Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius Caesar effects on society
Julius caesar biography
Julius Caesar effects on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For thousands of years people have been talking about the great powerful Caesar. He is one of the greatest known dictators known to people today mostly because of all of the things he was able to accomplish during his rein as emperor. After reading primary sources about Caesar, it has given me a better understanding of what other people thought of him during this time period. It’s safe to say that Caesar was obsessed with power and respect from other people that would explain his thirst for war and land, which is one of his greatest strengths and helped in making Rome a great empire. First of all, Caesar always felt entitled to himself and always had the audacity to see everyone as beneath him. A great example of Caesar’s bravery and fearlessness is when he was eighteen and was escape the punishment from the dictator Sulla, so in the process he was captured by pirates, who decided to be help for ransom. “When they demanded twenty talents for his ransom, he laughed at them for not knowing who he was, and spontaneously promised to give them fifty talents instead, Next after he had dispatched friends to various cites to gather the money…he felt so superior to them that whenever he wanted to sleep, he would order them to be quiet” . Even being surrounded by murderous pirates clearly out numbered, he refused to let them think that they were in charge while he was in their captivity for thirty-eight days. Afterwards, Caesar’s friends came around to pay the ransom and the pirates, they released him to go and spend their money as they wish. But that didn’t mean it was over for Caesar; after the pirates ran away they were captured and put in prison for their crime at the hand of Caesar. “Caesar [then] took the pirates out of prison and... ... middle of paper ... ...e him a better dictator. One of his greatest traits was that he was able to rule with an iron fist, but in my opinion I don’t think he abused his power since all he was trying to do was make Rome a huge and dominant empire. Obviously people who didn’t know him too well didn’t understand him, which made him appear as a scary and ruthless ruler, but even Cicero was able to change his mind about Caesar before the Gallic war was over. In the end, Caesar was one of the best dictators our world has ever seen. Works Cited Cicero, Letters to Atticus, 7.11, 8.13. Translation by Thomas R. Martin. Plutarch, Life of Julius Caesar, 1-2 (excerpted). Translation by Thomas R. Martin. Catullus, Poem 57. Translation by Thomas R. Martin. Julius Caesar, The Gallic War, trans. Carolyn Hammond (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 181, 183-4, 188-89, 191-94, 241-42.
Julius Caesar elected himself as the dictator of Rome. He became a favorite to many of the people of the lower classes. Unlike many leaders, Caesar valued the poor. Most people agreed with his decisions, but some of the higher classes’ did not. On March 15 44 BCE, now called the Ides of March, a few of Caesars’ closest peers decided to murder Caesar. Marcus Brutus killed Julius Caesar, on March 15.
He was making needed reforms and did good things for Rome. When they assassinated Caesar they opened a door to corruption and less order. While Caesar wasn’t in the Plebian class because of all his wealth and power, he made changes that many of them liked. Caesar was true to his people and that’s why he was well liked. He treated them all with respect. With such a well-liked leader assassination or murder of him will make many angry and without such reasoning the Conspirators are left in a troubled
Caesar is all about conquering power and he is afraid of nothing. Before he is murdered, he says “The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on my back. When they shall see the face of Caesar, they shall vanish” (II, ii, 575). This shows how his mind is only set on killing others to get rid of a problem.
Phillip Freeman’s Julius Caesar is a profound biography on the life, achievements, and personality of Caesar. The author’s style and major themes can be displayed in quotations from significant passages. For example, when Sulla, a dictator, ordered Caesar to divorce his wife after Sulla had removed Caesar from position of flamen dialis, Caesar refused. Freeman describes his defiance, “Whether out of stubbornness, audacity, or simply love, Caesar was a defying man who had ordered the murder of thousands. In doing so, he lost everything he owned, and was now marked for death on the proscription lists,” (32). In another pressing manner, Caesar’s personality is also displayed when he was captured by pirates. Freeman writes, “Caesar treated the pirates with a good-natured contempt that shocked and amused his captors. They were accustomed to terrified prisoners who begged for mercy, but Caesar acted more as if the pirates were a minor distraction to his busy schedule,” (39). Not to mention, Caesar’s compassion for loved ones is also depicted within this biography. When his beloved aunt died, instead of the quiet funeral orientation typical for a woman, he chose to give a bold, family pride filled speech to a huge crowd for his dearly departed aunt. Caesar himself exclaims, “The family of my aunt Julia is descended from kings on her mother’s side, and through her father, from the gods themselves. For the Marcii Reges, her mother’s family, are heirs of Ancus Marcius, fourth king of Rome, while the Julians, of which our clan is a member, descend from the goddess Venus herself. My family therefore holds the sanctity of the kings who rule among men and of gods who rule over kings,” (52). In a similar case, the death of his young wife Cornelia, his wife Sulla had told him to divorce and risked his life for her because he loved her so much, Caesar honored
Caesar’s power in Rome was growing, and people were afraid he was going to turn Rome into a monarchy. However, Caesar did not want to be known as a king, but he was appointed dictator for life.
In a well functioning republic, the leaders must listen to all that the people say and not do whatever he wishes. This part of the play displays Caesar’s sexism but also his lack of thought for others concerns that is similar to a tyrant view. Lastly, Caesar shows arrogance subtly through his words to make himself feel powerful. When Calpurnia warns Caesar of her visions, Caesar starts speaking in third person that personally seems like the zenith of someone being supercilious. “Caesar shall forth. The things that threatened me/Ne’er looked but on my back; when they shall see/ The face of Caesar, they are vanishéd.” (II.ii.10-11). Caesar basically says that because he is so great and powerful he will never be defeated. He also talks in third person which is quite arrogant of a leader to do. Whenever people feel too anxious for leadership they may let it all go to their head, another reason why he turned into a tyrant. People need to watch for tyrannical or corrupt politicians as they can get too power hungry and cannot be
Many ancient Romans considered Julius Caesar to be a hero. But there were also those who thought of him as a tyrant. Caesar may have seemed like a tyrant but those people failed to see the good he did for Rome. Caesar was more of a hero then he is a tyrant. For example in “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman he was able to feed everyone including the homeless that the senators before him failed to help. He gained even more land for Rome to expand its empire. Also he took the jobs of the senators that were failing to govern the empire.
Caesar created jobs for his people, and he fed the hungry and the poor. “The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread. Caesar created jobs by building roads, temples, and aqueducts.” Caesar brought fresh water to the city through his aqueducts. “Fresh water flowed freely in fountains throughout the city. Sanitation, sewage, and food all were seemingly under the control of Caesar.” Caesar was a good leader, the assassins only killed him because they were selfish and wanted their power back, the only person who had more of a reason than that was Brutus. “Now, while the average Roman basked in Caesars rule, then Senate of Rome was furious.” Caesar was a dictator, but he was a good
“For the average Roman, Caesar’s rule was a blessing” (article, “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman). Gaius Julius Caesar was no tyrant; he was a hero. Heroes do good for the people and that’s exactly what Caesar did all throughout Rome by making sure the Romans had more than what they needed to survive.
Julius Caesar wanted the most for his people. Athough he had his weak points, like his self-proclaimed title of “dictator for life,” he helped the people. In his time as dictator, 49 B.C. to 44 B. C, he just about doubled the land of Rome. He also refused to be king even though he was asked three times. Julius Caesar knew that to keep control of Rome, he had to keep a higher pace than his opponents. “Caesar lived at a faster tempo than the people who had to contend with him, and this gave him an enormous advantage.”
He was stuck up to the point that he put pictures of himself wearing a crown on the coins of Rome. He even scorned the Senate by wearing purple robes and never stood up to address them. These qualities and examples only validate that Caesar should not have been a leader. He marched over Rome, leaving citizens with the impression that he only cared about himself and would turn his back on his own people. This made the riddance of Caesar justifiable.
Julius Caesar treated people poorly by manipulating them for his own benefit and personal gain. Caesar used people, deceiving the wives of his rivals in order to obtain information. He appealed to his army by offering friendship in exchange for loyalty and support. If Caesar was not supported by a conquered tribe, he sold it, in its entirety, into slavery, without hesitation. Brutally conquering the Gauls, Caesar’s selfishness came with a desire to punish anyone who undermined his power. Julius Caesar was a man whose motives emerged from pure selfishness; however, he masked his greed with deception through empathy. Overall, Caesar used people and treated them with both disrespect and objectification, using individuals for his own benefit.
IP One could agree that Julius Caesar was a tyrannical dictator when examining these areas of his life:Caesar was involved in a civil war with pompey.During this time caesar was after pompey to have a serious discussion.After the civil war tragedy caesar went on to conquer Rome.When Caesar was getting comfortable as a ruler his fate was near.
One major reason Caesar was a tyrant is because he was tremendously deceitful. It started out when he was elected high priest “allegedly by heavy bribes” (McGill). This shows us that whe would do anything to gain power. Caesar was also in great debt from taking loans to fun and win-over the audience by using gladiator fights. These beloved fights made the people of Rome love caesar. Another prime example of he deceitfulness is when the “senate supported Pompey” and Caesar attacked Pompey and chased and killed him in Egypt (McGill). Caesar was willing to steal, kill, and bribe to rule. Caesar deceived many people including the Roman public, political figures, and would stop at nothing to gain power.
So in conclusion, Julius Caesar really isn't a bad person. He just got caught on the wrong side of the political train. Not everyone can also say that they fought for what was right for them and their country. Though half the population loved him, there will always be the ones who don’t abide by rules. This is what most likely led to his assassination, as not everyone agrees politically and some will go to the extremes to show their