Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corruption and power julius caesar
Rome corrupt government essay
Corruption and julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gaius Caligula is the fourth biography in Suetonius’ The Twelve Caesars. I can confidently say that Suetonius did not like Caligula. I will go over the beginning of the book, and then go into detail on Caligula’s moral depravity. The latter of which will support my belief that Suetonius did not like Caligula. Suetonius begins the biography describing Caligula’s father, who he says was extremely virtuous and well liked. He wraps up this section by giving a brief overview of Caligula’s family (brothers and sisters, mother). He then talks some of the controversy regarding Caligula’s birthplace. He talks some of the nickname ‘Caligula’. He describes the soldiers’ love for Caligula. At first the Roman people thought of Gaius’ rising as the answer …show more content…
to their prayers, due to the memory of his father. Suetonius states that Caligula did all that he good to be in good favor with his people. This is quickly soured by the rest of the biography. After this beginning section, Suetonius quickly gets dirty with describing the many ways in which Caligula was brutal, immoral, and mentally ill. He begins section 22 by saying “So much for Gaius the Emperor; the rest of this history must deal with Gaius the Monster.” Immediately we see Suetonius’ true view of Gaius, and the next 39 sections continue in this theme. Suetonius goes into quite a bit of detail regarding much of Caligula’s misconduct.
I will divide them into a few categories. The first is his random killings/executions. Suetonius vividly describes a great many times when Caligula, crucified, poisoned, beat to death, or otherwise killed in a great many creative ways, those around him for imagined slights. For example, he sent a tribune to kill the young Tiberius because he had smelled antidote to poison on his breath, when in reality it was medicine for a cold. Suetonius also states that when Gaius found the butchers meat unsatisfactory, he fed criminals to animals indiscriminately. The next category is in his sexual exploits. Suetonius states that, “after inviting a selection of them to dinner with their husbands, he would slowly and carefully examine each as they passed his couch”. He would then select one and leave the banquet with her and discuss her good and bad points. He even cost several divorces in this way. Suetonius also discusses Caligula’s habit of incest with his three sisters. The last category is Suetonius’ description of Gaius’ general unpleasantness. Suetonius states, “He claimed that no personal trait made him feel prouder than his ‘inflexibility’ – by which he must have meant ‘brazen impudence’.” This quote clearly shows Suetonius’ disdain for his general
demeanor. Clearly although he started his reign well, Caligula was a cruel, immoral, and generally unpleasant individual. Suetonius represents this view of him in his descriptions of his various wrongdoings in the way of murder/executions, sexual shenanigans, and general unpleasantness. Based on these things I can confidently state that Suetonius held Caligula in great disdain.
The credit to his downfall goes to himself. He brought upon the fall of “Caligula and his Tyrannous Reign”.
Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, commonly known as Caligula, was one of many problematic emperors of Rome. After conducting my research with various individuals in Rome, they mainly target Caligula’s cruelty, sadism, extravagance and sexual perversity.
Before reading the book, I must admit I did not know very much about the Caesars that ruled Rome. I had only heard of Julius Caesar and Caesar Augustus, and between the two, I only had a vague idea of what they did. Now after reading "The Twelve Caesars" I have a much clearer understanding of who these men were and what they did. Each one of them impacted the world in different ways, and some of their decisions still echo through the modern world. Suetonius has given me a better understanding of the Caesars and Rome.
Goldsmith’s account of Nero and Caligula is important in understanding why John Reed is likened to them. According to Goldsmith, Caligula was arrogant, greedy, and cruel (365). He had many vices and hurt everyone around him.
For thousands of years people have been talking about the great powerful Caesar. He is one of the greatest known dictators known to people today mostly because of all of the things he was able to accomplish during his rein as emperor. After reading primary sources about Caesar, it has given me a better understanding of what other people thought of him during this time period. It’s safe to say that Caesar was obsessed with power and respect from other people that would explain his thirst for war and land, which is one of his greatest strengths and helped in making Rome a great empire.
Gaius Julius Caesar, born 100 B.C.E. in Rome to the impoverished patrician Julian Clan, knew controversy at an early age. Nephew to Populare Gaius Marius, he was earmarked by the Optimate dictator Sulla for prosciption after his refusal to divorce his Populare wife, Cinna. Fleeing Rome, and not returning until after Sulla’s resignation in 78 B.C.E, upon his return he gained a position as a pontificate, an important Roman priesthood. Slowly but surely throughout his lifetime he worked his way up the political ladder, eventually becoming Consul, and finally Dictator Perpeteus – Dictator for life. One of the most influential political and military leaders of all time, Caesar was also a highly intelligent man and an exceptional orator. However, acquiring this absolute power was no mean feat, and Caesar had well equipped himself through previous expeditions with all the resources necessary to gain power in Ancient Rome.
Cassius is a sly, deceitful and an untrustworthy character. Caesar described him best. He said (act1, scene 2, line 195), “Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much. Such men are dangerous”. Cassius is very superstitious. This is shown when he says (act 5, scene 1, line 75) “ you know I held Epicurus strong, and his opinion. Now I change my mind, and partly credit things that do presage…”. He believes in omen and signs that foretell events to come. Cassius is conceded. This is shown when he says to Brutus (act1, scene 2, line 116), “ And this man is now become a god, and Cassius is now a wretched creature, and must bend his body if Caesar careless but nod on him…”. Cassius continues on saying about times when he saved Caesar from drowning and when he saw Caesar with a fever and he started to shake. All this tells us that Cassius thinks he is just as good or even better than Caesar.
In Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Brutus and Cassius are both considered honorable men by the public. But, like all traits, honor is in the eye of the beholder. Honor is defined as evidence or symbols of distinction. Those who are placed in power are often chosen because of their traits, which include being honorable. If those in power have any faults, it could diminish their position in the eyes of the public.
Julius Caesar was a strong leader of the Romans who changed the course of the history for the Roman world decisively and irreversibly. With his courage and strength, he created a strong empire and guided the empire for almost 20 years. His life was short, but had many adventures. I will tell of some of this man’s remarkable life. He did many things, therefore, I will only discuss a few. His name, part of his reign, one of his greatest battles, and his death will be told.
While Suetonius’s scriptures of Nero may pose a risk of bias, similar perversions were discussed within Edward Champlin’s ‘Nero Reconsidered’. Champlin discuses Nero’s descent into debauchery and malfeasance; how his personal exploits gradually began to corrupt his political and military affairs (Champlin, 1990). Nero began alienating and persecuting much of the elite for higher interests in personal concerns, as well as neglecting military advances and affairs completely. Nero’s exorbitant personal affairs and expenditures left the treasury thoroughly exhausted. His period was riddled with deflation as shortage of money began to emerge (Champlin, 1990). Nero’s adolescence and unruly upbringing was largely contributory to his inadequacy during his years as Roman Emperor. While Nero contributed significantly to the city, his reign demonstrated the unravelling of the Roman
Phillip Pullman, a British author, once wrote, “I stopped believing there was a power of good and a power of evil that were outside us. And I came to believe that good and evil are names for what people do, not for what they are”(goodreads.com). Pullman’s quotation on the actions of man being the source of good and evil closely relate to morality, principles regarding the distinction of right and wrong or a person’s values. The question of what human morality truly is has been pondered by philosophers, common folk, and writers for thousands of years. However, sometimes a person’s ethics are unclear; he or she are not wholly good or bad but, rather, morally ambiguous. William Shakespeare, an English playwrite, heavily presses the topic moral ambiguity in his play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. The titular character, Julius Caesar, is a morally equivocal character who serves a major purpose in the play.
Shakespeare introduces Cassius as one who is not fond of Julius Caesar. This is due to the fact that he is a higher rank and acts high and mighty. Brutus talks with Cassius about Caesar at the beginning of the play and Cassius says that Caesar is just like everyone else
...e murder because of his jealousy of Caesar's elevated power and mounting dominance over everyone, even his friends. Though they were close friends, their motives and descriptive character traits display a distinct contrast between them.
Caligula, first known as Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, is remembered as a tyrant, a villain, a madman, and much more horrible things. Many words can describe the dominant third Roman emperor. Additional figures in the early Roman history can be defined as menacing, but Caligula overpowers most. Think of the worst possible thing you can think of, and Caligula can possibly match that. Even though he had a rough start to his short life, he made himself worse and worse to the rest of the world as his life went on. Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus should be remembered for his rise to power, his interesting tactics to win, and his surprisingly short tyranny.
Cassius in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a very important character. Cassius is the leader of the conspirators group led to kill Caesar. It’s very easy to understand what kind of person he is in the play. He appears as a very persuasive, manipulative, and observant. All those traits seem to go hand in hand. Although he can easily come off as hateful, he’s the kind of person that has reason to his doings.