. From my results, it is evident why more and more people are choosing certain sodas over others and why there are more people than ever drinking less than the average American once did.
An example of this is in a Jamba Juice smoothie. Jamba juice says that there smoothies are only made of 100% natural ingredients. “ “Natural” or “organic” does not always equal healthy..” states Sarah Pacheco in the article ‘how healthy is jamba juice for you” The orange dream machine packs 540 calories for one 24 ounce original size. In comparison “one smoothie equals one-quarter of a person’s daily calories” . An addition to this is in Mountain Dew. A 20 oz bottle contains 77 grams of sugar as opposed to the 110 grams that we should be consuming every day as stated on ehow.com. That’s a whole 70% percent of the amount of sugar we should be taking in each day in one 20 oz bottle of soda. In the article “Why is too much sugar bad for you” Lauren Cox states “What we know is that added sugars put you at a higher risk for a poor lipid , Higher triglycerides, lower HDL (the good cholesterol) and higher LDL levels (the bad cholesterol) in the blood”. Kris Gunnars says in the article 10 Reasons why sugar is bad for you” on authoritynutrition.com, “sugar can cause insulin resistance, a stepping stone towards metabolic syndrome and
...ly look at the false claims made by food industries expand on their already set regulations, making it harder for companies to get around them. However, if the FDA believes that their regulations are as specific as they can get, then there should be at least somebody to educate consumers about food labels and add more detail to nutritional value charts. Because without changing the way how information is provided and educating people, they will not be able to change their diets to improve nations overall health.
Introduction There once was a time when words like "light" and "low-fat" were on food packages that had no nutritional meaning. As a result, shoppers were often led to believe they were buying products that were more helpful than they really were. Nutrition panels on labels are also confusing and hard to read. But the Australia New Zealand Authority (ANZFA) changed all that. In March 2001 the ANZFA defined new standardized terms that appear on food labels such as "low-fat", "reduced" and "lean" to control how food manufacturers could put their facts that are relevant to most of our dietary needs.
If we label articles such as cleaning supplies and nail polish remover that will do harm when ingested then why do we not label foods that can cause serious illness of death? Each day thousands of adults and children are diagnosed with disabling conditions such as heart disease and diabetes and the rates are rapidly increasing. Many of these lifelong impairments are directly related to the diets that we attest to as a society. Foods with GMO’s, hydrogenated oils, artificial sugars (aspartame), high fructose corn syrup, and monosodium glutamate ought to be clearly labeled on the front of its packaging for the consumer to recognize.
We are all familiar with sugar. It is sweet, delicious, and addictive; yet only a few of us know that it is deadly. When it comes to sugar, it seems like most people are in the mind frame knowing that it could be bad for our health, but only a few are really taking the moderate amounts. In fact, as a whole population, each and everyone of us are still eating about 500 extra calories per day from sugar. Yes, that seems like an exaggerated number judging from the tiny sweet crystals we sprinkle on our coffee, but it is not. Sugar is not only present in the form of sweets and flavourings, it is hidden in all the processed foods we eat. We have heard about the dangers of eating too much fat or salt, but we know very little about the harmful effects of consuming too much sugar. There still isn’t any warnings about sugar on our food labels, nor has there been any broadcasts on the serious damages it could do to our health. It has come to my concern during my research that few
Have you ever thought how much soda you consume and how bad it can be for you? Many people will drink soda instead of water, simply because it tastes better. The government should limit the intake of sugary beverages because it can lead to many different problems such as heart disease, obesity, and overall it is an unhealthy life-style. “The average person consumes almost 100lbs of sugar a year, with the single biggest source being soda.” A sugary beverage occasionally would be ok, but drinking it every day would cause problems for you overtime. People drink, more soda than they do water. People should be consuming at least eight 8-ounce glasses a day. Mostly no one will drink that amount of water a day. In today’s society, it can be easy to grab a soda for one dollar and carry on. They may taste better but they are not better for your health. “Sugary drinks include soda, fruit punch, lemonade, and other “aides” sweetened powdered drinks, and sports energy drinks.”
INTRODUCTION: You are what you eat, but what are we eating? Many laws have been passed for companies to be more specific on their nutrition labels for consumers to understand and be able to see what they are eating, the problem is that, us, as customers, do not pay attention to what we eat due to a lack of time or other daily hassles. CLAIM #1: Nutrition labels are made to help consumers know what they are consuming but instead of helping them it only confuses them even more.