Julius Caesar was once kidnapped by pirates! Yet, even though he survived this event, Caesar’s death was the result of a conspiracy by many Roman senators. Led by Gaius Cassius Longinus and Marcus Junius Brutus, they stabbed Julius Caesar to death in a location adjacent to the Theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March (March 15), 44 BC. Julius Caesar is ancient Rome’s most famous figure. He was a fantastic politician and general with a brilliant mind that even commenced the rise of the Roman Empire. Despite how intelligent Caesar was, his murder was justifiable because he was a tyrant, egocentric, and was unstable as a politician.
Julius Caesar was a tyrannical and selfish, which was clearly displayed in many of his actions. For example, he forcefully
…show more content…
took over Rome, which in return destroyed the system in which he wanted to succeed. He was a tyrant who had subverted his country's’ constitution in ways that undermined republican liberty, and both had prosecuted bloody civil wars in the process. Caesar was clearly a tyrant because he was more concerned about his power and image rather than the positive reform of his nation. He lived a lavish lifestyle and wiped out his entire senate to ensure his power. A tyrant cannot be a leader because he will obviously continue to take the precautions he does to have his lifestyle meaning he may take things out of hand… making it logical for him to be murdered. Caesar was extremely egocentric, arrogant, and obnoxious.
He was stuck up to the point that he put pictures of himself wearing a crown on the coins of Rome. He even scorned the Senate by wearing purple robes and never stood up to address them. These qualities and examples only validate that Caesar should not have been a leader. He marched over Rome, leaving citizens with the impression that he only cared about himself and would turn his back on his own people. This made the riddance of Caesar justifiable.
There was, and still is, no doubt that Caesar was a phenomenal leader. He was a natural born chief who only wanted success and was keen on getting his way. Yet, did Caesar manipulate his own people while trying to achieve dominance? Yes, he did! An example was how he took wealth and power away from prosperous and commanding senators and lords and gave it to the urban proletariat of Rome. He did this to manipulate the poor. The poor were undoubtedly the majority of Rome, making certain Caesar protects his power. These selfless acts made Caesar an unstable and untrustworthy politician. As a leader, being consistent and concise is a necessity, yet if there are alert people who could catch on to Caesar’s tricks, anarchy could break out. Those ebullient people who were able to catch onto Caesar’s ways, were in turn the same people who assassinated
him. The topic of whether Caesar’s assassination was justified or not, is still a very heated debate. Caesar was undeniably a gifted and radiant human being. In spite of this, he was a tyrant who needed to be stopped. The fact that he was more concerned about himself and not his own people was atrocious and just unsafe for all the people that he ruled. Caesar was also very puffed up and marched on Rome as if he controlled everything. To cover up his shocking acts, he would manipulate his own people. For these reasons, Caesar’s murder was justifiable.
During the Republic, the people of Rome had a major disinclination towards any sort of Royalty, which is why when Caesar attempted to lead undemocratically indefinitely, he disrupted one of the core stances that romans shared communally. Caesar over indulged in power when he retitled himself as ‘dictator in perpetuo’. “And as Caesar was coming down from Alba into the city they ventured to hail him as king. But at this the people were confounded, and Caesar, disturbed in mind, said that his name was not King, but Caesar, and seeing that his words produced an universal silence, he passed on with no very cheerful or contented looks…..But the most open and deadly hatred towards him was produced by his passion for the royal power.” Caesars egotism and self-importance made him uncherished by members of the senate. “Everybody knew that Caesar's ego would never allow him to play second fiddle to another senator, and it was equally well-known that another famous military leader, Pompey the Great, had similar ambitions. In January 49, more or less at...
Julius Caesar elected himself as the dictator of Rome. He became a favorite to many of the people of the lower classes. Unlike many leaders, Caesar valued the poor. Most people agreed with his decisions, but some of the higher classes’ did not. On March 15 44 BCE, now called the Ides of March, a few of Caesars’ closest peers decided to murder Caesar. Marcus Brutus killed Julius Caesar, on March 15.
Caesar, a strong and powerful man that doesn’t appear to have any fears. With only revealing slight fears to very trustworthy followers Caesar seemed to be invincible. “But I fear him not. Yet if my name were liable to fear, I do not know the man I should avoid so soon as that spare Cassius.” (I, II, 208-211). The Conspirators saw this as a threat and from that moment planned vengeance on Caesar. While intimidating and harsh the people of Rome adored him. The lines of Flavius when Caesar returns to Rome “Hence! Home, you idle creatures, get you home! Is this a holiday? What, know you not, being mechanical, you ought not to walk upon a laboring day without the sign of your profession?” (I, I, 1-5). They treated his return like a holiday, a festival. Even with this in mind, the Conspirators worries worsened that Caesar would become an overpowering dictator that put Rome at risk. In this situation most citizens would say spare Caesar, but the Conspirators were set on killing him. In the end the Conspirators did what they thought was right and killed Caesar in the senate, but were they right?
Julius Caesar is the leader of Rome and is seeking to become king in a matter of time. Though he is a good military strategist, he lacks knowledge in running government and is too greedy to have any concern for the peasants when he is alive. Caesar is all about conquering and power and he is afraid of nothing. Before he is murdered, he says “The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on my back. When they shall see the face of Caesar, they are vanished” (II, ii, 575). Th...
Julius Caesar (July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC) was a Roman general, statesman, Consul, and author of Latin prose. He played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. On March 15 44 B.C.E, the Roman dictator Julius Caesar was murdered. There are multiple accounts of this incident, while all accounts came after the death of Caesar, the writing on the incident portray Julius Caesar to have been a selfish dictator.
...e him a better dictator. One of his greatest traits was that he was able to rule with an iron fist, but in my opinion I don’t think he abused his power since all he was trying to do was make Rome a huge and dominant empire. Obviously people who didn’t know him too well didn’t understand him, which made him appear as a scary and ruthless ruler, but even Cicero was able to change his mind about Caesar before the Gallic war was over. In the end, Caesar was one of the best dictators our world has ever seen.
Would an honorable man murder his best friend? In William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar started as an innocent citizen of Rome, but soon made his way to the throne. Caesar started bettering Rome, but certain men accused him of becoming too ambitious. The conspirators, the men against Caesar, brutally murdered him because of his “ambition”. Marcus Brutus was Caesar’s supposed best friend but led the revolt against him. Brutus is characterized in the play as being gullible, noble, and naïve.
Julius Caesar emerged. He was able commander who led many conquests for Rome. In 59 B.C. Caesar set out for a new conquest. After nine years of constant fighting, he finally conquered Gaul. Pompey grew jealous of his achievement and had the senate order him to disband his forces and return to Rome. Caesar secretly crossed the Rubicon and killed Pompey then entered Rome. After crushing many rebellions, Caesar forced the senate to make him a dictator. Caesar launched many reforms such as public work programs and giving land to the poor. According to legend those in the senate murdered Caesar on March 15. Caesar's Grandnephew, Octavian, and Marc Anthony joined forces to capture his killers. However bitter feuds grew it soon became a battle for power.
Have you ever thought about an assassination and why it occurred? Many people have been assainated for a number of reasons.Sometimes these assainations can be unjust and wrongful.One famous assaination was Julius Ceasar.Julius Casear was born July 12 ,100 BCE in Rome ,Italy.His parents were far from rich. He married Cornelia the daughter of Sulla a Roman general. Caesar went into the military to get away from Sulla because he wanted him to divorce his wife or give up his land.He soon returned after the death of Sulla.After returning from the military he began his career in politics.He was said to have one of the greatest intellects on military leadership in history. When he returned he started his military and political career. Julius Caesar assassination was unjustified because he was a great military leader who solved many economic problems; although people may argue he had too much power.
Julius Caesar was assassinated by his own senate on March 15 44 BC; also known as the Ides of March. As he was walking in to the senate house, a man told him to beware the Ides of March. He ignored this statement and walked into the senate house. At this time some of the Senate members surrounded Caesar in a stealthy manner and tugged on his toga. As he looked around he was stabbed by many of the senate members multiple times. He collapsed to the ground and lay on the marble floor dead, next to the feet of Pompey's statue. (Nardo 94)
The assassination of Julius Caesar was due to his increased power and the senate’s fear of losing political relevance. They were losing their freedoms and thought the only way to resolve this problem was to kill Caesar. Killing Caesar never really did anything to help make the government a democracy like the senate had wanted. Marcus Brutus and Cassius ended up leaving Rome, so their plot did not do anything to help them. Caesar was the leader of Rome, the top of the Roman Empire. The people he thought he could trust most, his so-called friends, took him to the bottom of the Roman Empire, to his grave.
Julius Caesar is a moral, ethical man. He is a selfless man who puts others before himself. When Artemidorus gets word of the conspirator’s plans, he writes a letter to Caesar to warn him of his impending fate and rushes to the Capitol to give him word. Upon telling Caesar the letter is concerning him, Caesar simply brushes it off and responds, “What touches oneself shall be served last”(III,I, 8). Caesar altruistically puts aside an urgent manner concerning him to accept the offer of becoming King of Rome, which is the reason he went to the Capitol in the first place, which shows he is a benevolent, thoughtful person. In
Finally his sudden death was the result of various personal factors that insulted the senators and created hate between Caesar and them, believing his death was expected. His death then led to a domino effect, which ends in the eventual collapse of the Roman Empire. Caesar was assassinated by his own Senate. Julius Caesar had many men conspiring against him with a plot to assassinate him. Among the 60 men plotting to murder him, many were senators, which included Marcus Junius Brutus, Decimus Brutus Albinus and Gaius Cassius Longinus. Brutus believed the death of Caesar would bring the return of the old Roman spirit unfortunately, the city was in shock, and people became increasingly more aggressive, because Caesar was popular with the people of Rome. Unfortunately, peace was impossible and the conspirators fled to
His first reform, in 48 BC, was to give himself tribunician powers which thus allowed him to veto the Senate and in theory, dictate the Plebeian Council. He hoped to prevent the election of opposing tribunes, and used the same theory of popular sovereignty that had been introduced by Tiberius Gracchus in 133 BC (Ostwald, 1989). With no opposition from opposing tribunes, Caesar was able to keep sole power to himself and this caused many, prominently the Senate, to fear that Caesar was going to change the once stable Republic into a monarchy, with himself as the figurehead. However, in Monroe Deutsch’s 1928 book ‘Classical Philology’, it is stated that Caesar responded to these accusations with one sentence; “I am Caesar, not king.” The relevance of this quote shows that while Caesar had no ambitions to be king, his reforms had weakened the tradition structure of the Republic so much that many were then questioning its existence. In 47 BC, he increased the number of senators to nine hundred, which he filled with representatives from all classes and not just nobles; Spaniards, Gauls, military officers, sons of freedmen, and others who acted as an advisory group rather than a legislative body (Morey, 1901). This political change served to break down the distinction between nobles and common folk and was an attempt to unite the nation as a whole and again took great power
Julius Caesar Argumentative Essay I’m going to complete My Argumentative Essay and summarize the Julius Caesar play and give my claims and evidence to explain why I chose my theme to begin my essay. First, Julius Caesar has just return to Rome after defeating the sons of Pompey in battle. Caesar also parades through the streets of Rome, the higher ups in Rome are nervous about his growing power. His popularity with the commoners who have abandon their work to celebrate Caesar triumphant return. In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, on learns that Words Are Powerful.